the epidemiology of diabetes mellitus

Upload: luthfi-indiwirawan

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 The Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus

    1/4

    Nephrol Dial Transplant (1998) 13 [Suppl 8]: 25

    NephrologyDialysis

    Transplantation

    The epidemiology of diabetes mellitus

    R. Trevisan, M. Vedovato and A. Tiengo

    Divisione di Malattie del Metabolismo, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Universita di Padova,

    Padova, Italy

    Abstract. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM ) present in all age groups. IDDM is a world-widedisease but occurs with considerable geographical anddevelops predominantly in children and young adults,

    but may appear in all age groups. The incidence of ethnic variations. The greatest incidence is identifiedin Nordic countries, particularly in Finland, as com-IDDM differs greatly among populations, with Finland

    and Sardinia showing the greatest incidence rates pared with the rest of Europe. Overall, Europe encom-passes a >10-fold difference in incidence annually,(~3035% of cases annually per 100 000 children up

    to age 14 years) and oriental populations showing the ranging from ~35 new cases in Finland [1] to two to

    three new cases in Macedonia [2 ] per 100 000 childrenlowest rates. IDDM is diagnosed more frequently inthe winter months. The major genetic susceptibility to aged 014 years. The geographical pattern is not asimple north to south incidence gradient but in factIDDM is linked to the HLA complex on chromosome

    6. These genetic backgrounds interact with environ- there are sharp differences between neighbouringregions. For example, Sardinia shows an incidence ofmental factors (possibly certain viruses, foods and

    climate) to initiate the immune-mediated process that diabetes approaching that of Finland and which isseveral times greater than the rest of Italy [3]. Anotherleads to b-cell destruction.

    Non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) is the area of contrast is Estonia; despite its ethnic andcultural similarities with Finland, it has an incidencemost common form of diabetes. The prevalence of

    NIDDM varies enormously from population to popu- of only one-third that in Finland. On the other hand,the Russian population residing in Estonia presents alation. The greatest rates have been found in Pima

    Indians. The major environmental factors identified as disease risk less than that of the native Estonians. Sofar, the reasons for this wide variation in the risk ofcontributing to this form of diabetes are obesity and

    reduced physical activity. NIDDM shows strong famil- IDDM in Europe are unknown, and the power of

    genetic variation and of environmental factors has yetial aggregation in all populations and is clearly theresult of an interaction between genetic susceptibility to be established. From the comprehensive coverage

    of the European populations, it can be estimated thatand environmental factors. Before NIDDM develops,insulin concentrations are high for the degree of glycae- among 100 million children aged 014 years, some

    10 000 will develop IDDM each year.mia and of obesity, reflecting the presence of insulinresistance. As insulin resistance worsens, glucose levelsincrease, with the appearance of glucose intoleranceand, finally, of NIDDM, when insulin response cannot The epidemiology of IDDM according to timecompensate for insulin resistance.

    Temporal trends in the incidence of IDDM compriseKey words: epidemiology; genetics; type I diabetes

    both secular changes and seasonal variations. Themellitus (IDDM); type II diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)

    incidence of IDDM shows a steady increase in itsfrequency during the last few decades [4], correspond-

    ing in some instances to an estimated doubling inincidence per generation. Some authors have tried toexplain the changing incidence of environmental fac-

    Type I diabetes mellitus (IDDM)tors, such as changing breast-feeding habits, but noobvious explanations have yet been identified. On the

    Type I diabetes mellitus (IDDM) develops predomi- other hand, the increasing frequency cannot be attrib-nantly in children and young adults, but may be uted to improved survival and reproductiveness among

    IDDM patients. Recent studies found a correlationCorrespondence and offprint requests to: Roberto Trevisan, MD,

    between apparent levelling offin the increase in incid-PhD, Divisione di Malattie del Metabolismo, Dipartimento di

    ence with a decline in the occurrence of mumps anti-Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Universita di Padova, viaGiustiniani 2, 35100 Padova, Italy. bodies in newly diagnosed IDDM children due to the

    1998 European Renal AssociationEuropean Dialysis and Transplant Association

  • 8/11/2019 The Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus

    2/4

    The epidemiology of diabetes mellitus 3

    introduction of the mumpsmeaslesrubella vaccine. marker combinations most strongly associated withIDDM, the absolute risk of IDDM is ~510% atThese data suggest that the temporal variations in the

    incidence of IDDM can be modified, and that the the most.geographical distribution of the disease may change inthe future as a result of implementation of health

