the characterization of oil-degrading microorganisms from lubricating oil contaminated (scale) soil
TRANSCRIPT
The characterization of oil-degrading microorganismsfrom lubricating oil contaminated (scale) soil
K. JirasripongpunDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Silpakorn University,
Nakhornpathom, Thailand
65 ⁄ 02: received 25 February 2002, revised 13 June 2002 and accepted 18 June 2002
K . J IRASRIPONGPUN. 2002.
Aims: To isolate and characterize oil-degrading microorganisms from contaminated (scale) soil.
Methods and Results: Oil-degrading microorganisms were isolated from enrichment cultures
of scale soil. Each isolate was identified using 16S rDNA gene and oil degradability was
determined on both unused and used lubricating oil. The weight of the extracted remaining oil
revealed that most isolates degraded unused lubricating oil more than used lubricating oil.
Chemical composition of oil analysed by TLC-FID and GC-MS demonstrated that Nocardia
simplex W9 degraded used oil the best, and resulted in a decrease in saturates, aromatics and
resins to 52Æ46, 38Æ13 and 18Æ81%, respectively.
Conclusions: Nocardia simplex W9 is the best degrader, among all the isolates, on both used
and unused lubricating oil.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The presence of Nocardia simplex W9 in scale soil
enables iron to be recycled by biodegradation.
INTRODUCTION
Lubricating oils are manufactured in various formulations
for different applications. Most formulas generally consist of
two fractions: chemical additives and base fluid. The
chemical additives, about 5–20% (w ⁄ v), are selected com-
pounds added for specific functions (Vazouez-Duhalt 1989).
Base fluid, the main fraction in lubricating oil, is a complex
mixture of hydrocarbons: linear and branched paraffins,
cyclic alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons (Westlake et al.1974; Goto et al. 1994).
In the iron rolling process at a steel rolling mill,
lubricating oil is normally used to coat an iron sheet as oil
film while subjecting it to a high squeezing pressure and a
high temperature. The iron dust, resembling fish scales, is a
waste product of the process and these oil-contaminated
scales are mixed with soil to produce so called �scale soil�.This scale soil is released, resulting in a great loss of iron
each year. For example the Nippon Steel Company of Japan
at Hokkaido has reported to collect approximately 30 000
tons yearly. Removing oil from scale soil for iron recycling
cannot be simply done by smelting and refining, as the oil
contaminant can create environmental pollution when burnt
(Vazouez-Duhalt 1989). Extracting oil residue to a safe level,
prior to heat treatment, using chemical treatment seems also
to be very difficult due to the high expense and more
additional problems arising from the chemical wastes
(Benton 1997). The cheap, effective and safe method for
iron recycling could possibly be done through microbial
degradation (Venkateswaran and Harayama 1995). There-
fore, the aims of the present study were (i) to isolate oil-
degrading microorganisms from scale soil, (ii) to identify
the isolates using 16S rRNA gene sequence, and (iii) to
study their oil biodegradability compared with the known
degrader, Rhodococcus sp.strain I72 (Shirai et al. 1995).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Oil and medium
Both unused and used lubricating oils (from a steel company
at Hokkaido in Japan) were studied. Unused lubricating oil
was heated at 100 �C overnight to remove the volatile
hydrocarbons. The used lubricating oil was extracted from
scale soil using dichloromethane, filtered, and subjected to
rota-evaporator (RE121 Rotavapor, Buchi, Switzerland) at
40 �C, 80 rev min)1 for 30 min. The concentrated oil was
finally filtered through a 0Æ2 lm PTFE filter and the
dichloromethane was evaporated in an oven at 40 �C, and
Correspondence to: Dr Kalyanee Jirasripongpun, Department of Biotechnology,
Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Silpakorn University,
Nakhornpathom 73000, Thailand (e-mail: [email protected]).
ª 2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 2002, 35, 296–300
2000 p.p.m. oil was added to a defined mineral salts
medium, M9, as the sole carbon and energy source when
used. The composition of M9 was 6Æ0 g Na2HPO4, 3Æ0 g
KH2PO4, 0Æ5 g NaCl, 1Æ0 g HN4Cl, 1Æ0 ml of 24Æ6% (w ⁄ v)
MgSO4Æ7H2O and 1Æ0 ml of 1Æ47% (w ⁄ v) CaCl2Æ2H2O in
1000 ml of distilled water.
