survey of surveys

Upload: marshal-haroun-g

Post on 14-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    1/31

    Survey of Job Satisfaction among Employees of State Bank of India,

    Coimbatore.

    Groups Members: K Arun, Saranya, Kantimati, Ashik Ivar, G Vikram,

    Final Year B Com,

    Dr G R Damodaran College Of Management

    Neelambur, Coimbatore 641 041.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    2/31

    CHAPTER - I

    INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE STUDY

    JOB SATISFACTION

    Definitions:

    Job satisfaction does not seem to reduce absence, turnover and perhaps

    accident rates.

    -Robert L. Kahn

    Job satisfaction is a general attitude towards ones job: the difference

    between the amount of reward workers receive and the amount they believe theyshould receive.

    -P. Robbins

    Job satisfaction defines as The amount of over all positive affect (or

    feeling) that individuals have toward their jobs.

    Feldman

    -Hugh J. Arnold and Daniel C.

    Job satisfaction is the amount of pleasure or contentment associated with a job. If

    you like your job intensely, you will experience high job satisfaction. If you dislike

    your job intensely, you will experience job dissatisfaction.

    By

    Andrew J DuBrins,

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    3/31

    Human life has become very complex and completed in now-a-days. In

    modern society the needs and requirements of the people are ever increasing and

    ever changing. When the people are ever increasing and ever changing, when

    the peoples needs are not fulfilled they become dissatisfied. Dissatisfied people

    are likely to contribute very little for any purpose. Job satisfaction of industrialworkers us very important for the industry to function successfully. Apart from

    managerial and technical aspects, employers can be considered as backbone of

    any industrial development. To utilize their contribution they should be provided

    with good working conditions to boost their job satisfaction.

    Any business cab achieve success and peace only when the problem of

    satisfaction and dissatisfaction of workers are felt understood and solved,

    problem of efficiency absenteeism labour turnover require a social skill of

    understanding human problems and dealing with them scientific investigation

    serves the purpose to solve the human problems in the industry.

    a) Pay.

    b) The work itself.

    c) Promotion

    d) The work group.

    e) Working condition. f)

    Supervision.

    Determinants of job satisfaction:

    While analyzing the various determinants of job satisfaction, we have to

    keep in mind that: all individuals do no derive the same degree of satisfaction

    though they perform the same job in the same job environment and at the same

    time. Therefore, it appears that besides the nature of job and job environment,

    there are individual variables which affect job satisfaction. Thus, all those

    factors which provide a fit among individual variables, nature of job, and

    situational variables determine the degree of job satisfaction. Let us see what

    these factors are.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    4/31

    Individual factors:

    Individuals have certain expectations from their jobs. If their expectations are

    met from the jobs, they feel satisfied. These expectations are based on an

    individuals level of education, age and other factors.

    Level of education: Level of education of an individual is a factor which

    determines the degree of job satisfaction. For example, several studies have

    found negative correlation between the level of education, particularly higher level

    of education, and job satisfaction. The possible reason for this

    phenomenon may be that highly educated persons have very high expectations

    from their jobs which remain unsatisfied. In their case, Peters principle which

    suggests that every individual tries to reach his level of incompetence, applies

    more quickly.

    Age: Individuals experience different degree of job satisfaction at different

    stages of their life. Job satisfaction is high at the initial stage, gets gradually

    reduced, starts rising upto certain stage, and finally dips to a low degree.

    The possible reasons for this phenomenon are like this.

    When individuals join an organization, they may have some unrealistic

    assumptions about what they are going to drive from their work. These

    assumptions make them more satisfied. However, when these assumptions fall

    short of reality, job satisfaction goes down. It starts rising again as the people

    start to assess the jobs in right perspective and correct their assumptions. At the

    last, particularly at the fag end of the career, job satisfaction goes down because of

    fear of retirement and future outcome.

