think like an agilist - agile australia 2012
Post on 17-Oct-2014
1.992 views
DESCRIPTION
When an Agile situation is routine, you may not be able to tell the difference between a novice and an expert. It's really only in the unanticipated, more challenging situations where we see an expert's superior capability. Agile experts think differently than novices about situations which is what allows them to adapt. If we accept this, then how can we help non-experts to think like experts?TRANSCRIPT
Think Like an Agilist
By Jason Yip
d
d = ½gt2
What is d if…
t = 2 sg = 10 m / s2
d = 20 m
What are we learning?
d = ½gt2
How far will an object fall over time (assuming it doesn’t hit the
ground)?
OR
Which one hits the ground first?
NoviceExpert
Equations 20 m 20 m
Word problems
Same timeWhat?!?
Misconception
Adaptive Expertise
(survives change in context)
Routine Expertise
(context-specific)Indistinguishabl
e without change in context
A
B
C
Where should you aim?
Superficial
Semantic
Qualitative
What equation do I use?
The equation indicates that d is independent of mass
Just shoot the apple, the arrow will fall at the same
rateNecessary for Adaptive Expertise
Effective tactical leaders think differently about situations than ineffective ones
“What are their interests?” “They’re all out to get me!”
Run students through very difficult scenarios to expose and correct weaknesses in their thinking processes
Deliberate
practice for
effective
cognition!
Think Like a Commander
Think Like a Commander(expose weakness)
Full-scale simulation(exercise strengths)
Classroom study(basic concepts)
Our most challenging Agile scenarios!
Talk through your thought process
What would you do? Why?
THINK LIKE AN AGILIST
Thinker:Respond to the scenario using think-aloud
Scribe (1 or more):Capture the thoughts; remind Thinker to think-aloud
Think Aloud Protocol
• Describe what you are thinking, feeling, noticing, questioning so that the Scribe can capture it• What do you notice? want? suspect?• What questions do you have?• What actions would you take?• What else is passing through your head?
“Oh yeah, I
actually considered
that”
“I would have thought of that”
But if you were thinking aloud, we can see that you didn’t think of that and didn’t consider it
Warning! Scenarios may will be more unfair than reality
• No body language to read• No other background available• Not allowed to ask for
clarification (you can actually ask, but I likely won’t clarify)
Too hard!Too easy!
Can’t learn Can’t learn
Maximum learning(via failures)
SCENARIO ONE
Think Aloud Protocol Template
• Describe what you are thinking, feeling, noticing, questioning so that the Scribe can capture it• What do you notice? want? suspect?• What questions do you have?• What actions would you take?• What else is passing through your head?
DISCUSSION ONE
Assess the response
• What did you like about how the Thinker responded? What were the strengths in his / her response?
• What did you not like about how the Thinker responded? What were the weaknesses in his / her response?
More questions
• Did you consider higher intent? What is the overall purpose?
• Did you consider all the stakeholders and their interests?• Did you consider effects of organisational structure?• Did you consider what resources were available? What
might already be working that could be leveraged?• Did you consider timing?• Did you consider how the issues in the scenario might fit
into the bigger picture?• Did you consider risks, mitigation, contingencies?
END SCENARIO ONE
How many people learned something about how they
approach things that they did not previously know?
How many people will approach new scenarios differently?
Cognitive themes
• Keep focus on higher intent• Understand stakeholder interests• Consider effects of organisational structure• Consider and use all resources available• Include considerations of timing• Consider how the current situation fits into the
bigger picture• Consider risks, mitigation, and contingencies
SCENARIO TWO
DISCUSSION TWO
Assess the response
• What did you like about how the Thinker responded? What were the strengths in his / her response?
• What did you not like about how the Thinker responded? What were the weaknesses in his / her response?
More questions
• Did you consider higher intent? What is the overall purpose?
• Did you consider all the stakeholders and their interests?• Did you consider effects of organisational structure?• Did you consider what resources were available? What
might already be working that could be leveraged?• Did you consider timing?• Did you consider how the issues in the scenario might fit
into the bigger picture?• Did you consider risks, mitigation, contingencies?
END SCENARIO TWO
Overall impressions?
Adjustments if you do this yourself• Use small groups (3 – 4)• Use your own scenarios• Focus on your own common
misconceptions
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Expertise requires practice
“I’ve read the book and taken the course.”
“You’re a certified expert!”
“Um…”
Practice difficult scenarios (aka Think Like an Agilist)
(expose weakness)
Agile simulation / project(exercise strengths)
Classroom study(basic concepts)
Consider how you think not just what you do
THE END