    Type II diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)promotion programmes.Furthermore, there is seasonality of IDDM onset,

    and in fact it is diagnosed more frequently during the Type II diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is the mostcommon form of diabetes. Population studies basedwinter and autumn months, particularly during

    puberty [5 ]. As IDDM is an autoimmune disease and on standardized methods and diagnosis have showngreat variation in the frequency of the disease, andthe destruction of theb-cells begin several years beforeits clinical onset, this seasonality probably reflects the prospective studies have provided new insights into its

    associated risk factors and its pattern of development.importance of certain environmental precipitating fac-tors, such as viral infections. However, there is noevident explanation for why this pattern exists. The

    Prevalenceidentification of non-genetic determinants of IDDM isof particular importance as these are potentially modi-fiable with the aim of disease prevention. Some studies The prevalence of NIDDM varies enormously from

    population to population and throughout the worldhave demonstrated that a short duration of breast-feeding during infancy seems to be associated with an [10] . The highest rates are recorded in Pima Indians,

    but also in the Micronesian population living on Nauruincreased risk of developing IDDM. This possibleassociation may point to an aetiological role of cows Island in the Central Pacific. Proportions in different

    ethnic groups living in the same country may varymilk protein. Antibodies for cows milk are much more

    prevalent and at higher titres in children with recent- considerably. Rates differ in migrants as comparedwith natives remaining in their own country. Moreover,onset IDDM than in control subjects. In fact, the

    neonatal gut is relatively permeable to a large quantity the ratio in migrants is greater than in the indigenouspopulation, and these increases appear to be relatedof proteins, and it is postulated that bovine albumin

    increases the antibodies which cross-react with a pro- to rapidly changing lifestyles. The prevalence is parallelwith rapidly developing countries and among under-tein in theb-cell membrane. At present this hypothesis

    remains controversial. privileged individuals in developed nations. It has beenestimated that the number of people with diabetes willbe ~100 million by the year 2000. In Italy, NIDDM

    Genetic factors accounts for up to 85% of the total cases of diabetesand affects 57% of the population; it is likely thatmany cases (perhaps up to 50%) currently are undia-Islet cell autoantibodies, insulin and glutamic acid

    decarboxylase antibodies, markers of autoimmune dis- gnosed [11,12] .

    NIDDM describes various types of diabetes, andease, may be detected in the circulation some yearsbefore the clinical onset of IDDM, providing a power- only in a few of these is the aetiopathology known.NIDDM is rarely associated with insulin receptorful tool for individual assessment of subsequent risk

    of overt disease. IDDM clusters within families: it is ( leprechaunism) or the glucokinase gene (MODY)mutations. It may be caused by or associated withestimated that the risk of developing the disease in

    siblings and children of IDDM patients is ~510%, other endocrinological disorders (Cushings syndrome,pheochromocytoma or acromegaly).compared with ~0.5% in the general population [6].

    The risk is smaller for the offspring of diabetic womenthan in offspring of diabetic men, and the risk of

    Genetic factorsIDDM in children seems to be increased with advan-cing maternal age [7]. Such differential risk patternsprobably reflect selection due to particular features in NIDDM results from the interaction of genetic and

    environmental factors. The disease shows familialthe reproductive capacity of IDDM women ratherthan genetic mechanisms. aggregation, but there is no information on the mode

    of inheritance or on whether it is caused by one orIn Caucasian populations, strong IDDM associ-ations are found in the serologically determined HLA several genes [ 13]. Other evidence for the importance

    of genetic determinants comes from studies of mixedmarkers DR3 and DR4, the heterozygous stateDR3/DR4 and the genes which encode them at the populations and from populations of different genetic

    backgrounds living in similar environments. Other dataHLA-DQ loci on chromosome 6 [8 ]. On the otherhand, HLA-DR2 and DR5 seem to confer protection come from studies on populations residing in the same

    environment but within which there is a genetic admix-against IDDM. Recent studies have provided evidenceof genetic susceptibility to IDDM linked to several ture. For example, among the populations of the Gila

