the corporation of the municipality of … package36.pdf · the corporation of the municipality of...

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE Council Agenda of 12 Wednesday March 13, 2013

1.0 CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Larry Kraemer will call to Order at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday March 13, 2013, the Planning/Corporate Services Meeting of the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine in the Council Chambers at the Municipal Administration Centre.

2.0 ROLL CALL Mayor Larry Kraemer Deputy Mayor Anne Eadie Councillor Ron Coristine Councillor Maureen Couture Councillor Kenneth Craig Councillor Jacqueline Faubert Councillor Candy Hewitt Councillor Mike Leggett Councillor Randy Roppel

Staff Present Donna MacDougall, Clerk Roxana Baumann, Treasurer/Director of Finance

3.0 AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO/FROM THE AGENDA

4.0 DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Name Item of Business Nature of Interest

5.0 PUBLIC MEETINGS (Planning Advisory Committee)

Motion #03/13/13 - Moved by: Seconded by:

THAT Council move into Planning Advisory Committee to hold a public meeting to discuss planning applications.


6.0 CONSIDERATION OF BY-LAWS/MOTIONS

6.1 Draft Request for Proposal – 719 Queen Street – Annex

Motion #03/13/13 - Moved by: Seconded by:

THAT Council approve proceed with the Request for Proposal for the Annex building (719 Queen Street) as outlined in Report PL 2013-06.

7.0 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 7.1 Move Into Committee of the Whole

Motion #03/13/13 - Moved by: Seconded by: That Council move into Committee of the Whole and upon completion return to Council. 7.2 Delegations

(A) Bob Greason – Lake Huron Fishing Club (attached) 7.3 Corporate Services

(A) TRE 2013-02

Subject: 2013 Insurance RFP Report Summary: The purpose of this report is to address the upcoming insurance renewal requirement for the period of April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014, as the Municipality’s existing contract for insurance services with Jardine Lloyd Thomson is expiring in the current year. Request for Proposal (RFP) packages were sent to 5 insurers, and the Municipality has received 3 bids in response. The lowest bid was received from BFL Canada, which was quoted at an annual premium of $200,803 + PST. Staff is recommending that the quote from BFL Canada be accepted for the period of April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014, with the option to renew annually for a maximum of 3 annual renewals.


Origin: Expiry of current policy

Existing Policy: GG.2.17 Procurement Policy

Analysis: The Municipality of Kincardine’s insurance policy with Jardine Lloyd Thomson is expiring on April 1, 2013. As per the Purchasing and Procurement Policy GG.2.17, for professional services $40,000 and above, a Request for Proposal (RFP) process must be followed. The RFP included the ability to extend the contract on an annual basis not exceeding 3 renewals, dependent on the performance and service provided. The 2013 operating budget includes $240,000 for insurance costs. The Municipality of Kincardine solicited proposals from the following insurers/brokerage firms:

Stevenson & Hunt Miller Insurance Brokers/Frank Cowan Company OMEX Jardine Lloyd Thomson (JLT) BFL Canada

Staff has reviewed the submissions in detail, and has summarized the key points in this report. Proposals were submitted by 3 firms, with annual premiums quoted as follows:

(1) Frank Cowan - $217,016 (2) JLT - $218,746 (3) BFL - $200,803

The criteria used to evaluate the submissions consist of the following: A. Completeness of submission and project appreciation: The Municipality has requested $5 million primary coverage with a $45 million umbrella policy, for total coverage of $50 million. As JLT is our current insurer, their quoted premium for 2013 reflects this coverage. BFL’s insurance coverage is also for $50 million, comprised of 2 layers:

1. Primary Policy - $5 million per occurrence/$10 million aggregate 2. Excess Policy - $45 million per occurrence

These 2 policies work together seamlessly so that if a claim was to breach the primary limit of $5 million, the Excess policy would drop down to provide coverage up to the Excess policy limit. The Primary policy is the


“first responder” to all of the Municipality’s liability claims. Only when a claim breaches the $5 million primary limit or when the $10 million primary aggregate is exhausted, would the Excess policy be triggered into action. Cowan’s insurance coverage is also for $50 million, comprised of 3 layers:

1. Primary Policy - $15 million per occurrence/no aggregate 2. Follow Form Excess Policy - $10 million 3. Excess Policy - $25 million/$25 million aggregate

To summarize, all 3 policies provide the Municipality with total liability coverage of $50 million as requested. The effect of ‘layering’ essentially allows the insurer to reduce the premium, as the primary layer is the more expensive coverage and the umbrella/excess policy is less expensive to purchase. Most claims do not exceed the $5 million primary limit. Overall insurance coverage across all 3 firms was comparable, however there were some differences identified:

Volunteer accident insurance: JLT’s premium did not include this coverage, and if added this would cost the Municipality an additional $750

Voluntary medical payments: Cowan’s premium did not include voluntary medical payment coverage

Voluntary payment for property damage: Cowan’s premium did not include this coverage

Owned Automobile coverage: BFL’s coverage provides replacement cost for vehicles, regardless of age. JLT’s coverage provides replacement cost for vehicles less than 20 years old, and cash value for vehicles beyond 20 years old. This is increased to 25 years for fire vehicles. Cowan’s coverage is similar to JLT’s which is replacement cost on vehicles less than 25 years old. Given the high replacement cost of fire vehicles, the loss exposure is greatly reduced under BFL’s coverage.

B. Experience

JLT: The Municipality has been insured with JLT for almost 15 years, since 1998. They are an established company providing municipal insurance management and risk management services for many years. They are very familiar with our Municipality and they have a strong relationship with us. JLT will also continue to provide aviation liability insurance coverage and volunteer firefighter insurance coverage, as these have been specifically excluded from the RFP.

Cowan: This insurer is a leader in providing specialized insurance programs and risk management services to municipalities across


Canada. Through this arrangement, the Municipality would deal with Miller Insurance (located in Kincardine) as our broker.

BFL: This broker is the largest privately-owned commercial insurance brokerage and consulting services firm in Canada. They have experience with all tiers of municipalities, and local public sector clients include: Township of North Huron, Municipality of Bluewater, and Municipality of Morris Turnberry.

C. Services Offered All three firms are able to provide Risk Management and Claims Management services at no additional cost, which was specifically requested by the Municipality. This would include contract wording review, staff training, and claims analysis, and providing guidance and advice on risks affecting the public sector. D. Proponent’s Financial Statements/Stability All three firms have provided financial statements for their associated insurance companies. No issues have been identified in this area. E. References Submitted All three firms have provided at least 3 municipal references as requested. Staff has contacted some of these references to gather more information. No significant issues have been identified through this process. F. Price Of the 3 quotes provided, BFL Canada has quoted the lowest annual premium at $200,803 (before PST). This is $17,943 (or 8.2%) less than JLT’s quotation, and $16,213 (7.5%) less than Cowan’s quotation. BFL’s premium also included Voluntary Accident, which JLT did not include, as well as Voluntary Medical Payments, Voluntary Payments for Property Damage, and Incidental Garage Operations, which Cowan did not include. G. Interview Staff has been in contact with all 3 firms to clarify certain points contained within the proposals submitted. Recommendation: Based on the information submitted by all 3 firms, staff recommends that the insurance proposal for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 be awarded to BFL Canada. Although the Municipality has a long-standing relationship with JLT, when insurance coverage and risk management options were compared across the 3 firms, the significantly lower premium provided by BFL makes this firm the recommended option.

