The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle
Post on 28-Oct-2016
Embed Size (px)
The BIOMASS mission: Materrestrial carbon cycle
T. Le Toan a,, S. Quegan b, M.W.J.F. Rocca h, S. Saatchi i, H. Shugarta Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphre, CNRS-CNES-Ub Centre for Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics (CTCD), Universc Mission Science Division, ESA-ESTEC, The Netherlandsd Centre for Environmental Research (CERES), Universitye Observatoire Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers, Universf German Aerospace Center e.V. (DLR), Wessling, Germang IGBP-ESA Joint Projects Ofce, ESA-ESRIN, Italyh Dipartimento di Elettronica ed Informazione, Politecnico
Remote Sensing of Environment 115 (2011) 28502860
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Remote Sensing o
.e lsev ie r.com/ locate / rseCarbon cycleP-band SARSatellite missionESA Earth Explorer
afforestation. These science objectives require themission tomeasure above-ground forest biomass from70Nto 56 S at spatial scale of 100200 m, with error not exceeding 20% or 10 t ha1 and forest height witherror of 4 m. To meet the measurement requirements, the mission will carry a P-Band polarimetric SAR(centre frequency 435 MHzwith 6 MHz bandwidth)with interferometric capability, operating in a dawn-duskorbit with a constant incidence angle (in the range of 2535) and a 2545 day repeat cycle. During its 5-yearlifetime, the mission will be capable of providing both direct measurements of biomass derived from intensitydata andmeasurements of forest height derived from polarimetric interferometry. The design of the BIOMASSmission spins together two main observational strands: (1) the long heritage of airborne observations intropical, temperate and boreal forest that have demonstrated the capabilities of P-band SAR for measuringforest biomass; (2) new developments in recovery of forest structure including forest height from Pol-InSAR,and, crucially, the resistance of P-band to temporal decorrelation, which makes this frequency uniquelysuitable for biomass measurements with a single repeat-pass satellite. These two complementarymeasurement approaches are combined in the single BIOMASS sensor, and have the satisfying property thatincreasing biomass reduces the sensitivity of the former approach while increasing the sensitivity of the latter.This paper surveys the body of evidence built up over the last decade, from a wide range of airborneexperiments, which illustrates the ability of such a sensor to provide the required measurements.At present, the BIOMASS P-band radar appears to be the only sensor capable of providing the necessary globalknowledge about theworld's forest biomass and its changes. In addition, this rst chance to explore the Earth'senvironment with a long wavelength satellite SAR is expected to make yield new information in a range ofgeoscience areas, including subsurface structure in arid lands and polar ice, and forest inundation dynamics. Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 5 61 55 66 71; faxE-mail address: Thuy.Letoan@cesbio.cnes.fr (T. Le To
0034-4257/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier Inc. Aldoi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.020improve resource assessment, carbon accounting and carbon models, and 2) to monitor and quantify changesin terrestrial forest biomass globally, on an annual basis or better, leading to improved estimates of terrestrialcarbon sources (primarily from deforestation); and terrestrial carbon sinks due to forest regrowth andKeywords:Forest biomassi Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, USAj University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia,k Department of Radar Systems, FOI, Linkoping, S
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 29 April 2009Received in revised form 24 January 2011Accepted 16 March 2011Available online 1 June 2011pping global forest biomass to better understand the
Davidson c, H. Balzter d, P. Paillou e, K. Papathanassiou f, S. Plummer g,j, L. Ulander k
niversit Paul Sabatier-IRD, Toulouse, Franceity of Shefeld, UK
of Leicester, UKit Bordeaux-1, Francey
di Milano, Italy
a b s t r a c t
In response to the urgent need for improved mapping of global biomass and the lack of any current spacesystems capable of addressing this need, the BIOMASSmissionwas proposed to the European Space Agency forthe third cycle of Earth Explorer Coremissions andwas selected for Feasibility Study (Phase A) in March 2009.The objectives of the mission are 1) to quantify the magnitude and distribution of forest biomass globally to1. Introduction
One of the mplanet is the co
: +33 5 61 55 85 00.an).
