020215 Two beings each from the infinite intersect in the finite. But do they come from the same infinite? And does it matter?

012915 Rupert Sheldrake's. Phenomenon of morphic resonance and formative causation could perhaps most easily be demonstrated to be a manifestation of quantum entanglement in the case of the crystal formation or crystallization experiments.

The less information you have, the easier it is to fit the small number of facts which you do have to the dictates of personal bias prejudice and wishful thinking.

Is one's individual consciousness just a kind of fuzzy holographic piece or component of a larger whole?

The story of the true believer who wanted to wait for God to rescue him from the flood and ignored two boats and a helicopter in theprocess.God said if I can forgive humankind as a man and I will forgive them as God.

I'm reading "How Greek Philosophy Corrupted the Christian Concept of God" on Scribd. Read more:http://scribd.com/doc/202836394

The contradiction is that the collective of artifacts which coalesced from ground are taken as fundamentally constitutive of the context which provides the meaning for further manifestations of the phenomenal realm.

Mormon doctrine is in part an expression of the intertextuality of Aboriginal Scripture.

Like water or the quantum vacuum, consciousness possesses a possibly indefinite number of distinct phases. The availability of different phases implies a Providence of conditions necessary and sufficient to produce fundamental shifts in a system's integrative dynamics.

The phenomenon of dark energy and the endless accelerated expansion of the cosmos flies directly in the face of the second law of thermodynamics or the law of entropy.

Scribd and Wiki search: displacement current, space is emergent, consciousness is emergent, Dirichlet membrane, CMB as Hawking Radiation.

Entangled Hawking Radiation.

Ads/CFT duality

No single observer sees anything unusual. Although collective minds do.

Once we let go of the notion that the universe began in time, but that time began with the universe, then the infinite multiverse is but a next logical step an infinite multiverse of an indefinite number of disjoint timelines.

I'm reading "The Shape of Inner Space: String Theory and the Geometry of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions" on Scribd. Read more:http://scribd.com/doc/229360618

Information is preserved in parallel universes without black holes.

"Everything is gray until it happens to you."Hylozoism

The other side of God and Other Minds . . . Der Himmel ist nur eine Bedingung des Bewusstseins.

If Heaven exists then it must be a place where one's understanding and mode of perception, the relationship of minds un the immediacy of communication, the transpersonal nature of being, etc. is such that the problem of solipsism is either irrelevant or finds a solution.012915The case of multiple consciousnesses and centers of volition.It is not that oneself or other persons could in fact secretly process eternal life, but rather that the ground of being from which each and every consciousness springs possesses eternal life. Still thie important question remains whether or not there's any correlation between how the self is partitioned with respect to space time and causality and how this ground of being is partitioned within itself outside space and time.

Ordinary people and philosophers alike just have no appreciation of the brute fact of their own individual existence, thwarted and masked as it may be by their wonder at the merely seeming brute fact of human existence.

Each person's intelligence is unique and non-redundant.

The fabric substance and integral unity of any particular brain or any particular type of neural process, which is a cause of physical processes that take time and require time for their influence to spread throughout the bulk of a functional system and in which consciousness is structurally manifest. If consciousness is owing to quantum nonlocality, which is not a functionality which is specific to a distributed causal process, then the integral unity of conscious mind should be derivative of the quantum nonlocality of the underlying quantum vacuum, which ironically is also the very ground of temporality of these same nonlocality connected systems.

The duality is here innate, namely that of nonlocality and temporality. This is reminiscent of the duality of Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics.

Cat pulled aside my cover to see if I was asleep just as a dream character was paging either me the consultant or the hired help who allowed me to have the electronic key/pager to the storage rooms and closets. The cat knew that this might wake me from my dream, which it did.

The emergent properties of wetness and constituent water molecules in analogy with the emergent property of consciousness and allegedly constituent neurons. Mentioned in a podcast on attention schema theory.

The emergent properties of wetness and constituent water molecules in analogy with the emergent property of consciousness and allegedly constituent neurons. Mentioned in a podcast on attention schema theory.

There are persons of a certain level of intelligence that are capable of becoming fluently conversant with the terminology and catch phrases of a new system of thought, while the underlying logic of the system shall forever elude them.