    Other factors: Besides the above two factors, there are other indiidual factors

    which affect job satisfaction. If an individual does not have favourable social and

    family life, he may not feel happy at the workplace. Similarly, other personal

    problems associated with him may affect his level of job satisfaction. Personal

    problems associated with him may affect his level of job satisfaction.

    Nature of job:

    Nature of job determines job satisfaction which is in the form of

    occupation level and job content.

    Occupation level: Higher level jobs provide more satisfaction as compared to lower

    levels. This happens because high level jobs carry prestige and status in the

    society which itself becomes source of satisfaction for the job holders. For

    example, professionals derive more satisfaction as compared to salaried people:

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    5/31

    factory workers are least satisfied.

    Job content: Job content refers to the intrinsic value of the job which depends on

    the requirement of skills for performing it, and the degree of responsibility

    and growth it offers. A higher content of these factors provides higher

    satisfaction. For example, a routine and repetitive lesser satisfaction; the degree of

    satisfaction progressively increases in job rotation, job enlargement, and job

    enrichment.

    Situational variables:

    Situational variables related to job satisfaction lie in organizational

    context formal and informal. Formal organization emerges out of the

    interaction of individuals in the organization. Some of the important factors which

    affect job important factors which affect job satisfaction are given below:

    1. Working conditions: Working conditions, particularly physical work

    environment, like conditions of workplace and associated facilities for

    performing the job determine job satisfaction. These work in two ways.

    First, these provide means job performance. Second, provision of these

    conditions affects the individuals perception about the organization. If these

    factors are favourable, individuals experience higher level of job

    satisfaction.

    2. Supervision: The type of supervision affects job satisfaction as in each type

    of supervision; the degree of importance attached to individuals varies. In

    employee-oriented supervision, there is more concern for people which

    is perceived favourably by them and provides them more satisfaction. In job

    oriented supervision, there is more emphasis on the performance of the job

    and people become secondary. This situation decreases job satisfaction.

    3. Equitable rewards: The type of linkage that is provided between job

    performance and rewards determines the degree of job satisfaction. If the

    reward is perceived to be based on the job performance and equitable, it

    offers higher satisfaction. If the reward is perceived to be based on

    considerations other than the job performance, it affects job satisfaction

    adversely.

    4. Opportunity: It is true that individuals seek satisfaction in their jobs in the

    context of job nature and work environment by they also attach

    importance to opportunities for promotion that these job offer. If the

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    6/31

    present job offers opportunity of promotion is lacking, it reduces

    satisfaction.

    5. Work group: Individuals work in group either created formally of they develo

    on their own to seek emotional satisfaction at the workplace. To the extent

    such groups are cohesive; the degree of satisfaction is high. If the group is

    not cohesive, job satisfaction is low. In a cohesive group, people derive

    satisfaction out of their interpersonal interaction and workplace becomes

    satisfying leading to job satisfaction.

    Effect of Job Satisfaction

    Job satisfaction has a variety of effects. These effects may be seen in the

    context of an individuals physical and mental health, productivity, absenteeism, and

    turnover.

    Physical and Mental Health:

    The degree of job satisfaction affects an individuals physical and mental

    health. Since job satisfaction is a type of mental feeling, its favourableness or

    unfavourablesness affects the individual psychologically which ultimately

    affects his physical health. For example, Lawler has pointed out that drug abuse,

    alcoholism and mental and physical health result from psychologically harmful jobs.

    Further, since a job is an important part of life, job satisfaction influences general

    life satisfaction. The result is that there is spillover effect which occurs in both

    directions between job and life satisfaction.

    Productivity:

    There are two views about the relationship between job satisfaction and

    productivity:

    1. A happy worker is a productive worker,

    2. A happy worker is not necessarily a productive worker.

    The first view establishes a direct cause-effect relationship between job

    satisfaction and productivity; when job satisfaction increases, productivity

    increases; when satisfaction decreases, productivity decreases. The basic logic

    behind this is that a happy worker will put more efforts for job performance.