Isolation and identification
Scale soils were seeded in 5 ml of M9 containing
2000 p.p.m. of unused oil in stainless steel capped test
tubes under shaking at 100 rev min)1, 20 �C for 7 d.
Cultures were enriched two times and isolates were purified
according to Huy et al. (1999) on M9 agar containing
1000 p.p.m. lubricating oil. The isolates were Gram stained,
mobility tested using 0Æ2% semisolid agar plates containing
10 p.p.m. lubricating oil, and species were identified based
on 16S rRNA gene sequences. For identification, genomic
DNA from pure cultures was extracted and purified using a
DNA isolation kit (Puregene, Gentra systems, Danvers, MN,
USA). The DNA (30–500 ng) was subjected to PCR in a
DNA thermal cycler (Takara PCR thermal cycler MP, Takara
Biochemicals, Shiga, Japan) using prOR forward primer
(5¢-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3¢) and 9-rev
reverse primers (5¢-AAG GAG GTG ATC CAG CC-3¢).The amplified DNA fragments were purified using Sea
Plaque GTG agarose (FMC Byproducts, Rockland, ME,
USA) and a Qia quick spin column kit (Qiagen, Stanford,
CA, USA). The purified DNA was concentrated using an
evaporator rotary dryer (TOMY centrifugal concentration
CC101) and 30 ng DNA were submitted to DNA sequen-
cing using FS Prism Ready Reaction Dye dideoxyTM
Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA, USA). The forward sequencing primers
spanned positions 8–27, 335–355, 786–804 and 1223–1241.
The reverse primers spanned positions 357–377, 1100–1115
and 1522–1541. The nucleotide sequences determined by an
automated fluorescent dye terminator sequencer 377S
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were then
used to identify isolates using the GenBank Blast search
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BALST/).
Degradation of lubricating oil and oil analysis
The oil degradability of each isolate was performed similarly
to Goto et al. (1994). The culture tubes of each strain
including positive control (Rhodococcus sp.strain I72) and
negative control (without inoculum), in triplicate of either
used or unused lubricating oil, were incubated for 30 d on a
100 rev min)1 shaker at 20 �C. The remaining oils from each
isolate were extracted using dichloromethane, then they were
dry weight determined and the oil degradability was
calculated based on weight loss (Shirai et al. 1995) as follows.
ð%Þ oil degradation
¼ oil weight in negative control� oil weight in sample
oil weight in negative control
� �
� 100
The efficient isolates were further examined on their oil
degradability in 10 ml M9 containing 2000 p.p.m. used oil.
The tubes with 6% (v ⁄ v) of a 7-day-old culture of each of
the selected strains, including negative controls and positive
controls were tested similarly. Compositions of the extracted
remaining oil were analysed into component groups of
saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes using the TLC-
FID method (Goto et al. 1994), and into selected com-
pounds of n-alkanes (C14–C34), napthalene derivatives
(C2–C4), phenanthrene derivatives (C1–C7), dibenzothi-
ophene derivatives (C1–C4) and hopane using the GC-MS
method (Ishihara et al. 1996).
The chromatograms of each component were automatic-
ally recorded and computed for concentration. The oil
degradation of each component was calculated based on
hopane as follows:
ð%Þ oil degradation
¼
component in negative control based on hopane
�component in sample based on hopane
component in negative control based on hopane
0BB@
1CCA�100
RESULTS
Table 1 shows 26 isolates selected on their growth ability on
unused lubricating oil, weathered oil and aromatic oil of
culture broth derived after enrichment. The isolates named
after source of growth and order of enrichments are
characterized on their Gram stains, motility abilities, species
and oil-degrading abilities as shown in Table 1. Most
isolates were identified based on 16S rRNA gene sequences
with lengths from 1400 bp to 1500 bp to be bacterial species
with 95–100% homology. Only the sequence of isolate A3,
with 1457 bp using 18S rDNA primer, was identified as
yeast. All isolates showed oil degradability on unused
lubricating oil to a higher extent than the used oil after
30 d incubation; the isolates with efficient degradability
were S1, S6, W9, A1, A3 and A4.