Community Plan and Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) Considerations: N/A


Financial Considerations: The budgeted amount for 2013 for insurance costs, excluding aviation liability and volunteer firefighter coverage amounts to $240,000 plus PST. If the recommendation option is approved, the Municipality will be under budget by approximately $30,000.

Options:

1. THAT the Municipality of Kincardine Council approve the acceptance of BFL Canada for insurance services for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the premium amount of $200,803 + PST.

2. THAT the Municipality of Kincardine Council approve the retention of the existing insurer, Jardine Lloyd Thomson, for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the premium amount of $218,746 + PST.

3. THAT the Municipality of Kincardine Council approve the acceptance of Frank Cowen for insurance services for the period April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 for the premium amount of $217,016 + PST.

4. Do nothing at this time. Preferred Option: Option 1

Date to be considered by Council: Matters Arising

CAO’s Comments: I concur

COW RECOMMENDATION

(B) TRE 2013-03 Subject: Ontario Regulation 284/09 Report Summary: This report is being presented to Council in order to meet the requirements of Regulation 284/09 under the Municipal Act, 2001. Ontario Regulation 284/09 allows the Municipality to exclude from their annual budgets amortization, post-employment expenses, solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses; however the regulation does require that the Municipality report on the impact of these excluded costs. Municipalities must prepare a report about the excluded expenses and this report must be adopted by resolution.

Origin: Ontario Regulation 284/09

Existing Policy: None


Analysis: Ontario Regulation 284/09 allows a municipality to exclude from its budget the estimated expenses all or a portion of the following:

1. Amortization expenses 2. Post-employment benefits expenses 3. Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses

If any of these expenses are excluded from the budget, the Municipality shall (a) prepare a report about the excluded expenses; and (b) adopt the report by resolution. The Municipality of Kincardine’s 2013 budget, passed on February 21, 2013, excluded the following:

1. Amortization expenses of $5,328,000. Total amortization expense

for 2012 is $6,075,000, and the 2013 budget includes $747,000. The annual financial statements include amortization expense on tangible capital assets as required by PSAB standards. Although the Municipality’s 2013 budget does not include amortization expense in its entirety, provisions were made for contributions to capital and transfer to reserves funds for capital expenses amounting to $3,893,000. Therefore the overall net impact of amortization exclusion is $2,182,000.

2. Future post-employment benefits expenses. PSAB standards do

not require liabilities associated with post-employment benefits to be fully funded by setting aside any portion of the accumulated surplus as reserves and reserve funds. Employee Future Benefits include non-pension retirement liabilities for sick leave, extended health care, dental and life benefits, and WSIB benefits. Independent actuarial reviews are conducted to estimate the liability for financial reporting. In 2012, the expense recorded was $6,900 which would be a reduction to the accumulated surplus had this been included in the 2013 budget.

3. Solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses. PSAB

standards do not require liabilities associated with solid waste landfill closure and post-closure care activities to be fully funded by setting aside any portion of the accumulated surplus as reserves and reserve funds. The 2012 expense recorded for the estimate in change was $184,000. The impact of solid waste landfill closure and post-closure expenses is a reduction to the accumulated surplus and is estimated to be $184,000 in 2013.


Regulation 284/09 requires this report be approved by Council and adopted by resolution.

Community Plan and Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) Considerations: N/A

Financial Considerations: As per above analysis.

Options:

1. That Council adopt this report by Resolution as required under the Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario Regulation 284/09.

2. That Council not adopt this report by Resolution as required under the Municipal Act, 2001, Ontario Regulation 284/09.

Preferred Option: Option 1

Date to be considered by Council: Matters Arising

CAO’s Comments: I concur COW RECOMMENDATION

(C) CAO 2013-08

Subject: Council Remuneration Report Summary: To align Policy # GG 1.9(a) with the approved budget.

Origin: 2013 budget approved by Council.

Existing Policy: GG 1.9(a) and By-Law No. 2013-017 2013 Budget By-law

Analysis: Council elected to freeze their remuneration at the 2010 level for two years. The 2013 budget approved by Council included a 3% increase for Council Remuneration. 2012

Remuneration 2013

Remuneration Difference

Mayor $28,774 $29,638 $864 Deputy Mayor $20,855 $21,480 $625


Councillor $16,895 $17,402 $507

To align Policy GG 1.9(a) with the approved budget, the 2013 Remuneration for Council should be updated as noted above.

Please Note: Housekeeping changes are also included in this report as follows: Section A 3: Reflects current remuneration for Police Services Board members. Section B 7: The wording has been updated due to the elimination of the master standing committees system.

Community Plan and Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) Considerations: Community Plan – Corporate Services – Strategic Initiative #1 Ensure our policies are positioned to ensure financial sustainability for our community. ICSP – Municipal Operations and Community Leadership – “Committed to pursue excellence in operations”

Financial Considerations: Funded through the Council operating budget

Options:

1. That Council approve the changes to Policy GG 1.9 (a). 2. That Council approve Policy GG 1.9 (a) with additional

changes. 3. That Council not act at this time.

Preferred Option: Option No. 1

Date to be considered by Council: March 20, 2013

CAO’s Comments: Author of report. COW RECOMMENDATION

(D) CLE 2013-01

Attachments: 2013 Community & Enbridge Community Grants Recommended Allocation Subject: 2013 Community & Enbridge Community Grants Allocation


Report Summary: The 2013 Budget approved by Council on February 21, 2013 through By-law No. 2013 – 017 included funds for Community & Enbridge Community Grants. The recommended allocation of the grants is set out in the attached listing. Also, Enbridge has provided formal notice to the Municipality that, while they will continue to support and invest in the community, their program, in association with the Municipality, will come to a close with this 2013 distribution of funds as they intend to assume administration of their Enbridge grant program.

Origin: 2013 Budget

Existing Policy: GG.3.5 Allocation of Community Grants

Analysis: The Municipality has offered grants to cultural, heritage, arts, tourism, and community groups for several years. Policy GG.3.5 sets out that the program is to provide funds to cultural, heritage, arts, and tourism or community groups, which will have a positive impact on the quality of life in the community of the Municipality of Kincardine; to provide a fair and equitable process for the disbursement of community grants; that all applications are to be evaluated in a comparative context based on the purpose and objectives of the applicant and the funding available in the grant program. As part of the grant program, Enbridge contributes funds for the Enbridge Community Fund which is administered by the Municipality. The 2013 Budget, adopted February 21, 2013 by By-law No. 2013 - 017, included the sum of $130,300 for the purposes of the Community and Enbridge Community Grants. In the past, Enbridge has provided $50,000 annually, however, for 2013, $60,175 will be contributed. The additional $10,175 was not included in the budget, and therefore, the total grant monies available are $140,475. As noted above, Enbridge intends to assume administration of their grant program commencing in 2014. The Municipality and Enbridge will work together to ensure applicants are aware of the change in the process for next year to ensure a smooth transition. $25,000 of the Community Grants is provided to minor sports groups based on a formula that includes facility costs and enrollment numbers of the particular group.


