theories of regional development
DESCRIPTION
describing the theories of regional developmentTRANSCRIPT
Theories of Regional Development
Walter Christaller‟s Central
Place Theory
2
Introduction
• Settlements – by-products of social &
economic interaction processes and can be
manipulated for desired changes in spatial
structure
• Human activities must cluster together for
internal and external economies of scale
• Clustering – social costs, diseconomies of
scale, spatial imbalances
• Autonomous processes that generate
clustering – directed through policy
interventions to generate growth foci3
Walter Christaller –
1893- 1969
German Philosopher &
Geographer
Published “ Central Places
in South Germany” in
1933
Foundation for a large
body of research on cities
as a system of cities ,
rather than as simple
entities4
Central Place Theory
This is theory concerned with the
functional importance of places
Functional Interdependence between a
town and surrounding area
Assumptions• Boundless and homogeneous plain
• Plain – Uniformly settled
• Farmers having same demand for goods
and services
• Business persons in urban areas &
Farmers as consumers – rational
individuals
• Free entry to market
• All equally well served by Central Places
6
Central Place
• -is a settlement that provides goods &
services. It can be small (a village) or
large (primate city)
• all settlements form a link in a hierarchy
7
Nature of Central places
Centralisation as a principle of order
“The Centralisation ( Crystallisation) of mass around a
nucleus is an elementary form of order”.
Centralistic principles are found in human settlements
Centrality – Measure of importance of a settlement
The best term for settlements are Central Places as the word
Central is neutral
Importance & Centrality – not synonymous - but there is a
strong correlation
8
Why are there very few
large settlements?
9
Settlement hierarchy
• Why are there very few large settlements?
• Large settlements need a very large population
(threshold) to support all of their functions
(services)
• Large settlements provide very high order
functions .Because these functions are so highly
specialised there is not enough demand to
support more than a few of them
10
Sphere of influence
• Is the area around each settlement that
comes under it‟s economic, social &
political control.
11
Sphere of influence
• The extent of the sphere of influence will
depend upon the spacing, size & functions
of the surrounding central places
12
Central place functions
• These are the goods & services it provides
for local customers & for clients drawn
from it‟s wider sphere of influence
Function= a service
Population size does not necessarily determine the importance
of the central place
13
DistanceQ
D
em
an
ded
Demand
Distance
FLIP
Dis
tan
ce
Q Demanded
Demand
Rea
l P
rice
pe
r U
nit
Market
Threshold
Range
Threshold
Range
Market location
Spatial Demand Cone
RANGE:
The spatial extent of
demand before demand
drops to zero
Increasing real
price
14
Distance
Q D
em
anded
Demand
Distance
FLIP
Dis
tance
Q Demanded
Demand
Real P
rice
per
Unit
Market
Threshold
Range
Threshold
Range
Demand = zero
15
Important definitions• Threshold:
– minimum DEMAND (volume of sales) needed for a business to stay in operation (and make a “normal” profit).
• Range:– maximum distance over which a good can be sold
from point P (i.e. where real price is low enough that people will travel to market to buy it)
• Profit = R – T – really an excess profit
• Threshold and range is the spatial basis for profit
16
Range & Threshold
• The range of a good or services is the maximum distance that people are prepared to travel in order to obtain it. (short distances for a low order item e.g. newspaper)
• The threshold of a good or services is the minimum number of people required to support it i.e. 2500- doctors surgery
• 500-primary school/ 25,000-shoe shop /60,000 for a large supermarket/
• 100,000- large department store/ 1million University
• The more specialised the service the greater the number of people needed to make it profitable.
17
Range & Threshold
• Low order items (basic items)= newspaper
• High order items (specialised items)= furniture
• Low order functions (basic services)= corner shop/ Primary school
• High order functions (specialised services)= university/ hospital
• Settlements providing low order services = low order settlements (rural)
• Settlements providing high order services= high order settlements (urban)
18
Implications of the RANGE
R
T
M
Isotropic surface
Area of Extra Profit Min area required to stay
in business (normal profits)
?Unmet demand for same
good or service
19
Implication of RANGE:
• room for more than one producer of
same good / service
– where would producer locate?
– > 2*R
– avoiding overlap
20
Implications of the RANGE
R
T
M
Homogeneous plain
?Unmet demand for same
good or service
R
T
M
2R distance
21
?Unmet demand for same
good or service
22
R
T
M
How can problem of interstitial areas of unmet
demand be solved?