Used lubricating oil was the target oil for biodegradation.
Degradability on used lubricating oil in the isolates strains
S1, S6, W9, A1 and A3 were repeated using results from
TLC-FID and GC-MS. However, result from GC-MS
could not be determined. Therefore, TLC-FID was used to
determine the biodegradation of oil, using hopane as the
internal standard. Table 2 shows that W9 resulted in the
highest oil weight lost, and it degraded components in used
OIL-DEGRADERS FROM SCALE SOIL 297
ª 2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 35, 296–300
lubricating oil higher than the strain I72; W9 degraded
saturate, aromatic and resin fractions to 52Æ46, 38Æ13 and
18Æ81%, respectively. While strain I72 degraded each
fraction to 42Æ20, 34Æ01 and 0%, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Microbes are the main degraders of petroleum hydrocar-
bons in contaminated ecosystems (Leahy and Cowell
1990). Serial enrichments to isolate oil-degraders using
lubricating oil as sole carbon and energy source provided
various microorganisms from scale soil. However, fewer
species were isolated as the number of enrichments
increased. The isolates were bacteria and yeast belong-
ing to the genera of Nocardia, Acinetobacter, Pseudo-monas, Ralstonia, Gordono, Rhodococcus, Agrobacterium and
Debaryomyces. These genera are classified as the most
common hydrocarbonoclastic microorganisms listed by
Bossert and Bartha (1984). Among them, Nocardia,
Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Ralstonia were frequently
isolated, as was found by Austin and coworkers (Austin
et al. 1977). However, these isolates showed no relevance
of their capacity on oil degrading to the ordinal number of
enrichments. Probably the substrate for sequential enrich-
ment was unchanged, unlike the Venkateswaran’s tech-
nique (Venkateswaran and Harayama 1995) where oil
degradability of the isolates was enhanced using residual
hydrocarbon left after the last enrichment as substrate for
the next enrichment. Varying substrates to weathered oil
lead to no new isolate; the oil components in lubricating
oil and weathered oil were similar (Goto et al. 1994).
However, using aromatic oil containing aromatic fraction
Isolates Identified by NCBI as Characteristics Motility
Oil degradation (%)
Used oil Unused oil
S1 Pseudomonas mandelii G –, c, rod + 12Æ70 27Æ60
S2 Ralstonia eutropha G –, b, rod + 7Æ36 11Æ50
S3 Pseudomonas stutzeri G –, c, rod + 5Æ50 10Æ40
S4 Pseudomonas fragi G –, c, rod + 2Æ95 8Æ79
S5 Acinetobacter junii G –, c, rod + 9Æ20 9Æ95
S6 Rhodococcus sp. G +, rod – 9Æ20 25Æ10
S7 Nocadia asteroides G +, rod, hyphae – 5Æ10 10Æ23
S8 Agrobacterium
tumefaciens
G –, a, rod – 2Æ40 7Æ85
S9 Nocardia simplex G +, rod – 6Æ70 10Æ45
2S1 Comamonas testosteroni G –, b, rod – 2Æ10 7Æ80
2S2 Ralstonia sp. G –, b, rod ND 1Æ80 6Æ10
2S3 Pseudomonas mandelii G –, c, rod + 8Æ14 13Æ10
2S4 Acinetobacter junii G –, c, rod + 7Æ80 10Æ95
3S2 Nocardia simplex G +, rod – 7Æ15 12Æ10
3S3 Nocardia simplex G +, rod – 6Æ50 10Æ58
W1 Acinetobacter junii G –, c, rod + 6Æ43 10Æ67
W2 Pseudomonas monteilii G –, c, rod + 5Æ50 10Æ50
W3 Rhodococcus roseus G +, rod ND ND ND
W4 Pseudomonas monteilii G –, c, rod + ND ND
W6 Nocardia asteroides G +, rod, hyphae – 7Æ82 12Æ00
W7 Ralstonia sp. G –, b, rod ND ND ND
W9 Nocardio simplex G +, rod – 24Æ53 50Æ00
A1 Gordona terrae G +, rod – 14Æ15 30Æ00
A2 Nocardia transvalensis G +, rod, hyphae – 6Æ99 10Æ68
A3 Debaryomyces hansenii Yeast – 8Æ49 19Æ30
A4 Gornado terrae G +, rod – 15Æ00 27Æ10
ND: not determined.
a, b, c: type of proteobacteria.