Attached is a listing of the applications for both grant programs and the recommended allocation for 2013. It is a difficult task as each group represents a component of the community, yet, the amount requested from the groups is substantially higher than the budgeted amount. In developing the recommended allocation, factors taken into consideration included (not in any particular order): purpose and scope of the grant program as set out in GG.3.5; in-kind support from the Municipality for an event/group; other financial support already provided to the group by the Municipality; Enbridge support; minor sports allocation.

Community Plan and Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) Considerations: Preservation and promotion of the Municipality’s heritage and cultural diversity. ICSP: Continue to appreciate the role of the arts in economic development, tourism and community; Preserve the Municipality of Kincardine’s cultural heritage; Promote the Municipality of Kincardine’s cultural diversity.

Financial Considerations: The 2013 budget includes $130,300 for the Community and Enbridge Community Grant programs plus Enbridge provided an additional $10,175 bringing the total available to $140,475.

Options:

1. Accept the allocation of Community & Enbridge Community Grants as recommended.

2. Modify the recommended allocation of Community & Enbridge Community Grants.

3. Take no action at this time.

Preferred Option: Option 1

Date to be considered by Council: March 20, 2013

CAO’s Comments: I concur COW RECOMMENDATION

8.0 MATTERS ARISING FROM PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE /COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

9.0 MEMBERS OF COUNCIL GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS 10.0 CLOSED SESSION IF REQUIRED 11.0 MATTERS ARISING FROM CLOSED SESSION


12.0 SCHEDULING OF MEETINGS

12.1 Notice of Council Meetings March 20, 2013 Regular Council 5:00 p.m. April 3, 2013 Regular Council 5:00 p.m. April 10, 2013 Planning/Corporate Services 5:00 p.m. April 17, 2013 Regular Council 5:00 p.m. May 1, 2013 Regular Council 5:00 p.m.

12. 2 Notice of Public and Special Meetings

13.0 ADJOURNMENT

Motion # 03/13/13 - Moved by: Seconded by:

THAT this Council adjourn at p.m.

THE MUNICIPALITY OF KINCARDINE

Planning Advisory Committee Page 1 of 3 March 13, 2013

AGENDA

ROLL CALL

Mayor Larry Kraemer Deputy Mayor Anne Eadie Councillor Ron Coristine Councillor Maureen Couture Councillor Kenneth Craig Councillor Jacqueline Faubert Councillor Candy Hewitt Councillor Mike Leggett Councillor Randy Roppel

Staff Present Bruce Stickney, Planner Murray Clarke, Chief Administrative Officer Donna MacDougall, Clerk DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Name Item of Business Nature of Interest 1.0 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1.1 ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2.0 APPOINTMENT OF ACTING SECRETARY-TRESURER MOTION #PAC13- Moved by: Seconded by: Recommendation from Planning Advisory Committee.



3.0 ADOPTION OF MINUTES MOTION #PAC13-

Moved by: Seconded by:

Recommendation from Planning Advisory Committee.

4.0 ZONING AMENDMENTS

4.1 APPLICANT: Wayne & Dale Chipman Part of Lot 19, Concession ‘A’ Municipality of Kincardine, geographic Township of Kincardine (map in blue folder)

Planning Report # Z-8-13.21 The Planner will explain the report and recommendation.

Agency Comments: Any comments received by the time of writing the report are in the written report.

Public Comments: Any comments received by the time of writing the report are in the written report.

Presentations from the Public:

Committee Comments:



MOTION #PAC13-

Moved by: Seconded by: Recommendation from Planning Advisory Committee.

5.0 ADJOURNMENT

MOTION #PAC12 - Moved by: Seconded by: Recommendation from Planning Advisory Committee.


Planning Advisory Committee Page 1 of 3 January 16, 2013

MINUTES

ROLL CALL

Mayor Larry Kraemer Deputy Mayor Anne Eadie Councillor Ron Coristine Councillor Maureen Couture Councillor Kenneth Craig Councillor Jacqueline Faubert Councillor Candy Hewitt Councillor Mike Leggett Councillor Randy Roppel - A

Staff Present Bruce Stickney, Planner Murray Clarke, Chief Administrative Officer Michele Barr, Building and Planning Manager DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Name Item of Business Nature of Interest 1.0 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE

1.1 ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 2.0 ADOPTION OF MINUTES MOTION #PAC13- 01

Moved by: Anne Eadie Seconded by: Ken Craig

THAT the Minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of December 12, 2012 be adopted as printed. Carried



3.0 ZONING AMENDMENTS

3.1 APPLICANT: Karl R. Elliott Lot 28, Concession 6 Municipality of Kincardine, geographic Township of Bruce (map in blue folder)

Planning Report # Z-58-12-26 The Planner will explain the report and recommendation.

Agency Comments: Any comments received by the time of writing the report are in the written report.

Public Comments: Any comments received by the time of writing the report are in the written report.

Presentations from the Public: None

Committee Comments: None

MOTION #PAC13- 02

Moved by: Larry Kraemer Seconded by: Anne Eadie THAT the Planning Advisory Committee recommends to rezone the lands described as, Lot 28, Concession 6, Municipality of Kincardine (geographic Township of Bruce) to ‘General Agriculture Special’ and ‘Environmental Protection’ to facilitate the severance of a surplus farm dwelling, AND FURTHER waive the requirement for an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) Carried



4.0 ADJOURNMENT

MOTION #PAC13 - 03 Moved by: Anne Eadie Seconded by: Ron Coristine THAT the Planning Advisory Committee meeting now adjourns and moves back into Council. Carried ________________________ ______________________ Chairman Secretary-Treasurer

Chipman c/o Wilken Z-08-13.21

TO: Chair and Members of the Municipality of Kincardine Planning Advisory

Committee FROM: Bruce Stickney, Planner for the Municipality of Kincardine

County of Bruce Planning & Economic Development Department SUBJECT: Application submitted by Wayne and Dale Chipman c/o Paul Wilken to

facilitate the construction of a replacement single detached dwelling and sewage system.