    River Indian Community, the prevalence of NIDDMother loci, including the insulin gene on chromosome11 [9 ]. The disease susceptibility genes occur frequently is twice as great in full-blooded Pima Indians as in

    non-Indians, and the prevalence among those of half-but have low penetrance; therefore, even for those

  • 8/11/2019 The Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus

    3/4

    R. Trevisanet al.4

    Pima, half-non-Indian ancestry is intermediate [14]. high serum triglyceride, low high-density lipoprotein(HDL) cholesterol levels, hypertension and disturb-Genetic susceptibility does appear to be a basic step

    for the development of NIDDM, but the expression ances in the patterns of sex hormones. Hyper-insulinaemia, or insulin resistance, appears to be aof the disease is determined largely by environmental

    factors. central feature of this cluster of abnormalities relatedto abdominal obesity. Insulin resistance is a character-istic of patients with NIDDM, but also precedes and

    Environmental factors predicts the development of the disease [18].Differences in the extent or distribution of obesity,

    however, do not entirely account for differences in theThe development of NIDDM is influenced by exposureto different environments. Some of the environmental prevalence of diabetes among or within populations,nor does obesity entirely account for differences in theeffects can be assessed by comparing the frequency of

    the disease in migrants with that amongst individuals prevalence of diabetes among migrants. Thus, it hasbeen necessary to search for other factors.who remain in the original environment, assuming that

    both groups share similar gene pools. Therefore, AsianIndian, Japanese and Chinese populations present alower prevalence of NIDDM in urban rather than in

    Physical activityrural areas, and in countries of origin rather than in adifferent part of the world, where the prevalenceincreases from ~2-fold to 5- to 6-fold [15] . Another Physical activity influences the incidence of NIDDM,

    the prevalence of the disease among physically inactiveexample comes from the Polynesians of Wallis Islandwho migrated to New Caledonia and changed their individuals typically being two to three times greater

    than among active subgroups of the same populationway of life (from traditional to industrial ); the preval-

    ence of diabetes increased over 10 years from 3 to [19] . Increased obesity and reduced physical activityfavour the development of insulin resistance, which12%. These differences in the prevalence in migrant

    populations provide evidence for the importance of appears to be a critical component in the pathogenesisof NIDDM [18]. Another factor that may contributeenvironmental factors as determinants of NIDDM.

    Rapid changes have occurred in the prevalence of to the development of insulin resistance is a highcalorie diet containing a high percentage of caloriesdiabetes within certain populations. For example,

    among the Pima Indians, age-adjusted prevalence rates from saturated fat, a low fibre content, and a decreasedunrefined carbohydrate content (i.e. a shift from afor diabetes increased >40% during 19671977 [16].

    In 1967, the prevalence of NIDDM among the Pima traditional to a westernized environment).Indians was 10 times higher than in the US populationas a whole, yet 30 years earlier the prevalence ofdiagnosed diabetes was no greater among the Pima

    Insulin resistanceIndians than among the general population. Changes

    such as this over the course of few generations canonly be attributed to changes in lifestyle; hence, they Insulin resistance is a characteristic that precedes thedevelopment of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) andreflect the major influence of environmental factors on

    the expression of the disease. NIDDM. Hyperinsulinaemia, especially in the fastingstate, represents an index of insulin resistance. Insulinresistance shows familial aggregation and is associated

    Obesity with obesity and physical inactivity. The developmentof IGT is predicted by the presence of hyperinsulinae-mia, and IGT is a strong risk factor for NIDDM andObesity is a major determinant in the incidence of

    NIDDM, but only a small proportion of obese indi- can be considered as a stage in the development ofthe disease.viduals develop the disease. Longitudinal studies

    among the Pima Indians have demonstrated that the Longitudinal epidemiological studies have shownthat hyperinsulinaemia, even at a stage when glucoselikelihood of developing NIDDM results from an

    interaction between the effect of obesity in the offspring tolerance is within the normal range, is an important

    predictor of NIDDM [20]. The increase in insulinand a parental history of diabetes, which presumablyreflects inherited susceptibility [ 17]. Thus, even when concentration appears to be a compensatory response

    to increased intracellular insulin resistance, which leadsgenetic susceptibility is present, the expression of thedisease is largely dependent on other factors. to small increases in circulating glucose, and as a result

    an increment in insulin secretion, as well as subsequentNot only the presence but also the distribution ofobesity influences the risk of developing NIDDM. increases in both fasting and stimulated insulin levels.

