Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize and Alex McCalla

April 30, 2008

Global poverty and hunger concentrated in South Asia and increasingly in SSA

Despite rural-urban migration, poverty will remain primarily rural for a long time

Where economy –wide growth has occurred in Africa, it has reduced poverty, but without measurable impact on hunger

Agricultural growth is much better at reducing hunger

Real per capita growth above 3 % Per capita agricultural growth above 1% A consequence of macro-economic stability and

improved trade and agricultural policies• Inflation down to 10 percent range• Fiscal deficits transformed into surpluses• Anti-agriculture policy bias almost eliminated

Armed conflicts down to 5 from 15 in 2003 In 2007 elections in 22 countries declared “free and

fair” More civil society and participation Faster progress in business environment than LAC

and MENA Accelerated efforts in building of Regional and sub-

Regional institutions

AfDB much larger than IFAD, with comprehensive regional mandate

IFAD has a focused global mandate for the rural poor Their common interest is reducing rural poverty via

economic opportunity and growth They only rarely deal with relief or safety nets IFAD’s mandate fully reflected in a strategy that specifies

what they will and will not do Appropriate policies complement the strategy IFAD focuses on innovation, learning and scaling up AfDB overall strategy focused on poverty reduction,

infrastructure, policy reform, private sector and capacity of regional institutions

AfDB strategy for ARD not yet coherent, and focused

Figure 1: Agriculture, Rural Development, and Total ARD ODA: Africa 1974 -2005(Millions of 2005 Constant $US)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004

Years 1974 - 2005

Millio

ns $

US

ARD Total

Agriculture

Rural Development

the full

Figure 2: Sum of Agriculture and Rural Development ODA - AfDF and IFAD- 1978 - 2005(Millions of Constant 2005 $US)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005

Mill

ion

s $

US

AFDF Totals

IFAD Totals

Changing International Landscape And View Of ARD

New Aid Architecture Globalization And Changing Role Of

Private Sector Climate Change And Trans-boundary

Issues Biotechnology And Privatization Of

Agricultural Research Bio-fuels, Permanent Or Transitory

Global Demand Factor?

From Cold War to regional and local conflicts, with increasing numbers of emergencies

Development paradigm • changed to open economy, private-sector led growth,

trade liberalization, and freer capital (but not labor) flows

• democratization, participation, decentralization, accountability and empowerment

• Millennium Development Goals and harmonization and collaboration among donors, with countries in the lead

Vastly increased number of development actors: WTO, UNAIDS, Global conventions, NGOs, African Union, NEPAD, Regional trade agreements and organizations, FARA, and Sub-Regional Research organizations…

Exploding numbers of players: 233 multilateral agencies, 51 bilaterals, several hundred international

NGOs, tens of thousands of national NGOs, including millions of CBOs Real volume of development assistance from traditional

donors has stagnated, including for Africa, and has fragmented further

Additional Aid is coming from emerging countries and private donors; remittances are adding just as much

Despite 50 years of experience, still making the same mistakes, with little improvement in quality• Decline in tied aid and food aid are the positive trends• But increased fragmentation, unchanged emphasis on

TA, and little or no sign on selectivity

Climate Change is expected to reduce productivity in Africa more than in temperate zones, and impose higher costs on its farmers

Against a background of inadequate agricultural research and education, it will require more technical change than elsewhere

Mitigation via carbon trading provides positive opportunities for African agriculture

Local, national and sub-regional institutions and mechanisms need to be developed to capture them, an opportunity for AfDB

African farmers have adapted to multiple climate changes in the past and will do so in the future

Helping them do so is an additional element of the broad agricultural development agenda, not something apart

Managing increased climate variability should be as additional element of an overall risk management strategy at the farm, local, country and regional level

Modern Science and Technology and global markets make such adaptation easier than in the past, but only if they are really harnessed

From distressingly low rates, African growth has steadily accelerated since mid 1990s• 2007: 6.1 % for SSA, 4.9 % for MENA• Inflation down to 10 percent range• Fiscal deficits transformed into surpluses

Trend to faster growth started in early 1990s and has steadily accelerated since then (Ndulu figure 2.1)

Growth even more impressive if weighted by population of the countries

A consequence of high commodity prices? • Non-commodity countries doing almost equally well

Macro-economic management and policies were critical in improving growth• but now present fewer additional opportunities

Governance and business climate Infrastructure and regional integration

Capacity, financial sectors, and low savings remain major constraints• Capacity best in ministries of finance, central banks

Landlocked countries are at a distinct disadvantage

Four Traps: Conflict, Natural Resources, Landlocked with poor Neighbors, and Poor Governance and Policy

Costs to the countries, the neighbors and the World are incredibly high

Change requires lots of courage, which needs more outside support, not just by aid• Sustained military peacekeeping • Norms and Charters, such as for Natural resources and

corruption• Lots of TA in the first four years of a turnaround• Sustained large aid flows after first couple of years, not

immediately • Project risk can be reduced by intense supervision

More focus on Bottom Billion countries in AfDB and IFAD

DecentralizedSectoral

Approaches

Local GovernmentApproaches

Direct Community

SupportApproaches

Civil Society &Private Sector

Approaches

Integrated ApproachTo Local

Development

CHART 9: Index of Sector Decentralization in 19 Countries, in the 1990s

0.50.7

1.0 1.0 1.11.4

1.8

2.4 2.4 2.4 2.52.8

3.84.2 4.2

5.25.4

6.4

7.8

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

Country

SSA per capita agricultural growth now also faster than 1% per year• But by area expansion, not via productivity growth

Fuelled by same factors as economy-wide growth• And not by special agricultural programs