23
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
T
M
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
M
R
T
M
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
T
M
R
R
T
M
Interstitial areas of unmet demand disappear if
markets are moved closer together
24
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
T
M
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
M
R
T
M
R
T
MR
T
MR
T
MR
T
M
R
R
T
M
How will market area boundaries form given the
ellipses formed by overlapping market areas?
Overlapping Trade
Areas
•Unfilled demand
now served
•Competition
25
A system of hexagonal market areas fills the plain so that
every consumer is served and no market areas overlap
No Overlapping
Trade Areas
•Unfilled demand
now served
•No competition
•Every producer
making “normal
profit”
Homogeneous plain
26
Further economic / spatial
complications:
• T and R are good- or service-specific
• Separate demand curves / cones for
each good or service
• Why?
– Different levels of demand
– Different sensitivity to distance etc.
27
Distance
Q Demanded
Distance
Good / service A
Good / service B
Good / service C
28
Distance
Q Demanded
Distance
Good / service A
Good / service B
Good / service C
Range A
Range B
Range C
29
Distance
Q Demanded
Distance
Good / service A
Good / service B
Good / service C
Range A
Range B
Range C
30
31
32
Central Place Hierarchy: Cities,Towns,
Villages and Hamlets:
• Why cluster in Central Places?– Agglomeration economies
• Urbanization economies
• Localization economies
• Clustering in Central Places– Vertical arrangement of central Places
• (relative importance)
– Horizontal Arrangement of Central Places
• (situation of central places)
• Organization of central place hierarchy– Ordering principles: k=3, 4 and 7
– Relationship between centres and market areas
33
Changes in population size & number of
functions
• Settlement sizes change over time (via births, deaths, migration)
• Settlement functions (services) change over time
• Over the past 50yrs in the India= decrease in the no. of services available in small settlements and an increase in the no. of services provided by larger settlements
Settlement size- increases
Num
ber
of fu
nctions
1940
1998
34
Factors that affect a settlement’s
number of functions
• Settlement depopulation or increased population
• Greater wealth & mobility means some rural populations no longer visit their own local services but go further afield seeking services from higher order settlements
• Domestic changes means rural households no longer make use of daily low order services (village shop)
Population size does not necessarily determine the
importance of the central place but there is a strong
correlation 35
The rules of functional hierarchies
• 1. The larger the settlements are in size, the
fewer in number they will be
• 2. The larger the settlements grow in size the
greater the distance between them
• 3. As a settlement increases in size the range
and number of it‟s functions will increase
• 4. As a settlement increases in size, the number
of higher-order services will also increase (the
services become more specialised)
(service)
36
Walter Christaller‟s model of central
places
• The theory states that threshold and range act as laws that govern the number, size and distribution of settlements
• When these 2 factors act together they create a hierarchical landscape
• Christaller noticed in the flat land of South Germany that towns of a certain size were roughly equidistant (uniformly spread)
• He stated that the ideal shape for each towns sphere of influence should be a hexagon because circles either leave gaps (which are unserved by any central place) or they overlap (meaning one area is served by too many central places)
37
Christaller's central place theory
• Christaller stated that the best shape for a sphere of influence is a hexagon. This shape means that consumers still have accessibility to the highest order central place and its trading area from all parts of the hexagon.
• Christaller's key idea was that customers would go to the nearest higher order central place to buy goods and services
• High order central places act like a magnet for consumers.
• He called this phenomenon K=3 (or the marketing principle)
• In order to make his theory work Christaller had to make a few assumptions
• He assumed that each trading area had an isotropic surface (that the whole area was the same all over) i.e.
• the whole area was flat
• there was only 1 form of transport (and transport costs were proportional to distance)
• the population was distributed evenly across the plain
38
What's wrong with circles?
What‟s wrong with circles
39
The areas within the
black dots shows the
sphere of influence
(trading area) of the
largest settlements
Like London
40
Example -the highlighted lower order settlement
(village X) will have 1/3 of is consumers go to
the city (settlement A) and 1/3 will go to town Y
and 1/3 will go to town Z (middle order
settlements)
All the other lower order settlements (red dots)
will follow the same pattern.