Similar to the analogy between physical angular momentum within space-time and intrinsic spin in quantum mechanics we might have quantum entanglement serving the role of a kind of internal spatial distribution analogous to the normal physical distribution of matter in space and time

Similar to the analogy between physical angular momentum within space-time and intrinsic spin in quantum mechanics we might have quantum entanglement serving the role of a kind of internal spatial distribution analogous to the normal physical distribution of matter in space and time

If the integrity of a concept breaks down once we scrutinize it more carefully then one has to ask what was the terminology of the concept and its intrinsic language referring to all along if anything

If the integrity of a concept breaks down once we scrutinize it more carefully then one has to ask what was the terminology of the concept and its intrinsic language referring to all along if anything

There is no group selection in the anthropic cosmological principle. There is only the most highly individualized selection namely of a single, unique observer.

Clearly multiple anthropic principles could be formulated - the question becomes - in the competition between multiple anthropic principles, which one can be proven to come out on top and win the competition?

Nick Bostrom's self-sampling assumption, the random observer reference class and the non-existence of the concept of consciousness.

The stringent requirements posed by carbon based life are not what constitutes the actual filter at work in the anthropic cosmological principle. One might argue that it is the much more stringent requirements befitting consciousness, namely of a conscious observer, but the requirements are much more stringent than this because there is no concept of consciousness in general, so we must be referring to some particular consciousness or other as providing the extra stringent requirements of anthropic filtering.

The stringent requirements posed by carbon based life are not what constitutes the actual filter at work in the anthropic cosmological principle. One might argue that it is the much more stringent requirements befitting consciousness, namely of a conscious observer, but the requirements are much more stringent than this because there is no concept of consciousness in general, so we must be referring to some particular consciousness or other as providing the extra stringent requirements of anthropic filtering.

People and even philosophers of science no less consistently and seriously underestimate the openness of reality Henry Marganau open reality.

You reach a point in your mental life where the sheer mass of unresolved questions and loose ends or hanging strings, if you will become so vast that one becomes gradually more and more attracted to the prospect of returning to investigate and reinvestigate all of these open-ended issues than one does by any possible prospects of moving forward and investigating new things. This is the tipping point for intellectuals who are getting on in their years.

Younger people may view this as embarking upon a dark place, but they are quite mistaken there's actually joy in this voyage of return and rediscovery.

The conservation of all physical quantities associated with quantum observables is responsible for making necessary the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.

Explanation of multiverse theory, ACP, string theory, MWI, Schrodinger's Cat, quantum immortality, dream escapes, etc. to Toby Johnson.

Hilbert Space is the wormhole between real space and platonic space.

Future evolution involves the continual reprocessing of sociolinguistic concept maps and therefore of transgressing boundaries

Realism requires an interrealm, i.e., intersubjectivity, which necessarily involves the intersection of independently originating causal chains, which is to say the interaction of entities that have never interacted before and which may possess no prior coordination of their respective aboriginal grounds. What is this interground...what kind of nexus is it. This nexus is perfectly general and is itself not an instantiation of any kind or category.

Saul Kripke's interpretation of Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. Paul Grice. Cartesian Linguistics. "Philoso"I think it is a great burden for a field of theoretical inquiry if its practitioners have to compete for the approval of those who don't understand the issues."

- Thomas NagelSaul Kripke's interpreration of Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. Paul Grice. Cartesian Linguistics. "Philosophy is continuous with science, only more abstract and general." - Thomas Nagel

The relation of the ground of bring to being is that of existence to simulation. This points up the mysterious gap between being and existence.

"I think it is a great burden for a field of theoretical inquiry if its practitioners have to compete for the approval of those who don't understand the issues."

- Thomas Nagel

Investigate Wittgenstein's assumption that "everything is equally real".

The problem of other minds shall only be solved by a collective entering of that gap between being and existence implied by the simulation analogy.

Clearly, the subjective experience of the color red, for example, (whatever it is for a particular person) is caused by the effect that the collective *action* of the brain has on some self-sustaining and self-depicting medium, c.f., "there is no meaning without context", "no meaning without reference of the symbols of the system to something crucially beyond itself", etc., but it is not only this for otherwise we attribute 0 potential of the brain to participate in ground in the sense of its making a "substantial" contribution to it, say, through the generation of novel quantum entanglements.

The principle that, "Everyone is a zombie except oneself" applies equally from the standpoint of each ego.

Wittgenstein's solution to the private language argument may find application in processing Searle's statement that . . ."each of these behaviorist, functionalist, or computational theories could be satisfied by an unconscious zombie of sufficient physical complexity." Spontaneous decoherence, inertia threshold, exclusion of three-way interactions in Boltzmann's statistical mechanics, Gdels Incompleteness Theorem, Ontological interpretation of Heisenberg Uncertainty.