REASONS FOR AND NATURE OF THE APPLICATION: The lands are designated ‘Residential’ and ‘Natural Environment’ and are zoned ‘R1-r – Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing cottage dwelling and accessory building that are partially within the ‘EP’ zone; and, replace them with a single detached dwelling and tertiary sewage disposal system. The replacement dwelling and sewage disposal system would encroach into the ‘EP’ zone. The zoning would change from ‘R1-r’ and ‘EP’ to ‘R1-ba’ and ‘EP’ on the lands to permit development of a replacement dwelling and sewage disposal system on a seasonal road (requiring a ‘limited services agreement’); and, further to change the maximum Lot Coverage (Principal Building) from 20% as required in the By-law for partially serviced lots, to 28% to accommodate the dwelling. Filling and grading of the lot and the design of structures would allow for an adjustment to the ‘EP’ zone boundary such that the replacement building and sewage disposal system could be wholly contained within the ‘R1-ba’ zone and would not encroach into the ‘EP’ zone. CIRCULATION: The application was circulated to the mandated commenting agencies as well as to the public. One letter (see Appendix ‘D’) of concern has been received related to the potential impact to views from Sandy Crescent. SUMMARY: The lands are currently designated for Residential and Natural Environment uses. The proposed development is to the east of the existing cottage, is an improvement to the long-term safety of the site and the Conservation Authority will be able to control design measures within their ‘Permit Area’ to address the hazard associated with the new dwelling. CONCLUSION: The application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, complies with the intent of the Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan and of the County of Bruce Official Plan. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION: Subject to review of objections and submissions arising from the Public Meeting,

I recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment File No. Z-08-13.21 BE APPROVED, in accordance with the draft site-specific By-law attached.

I. CONTEXT:

Municipality of Kincardine Planning Report

Application: Zoning By-law Amendment File No.: Z-08-13.21 Date: March 6, 2013


Development Proposal

The purpose of the application is to rezone a portion of the subject lands from ‘R1-r – Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’ to ‘R1-ba – Residential One Special’ to facilitate the construction of a replacement dwelling and private ‘tertiary’ sewage system; permit an increase in maximum Lot Coverage (Principal Building) from 20% to 28%; and, to revise the ‘EP’ zone.

Related File(s) None Owner Wayne and Dale Chipman Applicant N/A Agent Paul Wilken Legal Description Part of Lot 19, Concession ‘A’, geographic Township of Kincardine Municipal Address 33 Lower Shore Road

Lot Description:

PART TO BE REZONED ‘R1-ba’ TO REMAIN ZONED ‘EP’ Frontage +/- 21.54 m (70.67 ft) +/- N/A

Width +/- 20.96 m (68.8 ft) +/- 20.96 m (68.8 ft)

Depth +/- 20 m (66 ft ) to include proposed development area;

+/- 8.5 to 10 m (28 to 33 ft) less proposed developed area

Area +/- 446 sq. m (4800 sq. ft.) +/-194 sg. m (2089 sq. ft.)

Uses

Existing Residential & Natural Environment Residential & Natural Environment

Proposed Residential Natural Environment

Structures Existing Part of Cottage and Shed Part of Cottage Dwelling Proposed Single Detached Dwelling Vacant

Servicing Existing Municipal Water and Private Septic N/A Proposed No Change No change

Access Lower Beach Road, a seasonal municipal road County Official Plan Primary Urban Community Proposed Official Plan No Change Local Official Plan Residential and Natural Environment Proposed Official Plan Minor Adjustment to follow Zone Boundary as permitted in OP Section D7.3

Zoning By-law ‘R1-r – Residential One Special’, and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’ (Municipality of Kincardine By-Law No. 2003-25)

Proposed Zoning By-law ‘R1-ba – Residential One Special’ and ‘EP – Environmental Protection’ Surrounding Land Uses Residential and Natural Environment uses surround the subject lands.

Subject Lands

II. MATTERS ARISING FROM AGENCY CIRCULATION Municipality of Kincardine: CBO – no concerns.


Public Works – Building location should be raised to provide proper drainage. COMMENT: Some filling is proposed. Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA): A portion of the property is designated Natural Environment in the Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan. The Natural Environment designation recognizes flooding, erosion and dynamic beach hazards associated with the shoreline. The proposal will represent an improvement to the long term safety of the site as the SVCA will control design measures to address the hazard associated with a new building and provide greater setback to the dune features. Therefore, given the intent of the NE designation can be met, provided design details are confirmed ..., the SVCA is of the opinion that the proposal appears to be consistent with the Municipality of Kincardine’s Official Plan. The SVCA is not opposed to a proposed rezoning of the subject property in order to facilitate the proposed development provided the EP zone is revised to avoid the proposed development. The sewage disposal system will also need to be represented as outside the EP zone. Future development (including decks or other buildings or structures) to the west, north and south of the proposed development, in the EP zone, will not be agreeable to the SVCA. COMMENT: Section D7.5c) outlines the policy for delineation of the Natural Environment Area, as follows: The exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment Area shall be delineated in the implementing Zoning By-law. The proposed EP zone will follow the west side of the dwelling and sewage disposal system, such that both will lie wholly within the ‘R1-ba’ zone, as recommended by the SVCA. Historic Saugeen Metis: HSM has no objection or issues with the proposed zoning by-law amendment, provided that the development maintains a minimum 30 metre setback from the Lake Huron Shoreline. COMMENT: The proposed development will be to the east of the existing developed area and substantially more than 30 metres from the shoreline. III. MATTERS ARISING FROM PUBLIC CIRCULATION A letter was received from a Sandy Crescent resident. Their concern seemed to be that this development may interfere with views of Lake Huron they now enjoy from their property. The ‘R1-Residential One’ zone permits a Principal Building Height of 10.5 metres. Comment: Sandy Crescent lies north-east of the subject property, and north of the MacCaskill Road allowance (not immediately east); and, Sandy Crescent properties are elevated 10 metres above the subject lands due to their location on the plateau above the ancient shoreline bluff. No impact on the view from Sandy Crescent properties are expected, due to the proposed development. IV. MATTERS ARISING FROM PROVINCIAL INTERESTS, POLICY STATEMENTS OR PLANS Under Section 3(5) of the Planning Act, the Municipality ‘shall be consistent with” matters of provincial interest as set out in the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Section 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 - Natural Hazards, provides policy directing development away from “hazard lands adjacent to the shorelines of the Great Lakes ... which are impacted by flooding hazards, erosion hazards and/or dynamic beach hazards, and further that no development shall occur within the hazard areas themselves. However, 3.1.6 goes on to explain that development may be permitted where the effects and risk to public safety are minor so as to be managed or mitigated, for example, in accordance with flood-proofing standards, protection works standards, and access standards, where vehicles and people can safely enter and exit the area, where new hazards


are not created or existing hazards are not aggravated, and no adverse environmental impacts will result. COMMENT: The proposed development is an improvement over existing conditions on the property and will not aggravate the existing hazards. The setback to dunes will be increased with the result that the proposed development will have no environmental impacts to natural features. An Archaeological Assessment was not requested since the application involved the redevelopment of an existing lot that was extensively disturbed. Upon review of the PPS and relevant policies as identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the proposed Amendment is consistent with the PPS. V. MATTERS ARISING FROM COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated ‘Primary Urban Community’ that permits single detached residential development. Section 5.8.3 provides a description of Hazard Land Areas and where they apply as follows: Hazard Land Areas include those areas that pose a risk if developed, due to the inherent site conditions, including flood and erosion susceptibility, steep slopes, organic soils or other physical conditions and are shown on Schedule ‘A’ Although not shown on Schedule ‘A’ for areas within Local Official Plans, these areas shall be continued within Local Official Plan boundaries, and shall be used in preparation of Official Plans and Zoning By-laws. COMMENTS: The Hazard Land Areas are designated as ‘Natural Environment’ in the Kincardine Official Plan and are accurately delineated as the ‘EP-Environmental Protection Zone’ in the implementing Comprehensive Zoning By-law. Upon review of the County of Bruce Official Plan (BCOP) and ‘Primary Urban Communities’ policies as identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the proposed Amendment is consistent with the BCOP. VI. MATTERS ARISING FROM LOCAL PLANNING DOCUMENTS I Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan The subject lands are designated ‘Residential’ and ‘Natural Environment’. Section D7.3, describes the Natural Environment designation as those lands having inherent natural hazards and are identified by the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority. The boundaries of the Natural Environment Area are delineated in a conceptual manner and the exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment Area shall be delineated in the implementing Zoning By-law using a separate and restrictive classification and/or be appropriately protected through the use of SVCA Regulations.

