tagging relations to achieve complex search goals
DESCRIPTION
Tagging relations to achieve complex search goals. Rossano Schifanella Luca Maria Aiello Giancarlo Ruffo Arc 2 s group, Torino, Italy. NWeSP 2011, Salamanca. WHY DO WE TAG?. Bookmarking, categorization, description, simple search tasks …. 25%. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NWeSP 2011, Salamanca
Tagging relations to achieve
complex search goals
Rossano SchifanellaLuca Maria AielloGiancarlo RuffoArc2s group, Torino, Italy
NWeSP 2011 2
WHY DO WE TAG?Bookmarking, categorization, description, simple search tasks…
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 3
25%query volume for complex search tasks on search engines
Donato et al.“Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad”WWW 2010
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 4
TAGS COULD DO MORE!
IDEA:
Tag complex cognitive relations and share them with users with the same needs.
In a complex search process, the user relates different objects and notions, with a very time-consuming activity.
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 5
THE “GESTALT EFFECT” IN TAGGING
13,317 Flickr users, 230,020 photosets, 7,188,004 pictures.Very often, sets of tagged items have titles that do not overlap with its inner tags.
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 6
FOLKSONOMY DEFINITION
Instances of A are called triples
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 7
RELATIONAL FOLKSONOMY
Depending on the definition of ρ we can obtain Sets,Lists,Trees,Graphs , Hypergraphs, …
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 8
USE CASE
…
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 9
• Organizing and sharing complex search experience
• Social search• Collaborative editing• Navigability of the results
ADVANTAGES19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 10
PORTAL: BUNDLE CREATION19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 11
PORTAL: SEARCH PHASE
http://mumb.di.unito.it
19/10/2011
NWeSP 2011 12
SUMMARY FUTURE DIRECTIONS
New relational folksonomy model
Tagging user-generated RELATIONS to enable a new form of social search
Improve web portal and collect data
Recommendation on the basis of relation affinity
19/10/2011