Ontological = Epistemological where interpretations of the HUP is concerned.

The principle that, "Everyone is a zombie except oneself" applies equally from the standpoint of each ego.

Interpenetration of otherwise distinct consciousnesses is necessary for minding the gap between being and existence.

The "neural identity theory" of Dennett works, but only because the heavy lifting is forever being effected in the background, performed by "the noumenal neural network", i.e., the neural network as it is in itself and forever beyond the realm of intersubjectively discoverable phenomena.

Like a digital clock disconnected from the internet, the isolated brain would at once begin to temporally drift, which is equivalent to a widening random walk in the multiverse. Even a closed system, if complex enough, would possess some small modicum of ground.

Multiple layering of intentionality.

One system of permutation and combination cannot possibly encompass the ground of possibility. This is because these phenomena do not cohere at the level at which the phenomena manifest themselves. One cannot escape the relevance of topology here.

So the coherence of a given set of phenomena cannot be explained away in terms of however vast a permutation and combination state space with an endless variety of differently configured sets of phenomena.

It is funny that dark energy turns on during the expansion of the universe right about the same time as the earth's solar system began to form.

What is it, what medium is it that can be both ground of being and manifestation thereof?

Martin Rees: local by-laws governing our cosmological patch.

The cash value of negation is compliment within a fixed or closed system of possibilities. And yet when to administration of negation within the context of an open system. Is this only a metaphorical projection? Or does it represent a transcendent ability of language to refer beyond the concrete basis of the application of language?

Just as in linear algebra wherein two n by n matrices are termed similar if there exists an invertible n by n matrix by which the two matrices can be intertranslated, information in one context can be related to analogous information in another context.

Supposedly here basis is analogous to context.

https://www.lds.org/ensign/1999/07/the-exodus-repeated?lang=eng

The quantum - classical discontinuity implies a breakdown of spatial scale reductionism and with relativity, also a breakdown of time scale reductionism.

There is no identifiable physical basis for consciousness other than the correlations that can be established by interrogation. Although processes beneath psychic discernability are where the real causal basis lies. No concept of consciousness means no theory of its physical basis either.

Multiple layering of intentionality.

There is no identifiable physical basis for consciousness other than the correlations that can be established by interrogation. Although processes beneath psychic discernability are where the real causal basis lies. No concept of consciousness means no theory of its physical basis either.

Empathy with people who can't feel empathy is paradoxical. Empathy with people who can't feel empathy is profoundly paradoxical!123114 It is not that oneself or other persons could in fact secretly process eternal life, but rather that the ground of being from which each and every consciousness springs possesses eternal life. Still the important question remains whether or not there's any correlation between how the self is partitioned with respect to space time and causality and how this ground of being is partitioned within itself outside of space and time.

Ordinary people and philosophers alike just have no appreciation of the brute fact of their own individual existence, thwarted and masked as it may be by their wonder at the merely seeming brute fact of human existence.@$ 123014 You might say that the photon has no time to do anything at any point along its trajectory other than moving to the next point. Intuitively it is easy to see that the photon therefore cannot possess any mass as it possesses no internal degrees of freedom with which we can associate an internal energy. Consciousness underlies and makes possible the rationality of data.

Law of excluded middle is not applicable to a closed system there was an assumption of Boltzmann that 3 Way interactions or captures were unlikely and could be dismissed out of hand which was at the basis of his statistical mechanics formulation of the second law of thermodynamics

The wavelike propagation of electrons in neural microtubules is going to interference between the electrons and the vacuum electromagnetic field such that the switch from wave like to particle like propagation which occurs at point zero 5 moles per liter concentration of anesthetic in brain fat would correspond to a switch from way like to particle like propagation

But it is precisely Boltzmann's assumption about the unimportance of 3 Way capture and three-way particle interactions in a gas that is needed in the case of the combination of helium 4 nuclei to form carbon-12 atoms in the stellar interior. Here lies the subtle connection between open system thinking and the anthropic principle.

What is the connection between opportunistic causal supervenience and collapse of the wavefunction by consciousness or by the mere possibility of a hypothetical observer finding out which trajectory a particle took within a quantum superposition of trajectories?

Can physical constants be interpreted as boundary conditions upon a field?

