The effect of nitric oxide on ischemia–reperfusion injury in rat liver

Download The effect of nitric oxide on ischemia–reperfusion injury in rat liver

Post on 01-Nov-2016




1 download

Embed Size (px)


  • Clinica Chimica Acta 288 (1999) locate /clinchim

    The effect of nitric oxide on ischemiareperfusioninjury in rat liver

    ~ * Tulay Koken, Mine Inal

    Department of Biochemistry, The Medical School, Osmangazi University, 26480, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Received 18 April 1997; received in revised form 4 January 1999; accepted 30 June 1999


    A dual role for nitric oxide (NO) in ischemiareperfusion (I /R) injury is still controversial.This study aims to investigate the role of NO in rat hepatic reperfusion injury. Ischemia wasinduced by total occlusion of hepatic artery and portal vein for 30 min, then the tissue was

    Greperfused for 30 min. The animals in the L-NAME group (n 5 10) received N nitro-L-argininemethyl ester (L-NAME) (15 mg/kg) intraperitoneally 60 min before ischemia. The ischemia group(n 5 10) was given an equal volume of saline solution. The control group comprised eight healthyrats which were not exposed to ischemia or reperfusion. An indicator of hepatic injury, plasmaalanine amino transferase (ALT) enzyme activities, were increased in the L-NAME group ascompared with the ischemia group ( p , 0.001). The level of serum nitrite, an index of NOproduction, and hepatic reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration were lower in the L-NAMEgroup than in the ischemia group ( p , 0.001, p , 0.01, respectively). Hepatic levels ofmalondialdehyde (MDA) and conjugated dienes (CD) were significantly increased in the L-NAMEgroup as compared to the ischemia group ( p , 0.05, p , 0.001, respectively). Our results confirmthat L-NAME, an inhibitor of the enzyme NO synthase, increased the lipid peroxidation andpossibly tissue injury, due to the inhibition of cytoprotective effects of NO in a rat hepatic I /Rmodel. 1999 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Ischemia / reperfusion; Nitric oxide; Free radicals

    *Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 90-222-2393-750.

    0009-8981/99/$ see front matter 1999 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.PI I : S0009-8981( 99 )00138-2

  • ~56 T. Koken, M. Inal / Clinica Chimica Acta 288 (1999) 55 62

    1. Introduction

    Studies have demonstrated that oxygen free radicals play a major role in thepathogenesis of many diseases [1]. One of these is ischemiareperfusion, whichis a deficiency in the transport of O to the tissue. Complete interruption of2blood flow to the liver is often necessary during operations, for extensive injuryto the liver is inevitably associated with periods of complete ischemia. Hepaticcirculation is also reduced during hemorragic shock, after severe trauma and inlate sepsis. Ligation of the hepatic artery, which was advocated in the treatmentof certain tumors of the liver, vascular lesions or injury to the liver, reduces totalhepatic blood flow, at least initially [2,3].

    During ischemia, adenine nucleotides are rapidly broken down to formhypoxanthine concomitantly, the enzyme xanthine dehydrogenase is convertedto xanthine oxidase. When blood flow is re-established to the ischemic organ,hypoxanthine is oxidized to xanthine and, during this reaction which is regulatedby xanthine oxidase, oxygen free radicals are formed. Oxygen radicals damagecell membranes by peroxidation of fatty acids within the phospholipid structureof the membrane. During this process, lipid peroxide radicals, lipid hydro-peroxides and other lipid fragmentation products, that are themselves activeoxidizing agents, are formed. Thus, the free radical reactivity has a tendency togenerate a chain reaction of radical species production, which enhances theultimate destructive effect [4,5].

    To protect an organ from reperfusion injury, the production of oxygen radicalsis reduced or radical scavengers are administrated. The best known scavangersare reduced glutathione, glutathione peroxidase(GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase(SOD) and catalase. In particular, reduced glutathione (GSH) is present inmillimolar concentrations in the liver and plays a key role in its protectionagainst oxidative damage by acting as a scavenger of radicals and as a substratefor GSHPx [68].

    Nitric oxide is a biologically active compound, which may have an impact onleukocyte endothelial cell interactions, in addition to causing smooth musclerelaxation [9].

    There are many positive [1012] and negative [13,14] data relating toefficiency of NO. Studies show that NO is both beneficial and ineffective.Inhibition of NO synthesis using various analogues of L-arginine, includingNO-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester, promotes leukocyte adhesion to postcapillaryvenules [15]. Although many studies suggest that NO may function as anendogenous antiadhesion molecule, the mechanism underling this importantproperty of nitric oxide remains unknown.

    Superoxide promotes leukocyte-adhesion in postcapillary venules, and it has[16] been implicated as a mediator of ischemiareperfusion induced leukocyteadhesion [17]. Nitric oxide and superoxide are known to interact rapidly toproduce nitrates and nitrites, compounds without the biological activity of either

  • ~T. Koken, M. Inal / Clinica Chimica Acta 288 (1999) 55 62 57

    free radical [18]. Therefore, nitric oxide may act as a biological scavenger orinactivator of the proadhesive oxygen free radical.