And fuelled by near elimination of implicit taxation of agriculture • But African producers still have the worst incentives

in the World

Figure 5.6: NRAs In Africa Over The Past 50 Years

Source: ibid

Rapidly rising demand from emerging economies and Africa itself are the most important and permanent increase in food demand

Bio-fuel induced food price rises may be transitory

In the longer term climate change and water scarcity may limit supply growth

However, past history shows enormous supply response capacity around the world, and current prices may not persist

Yet few analysts expect a return to declining real prices of cereals

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

Pri

ce

(U

S$

/mt)

Rice Wheat Maize Other grain Soybean

CerealsCereals

Source: IFPRI IMPACT projections, business as usual, IPCC SRESB2 climate scenario, Source: IFPRI IMPACT projections, business as usual, IPCC SRESB2 climate scenario, September 2007.September 2007.

From Population, Income Growth (especially in emerging economies) and urbanization

Will result in more South-South Trade For Africa the short and medium

opportunities are in food staples and livestock products for domestic and regional markets• Much larger opportunities than for niche

developed country export markets Requires infrastructure (continental,

rural, including irrigation) And removal of regional trade barriers

for foods

•Better nutritional status does not significantly reduce HIV incidence, or prolong life after infection. Only prevention and ARV therapy do

•Households which experience an AIDS death quickly replace adult members and are more short of land and capital than labor

•Not all orphans are vulnerable: Only orphans in households with more than one orphan are under-nourished. But their number growing rapidly

Rural prevention efforts must be mainstreamed via CDD programs and approaches

Mortality can only be reduced by ARV therapy, and scaling it up in rural areas is both possible and a major priority

However, food and agricultural interventions can be powerful tools for care and support, and household recovery

Prevention, ARV therapy, and care and support require deep community involvement, a comparative advantage of IFAD.

More mainstreaming in IFAD operations

Safety Nets will become more important because of HIV and AIDS, Climate Change, Globalization, and to assist those left behind by growth

Traditional approach are verticalized stove-pipe programs which reach very few, and have prohibitive overhead costs

Holistic, family-centered, and community-driven safety nets are needed, but can hardly be found• A possible approach is via performance-based grants• An alternative community-driven approach with community

cofinance and community targeting IFAD would have comparative advantage in entering

this area, possibly with co-finance from AfDB

Threat of further growth of the technology divide• Because of heterogeneity it has fewer opportunities to

borrow• Changing nature of technology discovery, with private

sector and intellectual property rights increases complexity• Persistent under-funding of public research persists,

despite high returns to agricultural research in Africa• Fragmented into400 research and teaching institutions• 3600 agricultural scientists, and 12 active CGIAR

institutions

Agricultural education lagging especially badly

NEPAD, FARA, and Sub-Regional Research Organizations have taken the lead in changing the situation, but their proposals remain under-funded

Opportunities and Constraints in the New AID Architecture• Countries that are open to private donations can mobilize

much more, without coordination requirements• Countries to coordinate only large donors/large programs,

but such coordination is difficult• Both IFAD and AfDB can raise more resources/co-finance for

ARD from new sources (emerging countries, private sector) More Focus on the on the Bottom Billion countries Resolve the Remaining Challenges of Agricultural

Incentives Reform and properly finance Agricultural

Technology Development and Science Education

All countries have an incentive to shirk in contributions to Regional Public Goods

Can only be overcome by a Regional or International Funding organization, probably in in association with ECA and the African Union

Small land locked countries depend on regional integration Regional trade is good for growth, farmer’s income, regional

foods security and the private sector; Requires harmonization of standards and sanitary measures,

and sub-regional and regional capacities to implement them; Regional infrastructure critical for access to regional/external

markets; Reversing land degradation and desertification and preserving

biodiversity require trans- boundary collective action; Defense against plant and animal disease epidemics require

collective responses at sub-regional and regional levels; Agricultural research is far better done on a regional or sub

regional basis –FARA and the SRO’s are on the right track; Bio technology is complicated and expensive requiring a large

critical mass; Indigenous scientific capacity is better fostered by regional

institutions which have critical mass and necessary financial support.

Who should AfDB and IFAD collaborate with for analysis, technical support, (ECA?) and political support (AU?)

How should they structure their support to strengthen incentives for country financing of Regional/sub-Regional institutions?

How will they have to change their own regional financing tools?

How could AfDB best support advocacy for international and regional trade reform?

How to develop common AfDB/IFAD strategy for ARD

How to translate into Regional and Country support owned by region/countries

How to partner with other major players in ARD in Africa (World Bank, EU, USAID)?

How to benefit from China’s and India’s involvement in Africa, other new donors

Should AfDB/IFAD give higher priority to SWAPs and focus on capacity building for aid and TA coordination?

How to expand role in “bottom billion” states?

How could IFAD/AfDB collaborate with others to protect Africa’s coastal fisheries from the predatory practices of rich countries’ industrial fishing fleets?

 What role in promoting further reform in land and gender rights, institutions for land administration, and land redistribution? And how to actually do it?

How to help the Region to take advantage of future opportunities from climate change?

How to foster the institutional environment for LCDD?

In particular, how to foster the lagging administrative and fiscal decentralization

How to deepen and scale up LCDD programs in collaboration with others

With whom and how?

Given the poor financial environment and record, how much emphasis to place on rural financial institutions? How? And with whom?

How to integrate small farmers into modern supply chains, the Super Market Revolution, and organic food markets?

How to improve small farmer access to inputs? How to increase and improve support to

technology development and dissemination? And to the science and technology institutions

involved in research and teaching