Analogous to hell subsonic frequencies interfering with frequencies that are audible alter the quality of those audible frequencies, we could say that temporal context, although more distant than the immediate past, i.e., that incorporated into a "specious present", nonetheless makes a difference to how we experience the moment in the now, that is, within that specious present. Therefore, moreover, there must be some earmarks, however subtle, within the presentational continuum of the specious present, which point to or make reference to time outside the boundaries of thisspecious present.

The ground of being as a kind of external field interacting with and influencing each moment acts to split the degeneracy between specious presents of smaller as opposed to greater time interval and still more provides a basis for differential scales of time, as well as disrupting any possibility of time scale reductionism.

Bertrand Russell skepticism about the historicity of the world, namely that it may have come into existence five minutes ago, complete with all requisite evidence for an authentically distant past, is disarmed by considering the meaning and importance of context and reference to egoic consciousness.

Promissory materialism

Consciousness studies research group

Strawson Panpsychism Nagel

Alfred North Whitehead "quantum theory"Skull beyond the sky.

The reach of metaphor and the behavioral genetics of African American physicists.

Dawkins' arrogance seems to treat the vastness of the cosmos like background filler for his godless anthropocentric ego.

Zero Proofiness

Meaning of Deja vu.

Is Terence McKenna was fond of saying whoever first discovered water it certainly wasn't a fish. Humans bear a similar relationship to consciousness that fish do to water.

Many terms in one of a kind of Larry acquired their referential force not by virtue of an initial act of ostensive definition, but by a kind of contextual osmosis-distillation process. All current meanings are nth order. Upon first occurrence, context was lacking to ground a full-bodied meaning of an ostensively defined term. The context necessary to ground a term's meaning is necessarily multilayered, not laminar, but interpenetrating. There is no naked ostensive meaning - this is a retrodictive projection similar to reconstruction of dream sequences from leftover physical traces of memory reactivated and reprocessed in the fully functioning awake brain though originally laid down within merely partially functioning grey matter.

As we know the Pharisees condemned Jesus for performing miracles on the Sabbath. There is perhaps no better illustration to be found of the block headedness of legalism and the legalistic mode of thought.

Entangled particles cannot communicate through the connecting string in the higher dimensional space time continuum because the string itself represents the highest frequency possible and so cannot function as an underlying carrier wave for a wave packet of transmitted data.

Alan Watts tells a story about his crazy uncle who believed that every single word of the Bible was true until one day while reading in the book of Proverbs he's encountered what he considered a dirty word and from that moment on would have nothing more to do with the Bible.The intentionality of consciousness combines its context and reference. Reference requires common grounds of referent and referatum? This is independent of whether there is a listener or not.

On "failure to refer".

Can entangled quantum bits mutually interfere so that it would be possible to create a non-local with packet?

Thermal fluctuations are far larger than quantum gravity phenomena in the same way that the ocean is far larger than any given wave within the ocean.

Brain scientists have the cart before the horse - it is not neural processes underlying our conscious experiences; it is conscious processes underlying our neural experiences. This is akin to Joseph Campbell's formulation, paraphrased, that human existence is a case of conscious-nesses having a human experience instead of a human having a conscious experience.

It was a revelation to Christ on the cross when all divine power and influence was suddenly withdrawn from Him, power that he had perhaps all along believed to be an integral part of his own unique identity, which caused Him to exclaim, " my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" he understood right away without having to have been briefed beforehand what was the part that he was about to play.

If we could perform an analysis of the phenomenology of the phenomenology of the mysterious so as to get at the root master metaphor of all that which we might consider mysterious, this may give us a foothold in ascending the mountain of consciousness in arriving at passable substitute for a general concept of consciousness.

Like many of my generation, I drifted away from my Catholic faith on an invisible tether, quite unaware that a deep and profound God consciousness had been lovingly instilled in me as a small child by parents, by the very early and numinous experience of Mass and of the Holy Eucharist and that I would surely and inevitably be gently drawn back into the arms of the Mother Church that originally gave birth to this consciousness. Someday soon, I would like to rediscover the wonders of my Catholic faith with a compatible woman who has herself experiencing a similar reawakening.