    As insulin resistance degenerates, the glucose toleranceCentral obesity is associated with an increased possibil-ity of developing NIDDM, as has been shown in many deteriorates and IGT eventually occurs. After IGT

    develops, when insulin responsiveness to segretagoguesdifferent ethnic and racial groups. Central obesity inmany populations is also associated with an increased (particularly to glucose itself ) diminishes, hyper-

    glycaemia worsens and diabetes appears.incidence of coronary heart disease, hyperinsulinaemia,

  • 8/11/2019 The Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus

    4/4

    The epidemiology of diabetes mellitus 5

    11. Bruno G, Bargero G, Vuolo A et al. A population basedReferencesprevalence of known diabetes mellitus in Northern Italy basedupon multiple sources of ascertainment. Diabetologia 1992;1. Tuomilehto J, Podar T, Brigis G et al. Comparison of the35: 851856incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in childhood

    12. Muggeo G, Verlato G, Bonora E et al. The Verona diabetesamong five Baltic populations.Int J Epidemiol1992; 21: 518527study: a population-based survey on known diabetes mellitus2. Kocova M, Trucco M, Konstantinova M et al. A cold spot ofprevalence and 5-year all cause mortality. Diabetologia 1995;IDDM incidence in Europe: Macedonia. Diabetes Care 1993;38: 31832516: 12361240

    13. Yki-Jarvinen H. Pathogenesis of non-insulin dependent diabetes3. Muntoni S, Songini M. Sardinian Collaborative Group ofIDDM. High incidence rate of IDDM in Sardinia. Diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1994; 343: 9195Care 1995; 18: 16001601 14. Knowler WC, Williams RC, Pettitt DJ, Steinberg AG. Gm3, 5,

    4. Songini M, Loche M, Muntoni Set al. Increasing prevalence of 13, 14 and NIDDM mellitus: an association in American Indiansjuvenile onset of IDDM mellitus in Sardinia: the military service with genetic admixture.Am J Hum Genet 1988; 43: 520approach. Diabetologia1993; 36: 547552 15. Kawate R, Yamakido M, Nishimoto Y et al. Diabetes mellitus

    5. Levy-Marchal C, Patterson C, Green A. Variation by age group and its vascular complications in Japanese migrants on theand seasonality at diagnosis of childhood IDDM in Europe. island of Hawaii. Diabetes Care 1979; 2: 161166Diabetologia 1995; 38: 823830 16. Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Increasing prevalence of diabetes in

    6. Allen C, Palta M, DAlessio DJet al. Risk of diabetes in siblings Pima (American) Indians over a ten-year period: In: Waldhausland other relatives of IDDM subjects. Diabetes 1991; 40: WK, ed. Diabetes 1979: Proceedings of the 10th Congress of831836

    the International Diabetes Federation. Excepta Medica,7. Warram JH, Krolewski AS, Gottlieb Pet al. Differences in risk

    Amsterdam: 1979: 507509of insulin-dependent diabetes in offspring of diabetic mothers

    17. Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Savage PJ, Bennett PH. Diabetesand diabetic fathers. N Engl J Med1984; 311: 149152

    incidence in Pima Indians: contributions of obesity and parental8. Thomson G, Robinson WP, Kuhner MKet al. Genetic hetero-diabetes.Am J Epidemiol1981; 113: 144149geneity, mode of inheritance, and risk estimates for a joint study

    18. De Fronzo RA. The triumvirate: B-cell, muscle, liver. A collusionof Caucasians with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Amresponsible for NIDDM. Diabetes 1991; 40: 166180J Hum Genet 1988; 43: 799816

    19. Kriska AM, LaPorte RE, Pettitt DJ et al. The association of9. Luo DF, Buzzetti R, Rotter J et al. Confirmation of three

    physical activity with obesity, fat distribution and glucose toler-susceptibility genes to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: ance in Pima Indians. Diabetologia1993; 325: 863870IDDM4, IDDM5, IDDM8. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5: 69369820. Saad MF, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ et al. A two-step model for10. Zimmet PZ. Kelly West Lecture 1991. Challenges in diabetes

    development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes.Am J Med1991;epidemiologyfrom West to the rest. Diabetes Care 1992;15: 232 90: 229240