    2. Material and methods

    Male Spraque-Dawley rats, weighing 250300 g, were used in all experi-ments. The animals were not fed for 12 h prior to the experiments. Twenty-eightrats were divided into three groups.

    (1) Control group (n 5 8): General anesthesia was induced with urethane, amidline abdominal incision was made and blood samples were obtained bycardiac puncture for determination of serum ALT and nitrite. The rats were thenkilled, and the liver was removed from each animal for determination of liverGSH and lipid peroxidation products.

    (2) Ischemialreperfusion (I /R) group (n 5 10): The animals were pretreatedwith saline solution (4 ml /kg body wt.) intraperitoneally (i.p.) 1 h beforeischemia. An in vivo hepatic ischemia / reperfusion model in the rat was studiedin which the hepaticoduodenal ligament (a. hepatica, v. porta, bile duct) wastotally occluded for 30 min using an atraumatic clamp. Reperfusion wasestablished by removal of the clamp. Thirty min after removal of the vascularclamp, blood and tissue samples were taken.

    (3) I /R 1 L-NAME group (n 5 10): All surgical procedures were done as inthe I /R group. Instead of saline solution, these animals received 15 mg/kg bodywt. L-NAME intra-peritoneally.

    The liver tissues were washed with cold saline and stored at 2 208C untilassay. The tissues were thawed and homogenized in potassium chloride buffer(0.15 mol / l) for GSH and malondialdehyde (MIDA) analysis, and in distilledwater for conjugated diene (CD) analysis with an Ultra-Turrax. Serum nitritelevels were determined according to Hortelano et al. [19]. The measurement ofGSH levels was carried out according to the method of Beutler [20]. MDA wasdetermined by the method of Okhawa [21]. CD was assessed according to themethod of Ward et al. [22]. Protein concentrations were analysed using acommercial Lowry protein kit. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and lactatedehydrogenase (LDH) levels were measured by BM-Hitachi 911 automatedanalyzer on the same day.

    Experimental data were analyzed and differences established using Studentst-test. Results were expressed as mean6standard error of the mean (SEM).

    3. Results

    As shown in Table 1, the ALT enzyme activities in the I /R group weresignificantly higher as compared to the control group ( p , 0.001). Also these

  • ~58 T. Koken, M. Inal / Clinica Chimica Acta 288 (1999) 55 62

    Table 1Serum ALT, LDH and nitrite levels of controls and treated rats

    ALT (U/ l) LDH (U/ l) Nitrite (mmol /ml)Control (n 5 8) 61.669.2 13846594 4.961.41

    a c aIschemia (n 5 10) 301.1677.4 342961472 2.560.63a,b a,d a,b

    L-Name (n 5 10) 806.16228.5 772963651 1.160.36a p , 0.001 vs. control.b p , 0.001 vs. ischemia.c p , 0.01 vs. control.d p , 0.01 vs. ischemia.

    enzyme activities in the L-NAMIE group were significantly higher compared tothe control group and the I /R group ( p , 0.001, p , 0.001 respectively).Similar findings of LDH enzyme activities were observed. That is, the LDHlevels in the I /R and L-NAME group were higher compared to the control group( p , 0.01, p , 0.001 respectively). Also, LDH activities in the L-NAME groupwere higher than the I /R group ( p , 0.01).The serum nitrite level in I /R groupwas decreased significantly in comparison with the control group ( p , 0.001). Inaddition, serum nitrite levels were more decreased in the L-NAME group.

    As shown in Table 1, MDA and CD levels in the I /R group were higher thanthe control group ( p , 0.001). Both MDA and CD levels in the L-NAME groupwere higher than in the I /R group ( p , 0.05, p , 0.001 respectively).

    The GSH tissue concentration (Table 2) in the I /R group was lower than inthe control group ( p , 0.01), was also significantly lower in the L-NAME groupthan in the I /R group ( p , 0.01).

    4. Discussion

    NO is an antioxidant and may interact with superoxide anion and otherradicals to produce less toxic species [23]. Because reactive oxygen inter-

    Table 2Tissue GSH, MDA and CD levels in livers of control and treated rats

    GSH MDA (nmol /g CD(nmol /mg protein) tissue) (OD/g tissue)

    Control (n 5 8) 12.261.8 16.162.3 2.1360.22a a aIschemia (n 5 10) 4.660.8 8 28.963.88 3.3160.31

    a,c a,d a,bL-Name (n 5 10) 3.560.5 37.5610.7 4.160.34

    a p , 0.001 vs. control.b p , 0.001 vs. ischemia.c p , 0.01 vs. ischemia.d p , 0.05 vs. ischemia.

  • ~T. Koken, M. Inal / Clinica Chimica Acta 288 (1999) 55 62 59

    mediates may mediate liver injury induced by macrophages and endotoxin [24],an antioxidant functi


View more >