Settlement X
The high order (3rd
order) settlement (A) in
the middle is
surrounded by medium
order settlements
(black dots) and lower
order settlements
(small red dots). These
consumers are
attracted in equal
amounts to whichever
large central place is
nearby.
K=3 The marketing principle
Y
Z
Why is K=3 called K=3?
Hint look at the numbers of consumers
who visit the highest order settlement 41
K4= The Traffic Principle
In the K=4 model
the lower order
settlements (red
dots) only have a
choice of 2 higher
order settlements
to visit, in order to
buy goods and
services.
-Half of them go to
settlement A and
the other half go to
a medium order
settlement (black
dot)
How did K=4 get its name?
Why is K=4 called the Traffic
Principle (model) 42
How the K=4 Traffic principle got it‟s nameThe K=4 model is
called the traffic
principle because the
model shows how
consumers are
influenced in where
they go to shop for
goods and services by
transport routes
The Crossways
train-line
In this example the low
order settlements (red dots)
are located along a transport
route. This means that
these low order villages can
only visit other settlements
that are also on their
transport route. So they are
limited to visiting the
settlement behind them on
the transport route or the
settlement in front of them. 43
Why is K7 called K7?
U
V
X
Y
W
Z
A high order
central place is
shown.
-All the low order
settlements lie
within the
hexagonal trade
area (U,V,W,X,Y)
This model shows a hierarchy of
control -Lower level settlements are
arranged within the sphere of
influence of the highest order
settlement. This is done so that the
lower order settlements can be
completely controlled by higher levels.
K=7 The Administrative
Principle
44
45
The marketing principle (k=3). The territory is served by a minimum number of
urban centers. Each centre has the largest choice (3) to purchase goods and
services of an higher order.
The transport principle (k=4). In this distribution, as many centers as possible are
along main transport lines. The system tends to be linear in orientation. With the
transportation principle, towns not on major transportation routes are smaller than
expected because on the market principle. Transportation routes attract business
and allow more and large towns to develop along the railroad.
The administrative principle (k=7). The central place system is organized in such
a way that there is a clear separation or all market areas. In the k=3 and k=4
principles the border between market areas of a centre of higher order is composed
of lines between centers of lower order. Administratively, it does not make sense, so
according to this principle, the boundary is located halfway between two centers of
the same order. Political boundaries also "distort" the even pattern of cities.
Causes of Dynamism
• Competition among forces of marketing,
transportation and administration
• Arrangement of general factors of
production including density, distribution
and structure of population, type, price and
production cost of central goods,
transportation technology
• Influence of internal and external forces
such as long distance trade, industrial
development and local events46
Uses of Christaller’s Central Place Model
• Breakthrough in predicting & understanding
hierarchical development of settlements
• Applied in regional and urban economies in
describing location of trade and service activity
and consumer market- oriented manufacturing
• Distinctive social network as economic activities
and movement of people are modified
• Foundation for a large body of work on „Systems
of Cities‟
47
Uses of Christaller’s Central Place Model
• The model is often used by governments to plan the location of new towns (i.e. Milton Keynes) and high order services i.e. hospitals
• It is used by transport authorities to plan transport routes( so that all areas have equal access i.e. K4 model)
• Businesses can use the model to decide where to locate a new shop
48
Limitations of Christaller's model
• Few real-life regions fit Christaller's model (except the flat lands of the Dutch Polders and East Anglia in the UK)
• The problem lies in the basic assumptions of the model:
• People do not always go to the nearest central place (they may chose a new edge of city superstore further away) So the K3 theory wouldn‟t work.
• Large areas of flat land rarely exist. Mountains & hills etc distort transport routes (so the K4 theory wouldn‟t work)
• People and wealth are not evenly distributed (if poorer people live in a certain area & their nearest high order settlement is expensive then they won‟t visit it)
• Governments often control where new towns are located, not market forces (i.e. not necessarily where the demand for goods and services is highest)
Hill
Train-line49
Laundhart’s Theory
• Laundhart in 1882- Individual
manufacturing firms locational decisions
based on transportation costs
• Relative to location of raw materials and
consumer markets
• Optimum location of firms
• Foreshadow of Industrial Location Theory
of Weber
50
Alfred Weber & Industrial Location
Theory
• Minimum transport theory – 1909 –
Locational preference of individual firm
• Expanded Laundhart‟s approach by
introducing variables such as labour cost,
agglomerating factors and deglomerating
factors
• Assumed static location of raw materials,
output consumption, immobility and unlimited
supply of labour at fixed wages and
transportability of raw materials51
Assumptions
• Isotropic plain assumption- model is operative in a
single country with a uniform topography, climate,
technology, economic system.