    However, this may not be true in all cases. For example, a worker having low

    expectations from his jobs may feel satisfied but he may not put his efforts more

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    7/31

    vigorously because of his low expectations from the job. Therefore, this view does

    not explain fully the complex relationship between job satisfaction and productivity.

    The another view: That is a satisfied worker is not necessarily a productive

    worker explains the relationship between job satisfaction and productivity.

    Various research studies also support this view. This relationship may be

    explained in terms of the operation of two factors: effect of job performance on

    satisfaction and organizational expectations from individuals for job

    performance.

    1. Job performance leads to job satisfaction and not the other way round.

    The basic factor for this phenomenon is the rewards (a source of

    satisfaction) attached with performance. There are two types of rewards-

    intrinsic and extrinsic. The intrinsic reward stems from the job itself which

    may be in the form of growth potential, challenging job, etc. The satisfaction

    on such a type of reward may help to increase productivity. The extrinsic

    reward is subject to control by management such as salary, bonus, etc.

    Any increase in these factors does not hep to increase productivity

    though these factors increase job satisfaction.

    2. A happy worker does not necessarily contribute to higher productivity

    because he has to operate under certain technological constraints and,therefore, he cannot go beyond certain output. Further, this constraint

    affects the managements expectations from the individual in the form of

    lower output. Thus, the work situation is pegged to minimally acceptable level

    of performance.

    However, it does not mean that the job satisfaction has no impact o

    productivity. A satisfied worker may not necessarily lead to increased

    productivity but a dissatisfied worker leads to lower productivity.

    Absenteeism:

    Absenteeism refers to the frequency of absence of job holder from the

    workplace either unexcused absence due to some avoidable reasons or long

    absence due to some unavoidable reasons. It is the former type of absence

    which is a matter of concern. This absence is due to lack of satisfaction from the job

    which produces a lack of will to work and alienate a worker form work as for as

    possible. Thus, job satisfaction is related to absenteeism.

    Employee turnover:

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    8/31

    urnover of employees is the rate at which employees leave the

    organization within a given period of time. When an individual feels

    dissatisfaction in the organization, he tries to overcome this through the various

    ways of defense mechanism. If he is not able to do so, he opts to leave the

    organization. Thus, in general case, employee turnover is related to job

    satisfaction. However, job satisfaction is not the only cause of employee

    turnover, the other cause being better opportunity elsewhere.

    For example, in the present context, the rate of turnover of computer

    software professionals is very high in India. However, these professionals leave

    their organizations not simply because they are not satisfied but because of the

    opportunities offered from other sources particularly from foreign companies

    located abroad.

    Improving job satisfaction:

    Job satisfaction plays significant role in the organization. Therefore,

    manager should take concrete steps to improve the level of job satisfaction.

    1. Re-designing the job.

    2. Improving the quality of work life.

    3. Linking rewards with performance.

    4. Improving overall organizational climate.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    9/31

    PRO FILE O F SBI

    The origin of the State Bank of India goes back to the first decade of the

    nineteenth century with the establishment of the Bank of Calcutta in Calcutta on

    2nd June 1806. Three years later the bank received its charter and it was re-

    designed as the Bank of Bengal (2nd

    January 1809). A unique institution, it was the

    first joint-stock bank of British India sponsored by the Government of Bengal. The

    Bank of Bombay (15th

    April 1840) and the Bank of Madras (1st

    July 1843)

    followed the Bank of Bengal. These three banks remained at the apex of modern

    banking in India till their amalgamation as the Imperial Bank of India on 27

    th

    January 1921.

    ESTABLISHMENT

    The establishment of the Bank of Bengal marked the advent of limited

    liability, joint-stock banking in India. So was the associated innovation in banking,

    viz. the decision to allow the Bank of Bengal to issue notes, which would be

    accepted for payment of public revenues within a restricted geographical area.This right of note issue was very valuable not only for the Bank of Bengal but also

    its two siblings, the Banks of Bombay and Madras. The three banks were

    governed by royal charters, which were revised from time to time.