COMMENT: A single detached dwelling is permitted in the ‘Residential’ designation.

The proposed development will meet the requirements of the Kincardine Official Plan as the SVCA considers the entire property to be within their Regulation Area and will require written permission from the SVCA prior to development. The adjustment to the Natural Environment designation will be delineated and implemented by the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment using an ‘EP’ zone.

Upon review of the Municipality of Kincardine Official Plan (LOP) and relevant policies as identified in Appendix ‘A’ to this report, the proposed Amendment is consistent with the LOP.


II Municipality of Kincardine Zoning By-law 2003-25 The By-law permits a single detached dwelling in an ‘R1’ zone. No person shall erect any building or structure, in any zone fronted by a Class Two (2) unless the owner has entered into a ‘Limited Services Agreement’ with the Corporation. Lots that utilize partial services (i.e. municipal water and private sewage systems) are limited to a maximum Lot Coverage of 20% for the Principal Building (dwelling). This allows sufficient space for a typical Class Four Septic System. COMMENT: The proponent has proposed the use of a tertiary sewage treatment system that would occupy less space on the lot, and in turn permit a greater portion to be used for the principle building (dwelling). The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would allow the maximum Lot Coverage to be increased to 28%, and require the owner to enter into a ‘Limited Services Agreement’. The proposed development will comply with all other provisions of the By-law. VII. OTHER ISSUES / MATTERS None


APPENDIX ‘A’ Planning Policy Checklist

I. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS)

Applicable Policy

Section Policy

1.0 Building Strong Communities 1.1 Managing and Directing Land Use to Achieve Efficient Development and Land Use

Patterns ` 1.1.3 Settlement Areas

1.1.4 Rural Areas in Municipalities 1.1.5 Rural Areas in Territory Without Municipal Organization 1.2 Coordination 1.3 Employment Areas 1.4 Housing 1.5 Public Spaces, Parks and Open Space 1.6 Infrastructure and Public Service Facilities 1.6.4 Sewage and Water 1.6.5 Transportation Systems 1.6.6 Transportation and Infrastructure Corridors 1.6.7 Airports 1.6.8 Waste Management 1.7 Long-Term Economic Prosperity 1.8 Energy and Air Quality 2.0 Wise Use and Management of Resources 2.1 Natural Heritage 2.2 Water 2.3 Agriculture 2.3.3 Permitted Uses 2.3.4 Lot Creation and Lot Adjustments 2.3.5 Removal of Land from Prime Agricultural Areas 2.4 Minerals and Petroleum 2.4.2 Protection of Long-Term Resource Supply 2.4.3 Rehabilitation 2.4.4 Extraction in Prime Agricultural Areas 2.5 Mineral Aggregate Resources 2.5.2 Protection of Long-Term Resource Supply 2.5.3 Rehabilitation 2.5.4 Extraction in Prime Agricultural Areas 2.5.5 Wayside Pits and Quarries, Portable Asphalt Plants and Portable Concrete Plants 2.6 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology 3.0 Protecting Public Health and Safety 3.1 Natural Hazards 3.2 Human-made Hazards

II. Other Provincial Interests

Ministry Policy / Legislation

MMAH MCul MOE MTO MNR OMAFRA

Criteria for Evaluating Archaeological Potential – A Checklist for the Non-Specialist

III. County of Bruce Official Plan 5.8 HAZARD LAND AREA

5.8.1 Introduction Hazard Land Areas generally identify lands that pose a risk if developed, due to the inherent site conditions,

but these areas may also include important environmental features. Specifically, Hazard Land Areas include, flood and erosion susceptibility areas, steep slopes, organic soils, or other physical conditions which are severe enough to cause property damage or potential loss of life if the lands were to be developed. Municipalities, Conservation Authorities and the appropriate approval authority shall be encouraged to


undertake floodplain and other mapping to define more precisely hazard lands and other environmental protection areas.

5.8.3 Areas of Application .1 Hazard Land Areas include those areas of identified Provincially Significant Wetlands (Class 1 through 3

wetlands) and Environmental Hazard Areas such as flood and erosion susceptibility areas, hazard lands, steep slopes or other physical conditions which are severe enough to cause property damage or potential loss of life if the lands were to be developed. These Wetlands, Environmental Hazard Areas and Floodplains are shown collectively on Schedule A as Hazard Land Areas.

.2 Although not shown on Schedule ‘A’, mapping for Wetlands, Environmental Hazard Areas and Floodplains

shall be continued on within the boundaries of areas also covered by Local Official Plans. Where detailed shoreline, floodplain, slope or wetland mapping exists this mapping shall be used in the preparation of County Official Plan Amendments or Local Official Plans, and Zoning By-Laws. Where new development is proposed and detailed mapping is not available, the proponent shall be required to produce the necessary mapping.

5.8.5 General Policies .1 It is the policy of this Plan to prohibit any form of development including new residential, commercial, or

industrial uses in Hazard Land Areas that would detract from the natural environment or be situated where environmental constraints exist. In addition to Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement concerning development and site alterations in hazardous lands and sites, the following must be considered....

Existing Uses .3 Uses existing on the date of approval of this Plan may be recognized in the Zoning By-Law as legally

conforming despite the Environmental Hazard area Zone in the implementing Zoning By-Law. The expansion or enlargement of non-conforming uses shall be discouraged.

.4 The replacement or rebuilding of an existing building destroyed by natural means beyond the control of the

owner may be permitted providing it does not exceed the size or volume of the original building, is located at the same site, unless an environmentally more acceptable site is available and acceptable to the owner which will not aggravate the existing hazardous situation, and is for substantially the same use, subject to the approval of the local municipality and the appropriate approval authorities.

5.8.6 Great Lakes Shoreline Hazard Areas

5.8.6.1 General Principles .1 Great Lakes Shoreline Hazard Areas are not a separate designation. These areas have been identified by

the Province of Ontario and Conservation Authorities on mapping which includes shoreline floodplain, erosion and dynamic beach features....