• Only one finished product is considered at a time,
and the product is shipped to a single market.
• Raw materials are fixed at certain locations, and the
market is also a known fixed location.
• Labour is fixed geographically but is available in
unlimited quantities at any production site selected.
• Transport costs are a direct function of weight of the
item and the distance shipped.
52
• Tries to explain & predict the locational
pattern of the industry at a macro-scale.
• It emphasizes that firms seek a site of
minimum transport and labour cost
• Deals with weight of goods and distance –
postulated only one form of transportation
• Locational figure – area bounded by places of
consumption and sources of raw materials
53
• The reasons for location of certain types of
industry
Function of transport cost where it does
not use weight losing materials
Drawn to sources of raw materials where
it does not use weight losing raw
materials
Concentration of industries which have a
high labour cost per weight
• Supply side model – assumes static demand
in a single market or to a single distribution
point to multiple markets54
• Locational patterns of industrial firms
based on three principles:
Minimum transport cost
Labour Isodapanes
Effects of Agglomeration
55
Material Index• The point of optimal transportation based on the costs
of distance to the "material index" - the ratio of weight
of intermediate products (raw materials) to finished
product.
• If the weight of the final product is less than the
weight of the raw material going into making the
product -- the weight losing industry.
Example - Copper industry, it would be very expensive
to haul raw materials to the market for processing, so
manufacturing occurs near the raw materials.
• If the final product is heavier than the raw materials
that require transport. -weight-gaining industry.
56
• Weight losing raw materials lose weight
during production process and increase
the locational pull of source of raw material
in determining minimum transport cost
• Pure raw materials closest to place of
consumption tend to be used since total
transport cost would be lowest for users
57
• As pure raw materials would tend to be
exhausted over time, Weber suggested
that over the long term for industries for
which raw materials have weight losing
characteristics, location near the source of
raw material becomes an even stronger
pull
• Reinforced by process and technological
improvements
58
Labour
• Labour distortion:
Sources of lower cost labour may justify greater
transport distances and become the primary determinant
in production.
• Unskilled Labour –industries such as the garment
industry require cheap unskilled laborers to complete
activities that are not mechanized. They are often termed
"ubiquitous" meaning they can be found everywhere.
• Skilled Labour - High tech firms- require exceptionally
skilled professionals. Skilled labour is often difficult to
find.
59
• Isodapanes- Circles around points of minimum
transport costs - within which additional transport
costs are equal
• Isotim-a line of equal transport cost for any
product or material
• Critical Isodapanes – Savings in labour cost is at
least equal to increased transport cost at the
new location outside of the point of minimum
transport cost
• Locational figure was derived
60
• Low population density increases average
distance between locational figures and
labour
• Rate of transportation cost increase with
distance determines size of isodapanes
• When transport costs are uniformly low
and rate of increase of transport cost is
low with distance , labour exerts stronger
pull on optimum firm location
61
Agglomeration and Deglomeration
• Agglomeration - phenomenon of spatial
clustering, or a concentration of firms in a
relatively small area.
• The clustering and linkages allow individual
firms to enjoy both internal and external
economies.
• Auxiliary industries, specialized machines or
services used only occasionally by larger firms
tend to be located in agglomeration areas, not
just to lower costs but to serve the bigger
populations.
62
• Deglomeration occurs when companies and
services leave because of the diseconomies of
industries‟ excessive concentration.
• Firms who can achieve economies by increasing
their scale of industrial activities benefit from
agglomeration.
• However, after reaching an optimal size, local
facilities may become over-taxed, lead to an offset
of initial advantages and increase in Production
Cost
• Then the force of agglomeration may eventually be
replaced by other forces which promote
deglomeration.
63
• Locational triangle. - one market and two sources
of material.
• This illustrated such that manufacturing which
utilizes pure materials will never tie the
processing location to the material site.
• Also industries utilizing high weight loss materials
will tend to be pulled toward the material source
as opposed to the market.
64
• Furthermore many industries will select an
intermediate location between market and
material.