    Each charter provided for a share capital, for-fifth of which were privately

    subscribed and the rest owned by the provincial government. The members of

    the board of directors, which managed

    bank, weremostly proprietary directors representing the large

    European managing agency houses in India; The rest where government nominees

    invariably civil servants. One of whom was elected as the president of the board.

    MAJOR CHANGE IN THE CONDITIONS

    A major change in the conditions of operation of the Banks of Bengal,

    Bombay and Madras occurred after 1860. With the passing of the Paper Currency

    Act of 1861, the right of note issue of the presidency banks was

    abolished and the Government of India

    assumed from 1 March 1862 the sole power of issuing paper currency within British

    India. The task of management and circulation of the new currency notes was

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    10/31

    conferred on the presidency banks and the Government undertook the transfer the

    Treasury balances to the banks at places where the banks would open branches.

    None of the three banks had till than any braches (except the sole attempt ad that

    too a short-lived one by the Bank of Bengal at Mirsapore in 1839) although the

    charters had given them such authority. But as soon as the three presidency band

    were assured of the free use of government.

    IMPERIAL BANK

    The Imperial Bank during the three and a half decades of its existence

    recorded an impressive growth in terms of offices, reserves, deposits, investments

    and advances, the increases in some cases

    amounting to more than six-fold. The financial status and security inherited form

    its forerunners no doubt provided a form and durable platform. But the lofty

    traditions of banking which the Imperial Bank consistently maintained and the high

    standard of integrity it observed in its operations inspired confidence in its

    depositors that no other bank in India could perhaps then equal. All these enabled

    the Imperial Band acquire a pre-eminent position in the Indian banking industry and

    also secure a vital place in the countrys economic life.

    When India attained freedom, the Imperial Bank had a capital base (including

    reserves) of Rs.11.85 crores, deposits and advances of Rs.275.14 crores and

    Rs.72.94 crores respectively and a new work of

    172 branches and more than 200 sub offices extending all over the country. The

    State Bank of India was thus born within a new sense of social purpose aided by

    the 480 offices comprising branches, sub offices and three Local Head Offices

    inherited form the Imperial Bank.

    The concept of banking as mere repositories of the

    communitys savings and lenders to creditworthy parties was soon to give way to

    the concept of purposeful banking sub-serving the growing and

    diversified financial needs of planned economic

    development. The State Bank of India was destined to act banking system into the

    exciting field of national development.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    11/31

    WELFARE MEASURE

    SBI provides educational facilities to its employees children.

    SBI provides loan to its employees at a low rate of interest.

    SBI provides health insurance to its employees.

    The number of employees in State Bank of India is more, so sample size is

    limited by 100.

    The information collected by the observation method is very limited.

    The result would be varying according to the individuals as well as time.

    Some respondents hesitated to give the actual situation; they feared that

    management would take any action against them

    The findings and conclusions are based on knowledge and experience

    of the respondents sometime may subject to bias

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    12/31

    CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

    Area of study:

    This study was conducted in Coimbatore city.

    Sample size:

    The researcher has proposed to interview 100 respondents who are working

    in 7 branches of State Bank of India, Coimbatore and they were selected as the

    sample for the study.

    Sources of data:

    The study is based on both primary and secondary data.

    Primary data:

    The primary data were collected through structured

    questionnaire.

    Sampling techniques:

    The methodology followed for collecting data, selection of sample, and

    analysis of data is as follows:

    Data collection technique:

    The questionnaire has been designed and supplied to the

    respondents for collecting primary data from customers.

    Tools for analysis:

    The following statistical tools are used in the study for the purpose of

    analysis.

