the world bank prem public sector governance the “tools of the trade”: an overview of the world...
TRANSCRIPT
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance
The “Tools of the Trade”:The “Tools of the Trade”: An An OverviewOverview of The World Bank’s of The World Bank’s
Governance Diagnostic and Assessment Governance Diagnostic and Assessment InstrumentsInstruments
Presented to:Presented to:
PREM – WBI Core Course onPublic Sector Governance &Anticorruption
Presented by:Presented by:
Francesca RecanatiniSenior EconomistWorld Bank Institute (WBIGP)www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance
February 14-17, 2005February 14-17, 2005
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 3
Objective
Which are the key elements for a governance assessment?Which empirical tools and approaches are already available?How can we select among them?How can such assessments be used for policy purpose?
How to choose among governance tools?
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 4
Key starting points
1. What is the purpose of the assessment?
Research and analysisAwareness raising Policy and Action planningCapacity buildingMonitoring
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 5
2. What is the focus of the assessment?
Governance as a wholeCorruption Performance of a specific agency/sectorQuality of a specific public service delivered
Key starting points
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 6
Suppose we have determined ...
The final purpose of the assessmentThe focus of the assessment
What next?
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 7
Existing Empirical ToolsBEEPSIGRPublic Official surveysPETsQSDSScore CardsInvestment Climate SurveysEC Audits
PERCFAACPARGACCase StudiesHIPC Exp. TrackingROSC
www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/assessing
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 9
Governance Assessment
Analysis& use
Empirical tools & sample
Conceptual dimension
Implementation process
Use a working framework …
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 10
Conceptual dimensionClear definition of the variable we focus on and its manifestationsTranslation of the definition into observable and measurable componentsSelection of methodological approachUnderstanding of the links between governance and
Performance outcomesDevelopment outcomes
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 11
Linking the Tools to the Blueprint
PERHIPC E.T.ROSCCPAREC Audits
CFAA
IGR & GAC & Governance Cross-Country Ind.
BEEPS & INVEST.CLIMATE
SCORE CARDS
QSDS
Public Official Surveys
Political System- Cam paign Finance- Recruitm ent/Patronage
Executive Branch- Core Accountability M echanisms- Key Sectors: Revenue, Expenditure & Regulatory Agencies
Legislative Branch- Parliam entary O versight- Parliam entary Safeguards
Judicial Branch- Judicial Independence- Judicial Predictability- Prosecution & Trial of Corruption Cases
Sub-National Governm ent- Transparency and Responsiveness- Accountability M echanisms
Users- Households- Enterprises
Service Delivery Agencies- Accountability M echanisms- Accessibility and Responsiveness
PETs
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 12
Conceptual dimension, cont.
Finding answers may require single or multiple methods and data formsThe methodological approach can be a combination of different methods (for example, qualitative, quantitative or mixed)To each method corresponds a set of empirical tools that we can useData can also be qualitative and/or quantitative
For more information on alternative methods www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/assessing
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 13
Purely QualitativeMethods: - Focus Group Discussions, interviews,
case studiesProblems:- Non-representative- Lack of counterfactuals, causality is
unclear- Small Samples Advantages- Open-Ended- Context, History
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 14
Problems:- Structured Questions- “Top-Down”- Reflect Biases of ResearcherAdvantages:- Large Samples- Representative Samples- Clear Methods for Inferring
Causality
Purely Qualitative
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 15
Mixed MethodsTake Best of Both Worlds - Advantages1) Quantitative Questions Informed by
Qualitative Investigation.2) Hypotheses Generated by Qualitative
tested for Generalizability by Quantitative.
3) Depth supplemented by breadth – “thick” understanding with generalizability.
4) History, Context, Process and Identifying Causal Links
5) Participation Remember!
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 16
Mixed Methods – Problems
High CostTime ConsumingLarge Teams – Coordination ProblemsUsually poorly done – more research required to understand how methods compare
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 18
Empirical dimension
Focus on institutions vs. individualsExperiential vs. perception dataOne vs. many types of respondentsStandard vs. customized empirical toolsDefinition of sample and field work detailsOpen end vs. close end questions
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 19
CitizensCitizens
Government Government OfficialsOfficials EnterprisesEnterprises
Civil SocietyCivil Society
Private Sector
Private Sector
The State
The State
Linking the Tools to the Respondents
PETQSDSPERCFAACPAR
Score cards
GACIGR
BEEPSINV. CL.