l rights reserved.j ourna l homepage: wwwf Environment 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Biomass and the global carbon cycle
ost unequivocal indications of man's effect on ourntinual and accelerating growth of carbon dioxide
(CO2) in the atmosphere. A central concern is the climate-changeimplication of increasing atmospheric CO2. The principal contributionto this growth is emissions from fossil fuel burning. However, the rateof growth is substantially less and much more variable than theseemissions because of a net ux of CO2 from the atmosphere to theEarth's surface. This net ux can be partitioned into atmosphere-ocean and atmosphere-land components, whose mean values for the1990s are 2.20.4 GtC yr1 and 1.00.6 GtC yr1 respectively(International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007). As in mostcarbon cycle calculations, CO2 uxes are reported in this paper interms of carbon units; 1 GtC=1 Pg or 1015 g of carbon.
This simple description of the overall carbon balance concealssome major scientic issues, which we illustrate by Fig. 1:
1. Although fossil fuel emissions, the atmospheric CO2 increase andthe net atmosphere-ocean ux are well constrained by measure-ments (IPCC, 2007), this is not true of the atmosphere-land ux. Itsvalue is estimated simply as the residual needed to close the carbonbudget after subtracting the atmospheric growth in CO2 and the netamount transferred into the oceans from the emissions. Hence itsvariance is determined indirectly as the sum of the variances of theother uxes.
2. Fossil fuel burning forms only part of the total anthropogenic CO2
2851T. Le Toan et al. / Remote Sensing of Environment 115 (2011) 28502860loading of the atmosphere,with anothermajor contribution comingfrom land use change. The size of this ux is poorly known, and isreported in IPCC (2007) simply as a range, shown in Fig. 1 as a lowand high value about a central value of 1.6 GtC yr1. (It is worthnoting that the lastest value put it to 1.4 GtC yr1 (Le Qur et al.,2009)).
3. In order to balance the carbon budget, any value of land-use-changeuxmust have an associated land uptakeux, indicated in Fig. 1 as aresidual ux, since its value is derived purely as a difference ofother terms.
Marked on Fig. 1 are the uncertainties in the well-constrainedterms; it can be seen that the uncertainties in both emissions anduptake by the land dominate the overall error budget. Fundamental tobetter quantication of these land uxes is accurate knowledge aboutthe magnitude, spatial distribution and change of forest biomass.
More than 98% of the land-use-change ux is caused by tropicaldeforestation (IPCC, 2007), which converts carbon stored as woodybiomass (which is approximately 50% carbon) into emissions. Themost basic methods of calculating this ux simply multiply the area
Changes in C pools
Fig. 1. Bar chart showing the anthropogenic carbon sources and the associated annualnet uxes to the carbon pools for the 1990s, with units given as GtC yr1. Theuncertainties in the well-constrained terms (fossil fuel emissions, the atmosphericincrease in CO2 and the net ocean sink) are indicated by the error bars. The land usechange ux is poorly constrained and the chart indicates the range of estimates, fromlow to high, of this quantity. In order to achieve carbon balance, there must be take-upof CO2 by the land surface, and the corresponding low and high estimates of this
residual land sink are indicated. The data for this gure are taken from IPCC (2007).deforested (derived from national statistics or remote sensing) by theaverage biomass of the deforested area, expressed in carbon units(IPCC, 2003). More complete methods of carbon accounting wouldinclude carbon uxes from the soil, differential decay rates of carbondepending on how the biomass is used, and regrowth uxes (DeFrieset al., 2002; Houghton, 2003a, 2003b). However, both approaches areseverely compromised by lack of reliable information on the levels ofbiomass actually being lost in deforestation. This uncertainty aloneaccounts for a spread of values of about 1 GtC yr1 in different esti-mates of carbon emissions due to tropical deforestation (Houghton,2005).
The residual land ux is of major signicance for climate, since itreduces the build-up of CO2 in the atmosphere. If we assume a landuse change ux of 1.6 GtC yr1, the total anthropogenic ux to theatmosphere in the 1990s was 8 GtC yr1. Of this, around 32.5% wasabsorbed by the land (see Fig. 1), but this value has very largeuncertainties arising from the uncertainties in the land use changeux. The uptake is highly variable from year to year, for reasons thatare poorly understood. Similar trends are seen since 2000 (Canadellet al., 2007). A key question is howmuch of this residual sink is due toxi