    Percentage analysis:

    It refers to a special kind of ratio; percentages are used to comparison

    between two or more series of data and also to describe the relation. Since the

    percentage reduced everything to a common base and there by allow meaningful

    comparison to be made.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    13/31

    ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    This chapter is allocated for analysis and interpretation of data.

    Preparing percentage analysis, two-way table does the analysis of job

    satisfaction, which are directly extracted from the questionnaire. Thevariations in the extent of the consumer satisfaction

    can be measured with the variables such as job secured, promotional

    opportunity, relationship with management, and

    satisfaction factors of the respondents.

    The following are the tools used to carry out the analysis, are:

    PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:

    It refers to special kind of ratio; percentages are used in making

    comparison between two or more series of data, and used to describe the

    relation. Since to percentage reduced everything to a common based and

    thereby allows meaningful comparison to be made.

    TWO-WAY ANALYSIS:

    The score secured by the respondents who falls between the score as up to 50

    indicates less satisfaction of the respondents, from 51 70 are got average

    satisfaction and 71 90 respondents are highly satisfied.

    CA LCU LAT ION OF SAT ISFACT ORY SC ORE S

    The Respondents were asked to state their level of Satisfaction relating to

    twenty factors. Based on their responses the Satisfaction score obtained by each

    respondent was found out. Points or scores were allocated based on the

    response. For each of the factor three levels of satisfaction were assigned

    namely high, medium and low. For high satisfaction three points were given, for

    Medium two and for low satisfaction one point was given. The total scores

    secured by each respondent were thus arrived at. All the hundred respondents

    were classified based on their level of satisfaction. Those who have obtained up to

    30 points were classified under low satisfaction category, Respondents with

    30 45 points were classified under medium satisfaction category and those with

    more than 45 points were classified under high satisfaction category.

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    14/31

    NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS

    HIGH SATISFACTION 23

    MEDIUM SATISFACTION 54

    LOW SATISFACTION 23

    TOTAL 100

    AGE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)

    BELOW 30 39 39

    31 TO 45 43 43

    ABOVE 45 18 18

    TOTAL 100 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    15/31

    MARITAL STATUS

    MARTIAL STATUS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)

    MARRIED 76 76

    SINGLE 24 24

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.3

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS TOWARDS GENDER

    GENDER RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)

    MALE 62 62

    FEMALE 38 38

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.4

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS OF DIFFERENT

    LEVELS OF JOB

    LEVEL OF JOB RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

    (%) ACCOUNTANT 26 26

    CASHIER 21 21

    CLERK 35 35

    CONSUMER CARE

    EXECUTIVE

    6 6

    MANAGER 12 12

    TOTAL 100 100

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS TOWARDS EXPERIENCE

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    16/31

    EXPERIENCE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)

    LESS THAN 5 59 59

    6 TO 10 36 36

    ABOVE 10 5 5

    TOTAL 100 100

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS TOWARDS MONTHLY

    SALARY

    MONTHLY SALARY RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)

    BELOW Rs.10,000 24 24

    Rs.10,001 TO Rs.20,000 54 54

    Rs.20,001 TO Rs.30,000 16 16

    ABOVE Rs.30,000 6 6

    TOTAL 100 100

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS TOWARDS

    EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

    EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

    (%) GRADUATE 37 37

    POST-GRADUATE 6363

    TOTAL 100 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    17/31

    Table No 4.8

    TABLE SHOWING OPINION OF RESPONDENTS TOWARDS FAMILY SIZE

    FAMILY SIZE RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%) UP

    TO 2 5 5

    3 TO 5 65 65

    ABOVE 5 30 30

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.9

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SALARY

    Man work to earn every employee is te organisation will expect a corret pay

    to be paid for the job done by him. The reasonable pay for each job which is

    performed in theorganisation. This scale of pay may help for the job satisfaction to

    a certain extent.

    SALARY AND NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS

    SALARY SATISFACTION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)

    AGREE 61 61

    DIS-AGREE 36 36

    STRONGLY AGREE 3 3

    TOTAL 100 100

    .