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 20
Process/Capacity Building dimension
To increase impact and sustainability:Consultative and participatory approach to discuss purpose, use and features of the assessmentEngage local NGOs and academic institutions to adapt/revise toolsPublic dissemination of resultsJoint design of policy recommendations
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 21
Governance Assessment
Enhanced local
capacity
Greater consensu
s
Knowledge for policy
and/or research
Broader awarenes
s
Measuring governance: possible outcomes
Internet, radio
Policy dialogue
Focus groups
Workshops
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 22
Where we are
We defined our objectiveWe identified a tool and a methodWe defined the sampleWe specified the details of the field workWe defined the process
What next?
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 23
Analytical and Policy dimension
The use of data to identify an issuemeasure a phenomenonunderstand a processcompare experiencesevaluate constraintsquantify costs and benefitslink effect to a causeevaluate policy choices
Focus on links between governance manifestations and:
- Quality of services
- Growth - Public
sector characteristics
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 24
Empirical analysis – a word of caution
The data has to handle with care to interpret correctly the resultsKey elements:
Characteristics and size of sampleModus of data collectionObjectiveness of the dataRigor of the approachMargin of errorSignificance
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 25
Key dimensions for governance analysis1. Identify both weak institutions (in
need of reform) and strong institutions (example of good governance)
2. Unbundle corruption by type – administrative, capture of the state, bidding, theft of goods and public resources, purchase of licenses and regulations
1. Identify both weak institutions (in need of reform) and strong institutions (example of good governance)
2. Unbundle corruption by type – administrative, capture of the state, bidding, theft of goods and public resources, purchase of licenses and regulations
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 26
3. Assess the cost of each type of corruption on different groups of stakeholders
4. Identify key determinants of good governance
5. Develop policy recommendations
Key dimensions (cont.)
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 27
An example – Peru 2002
Issue: the government wanted to monitor progress in terms of
Transparency of public administration activitiesCivil society “participation” and voiceQuality of public services
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 28
Peru 2002, cont.
Purpose of assessment: monitoringFocus of the assessment:
TransparencyCitizens’ “Participation” and VoiceQuality of public services
What next?
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 29
Purpose of assessment: monitoringFinal users: government and civil societyKey feature:
Comparability across timeAbility to identify progresses
Type of information needed: agency-specificApproach: objective, and based on citizen’s feedback
Peru 2002, cont.
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 30
Conceptual dimensionTransparency in the management of resourcesQuality of basic health and education servicesQuality of complaint and feedback mechanisms
Empirical Tool Score card/Questionnaire to householdsFocus on agency-specific informationObjective, experiential dataClose-end questions
Peru 2002, cont.
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 31
Process/Capacity building:Partnership between WBI and with National Statistical Office on methodological issuesData and results publicly available
Analytical dimensionMonitoring of indices’ performance over timeLink between indices of performance and measures of poverty
Peru 2002, cont.
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 32
Peru 2002 – Decisions taken
To develop the following yearly indicators:
Index of transparency and civil society participationIndex of quality of public services
To focus on households/users onlyTo promote a partnership between the National Statistical Agency and citizens
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 33
Governance and A-C diagnostic surveys
A demand-driven process to improve governance, build local capacity and consensusKey elements: participation, transparency and analytical rigorOutcomes: greater local capacity, new policy actors, baseline governance data, and action plan for policy reform
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 34
Challenge: poor governance and corruption
1. Establishment of Steering Committee
2. Diagnostic surveys + analysis
3. Draft of the NAS
4. Public dissemination + discussion
5. Revision of the NAS
6. Implementation by Government
7. Monitoring and Evaluation of NAS
WB
I T
ech
nic
al A
ssis
tan
ce
Key Partnership: Government + Civil Society
Country Implemented
The process
GuatemalaHighly fragmented civil societyJoint effort to build consensus and focus on rigorous approach
Sierra LeoneStrong commitment (civil society, state, donors) => surveys and report within a year. Results will be used for Institutional Reform Loan
HondurasCNA: report and strategy to newly elected gov (January 2001); integration of strategy in the 2002-2006 government plan
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 38
Governance Variables for Selected Countries (View of the Firm, EOS 2003) - Percentage Firms Reporting Low Governance
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
tage
Fir
ms
(%)
Bolivia Costa Rica Ecuador Guatemala Nicaragua Paraguay
Source: EOS (firm survey), 2003. Y-axis displays percentage of firms who reported low Governance (1-3) in each governance dimension.
