tennessee valley authority (tva) kingston fossil plant knoxville
TRANSCRIPT
Coal Combustion Residue:
Status of EPA’s Efforts to Regulate
Disposal
Lauren Parry BoyerCited from GAO, Frank Rusco
Coal Combustion Residue
Data | Storing CCRs | Federal Role | Resolutions
Environmental Protection Agency
•Sent request letters to 210 facilities and 61 corporate offices
•Purpose - To determine the number of CCR coal storage areas and other information
•Ultimate Goal – To assess the structural stability
•Currently, 584 coal storage areas in 35 States
Coal Combustion Residue
Data | Storing CCRs | Federal Role | Resolutions
Problems
1.Structural defects (such as TVA Kingston Facility)
1.Health and environmental risks• 26 facilities reported spills or unpermitted releases
within 10 years• 24 cited were proven to endanger human health and
environment between 1999-2005• 39 cited were potential damage cases
1.Risks from wastewater containing CCR• Toxins from CCR wastewater seep into groundwater
from unlined surface impoundments• EPA reports that toxins in CCR wastewater will
continue to increase
Coal Combustion Residue
Data | Storing CCRs | Federal Role | Resolutions
EPA does not Directly Regulate CCR Disposal
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Options Industry and State
Agencies
Environmental Groups
Regulations under Subtitle C
Regulations under Subtitle D
XX
Coal Combustion Residue
Data | Storing CCRs | Federal Role | Resolutions
Beneficial Uses for CCR Wastes
•Subtitle D reduced potential risks
•Used in cement, concrete, wallboard products, roadbeds and structural fill
Coal Combustion Residue
Data | Storing CCRs | Federal Role | Resolutions
Current Issues to be Resolved
•Reconsidering Subtitle D
•Hybrid Approach – Hazardous waste may become solid waste upon regulations
•Studies suggest CCRs present risks to human health and the environment
•New units are lined and provided with groundwater monitors but these only represent a small portion of existing plants
•Federal vs. State control debate