the failing pouch

44
Oxford Colorecta Restorative Proctocolectomy The Failing Pouch The Failing Pouch Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of Colorectal Department of Colorectal Surgery Radcliffe Hospital, Surgery Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford Oxford M62 Course 2006

Upload: rudolf

Post on 11-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

M62 Course 2006. The Failing Pouch. Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of Colorectal Surgery Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. Parks and Nicholls Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis BMJ 1978;2:65-8. Pouches around the World 2000. USA7600 UK2500 Sweden2500 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

The Failing PouchThe Failing Pouch

Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Neil Mortensen MD FRCS Department of Colorectal Surgery Department of Colorectal Surgery

Radcliffe Hospital, OxfordRadcliffe Hospital, Oxford

M62 Course 2006

Page 2: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Parks and Nicholls

Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis

BMJ 1978;2:65-8

Page 3: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouches around the World 2000USA 7600

UK 2500

Sweden 2500

Canada 1500

Germany 1100

France 250

Australia 200

Estimated Total 15650

Page 4: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch surgery – the ecstasy

Page 5: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch surgery – the agony

Page 6: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Failure

Page 7: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Bleeding

Infarction

Peritonitis

Anastomotic leak

Pouch cutaneous fistula

Pouch vaginal fistula

Stricture

Small bowel stricture

Pouch complications

Page 8: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford Pouch Excision

408 IPAA

30 Pouch excisions, 7 immediate

27 (6.6%) in house

3 elsewhere

Page 9: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Oxford Pouch Excision

Reasons for excision

8 pouchitis

6 ischaemia

6 sepsis

5 Crohns

3 incontinence

1 bleeding

1 desmoid

Page 10: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Timing of pouch excision

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <20 years after pouch construction

number

Page 11: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Indications for Pouch Excision at St Mark’s

St Mark’s n=996

Referred n=245 Total

No patients 58(5.6%) 10(4%) 68Pelvic sepsis 28 5 33(48.5%)Pouch fistula 24 4Crohns 3 2Poor function 21 3 24(35.2%)Pouchitis 4 1other 5 1

Karoui, Cohen, and Nicholls DCR 2004

Page 12: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Failure Rates from St Mark’s

Karoui Cohen and Nicholls DCR 2004

Page 13: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Please don’t let it

leak

Page 14: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Causes of Pouch Failure

49 (8.8%) of 551 pouches failed9 (1.6%) defunctioned

- 21 (39%) anastomotic leak- 13 (23%) poor function

- 7 (12%) pouchitis- 7 (12%) pouch leakage- 7 (12%) perianal disease- 3 (5%) various

MacRae et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Page 15: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Restorative Proctocolectomy - Anastomotic Leakage

n % leaks

single stage 22 32

previous colectomy 49 12*

steroids > 15mg 15 33

no steroids 56 14*

under 40 yrs 54 13

over 40 yrs 17 35*Pemberton et al 1994

Page 16: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Patient Selection : Patient Selection : Steroids

• 671 patients

• 20 mg Prednisolone threshold

• no differences in septic complications

• IPAA without diversion, 50% complication on high dose steriods

Ziv et al Dis Col Rect 1996

Page 17: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Incidence and Impact Pelvic Abscess after IPAA

73 of 1508 pelvic abscess

• pouch failure 26%

• 55% need transabdominal salvage

• 8% local surgery

• 37% non surgical

• functional outcome poorer

Farouk et al Dis Col Rect 1998

Page 18: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Patient Selection - indeterminate colitis

• 71 indeterminate v. 1232 UC

• no difference in frequency, continence or pouchitis

• failure rate 19% v. 8%

McIntyre et al Dis Col Rect 1995

Page 19: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Results of IPAA in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

37 patients

Original diagnosis UC (22), indeterminate (9), Crohn’s (6),

Complex fistulas in 11

Site of Crohn’s pouch (20), anal (4), both (10)

Failure in 17 Sagar et al Dis Col Rect 1996

Page 20: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Failure & Crohn’s - Cleveland Clinic

Overall failure 3.4%, 1.1% non function

Of 34 failures - 17 had Crohn’s

25% Crohn’s fail

Fazio et al Ann Surg 1995

Page 21: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Treating the early abscess or anastomotic dehiscence