5.8.7 Implementation .1 The boundaries of the areas designated as Hazard Land Area on Schedule A are not hard and fast lines, but

are accepted as being flexible to some extent. The limits of the Hazard Land Area on the ground should be determined through consultation with the appropriate Conservation Authority, the appropriate Provincial authority, the local municipality, and by a site inspection and evaluation.

.2 Minor adjustments to the Hazard Land Area boundaries may be made without an Amendment to this Plan, in

consultation with the appropriate Conservation Authority or appropriate Provincial authority, providing the abutting land use designation remains unchanged.

.3 In the absence of more detailed hazard land or environmentally significant area mapping, the boundaries of

the Hazard Land Area as shown on Schedule A to this Plan, will be used as guides for the preparation of Zoning By-laws, which will implement the policies of this Plan and more accurately define the boundaries. Detailed hazard land mapping is available for much of the County, through the Conservation Authorities.

.4 Hazard Land Areas will be placed in a Municipal Zoning By-Law which will prohibit all buildings, structures

and uses except those permitted in Section 5.8.4 [Permitted Uses (Hazard Land Area)] of this Plan.

IV. Official Plan of the Municipality of Kincardine D7 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AREAS D7.3 General Principles


The Natural Environment designation is comprised of those lands having inherent natural hazards such as flood or erosion susceptibility, steep slopes, poor drainage, areas of organic soils, and other physical conditions which, if developed upon, could cause loss of life, property damage, social disruption or result in the degradation of the environment. Council shall, therefore, require these type of lands to be retained in a natural state....

The Natural Environment designation as shown on Schedule ‘A’ is based upon one or more of the

following features:

c) The one in 100 year flood level along the Lake Huron Shoreline as indicated on the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority Flood Risk Maps for the Municipality of Kincardine plus a:

i) Flooding and Erosion Hazard Limit - being a 15 metre allowance for wave uprush, erosion and other water related hazards, measured horizontally landward from the 100 year flood line;

And where appropriate a:

ii) Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit - being a dynamic beach allowance of up to 30 metres measured landward from the Flooding and Erosion Hazard limit to recognize areas of inherently changeable accumulations of shoreline sediments.

Interpretation of the boundaries of the Natural Environment designation should be based upon

evaluation of the above information and any other applicable policies of this Official Plan. However, for the exact location of the flood line or other hazardous feature on any property, the

owner is advised to review the detailed mapping available at the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority, and to obtain their input, interpretation, and recommendation.

Natural heritage features are identified and can only be modified by the Ministry of Natural

Resources. Other provincial ministries shall bo included in consultation when required. Hazard lands are identified by the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority. Minor adjustments to the boundaries shall not require an amendment to this Plan.

D7.5 Policies The following policies apply to the Natural Environment designation: a) The erection of buildings and structures or the placing or removal of fill of any kind, whether

originating on the site or elsewhere, within a Natural Environment Area are generally prohibited. Minor extensions or enlargements of existing buildings and structures shall be discouraged....

c) The boundaries of the Natural Environment Area are delineated in a conceptual manner on the attached Schedule ‘A’, 'B' and 'C'. The exact location of the boundaries of the Natural Environment Area shall be delineated in the implementing Zoning By-law.

d) Development and site alteration shall not be permitted within the floodway portion of the floodplain, as defined by the Regional Storm flood.

e) Replacement of existing buildings or structures damaged by natural causes may be permitted if the hazard risk does not increase from the original condition....

k) If more detailed Natural Environment and Natural Heritage mapping becomes available and is recognized by the Municipality, or should flood control or similar works be undertaken, to the satisfaction of the Municipality and the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority, which result in major changes in areas designated Natural Environment, then this Plan may be amended as required.

l) It shall be the policy of this Plan that in considering an application for the redesignation of lands designated Natural Environment for other purposes, Council will consider redesignation, if all of the following can be satisfied:

i) The hazards can be safely addressed and new hazards are not created or existing ones aggravated. This may include preparation of an engineering study to the satisfaction of Council and the SVCA;

ii) No adverse or negative environmental impacts will result, and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or the ecological functions for which they have been identified. The Municipality, in consultation with the SVCA shall require an Environmental Impact Study to be prepared, at the proponent's expense, in accordance with Section D7.6 of this Plan;

#77


iii) Vehicles and people have a way of safely entering and exiting at all times;

iv) The development does not include institutional uses, emergency services (excluding emergency services specifically for water rescue), or involve hazardous substances, and;

v) The advice, or approval where required, of the Conservation Authority shall be obtained.

m) Where development or site alteration is proposed and detailed mapping is not available, the

proponent shall be required to produce the necessary mapping.

n) It shall be the policy of this Plan that the areas designated Natural Environment shall be zoned in a separate and restrictive classification in the implementing Zoning By-Law and/or appropriately protected through the use of SVCA Regulations.

o) Written permission may be required from the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority pursuant to Ontario Regulation 169/06 – Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses where development or site grading is proposed within a Regulated Area as shown on schedules filed with the SVCA where such mapping exists or otherwise generally within or near the Natural Environment designation. In areas that are subject to the SVCA Regulation No. 169/06 and where the intent of the Natural Environment designation is being maintained, the Municipality has the option of relying on the regulatory role of the SVCA through their Regulations to implement the intent of the hazards relating to the Natural Environment designation along the shoreline areas of Lake Huron.

V. Municipality of Kincardine Zoning By-law 2003-25

SECTION 5 – DEFINITIONS ‘STREET, CLASS TWO (2)’ shall mean streets under the jurisdiction of the Corporation and shown as reference on Schedule ‘A’ to this By-law to which the Corporation provides “limited services” including snow clearance or ploughing. 6.12 FRONTAGE ON A CLASS TWO (2) STREET/PRIVATE STREET .1 No person shall erect any building or structure, or increase the height, size or volume of existing structures, in any zone fronted by a Class Two Street or Private Street unless the owner of the lot upon which such building or structure is to be erected or increased in height, size or volume has entered into a ‘Limited Service Agreement’ with the Corporation. .2 Class Two Streets and Private Streets are identified on Schedule ‘A’ for interpretation purposes only.

Section 12 – RESIDENTIAL ONE – R1

12.1 Permitted Uses In any R1 – Residential One Zone, no person shall use any building, structure or land nor erect any building or structure except in accordance with the following provisions: RESIDENTIAL • Single detached dwelling • Semi-detached dwelling • Duplex dwelling • Secondary Suite in accordance with Section 6.34 NON-RESIDENTIAL • Bed and Breakfast Establishment in accordance with Section 6.17 • Place of Worship • Group Home - Type 1 • Home Occupation – Household and Domestic Arts in accordance with Section 6.14 • Home Occupation – Professional Uses in accordance with Section 6.13 • Day Care Nursery (Licensed) • Nursing Home • Public Park 12.2 Zone provisions No person shall within any R1- Residential One Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except in accordance with the following provisions: 12.2.1 Zone Provisions for Single Detached Dwellings


PROVISIONS NO MUNICIPAL WATER OR SEWER

EITHER MUNICIPAL WATER OR SEWER

MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER

Lot Area (Minimum) (Replaced by By-Law No. 2005-013 – Housekeeping) 4,000 square metres

(Replaced by By-Law No. 2005-013 – Housekeeping) 1800 square metres

464 square metres

Lot Frontage (Minimum) 30 metres (Replaced by By-Law No. 2005-013 – Housekeeping) 30 metres

15 metres

Lot Frontage – Corner Lot (Minimum)

30 metres 30 metres 18 metres

Front Yard (Minimum) 6 metres 6 metres 6 metres

Rear Yard (Minimum) 7.5 metres 7.5 metres 7.5 metres

Exterior Side Yard (Minimum) 6 metres 6 metres 6 metres

Interior Side Yard (Minimum)

2.4 metres on one side and 1.2 metres on the opposite side of the same lot plus 0.6 metres on the narrow side for each additional or partial storey above the first storey on that side. Provided that where a garage or carport is attached to the main principal building, or the lot is a corner lot, the minimum width of the interior side yard shall be 1.2 meters plus 0.6 metres for each additional or partial storey above the first storey on that side.