Bad
Good
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 39
Extent of corruption
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
% of public officials report frequent publicfunds mis-management
% of public officials report frequentpurchase of positions in their institutions
% public officials report frequent cases ofcorruption in public administration
% firms report bribes used frequently inpublic services
% users report bribes used frequently inpublic services
% firms report bribes used frequently inpublic contracts
Peru Colombia Honduras Ecuador
(Various countries, 2001)
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 40
National and municipal agencies are ridden by different types of corruption
(based on public officials' responses, a Latin American country, 2001)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Irregula use ofpublic
resources
Bribes to obtainpublic contracts
Bribes tochange a legal
decision
Bribes to obtaina public service
% r
epor
tin
g th
at t
his
for
m o
f co
rru
pti
on is
ve
ry f
req
uen
t
Municipal agencies National agencies
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 41
Bribes and Quality of Service in Public Sector
(as reported by public officials in Honduras, 2001)
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35
% reporting bribes paid to obtain public services
% reporting purchase of positions in theirinstitutions among superiors
% reporting purchase of positions in theirinstitutions among co-workers
% reporting public funds mismanagement isfrequent
% of public contracts awarded because bribeswere paid
Executive Judicial Legislative Municipal
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
% th
at r
ate
as im
por
tan
t ob
stac
le
Cost involved Educational system notupdated
Teachers' professionalcapacity
Inadequate infrastrustureand equipment
Households' opinion: obstacles to good education
Bo Bombali SL
c
Quality of education by district(Sierra Leone 2003)
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 43
Obstacles to using courts in Zambia
(as reported by households and firms)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
% o
f re
spon
dent
s ag
reei
ng th
at
the
obst
acle
is v
ery
impo
rtan
t
Small Medium Large lowincome
middleincome
highincome
Too long the process
Court decisionsinfluenced by corruption
Gratifications
Businesses Households
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 44
Percentage of household income spent on bribes to obtain services, by income status (as reported by households), Sierra Leone, 2003
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Public health services
Public education services
Income Tax Department
Judges/Courts officials
Municipal/Dist. Councils
Surveys and Lands
percentage of household income spent on bribeshigh income
middle income
low incomeThe thin lines represent margins of error (or 95% confidence intervals) for each
Corruption increases inequality
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 45
The costs of corruption(Investment Climate Survey, Guatemala, Honduras
and Nicaragua, 2003)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(% o
f ex
pen
dit
ure
)
Cost of security Cost of bribes
Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua
As reported by managers
Costs of bribes by firm size, Guatemala
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Large Medium Small Micro
Costs of security by firm size, Guatemala
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Large Medium Small Micro
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 46
The costs of corruption(Investment Climate Survey, Guatemala,
Honduras and Nicaragua, 2003)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua
MicroSmallMediumLarge
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 47
Cost of Corruption:discouraged users by service
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Municipal and District Councils
Public education services
Public health services
Sierra Leone Roads Transport Authority(RTA)
Sierra Leone Housing Corporation(SALHOC)
Proportion of head of households reporting that they decide to not conduct procedures with these institutions because they couldn't pay the unofficial costs
Sierra Leone Housing Corporation
0% 10% 20% 30%
high incomemiddle incomelow income
0% 10% 20% 30%
Sierra Leone Roads Transport Authority
Corruption imposes barriers to households to access basic social
services
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 48
Mechanisms to participate to policy process
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Association/NGO Direct tie topublic officials
