t-2040 prioritization walk 21 symposium robin...
TRANSCRIPT
T-2
04
0 P
rio
riti
zati
on
Wa
lk 2
1 S
ym
po
siu
m
Ro
bin
Ma
yh
ew
, A
ICP
Oct
ob
er
5th
, 2
01
1
Puget Sound Regional Council
Our Region
•4counties
•82cities
andtowns
•Urbanand rural
Our Members
•Cities,counties,ports, andtransit
•Stateagencies andtribal governments
Who We Represent:
Growth Planning: Vision 2040
Transportation 2040: Adopted 2010
Tra
nsp
ort
ati
on
20
40
Pla
n D
ire
ctio
n
1.
Su
pp
ort
fo
r th
e r
eg
ion
al
gro
wth
str
ate
gy
, in
clu
din
g f
ocu
sin
g g
row
th i
n
reg
ion
all
y d
esi
gn
ate
d c
en
ters
in
sid
e t
he
Urb
an
Gro
wth
Are
a
2.
Re
du
cin
g g
ree
nh
ou
se g
ase
s
3.
Re
du
cin
g v
eh
icle
mil
es
tra
ve
led
4.
Fre
igh
t m
ob
ilit
y
5.
Su
sta
ina
ble
fu
nd
ing
6.
Eq
uit
y a
nd
en
vir
on
me
nta
l ju
stic
e
7.
Re
du
cin
g i
mp
act
s o
n P
ug
et
So
un
d w
ate
r q
ua
lity
8.
Ad
dre
ssin
g c
on
ge
stio
n a
nd
mo
bil
ity
9.
Pro
mo
tin
g e
con
om
ic a
ctiv
ity
an
d e
mp
loy
me
nt
gro
wth
10
.A
chie
vin
g a
jo
bs-
ho
usi
ng
ba
lan
ce
11
.H
ea
lth
/Act
ive
Liv
ing
(a
dd
ed
at
6/1
0/2
01
0 T
PB
me
eti
ng
)
Th
e p
roce
du
res
de
ve
lop
ed
sh
ou
ld u
tili
ze a
co
mm
on
ev
alu
ati
on
fra
me
wo
rk
wh
ere
po
ssib
le,
an
d s
ho
uld
ex
pli
citl
y a
sse
ss k
ey
VIS
ION
20
40
po
licy
are
as
incl
ud
ing
bu
t n
ot
lim
ite
d t
o:
Source: Transportation 2040, pages 120-121
T2040 Prioritization Mission Statement
“To
pri
ori
tize
tra
nsp
ort
ati
on
pro
ject
s in
a
ma
nn
er
tha
t re
info
rce
s a
nd
im
ple
me
nts
VIS
ION
20
40
.T
his
wil
l in
clu
de
th
e
de
ve
lop
me
nt
an
d a
pp
lica
tio
n o
f a
n e
va
lua
tio
n
pro
cess
to
pri
ori
tize
pro
ject
s/p
rog
ram
s th
at
are
wit
hin
th
e p
lan
as
we
ll a
s th
e m
ea
ns
for
all
ow
ing
pro
ject
s to
be
en
tere
d,
mo
dif
ied
or
rem
ov
ed
.”
Approved
December 2010
77
T 2040 Prioritization Measures
•Support for Centers
•Jobs
•Travel
•Multimodal
•Equity
•Safety
•Freight
•Air Quality
•Puget Sound Land &
Water
88
T2040 Prioritization Evaluation Method
Evaluation Method: Utilizing the most
appropriate tools and units for evaluating
projects within investment categories –to
provide information for the decision
Continued
•Bicycle, pedestrian and complete
streets
•Efficiency and safety (TDM/TSM&O)
•Special Needs
•Arterial and State Routes
•Highway and Transit Expansion
Advisory committee
scoring
Advisory committee
scoring with
information from
Travel Demand
Model
10
1111
Regional Bicycle & Ped Peer Review
12
Peer Review –Health and Active Living
Information and Contacts
ww
w.p
src.
org
Ro
bin
Ma
yh
ew
, A
ICP
Pro
gra
m M
an
ag
er
Pu
ge
t S
ou
nd
Re
gio
na
l C
ou
nci
l
rma
yh
ew
@p
src.
org
20
6-4
64
-75
37