Imposing quantum entanglement onto particles in the past (which may no longer exist). :)Don't forget that quantum uncertainties of the present do not vanish just because they are "now" in the past. Future measurements can still affect past quantum (Heisenberg) uncertainties. In this sense, time must possess at least two dimensions (to account for feedback across time).

http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4834

Funny that the relationship between particle vs. wave behavior and the presence or absence of consciousness is inverted for electron behavior inside brain microtubules from how electrons behave in all these varieties of the two-slit experiment (in which, of course, electrons have been substituted for a photons), namely, when the patient is anaesthetized (consciousness absent), the electrons exhibit particle behavior, while it is the very presence of consciousness in the two-slit experiment (that of the observer), which causes the electrons to behave in a particle-like fashion. One wonders if the relation of inversion has anything to do with the inverted relationship between the subjective observer and the objective observer (objective possibility of hypothetical observers obtaining which-way knowledge).

That quantum theory exists at all is a vindication of the scientific community's assertion that they havenoworld view, no axe to grind. Since the Enlightenment, the model scientific approach has been to cast aside world views, only reporting on the results of experiments which can be repeated and verified, c.f., The Reality Program by Ross Rhodes http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/reality/RealityFrame1.html Must engage in a program of self-study of at least several hours per day in addition to aggressively pursuing opportunities for NRC and FEMA training course. Attempt to take the CHP exam within five years of date of hire. Set up and frequently visit and update your linkedIn account and consider trying the premium option to see if it's for you. Network as much as possible when doing business travel. Volunteer for outside projects and complete them on time and endeavor to put more into their completion than just what is required. Regularly interview for jobs - do it for the interviewing experience even if you are not planning on leaving your current job. Your current employer should know that you are maintaining your marketability with prospective competing employers. Dressing for success at all times will contribute to maintaining this favorable impression. Attempt to develop additional outside income streams, e.g., 2nd job, rental propety, etc. to reduce your "vulnerability"!Ordinary knowledge is knowledge of objects; transcendental knowledge is knowledge of how it is possible for us to experience those objects as objects. This is based on Kant's acceptance ofDavid Hume's argument that certain general features of objects (e.g. persistence, causal relationships) cannot derive from the sense impressions we have of them. Kant argues that the mind must contribute those features and make it possible for us to experience objects as objects. In the central part of hisCritique of Pure Reason, the "Transcendental Deduction of the Categories", Kant argues for a deep interconnection between the ability to have self-consciousness and the ability to experience a world of objects. Through a process of synthesis, the mind generates both the structure of objects and its own unity.A metaphilosophical question discussed by many Kantian scholars is how transcendental reflection is itself possible. Stephen Palmquist interprets Kant's appeal tofaithas his most effective solution to this problem.[4]For Kant, the "transcendent", as opposed to the "transcendental", is that which lies beyond what our faculty of knowledge can legitimately know.Hegel's counter-argument to Kant was that to know a boundary is also to be aware of what it bounds and as such what lies beyond it in other words, to have already transcended it.Inphenomenology, the "transcendent" is that which transcends our own consciousness that which is objective rather than only a phenomenon of consciousness.Noemais employed in phenomenology to refer to the terminus of an intention as given forconsciousness.

There is no logical impossibility in the hypothesis that the world sprang into existence five minutes ago, exactly as it then was, with a population that "remembered" a wholly unreal past. There is no logically necessary connection between events at different times; therefore nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future can disprove the hypothesis that the world began five minutes ago.... I am not here suggesting that the non-existence of the past should be entertained as a serious hypothesis. Like all skeptical hypotheses, it is logically tenable but uninteresting. (The Analysis of Mind,1921, p. 159-160). How many such points of logically tenable but uninteresting vulnerability can common sense and its associated nave realism be demonstrated to possess? Likely there are many, which points up the need for a kind of providence behind all of this seemingly revealed wisdom of common sense. And the question becomes: must this providence be of a wholly naturalistic origin?