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    18/31

    Table No 4.10

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

    PROMOTIONALOPPORTUNITYSATISFACTION RESPONDENTS

    PERCENTAGE(%)

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    19/31

    AGREE 60 60

    DIS-AGREE 23 23

    STRONGLY AGREE 6 6

    STRONGLY DIS-AGREE 3 3

    UNDECIDED 8 8

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.11

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    WORKING CONDITION

    OPINION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)

    GOOD 67 67

    FAIR 22 22

    EXCELLENT 9 9

    UNDECIDED 2 2

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.12

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT NATURE OF JOB

    OPINION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)

    GOOD 63 63

    FAIR 25 25

    EXCELLENT 2 2

    POOR 9 9

    UNDECIDED 1 1

    TOTAL 100 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    20/31

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

    OPINION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)

    GOOD 63 63

    FAIR 26 26

    EXCELLENT 6 6

    POOR 2 2

    UNDECIDED 3 3

    TOTAL100 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    21/31

    Table No 4.14

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    RELATIONSHIP WITH MANAGEMENT

    OPINION RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE (%)GOOD 70 70

    FAIR 13 13

    EXCELLENT 11 11

    POOR 3 3

    UNDECIDED 3 3

    TOTAL 100 100

    Table No 4.15

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    RELATIONSHIP WITH CO-WORKERS

    OPINION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)