Total Floor Area (Minimum) 75 square metres 75 square metres 75 square metres

Height - Principal Building (Maximum)

10.5 metres 10.5 metres 10.5 metres

Lot Coverage (Principal Building) (Maximum)

15% 20% 40%

12.3 Special Provisions

.17 By-law No.: Not available Subject Lands: Multiple locations Special Zone: ‘R1-r’ Exception to Zone Provisions:

(i) Lands zoned ‘R1-r’ are existing lots of record and have frontage on a ‘Class Two (2) Street’. Prior to development, alteration, expansion, or additions to existing buildings or structures a limited service agreement shall be entered into with the Municipality. Class Two (2) Streets are identified on Schedule ‘A’ for information purposes only.


SECTION 34 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION – EP 34.1 PERMITTED USES No person shall within any EP – Environmental Protection Area Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure for any purpose except for one or more of the following uses: RESIDENTIAL USE • Prohibited NON-RESIDENTIAL USE • Agriculture, General • Conservation Area • Public Park • Passive Recreation 34.2 Structures Prohibited All buildings and structures shall be prohibited in a ‘EP – Environmental Protection’ zone except for the following:

a) those necessary for flood and/or erosion control purposes; b) unenclosed picnic shelters/structures; c) washroom facilities associated with a Public Park or Conservation Area; d) buildings for essential public utilities.

34.3 Interpretation of ‘EP’ Zone Boundaries The Environmental Protection Zone boundaries identified on Schedule ‘A’ are intended to generally identify areas of existing or potential natural hazards, areas of natural or scientific interest and areas of provincial natural significance. Notwithstanding Section 34.1, ‘EP-Environmental Protection’ zone boundaries are subject to minor changes without a formal amendment to this By-law when approved in writing by Saugeen Valley Conservation and the Chief Building Official of the Corporation. Changes to the ‘EP’ boundaries shall be incorporated when required in subsequent By-law consolidation. 34.4 PROVINCIALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS – SCHEDULE ‘B’ Some areas zoned as ‘EP-Environmental Protection’ are within a “Provincially Significant Wetland”. The Bruce County Official Plan and Provincial Policies prohibit development and site alteration in these areas. Provincially Significant Wetlands are shown on Schedule ‘B’ and forming part of this By-law. For more complete information reference should be made to the Bruce County Official Plan and the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority. In cases where lands are identified as Provincially Significant Wetlands in Schedule ‘B’ permitted uses shall be limited to: RESIDENTIAL USE • Prohibited NON-RESIDENTIAL USE • Forestry/Silviculture • Passive recreation, exclusive of buildings and structures • No building or structures shall be permitted except those necessary for flood and/or erosion control purposes.


APPENDIX ‘B’ Existing Development

Existing ‘EP’ Boundary


APPENDIX ‘C’ Proposed Zone Boundary

EP

R1-ba


APPENDIX ‘D’ PUBLIC COMMENTS

1

Lake Huron Fishing Club

Dedicated to ensuring future generations will

have quality fishing opportunities.


Formed in 1983

350 Members from throughout Southwestern Ontario

Meetings every 2nd month at Underwood Community Center

Monthly Newsletter

Fish Fries, Pig Roasts, Christmas Parties

Port Elgin Chinook Hatchery Built in 1985

Capacity for 250,000 Chinook Salmon Fingerlings each year

Currently Produces 120,000 Fingerlings each year

Over 4.5 million Salmon stocked into Lake Huron

5

Streamwork Little Sauble River and Penetangore River

Cattle Fencing - 1,000s of meters

Tree Planting - hundreds of thousands

Bank Stablization

Cattle Crossings

Spawning Beds

8

Kincardine Trout Hatchery Built in 1992

Produces 60,000 Rainbow Trout Yearlings and 60,000 Brown Trout Yearlings a year

Brown Trout stocked directly into Lake Huron

Rainbow Trout stocked into Saugeen River

Over 1.9 million fish stocked

17

Tackleshare 20 libraries participating

Sign out a fishing rod and tackle box for the day

Hundreds of withdrawals yearly

Run by Lake Huron Fishing Club

Supported by Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters

School Hatcheries This year 10 schools participating

Set up mini-hatchery in classroom

Supply 100 Chinook Salmon eggs

Children monitor hatch of fish

Care and feed fish until Spring

Release fish into wild

Expanding program for next year

Waiting list for more sponsors - $1,000.00 per school hatchery required for set up

18


For more information

or to follow our projects:

Please Visit

www.lakehuronfishingclub.com

LAKE HURON

And its CHANGING ECOLOGY

26

Double Crested Cormorant Great Lakes Nests 1979 - 2009

27

Chantry Chinook Classic Salmon Derby Chantry Chinook Classic

Largest Fishing Derby on Lake Huron

Running for 30 years

3 Weigh Stations On Lake Huron Shoreline

16 Days In Duration

Brings over 1,300 anglers to local communities.

28

2012 Derby Demographics

Prize Structure

Salmon

1st: $14,000.00 2nd: $4,000.00 3rd: $2,000.004th – 25th: Sponsor Prize Boards

Trout

1st: $6,000.00

2nd: $1,500.00

3rd: $750.004th - 5th: Sponsor Prize Boards

Ticket Outlets

Cambridge

Tall Tales Live Bait & Tackle310 King St ECambridge, Ontario N3H 3M8Email: [email protected]

Guelph

First Choice Fishing Tackle

29

Sponsorship Opportunities

The Chantry Chinook Classic Salmon Derby has sponsorship opportunities available to

highlight your firm’s support of our fisheries and the environment. The Derby Committee again requests your assistance through donations of products or funds for prizes to be awarded to the Top 25 Salmon, Top 5 Trout, daily prizes and special events for Kids, Ladies and Seniors Days. The Derby features the largest prize package on Lake Huron.

There are prize categories for the entire family as well as the seriously competitive angler.

