tb – yesterday, today and tomorrow
DESCRIPTION
TB – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Jerrold J. Ellner MD Boston University Sept 2013. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Jerrold J. Ellner MD
Boston University
Sept 2013
TB – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
“If the number of victims that a disease claims is the measure of its significance, then all diseases, particularly the most dreaded infectious diseases such as bubonic plague, Asiatic cholera, etc., must rank far behind tuberculosis.”
- Robert Koch, 1882
Short History of TB
• 1882 – Koch discovers tubercle bacillus*
• 1907 – von Pirquet adapts Koch’s tuberculin as diagnostic test
• 1919 – Calmette & Guerin produce BCG vaccine
• 1943 – Schatz and Waksman discover streptomycin*
• 1948 – BMRC trial of streptomycin vs. bedrest
• 1952 – development of INH
• 1966 – development of rifampicin
• 1978 – ‘short-course’ TB treatment (6 months)
• 1990s- DOTS strategy
Global TB 2010
• 8.8 million new cases – 1.1 HIV
• 1.5 million deaths – 0.35 HIV
• 0.65 MDR – 10% XDR = 3.4% new; 20% retreatment cases
WHO Reports. 2011
TB Cases
Natural History of TB
Lancet Inf Dis 2008;8:601-11
50%5% (40%)
5% (2-10%/y)
Re-exposRe-expos
Re-exposRe-expos
TB diagnostics, 1882 TB diagnostics, 2010
DIAGNOSIS OF ACTIVE TB
AFB (acid fast bacilli) smear
AFB (shown in red) are tubercle bacilli
Proportion of Patients with PulmonaryTB with Positive AFB Smears
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70AFB positivity in TB patients
Similar for “classic” RUL infiltrate
Late HIV
Early HIV
HIV uninf
11
MGIT LJ PCR FM ZN
102 104 105 106 107103101
1+ 2+ 3+ 4+
E-MTD sensitivity >95% smear (+); 75-90% smear (-)Amplicor sensitivity >95% smear (+); 60-70% smear (-)
MMWR Jan 16, 2009
NEJM. – published on-line Sept 1, 2010
Xpert – MTB-RIF
• One sample – 98% smear pos, 73% smear neg
• Three samples – 100% smear pos, 90% smear neg
• Specificity - 99%
• Sensitivity MDR-TB – 97%
GeneXpert rolled out as first-line diagnostic for TB in South Africa - 31 March 2011
"If a minister can do it, it can’t be that hard," said South African Health Minister Aaron Moatsoaledi, Demonstrating GeneXpert test for TB
16
5 20 80 500-1000Samples per shift
GeneXpert
Xpert MTB/RIF
IGRA v TST
• Mtb specific antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, TB 7-7)
• Higher specificity, correlation with exposure, less cross-reactivity BCG, non tuberculosis mycobacteria
• One visit dx• TST not quality controlled application,
reading
TST v IGRA
• Variable cut-point, risk stratification
• Strong epi basis
• Standard definitions, TST conversion, boosting
• ? Less variability near cutpoint
• Preferable for annual screening
• Less expensive
Diagnosis LTBI
• TST first:
if negative IGRA:
immunocompromised, high risk, ?active TB
if positive IGRA:
BCG vaccinated, ?NTM
Nature Rev Micro. 2009
393 Trancripts TB v LTBI v HC
Nature. 2010
Estimated HIV-TB Co-infection Prevalence, 2000
10 - 99
100 - 999
1000 - 4999
< 5
5 - 9.9
5000 or more
No estimate
Rate per 100 000
From presentation made by: Paul Nunn, WHO, Geneva, Durban 2002
Accuracy of Determine TB-LAM, by CD4
63.9
96.6 98.3
%
Sensitivity 69% for CD4 <50Sensitivity 53% for CD4 50-100
Rapid Dx TB-HIV
AFB Smear Neg PTB
• Xpert sens 62%
• LAM sens 45%
• LAM plus/then Xpert sens 79%
Optimal timing of antiretroviral therapy in adults with untreated HIV-infection and new
TB
ART started within 2 weeks of TB tx improves survival
in PTB patients with Adv. immunosupression;
increased risk of IRIS
Why is TB treatment duration so long?
A
B
C
Hypothetical Model of TB Chemotherapy
anatomic/metabolic populns of bacilli cavitary TB
# b
acill
i
# months of therapy
A: rapidly multiplying, INH>RIF>EMBB: slowly multiplying, PZA>RIF>INHC: sporadically multiplying, RIF>INH
D. Mitchison
1 2 3 4 5 6
Drug-susceptible TB: strategies for shortening duration of treatment
required for cure
1 2 3 4 5 6
EMB
PZA
RIFRIF
INHINH
Treatment month
Optimize the use of the drugs in the regimen (RIF)•RIF at higher dose•RPT instead of RIFReplace EMB (low potency) with a more active drug (e.g. FQ)
Bedaquiline (‘Sirturo’, from Johnson & Johnson)
Addition of bedaquiline (vs. placebo) to a 5-drug MDR-TB regimen resulted in:•Faster culture conversion•Higher sputum culture conversion rate at 24 weeks (78.8% vs. 57.6%)•Prevention of acquired resistance to other background drugs
From Johnson & Johnson
Kaplan–Meier Curves for Culture Conversion According to Time since Randomization.
Lee M et al. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1508-1518.
LINEZOLID in XDR-TB:
NEJM. 2012
PRECLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III
TBA-354NitroimidazolesTB Alliance, U Auckland, U Illinois
AZD587 OxazolidinoneAstrazeneca
PA – 824NitroimidazoloxazineTB Alliance
GatifloxacinFluoroquinoloneWHO/TDR
CPZEN-45Caprazene nucleosideMCRF, Lily TBDDI, NIAID, IDRI
PNU – 100480 (Sutezolid)OxazolidinonePfizer
MoxifloxacinFluoroquinoloneTB Alliance
Quinolone DC – 159aFluoroquinolone AntibioticsJATA, Daiichi-Sankyo Pharmaceutical
TMC207 (Bedaquiline)for MDR- TBDiarylquinolineTibotec BVBA
OPC-67683 (Delamanid)Nitrodihydroimidazo-oxazoleOtsuka PharmaceuticalSQ609
DipiperidinesSequella SQ109
EthylenediaminesSequella, NIH
SQ641CapuramycinsSequella
TMC207 (Bedaquiline)for DS – TBDiarylquinolineTB Alliance, Janssen
BTZ043BenzothiazinonesNew Medicines For Tuberculosis(NIM4TB)
Rifapentine (TBTC study 29)RifamycinCDC, Sanofi-aventis
Q201 – Novel anti – TB agentImidazopyridineQuro Science, Inc.