    GOOD 67 67

    FAIR 13 13

    EXCELLENT 17 17

    POOR 3 3

    TOTAL 100 100

    TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT

    SATISFACTION WITH OTHER FACILITIES

    OPINION RESPONDENTSPERCENTAGE

    (%)GOOD 71 71

    FAIR 16 16

    EXCELLENT 11 11

    POOR 2 2

    TOTAL 100 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    22/31

    TWO WAY TABLE - 1

    Relationship Between Age And Level Of Satisfaction

    AGE

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    TOTAL

    HIGHLYSATISFIED

    MEDIUMSATISFACTION

    LOWSATISFACTION

    BELOW 308(21%) 23(59%) 8(20%) 39

    31 4512(28%) 18(42%) 13(30%) 43

    ABOVE 453(17%) 13(72%) 2(11%) 18

    TOTAL23 54 23 100

    WAY TABLE 2

    Relationship Between Marital Status And Level Of Satisfaction

    MARITALSTATUS HIGHLY

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    MEDIUM LOWTOTAL

    SATISFIED SATISFACTION SATISFACTION

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    23/31

    MARRIED17(22%) 42(55%) 17(23%) 76

    UNMARRIED6(25%) 12(50%) 6(25%) 24

    TOTAL23 54 23 100

    TWO WAY TABLE 3

    Relationship Between Gender And Level Of Satisfaction

    GENDER

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    TOTALHIGHLY

    SATISFIEDMEDIUM

    SATISFACTIONLOW

    SATISFACTION

    MALE20(32%) 30(48%) 12(20%) 62

    FEMALE

    3(8%) 24(63%) 11(19%) 38

    TOTAL23 54 23 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    24/31

    TWO WAY TABLE 4

    Relationship Between Experience And Level Of Satisfaction

    EXPERIENCEHIGHLY

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    MEDIUM LOWTOTAL

    LESS THAN 5

    SATISFIED SATISFACTION SATISFACTION

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    25/31

    YEARS14(24%) 29(49%) 16(27%) 59

    6 TO 10

    YEARS6(17%) 23(64%) 7(19%) 36

    ABOVE 10

    YEAS3(60%) 2(40%) 0 5

    TOTAL23 54 23 100

    TWO WAY TABLE 5

    Relationship Between Salary And Level Of Satisfaction

    SALARYHIGHLY

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    MEDIUMLOW

    TOTAL

    BELOW

    SATISFIED SATISFACTION SATISFACTION

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    26/31

    Rs.10,0003(12%) 16(67%) 5(21%) 24

    Rs.10,001 TO

    Rs.20,00014(26%) 32(59%) 8(15%) 54

    Rs.20,001 TO

    Rs.30,0003(19%) 3(19%) 10(62%) 16

    ABOVE

    Rs.30,000

    3(50%) 3(50%) 0 6

    TOTAL 23 54 23 100

    Relationship Between Education Level And Level Of Satisfaction

    EDUCATIONHIGHLY

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    MEDIUM LOW TOTAL

    SATISFIED SATISFACTION SATISFACTION

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    27/31

    GRADUATE 6(16%) 28(76%) 3(8%) 37

    POST-

    GRADUATE17(27%) 26(41%) 20(32%) 63

    TOTAL 23 54 23 100

    Relationship Between Nature of Job And Level Of Satisfaction

    NATURE OFJOB

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    TOTALHIGHLY

    SATISFIED

    MEDIUM

    SATISFACTION

    LOW

    SATISFACTION

    ACCOUNTANT 5(19%) 14(54%) 7(27%) 26

    CASHER 9(43%) 7(33%) 5(24%) 21

    CLERK 0 24(69%) 11(31%) 35

    CONSUMER

    CARE

    EXECUTIVE

    0 6(100%) 0 6

    MANAGER 9(75%) 3(25%) 0 12

    TOTAL 23 54 23 100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    28/31

    TWO WAY TABLE 8

    Relationship Between Family Size And Level Of Satisfaction

    FAMILY SIZEHIGHLY

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

    MEDIUM LOWTOTAL

    SATISFIED SATISFACTION SATISFACTION

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    29/31

    UP TO 2 1(20%) 2(40%) 2(40%)

    5

    3 TO 5 15(23%) 40(62%) 10(15%)

    65

    ABOVE 5 7(24%) 12(40%) 11(36%)

    30

    TOTAL 23 54 23100

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    30/31

    Summary of Findings:

    The following are the findings of the study:

    PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

    43% of the respondents are in the age group of 31-45

    years.

    62% of the respondents are male.

    76% of the respondents are married.

    35% of the respondents are clerk.

    59% of the respondents are less than 5 years experience.

    54% of the respondents monthly income as Rs. 10,001-Rs.

    20,000.

    Most of the respondents are Post-Graduate.

    65% of the respondents are 3-5 members in family.

    39% of the respondents are not satisfied and the remaining

    is satisfied with their salary.

    Most of the respondents are agree with their promotional

    opportunities.

    67% of the respondents are satisfying their working

    conditions.

    63% of the respondents are satisfied with their job.

    Most of the respondents agree with their training

    opportunities.

    There exists a cordial relationship between employees and

    management.

    67% of the respondents are very much satisfied with their

    relationship with the co-workers.

    Most of the respondents satisfied other facilities

  • 7/30/2019 Survey of surveys

    31/31

    Interpretation:

    Highly satisfied employees are more among the age group

    of 31-45.

    Highly satisfied employees are more among the unmarried

    persons than the married persons.

    Highly satisfied employees are more among the male

    respondents than the female respondents.

    Highly satisfied employees are above Rs.30,000/- income

    group.

    Highly satisfied employees are more among the post-graduate than the Graduate

    employees.

    Highly satisfied employees are above 10 years experience.

    The managers are highly satisfied than the other

    employees.

    CONCLUSION:

    From the study, we have come to know that most of the respondents have job

    satisfaction; the management has taken the best efforts to maintain cordial relationship

    with the employees. Due to the working conditions prevailing in this bank, job

    satisfaction of each respondent seems to be the maximum.

    From the study, we have come know that most of the employees were satisfied with

    the welfare measures provided by bank. The employees of SBI get more benefits

    compare to other banks. The main problem of shortage of man power is less in the SBI

    compare to other banks.