Derby proceeds go to the Lake Huron Fishing Club conservation account for their ongoing programs. LHFC depends on a successful Derby to continue their annual stocking of salmon and brown and rainbow trout from their hatcheries in Port Elgin and Kincardine along with their rehabilitation of local tributaries to improve fish habitat. Our efforts ensure Lake Huron remains a premiere Great Lakes fishing and tourism destination for our many annual participants and all anglers throughout the entire year. Support for this Derby helps ensure a sport fishery for our sons, daughters and grandkids.

Chantry boundaries cover over 100 miles of shoreline on Lake Huron and Georgian Bay making it the largest on the lake Chantry anglers enjoy live streaming updates as

31

2012 Salmon & Trout Winners

Brought To You In Part By Dwinnell’s Computer Services And

Dwindle’s Dream Fishing ChartersLake Huron Kincardine Ontario

#

Organization Name2013 Enbridge Grant Request

2013 Enbridge Grant

Recommendation Project Description2013 Community Grant Request

2013 Community Grant

Recommendation Project Description1 ArtFul Hands $3,000 $0 Sponsorship of event $2,000 $1,500 Sponsorship of event

2Downtown Kincardine BIA $3,500 $0 Downtown Ambassadors

3Big Brothers & Big Sisters $2,375 $2,375 Child safety program $4,300 $1,000

Enhance agency's annual activities

4 Bluewater Summer Playhouse $2,000 $0 20th Anniversary Brochures $2,000 $2,000 20th Anniversary Brochures

5Breast Cancer Society of Canada $950 $500 Sponsor mothers day walk

6Bruce County Museum & Cultural Centre $5,000 $5,000 Kids Korner at Museum

7Bruce County Plowmen's Association $500 $400

Host Bruce County annual Plowing Match

8 Chantry Chinook Classic Salmon Derby $5,000 $1,000 Sponsorship of annual derby $5,000 $1,500 Sponsorship of annual derby

9 Community Living Kincardine & District $10,000 $10,000 Construction of new residence $10,000 $25,000

Construction of new residence (Delegation to Council requested $50,000)

10 Elgin Market Home & School Association $5,000 $5,000

Purchase of Smart boards for the school $1,000 $0 Bike Rodeo

11 Glammis Historical Researchers $750 $0 Historic book of Glammis $1,000 $700 Historic book of Glammis

12 Grey Bruce Woodturners Guild $800 $0

Sponsor two seminars/demonstrations $500 $400

Sponsor two seminars/demonstrations

#


2013 Enbridge Grant



Recommendation Project Description

13Heritage Kincardine $1,000 $0

Develop heritage plaque program/walking tour brochures

14Kincardine Agricultural Society $2,500 $1,000

Erect roof structure over existing rings/improve fall fair venue and Farmers Market $2,500 $1,100

Improve fall fair venue and Farmers Market

15Kincardine & Community Health Care Foundation $1,500 $1,500

Purchase of medical equipment for Kincardine Hospital

16Kincardine Canada Day $1,500 $1,000

Sponsorship for children's entertainment

17Kincardine & District Chamber of Commerce $1,000 $1,000

Sponsorship of the Fish Kincardine Derby

18Kincardine & District Chamber of Commerce $540 $0

Sponsorship of 2013 Community Achievement Awards $540 $540 Sponsorship of annual award

19Kincardine & District Chamber of Commerce $500 $200

Sponsorship of 2013 Santa Claus Parade

20Kincardine Guiding $500 $350

Sponsorship of Kincardine Guiding

21Kincardine Saturday Farmers Market $2,000 $0

Farmers Market permanent signage (temporary signs added to wayfinding system)

22Kincardine Scottish Festival & Highland Games $5,000 $5,000 Sponsorship of Scottish Festival

#


2013 Enbridge Grant




23 Kincardine Scottish Pipe Band $1,200 $1,000

Sponsorship of Gathering of the Bands to support security/policing costs

24 Kincardine Skating Club $1,000 $0

Program Enhancement (stroking, jump & dance programs) $2,000 $0

Davidson Centre rental rates for Home & Garden Show

25 Kincardine Summer Music Festival $5,000 $5,000

Sponsorship of the Kincardine Summer Music Festival $5,000 $1,500

Sponsorship of the Kincardine Summer Music Festival

26Kincardine Trails Association $5,000 $2,500

Huron Ridge‐ Kin‐Huron Trail Link

27Knights of Columbus $5,000 $0

Collect funds in support of local charities, bursaries, volunteering $5,000 $0

Collect funds in support of local charities, bursaries, volunteering

28 Lake Huron Fishing Club $6,000 $4,000

Kincardine Hatchery/encourage youth/ensure future fishing $1,000 $500 Mini hatcheries for schools

29Royal Canadian Legion Branch 183 $5,000 $0 Repairs to walk‐in fridge $5,000 $2,000 Repairs to walk‐in fridge

30Lighthouse Blues Festival $5,000 $2,500 Sponsorship of Festival $5,000 $2,500 Sponsorship of Festival

31Lovat Cemetery Board $2,250 $2,250 Maintenance of the cemetery

32 Ontario Shuffleboard Association $400 $400

OSA tournament insurance costs $410 $250

Davidson Centre rental fees for OSA tournament

33Paddy Walker Heritage Society $2,000 $0 Kitchen Improvements $2,000 $800 New display cases

#


2013 Enbridge Grant




34 Paisley Agricultural Society $500 $300 Sponsorship of rural fair

35Parkinson Society Southwestern Ontario $1,000 $1,000

Sponsorship of Parkinson's Superwalk

36Penetangore Watershed Group $1,500 $1,500

New plantings in ravines/increase tree cover $1,000 $500

Plant trees, native plants and shrubs

37 PRANCE $1,000 $300 Appreciation celebration

38 Tiverton Agricultural Society $1,000 $1,000

Sponsorship of the annual Tiverton Fall Fair $3,000 $1,100

Sponsorship of the annual Tiverton Fall Fair

39Township of Bruce Historical Society $500 $300

Give seedlings to annual meeting attendees/landscaping at existing plaques

40Victoria Park Gallery Artists' Co‐operative $5,000 $0

Victoria Park Gallery & Scougall Gallery and variety of activities

41VON Grey Bruce $1,830 $1,400

Community programs in Tiverton (received $1,220 pre‐budget approval)

42 Women's House Serving Bruce & Grey $5,000 $5,000

Shelter services and client necessities $10,000 $4,000 Delivery of services

43World Peace Day $1,000 $700

Sponsorship of World Peace day event

44Sports Grants $25,000 $25,000

Annual Contribution to Minor Sports

#


2013 Enbridge Grant




45Misc $118

For items after budget is passed

46MultiCultural Day $542 $542

Rental fees at Davidson Centre

47Bruce County Rugby $650 $550

Towards cost of renting gymnasium at Davidson

48Saugeen Valley Children's Safety Village $3,400 $3,400

Sponsorship of the Children's Safety Village

49 Firefighters' Association $500 $500

Ice rental rate at Davidson Centre for charity hockey game

TOTAL $102,965 $60,175 $106,472 $80,300

Enbridge $60,175Community Grant $80,300Total $140,475

the corporation of the municipality of … package36.pdf · the corporation of the municipality of...

Documents