Often relegated to the methods section of genetic research articles, the term degeneracy is regularly misunderstood and its theoretical significance widely understated. Degeneracy describes the ability of different structures to be conditionally interchangeable in their contribution to system functions. Frequently mislabeled redundancy, degeneracy refers to structural variation whereas redundancy refers to structural duplication. Sources of degeneracy include, but are not limited to, (1) duplicate structures that differentiate yet remain isofunctional, (2) unrelated isofunctional structures that are dispersed endogenously or exogenously, (3) variable arrangements of interacting structures that achieve the same output through multiple pathways, and (4) parcellation of a structure into subunits that can still variably perform the same initial function. The ability to perform the same function by drawing upon an array of dissimilar structures contributes advantageously to the integrity of a system. Drawing attention to the heterogeneous construction of living systems by highlighting the concept of degeneracy valuably enhances the ways scientists think about self-organization, robustness, and complexity. Labels in science, however, can sometimes be misleading. In scientific nomenclature, the word degeneracy has calamitous proximity to the word degeneration used by pathologists and the shunned theory of degeneration once promoted by eugenicists. This article disentangles the concept of degeneracy from its close etymological siblings and offers a brief overview of the historical and contemporary understandings of degeneracy in science. Distinguishing the importance of degeneracy will hopefully allow systems theorists to more strategically operationally conceptualize the distributed intersecting networks that comprise complex living systems. 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity, 2014, c.f., Degeneracy: Demystifying and destigmatizing a core concept in systems biology, Paul H. Mason

Degeneracy is the ability of elements that are different, in some respect, to perform the same role in some, but not all, situations. Degeneracy is a noticeable property of many biological systems, and is observable on many scales within those systems [7] and has been linked to the evolvability and robustness of these systems [16]. Examples range from molecular interactions and gene networks [7], the connectivity of neurons in the brain [13], through to social networks [15]. Complexity and degeneracy have been strongly linked [14]. Attempts have been made to describe these concepts into mathematically meaningful, and consequently unambiguous formulae [14][7], c.f., Degeneracy Enriches Artificial Chemistry Binding Systems. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/alife/0262297140chap23.pdf

December 2014 "I dont think that death should be feared, because looked squarely in the eye it can be seen to be the same as the silence from which we came." - David Rnnegard (Holds a PhD in philosophy from the London School of Economics, and is a researcher and teacher in corporate social responsibility in Stockholm.) This presumed symmetry between the "silence from which we came" and "the silence of death" appears to me to be a rather "broken symmetry" (insert the real "God particle" here, lol) because the one silence has somehow succeeded in producing us, while, according to Dr. Rnnegard, the other is wholly without the power to produce us altogether anew. And this is because of a hidden prejudice by which ones conception of time, temporality and even dimensionality is truncated. This prejudice unmasked would be that unself-conscious conceit of the human mind that its concept map exhaustively covers Reality. So the divide between, philosophically-minded at least, theists and atheists is one of belief in what I will term here big-R reality vs. small-R reality. This divide goes far beyond the mere belief or non-belief in a transcendent creator-being. I think this hinges on an understanding of personal identity, namely is personal ID based on the maintenance of a threadlike continuity or is it merely based upon the satisfaction of a finite collection of precursor conditions such that if the laundry list of such conditions could be fulfilled once, then it could not be necessarily the case that this list could never more find fulfillment. It is likely that, in the majority of cases, atheism is an ethical choice and a moral stance, which for logical consistencys sake must altogether forego an opposing position to an unfounded metaphysical claim of the religionist that God exists. In other words, the principled atheist does not believe in the proposition, God exists for moral, ethical, social, cultural, historical reasons, but also for reasons of viscerally personal taste. The principled atheist dismisses all metaphysical claims and so may only truly dismiss the proposition, God exists by asserting, after the fashion of Wittgenstein, Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. In other words, the proposition, God exists is not false; it is merely that this proposition is meaningless. But is it really? Can we not conceive of a situation in which this proposition could possess a self-consistent and intelligible meaning?

December 2014 Is the quantum mechanical nature of particle behavior wholly or largely dependent upon interaction of the particle with the underlying quantum vacuum electromagnetic field, c.f., action of anesthetics upon electron mobility, etc.

A possible moral implications of the anthropic principle is the personal aspects of the fine-tuning argument or its application to one's personal existence. One should perhaps think twice before throwing out a given feature of the original fine tuning of one's anthropic incarnation. For example I was born Catholic so should I think twice therefore before I consider leaving the Church in favor of some evangelical or even more different faith or belief system?

There appears to be a provincialist ethical and moral implications of the anthropic cosmological principle in light of the fine-tuning argument and controversy.

Christ reformed metaphysical work in redeeming mankind. A key to this is that when the devil tempted Christ, like Adam before him, was actually tempted in that there was a real possibility of him falling prey to this temptation. There had to have been real risk of failure of this divine redemptive project or otherwise everything which transpired within the history of its fulfillment would have been a mere charade. Metaphysical work appears to require the free will of at least two or more persons, possibly three, if the complexity processing capacity of the ground of being needs to be superseded in the process.