S ¼ isolates selected from the first enrichment using unused lubricating oil.
2S ¼ isolates selected from the second enrichment using unused lubricating oil.
3S ¼ isolates selected from the third enrichment using unused lubricating oil.
W ¼ isolates selected on weathered oil medium of culture broth from the first enrichment.
A ¼ isolates selected on aromatic oil medium of culture broth from the first enrichment.
Table 1 Characterization of isolates from
scale soil
298 K. J IRASRIPONGPUN
ª 2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 35, 296–300
(Venkateswaran et al. 1995), provided different isolates as
shown in Table 1.
Unused lubricating oil was emulsified under shaking even
in the absence of inoculum, while this was in contrast to the
used lubricating oil. Analysis of the remaining oil showed
more weight loss of unused lubricating oil from each culture
than the used oil. This was probably because the oil
emulsification made available substrate as a microdroplet,
which facilitated hydrocarbons uptake by microorganisms
(Morgan and Watkinson 1994) and resulted in higher
degradation on unused lubricating oil in most isolates.
Chemical composition analysed using TLC-FID of both oils
revealed that unused lubricating oil contained saturates,
aromatics, resins and asphaltenes at 28Æ56, 37Æ02, 21Æ41 and
13Æ02%, while the used oil contained 78Æ42, 12Æ42, 8Æ84 and
0%, respectively (data not shown). The change on oil
components due to high temperature and high pressure in
iron pressing could play a role on the physical property of the
used oil. The analysis of alkanes in both oils using GC-MS
revealed that used lubricating oil contained components of
higher carbon (C > 29) in much higher quantities than
components of the lower carbon (C14–C28) as detected in
unused oil (data not shown). The higher carbon alkane could
result in a low solubility (Eastcott et al. 1988) and is less
degradable than the lower carbon alkane (Westlake et al.1974) as found on used lubricating oil.
However, used lubricating oil was the target for oil
biodegradation in scale soil. Hopane, the most recalcitrant of
oil components present in used lubricating oil, was used as
an internal standard to evaluate oil degradation analysed by
TLC-FID (Prince et al. 1994). The concentration of each
component calculated based on the ratio of peak areas for
each group component and internal standard would give a
more reliable result. Table 2 shows that the isolate strain W9
was the best degrader among the isolates resulting in 34Æ31%
oil weight loss and degraded saturate, aromatic and resin
fractions at 52Æ46, 38Æ13 and 18Æ81%, respectively. The
Rhodococcus sp. strain I72 reported by Shirai et al. (1995) to
be a good degrader on heavy oil with degradability at 46%
less than the isolated strain W9. This was probably due to
the fact that the Rhodococcus sp. strain I72 was a marine oil
degrader, which was grown in suboptimum conditions for
efficient biodegradation to take place. Thus, Nocardiasimplex W9 might be an alternative microorganism used in
biodegradation of oil on scale soil for iron recycling. Other
factors affecting the rate of biodegradation on scale soil, such
as seeding size, available nutrients, the presence of inhibiting
substrates, predation and insufficient movement of seed
organisms within the soil, should be studied in the future to
enhance oil degradation in scale soil.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was financially supported by the JICA (Japan
International Cooperation Agency) on a training course
(course ID: J97-03343). I am indebted to the JICA and the
MBI (Marine Biotechnology Institute, Kamaishi, Japan),
especially Dr Shigeaki Harayama and Dr Hideo Kishira
for their professional advice. Thanks to Dr Nuananong
Jirakarnjanakit and Dr Jureerut Puttanlek for their proof
reading and comments on the manuscript. Thanks also to
Dr Linda Harris and Mr Andrew David Shipley for English
correcting.
REFERENCES
Austin, B., Calomiris, J.J., Walker, J.D. and Cowell, R.R. (1977)
Numerical taxonomy and ecology of petroleum-degrading bacteria.