• The last generalization is considered to be
wrong because he never takes into
account terminal costs and therefore is
considered biased toward intermediate
locations.
65
• Increase in land rent caused by
concentration of firms (agglomeration)
causes an opposite effect as land rent
rises (deglomeration)
• Cost savings in concentration can
counterbalance increased land rent
• Critical Isodapanes regarding
concentration exists where rise in
transportation cost is balanced by lower
cost due to concentration
66
• Least cost location then implies marketing the product at
the least cost to the consumer, much like retailers
attempt to obtain large market shares today.
• Economically, it is explained as one way to make a
profit; creating the cheapest product for the consumer
market leads to greater volume of sales and hence,
greater profits.
• Therefore, companies that do not take the time to locate
the cheapest inputs or the largest markets would not
succeed, since their product costs more and costs the
consumer more.
67
• Didn‟t explain Central Places
• Critical assumptions
Unlimited availability of labour
Site Rent
Varying prices and demand
Varying factor proportions in production
68
Criticism• Geographic variation in market demand, which
is considered a locational factor of paramount
influence – not considered
• Treatment of transport did not recognize that
these costs are not proportional to distance and
weight, and that intermediate locations
necessitate added terminal charges.
• Labor is not always available in unlimited
quantity at any location and is usually quite
mobile through migration.
69
Criticism
• Most manufacturing plants obtain a large
number of material inputs and produce a
wide range of products for many diverse
markets, so his theory doesn‟t easily
apply.
• Underestimated the effect of
agglomeration
70
Löschian Theory
• The German economist August Lösch
expanded on Christaller‟s work in his book
“The Spatial Organization of the Economy”
(1940)
• Used a concept similar to Range and
Threshold
• Contended that K=3 was a simple case of
a general arrangement
71
• Considered other values for K
• More flexible system in which different
goods and service have different
thresholds and different market areas
• Centres of differential functional mixes
• Superimposition of different market areas72
•Individual market area networks –
superimposed in such a way that there is at
least one common central location
•Rotation of networks – location pattern in
which certain sectors are with many urban
places and others with few
73
74
75
Growth Pole Hypothesis
• Formulated by Perroux – 1955
• Urban Centres – foci of change
– Developing countries – Over grown villages
– Developed countries – Generators of social
and economic change
76
Assumptions
• Human activities must cluster together to
generate internal and external economies of
scale
• Clustering also entails social costs,
diseconomies of scale & spatial imbalances
in social and economic development
• Autonomous processes that generate
clustering can be directed through policy
interventions to generate growth foci in areas
where they do not exist
77
Concept of a Growth Pole
• Growth pole – concentration of highly
innovative and technically advanced
industries that simulate economic
development in businesses and industries
78
Concept of a Growth Pole
• Centre in abstract economic space from
which centrifugal forces emanate and to
which centripetal forces are attracted to.
• Forces – economic in nature
• Generators – firms & industries
• Process of economic growth – unbalanced
involving a succession of dynamic poles
through time
79
• Large economic units that are innovative –
dynamic propulsive firms
• Dynamic firms – new, technologically advanced,
operating in high income elastic markets market
for its products
• Exert influence on economy through inter-
industry linkages
• Linkages – forward or backward
• Backward linkage – growth in production in one
industry stimulates the production in the
industries supplying it
80
• Forward linkage – when the availability of the
output of an industry make possible the
production of industries using that output
• Clusters become growth poles if leading &
propulsive industries come together to form a
complex, large enough to exert a determining
influence over industrial environment
81
Dominant Propulsive Firms
• Relatively large
• Generate growth impulses to its
environment
• High ability to innovate
• Belongs to fast growing sector
• Technologically advanced
82
• Relied on Leontief Model – Once
inter- industry linkages are well
established, developmental activities will
spread automatically
83
Criticisms
– Static character of inter-industry model –
while developmental processes are dynamic
in nature
– Less concerned with spatial dimensions
– Failure of newly established industrial
complexes with inter- industry linkages to
generate development in surrounding
environment
84
Growth• Expansion in quantitative terms and structural
changes in society and economy
• Elements of change – institutional, social and
economic ( sectoral and spatial)
• Development – change in desired direction at
a desired speed
• Presupposes policy interventions to attain
goals and objectives
• Involves socio- psychological transformation
• Involves temporal, sectoral and spatial
phasing & integration of planning85
THANK YOU
86