Discuss the conceit of the human mind in believing that its concept map exhaustively covers reality use the analogy of the peripheral field of vision which is limited but whose demarcation is not visible because beyond the purview of the visual field is not blackness but nothingness.

Re investigate the color analogy for consciousness in discussing the absence of a concept of consciousness and the reality of transcendental mind

Investigate the multifarious implications of the concept of metaphysical work, for example, in the contexts of free will, collapse of the wavefunction, noncomputability of consciousness, inertia of real particles, spontaneous decoherence of particles and energy configurations with total energy exceeding the Planck mass-energy, non-gravitating of vacuum and virtual particles, qualified gravitation of superposition states, etc., still further theological applications of this concept: fall of Mankind, redemptive acts of Christ, e.g, when tempted by the Devil, when forsaken by God, when bodily resurrected, etc.

Is consciousness a law unto itself? You know the words can keeping the physical constants truly constant and merely operating within the static physical laws such as they are produced the same phenomena has tweaking those physical constants to create distinct universes each with its own different physical laws?

We have to consider the case of there being multiple grounds of being

Consciousness is only not mysterious and therefore explicable to a transcendental mind never to a particular embodied mind

We must never lose sight of the fact that there exists. Things which fall all together outside of our broadest deepest and most general concepts

Under the effect of sensory stimulation the brain pulls information directly from where it is interface in situated with in its own ground of physical existence.Reply,Reply AllorForward|More

The Kantian postulates do not postulate a time after time. Rational hope is not for those who, in time, await events that would come to ll hopes void. For Husserl, intuition lls a signitive aim, as though, one day, what is hoped for would have to make itself known. For Kant, that is impossible: time is the form of sensibility and belongs to the understandings constitution of phenomenal objectivity. If rational hope were to be fullled, if it had to make itself known at a certain moment, that would mean that immortality would have a temporal fullment, known in the manner of the phenomenon. But such a contact with the absolute is excluded by the Critique of Pure Reason. The rational hope is a hope that cannot be compared with hope in time, c.f., Derrida on Time, (L: GDT, p. 66)1

There is a much wider spectrum of possibilities and categories and concepts then is available to the human intellect

This is only to be expected from the general principle that the ground of a process transcends any or defects which are manifest or come out of that process

A human being should no more expect to understand what is happening to him upon experience of death as a newborn infant would understand the process of its birth.

The solipsism of the entrenched skeptic will never be refuted by a committee, but only by a transcendent other. A defining characteristic of this transcendent other is that it should have privileged access to one enter subjective mental states.

Prolegomena to any ground of being the ground of ground of being

So not only did one's parents have to meet, but each gamete cell from each parent had to meet. "Supervenient probability".

Language maps are not intertranslatable points to indeterminate linguistic "geography".Is the anthropic principle reversible?

Similar to big band/big crunch

We exile those from the moments we wish to preserve.

Exactly analogous does not work because consciousness is not formal or computable.

When we are attempting to pursue to its very end the logic of the anthropic cosmological principle in handling the fine tuning problem, how might we be able to do this for multiple targets in which 1) "also rans" are minimalized (or at least marginalized - by placing them in less well anthropically fine tuned alternate universes) and 2) excluding "also rans" almost entirely? There would have to be a unity of the human spirit at work here which, again, would bespeak a transcendental concept of consciousness known only to a transcendental mind.

How do we distinguish what is an artifact of fine tuning versus what is an act of interpretation of partially ambiguous data?

The case of multiple consciousnesses and centers of volition has a distinct topology from that of a solitary consciousness or center of volition. If the phenomenal self is real then it must be enclosed within its solitary ground of being in order for interaction with the other or others to be authentic. Paradoxically enough, reality must be the product of mutual agreement in participatory collaboration between selves and so the self is not phenomenally real but merely an avatar as well as that of all other selves appearing with within the presentational continuum of the self.

The deep time context for a Boltzmann brain continuant is topologically distinct from that of a really physically embodied mind brain combination.

Eric Schwitzgebel, "My Boltzmann continuants" on The Splintered Mind @ http://schwirzgebel.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-boltzmann-continuants.html

Are both Boltzmann brain continuants dependent upon inclusion within the same light cone as the historical legacy self? This depends on the particular nature of the grounding of the self. Is the self is grounded within its own light cone or is it merely grounded within a single universe or is it grounded within the multiverse as a whole or is its ground altogether transcendental?