None
Southern Northern Eastern Western
% of households reporting to use the following channel to participatein the policy process
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 49
The determinants of The determinants of governance – a set of new governance – a set of new
indicatorsindicatorsInternal TransparencyMeritocracyQuality of norms and rules“Accountability” & citizen voiceRule application and supervisionSalary SatisfactionAgency MissionsPoliticizingQuality of services
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 50
Index of Quality of Rules (to manage personnel and
budget resources)
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
Colombia (2001) Honduras (2001) Peru (2001)
PersonnelBudget
As reported by public officials
High
Low
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 51
Index of Voice and Accountability
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Ecuador (2000)Paraguay (1999)Bolivia (1999)Colombia (2001)Peru (2001)Honduras (2001)Indonesia (2001)
As reported by public officials
High
Low
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 52
South North East West WHOLEProv. Prov. Prov. Area COUNTRY
Corruption in budget 35 43 48 39 40
Overall corruption 22 32 35 33 32
Corruption in public contracts 18 35 29 33 30
Corruption in personnel (2) 39 44 55 53 49
Accessibility for poor 85 74 87 74 78
Audit Mechanisms 55 59 66 58 58
Enforcement of rules 70 67 80 73 71
Politicization 21 34 22 34 32
Quality of rules 62 62 70 61 63
Resources 54 51 47 55 52
Transparency 51 55 53 51 55
Citizen voice 70 59 65 66 66
Meritocracy 66 65 70 69 68
Governance & corruption indicators by
province
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 53
Enforcement Citizen Wage
Audit of rules Resources Transparency Voice Satisfaction
Presidential Affairs 52 74 51 55 59 17Ministry of Finance 57 68 52 54 60 25Quasi-independent institutions 69 85 41 63 78 32Ministry of Trade and Industry 64 84 60 59 63 19Ministry of Internal Affairs 60 76 57 61 76 0Ministry of Energy and Power and NPA 72 92 62 61 69 25Ministry of Foreign Affairs & International Cooperation 50 74 54 50 30Ministry of Development & Economic Planning 54 72 69 57 58 25Ministry of Social Welfare, Gender & Children's Affairs 59 71 53 56 58 13Ministry of Health & Sanitation 54 71 53 55 65 21Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 55 68 51 51 60 18Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 54 69 51 55 67 26Ministry of Youth and Sports 56 76 50 52 72 25Ministry of Labor and Industrial Relations 61 71 48 56 64 25Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security 60 69 46 58 66 16Ministry of Local Government & Municipal and district councils 58 72 54 57 63 15Ministry of Transport & Communications 64 77 46 57 66 31Ministry of Works and Public Maintenance 53 67 52 53 68 5Ministry of Lands, Housing & Country Planning 54 57 56 13Ministry of Mineral Resources 60 67 68 55 55 21House of Parliament 54 53 41 59 50 13Office of the Attorney General, Minister of Justice and Director
of Public Prosecutions60 75 49 55 67 25
Traffic Police and Sierra Leone Road Transport Authority 41 74 64 54 63 34Supreme Courts 64 78 55 56 72 43Local Courts 61 68 41 53 77 36SALWACO/GVWC and SIERRATEL 56 73 53 57 58 35SALPOST 61 66 46 54 60 28Sierra Leone Ports Authority 53 66 56 54 59 42SL National Tourist Board and SL Standards Bureau 44 47 49 51 63Police and Prisons 59 68 57 53 66 25Post-conflict institutions 60 71 47 54 64 44WHOLE COUNTRY 58 71 52 55 66 25
Governance & corruption indicators by province
The World Bank
PREM Public Sector Governance 54
WBI Governance on the Web
About Governance Diagnostics and Statistical Capacity Building: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/capacitybuild/about.html
Governance Diagnostic Surveys Country Sites: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/capacitybuild/d-surveys.html
Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996-2002: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/govdata2002/index.html
The Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS) 1999-2000: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/beeps/
The Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS II) 2002: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/beeps2002/
Courses and Surveys: Governance Diagnostic Capacity Building: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/capacitybuild/courses.html
Step by Step Guide to Governance Diagnostic Empirical Tools Implementation: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/capacitybuild/diagnostics.html