Applied and Enviromental Microbiology 34, 60–68.
Benton, C.I. (1997) Lubricants. In Environmental Technology in the Oil
Industry ed. Orszulik, S.T. pp. 367–380. Glasgow: Blackie.
Bossert, I. and Bartha, R. (1984) The fate of petroleum in soil
ecosystem. In Petroleum Microbiology ed. Atlas, R.M. pp. 434–476.
NewYork: Macmilliam.
Eastcott, L., Shiu, W.Y. and Mackary, D. (1988) Environmentally
relevant physical-chemical properties of hydrocarbons: a review of
data and development of simple correlations. Oil Chemical Pollution
4, 191–219.
Goto, M., Kato, M., Asaumi, M. and Venkateswaran, K. (1994)
TLC ⁄FID method for evaluation of the crude oil degrading capacity of
marine microorganisms. Journal of Marine Biotechnology 2, 45–50.
Huy, N.Q., Jin, S., Amada, K., Haruki, M., Huu, N.B., Hang, D.T., Cam
Ha, D.T., Imanaka, T., Morikawa, M. and Kanaya, S. (1999) Charac-
terization of petroleum-degrading bacteria from oil-contaminated sites
in Vietnam. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 88, 100–102.
Ishihara, M., Sugiura, K., Asaumi, M., Goto, M., Sasaki, E. and
Harayama, S. (1996) Oil degradation in microcosms and mesocosms.
Microbial Processes for Bioremediation 15, 101–116.
Table 2 Used lubricating oil degradability of the selected degraders
Isolates
Degradation (%) of used lubricating oil
Weight loss
(%)* Saturates� Aromatics� Resins�
S1 3Æ01 9Æ00 22Æ45 2Æ11
S6 9Æ90 25Æ98 29Æ81 0
A1 7Æ86 13Æ88 4Æ46 0
A3 3Æ92 3Æ64 6Æ09 4Æ75
W6 1Æ00 5Æ22 6Æ49 0
W9 34Æ31 52Æ46 38Æ13 18Æ81
I72 20Æ59 42Æ20 34Æ01 0
*Weight of oil (negative control) minus weight of oil (degraded)
divided by weight of oil (negative control) multiplied by 100.
�(%) oil degradation ¼ (component in negative control based
on hopane ) component in sample based on hopane) ⁄ component
in negative control based on hopane · 100.
OIL-DEGRADERS FROM SCALE SOIL 299
ª 2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 35, 296–300
Leahy, J. and Cowell, R.R. (1990) Microbial degradation of
hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiological Reviews 54, 305–
315.
Morgan, P. and Watkinson, R.J. (1994) Biodegradation of components
of petroleum. In Biochemistry of Microbial Degradation ed. Ratledge,
C. pp. 1–31. The Netherlands: Kluwer Acadaemic.
Prince, R.C., Elmendorf, D.L., Lute, J.R., Hsu, C.S., Halth, C.E.,
Senlus, J.D., Dechert, G.J., Douglas, G.S. and Butler, E.L. (1994)
17a (H), 21b (H) -Hopane as a conserved internal marker for
estimating the biodegradation of crude oil. Environmental Science and
Technology 28, 142–145.
Shirai, K., Hanzawa, N. and Katusta, M. (1995) Heavy oil degrading
bacteria isolated by long term enrichment in alumina columns
containing heavy oil C. Bioscience of Biotechnology and Biochemistry
59, 2159–2161.
Vazouez-Duhalt, R. (1989) Environmental impact of used motor oil.
Science of the Total Environment 79, 1–23.
Venkateswaran, K. and Harayama, S. (1995) Sequential enrichment of
microbial populations exhibiting enhanced biodegradation of crude
oil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41, 767–775.
Venkateswaran, K., Hoaki, T., Kata, M. and Maruyama, T. (1995)
Microbial degradation of resins factioned from Arabian light crude
oil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41, 418–424.
Westlake, D.W.S., Jobson, A., Phillipe, R. and Cook, F.D. (1974)
Biodegradability and crude oil composition. Canadian Journal of
Microbiology 20, 915–928.
300 K. J IRASRIPONGPUN
ª 2002 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 35, 296–300