• EUA assessment • Abscess – drain mushroom catheter, CT drain• Dehiscence – drain, early resuture or advancement• Wait, pouchogram, consider re operation

Page 22: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Fistula at Anastomosis

Page 23: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch related fistula

59 of 1040 IPAA

• 24 pouch vaginal

• 11 pouch cutaneous

• 16 pouch perineal

• 8 pouch presacral

32% eventually excised

Ozuner et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Page 24: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Related Fistula after Restorative Proctocolectomy

21 patients, in 6 > 5 m after ileostomy closure

Site : anastomosis 14

vertical staple line 2

efferent limb end 5

Adverse factors : late fisutula

enterocutaneous

pouch vaginal

suspect Crohn’s

Paye et al 1996 BJS

Page 25: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Try Local Repair First if:

• gross sepsis absent

• granulation tissue minimal

• fistulas close to anal verge

• strictures are short

Page 26: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Repeat IPAA - indications

• mechanical outlet obstruction

• lack of reservoir capacity

• sepsis

Page 27: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Revision for septic complications35 patients repeat IPAA

Outcome 86% functioning pouches, 4 excised

Function 57% good, 43% fair or poor,

Pad usage and seepage 60-70%

Fazio et al Ann Surg 1998

Page 28: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Revision by Disconnection - Reconnection

23 patients 9 long efferent 4 sepsis fistula 3 redundant blind limb 3 twisted pouch 3 anastomotic problem

Pouch Salvaged in 16Good function 11Pouch excision 6

Sagar et al 1996 BJS

Page 29: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Long Term Results of Abdominal SalvageLong Term Results of Abdominal Salvage

• 112 underwent 117 pouch salvage procedures• Common indications - sepsis 45, stricture 13,

retained stump 35• 21% pouch failure• Associated with Crohn’s, sepsis

Tekkis et al BJS 2006

Page 30: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy Cumulative Pouch SurvivalCumulative Pouch Survival

Tekkis et al BJS 2006

Page 31: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Restorative Proctocolectomy - Technique

Get it right first timeGet it right first time

Page 32: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Page 33: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

The risks of maintaining Columnar Cuff

- Some 6-10% of the total anorectal mucosa is retained

- risk of malignancy

- risk of inflammation

Page 34: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis - symptoms

• urgency

• frequency

• leakage

• bleeding

• anal irritation or burning discomfort

Page 35: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis and Inflammatory Changes

113 patients, 715 biopsies

• acute inflammation in columnar cuff in 13%

• in 9% symptomatic with endoscopic inflammation

• no relationship with pouchitis, pouch frequency or anastomotic height

Thompson-Fawcett, Warren, Mortensen Dis Col Rect 1999

Page 36: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Cuffitis - Treatment

• medical - largely empirical

- steroids, per anal or oral

- 5ASA compounds, per anal or oral

- lignocaine jelly, per anal

• surgery - mucosectomy Curran & Hill 1992

- mucosectomy & pouch advancement

Fazio & Tjandra 1994

Page 37: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouch Vaginal Fistula

• avoid catching vagina with stapler

• repair by endo vaginal advancement flap

• defunction ?

Page 38: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Page 39: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Small Bowel Problems

Adhesions 15-30% symptomatic

5-10% need re-operation

Functional obstruction - ileal brake

Small bowel bacterial overgrowth

Crohn’s disease (5-7%)

Page 40: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Pouches Misbehaving Badly - the 3 problem areas

Upstream Small bowel Within the

pouch

Pouch outlet

Page 41: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.00 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

overall

chronic

Follow up (m)

Prop

ortio

n of

risk

Keranen et al Dis Col Rect 1997

Cumulative Risk of Pouchitis

Page 42: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Refractory Pouchitis

• Review the previous histology

• Is there a pelvic abscess?

• Is there partial obstruction to ileum?

• Is there a small bowel motility disturbance

• Is there dietary intolerance?

Page 43: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

Summary

10% lose pouch

10% have poor function but prefer to keep their pouch

80% report an excellent quality of life

Page 44: The Failing Pouch

Oxford

Colorectal

Restorative Proctocolectomy

But….. Some worries

Increasing numbers of patients needing chronic

ciproxin dosingPerianal disease

being treated with infliximab