surface science: physical chemistry of surfaces massimiliano bestetti lesson n° 2 - 11 october 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Surface science: physical chemistry of surfaces
Massimiliano Bestetti
Lesson N° 2 - 11 October 2011
Nome relatore
2
Surface topography
1. Parameters
2. Measurements
3. Surface topography modification: examples
4. Standards
Nome relatore
3Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Nome relatore
4Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Problem 1
Water is flowing into a pipe of diameter D = 0.1524 m at a flow rate of 0.1262 m3 s-1. Is the flow turbulent or laminar?
Estimate the pressure drop along a distance of 1000 m for different wall roughnesses.
Calculate the power needed to keep the water flow in stationary conditions.
Nome relatore
5Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
1-
22s m 918.6
1524.0
1262.044
D
Qv
63
3
10054.110
101524.0918.6Re
Dv
Reynolds number
Average velocity of water
Turbulent
Nome relatore
6Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
fD
e
f Re
51,2
7,3log0,2
1
Friction factor
roughness
(Colebrook – White equation)
Nome relatore
7Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Nome relatore
Roughness coefficient e for common materials 8
Surface (m) 10-3
Copper, Lead, Brass, Aluminum (new) 0.001 - 0.002
PVC and Plastic Pipes 0.0015 - 0.007
Stainless steel 0.015Steel commercial pipe 0.045 - 0.09Stretched steel 0.015Weld steel 0.045Galvanized steel 0.15
Rusted steel (corrosion) 0.15 - 4
New cast iron 0.25 - 0.8Worn cast iron 0.8 - 1.5Rusty cast iron 1.5 - 2.5
Sheet or asphalted cast iron 0.01 - 0.015
Smoothed cement 0.3Ordinary concrete 0.3 - 1Coarse concrete 0.3 - 5Well planed wood 0.18 - 0,9Ordinary wood 5
Nome relatore
9Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
fD
e
f Re
51,2
7,3log0,2
1
D = 0.1524 m
Re = 1.054·106
e = 5·10-5 m
f =0.01588
Nome relatore
10Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Pressure drop
Pa10493.21524.0
10
2
918.61010588.1
2
1 633
22
D
Lvfp
W 10146.310262.110493.2 426 QpP
Power
Nome relatore
11Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Problem 2
Air at 0°C is flowing in a galvanized duct, having a diameter of 315 mm diameter, with velocity 15 m s-1.
Estimate the Reynolds number and pressure drop along a distance of 10 m when ε - for galvanized steel is 0.15 mm.
Nome relatore
12Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Re = (15 m/s) (315 mm) (10-3 m/mm ) (1.23 kg/m3) / (1.79 10-5 Ns/m2)
Re = 324679 (kg m/s2)/N
Re = 324679 ~ Turbulent flow
With roughness - ε - for galvanized steel 0.15 mm, the roughness ratio can be calculated:
Roughness Ratio = ε / D = (0.15 mm) / (315 mm) = 4.76 10-4
Nome relatore
13Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
Using the graphical representation of the Colebrook’s equation - the Moody
Diagram - the friction coefficient - f - can be determined to:
f = 0.017
The pressure drop for the 10 m duct can be calculated
Δp = f ( l / D) ( ρ v2 / 2 )
= 0.017 ((10 m) / (0.315 m)) ( (1.23 kg/m3) (15 m/s)2 / 2 )
= 74 Pa (N/m2)
Nome relatore
14Example III. Pressure drop in a turbulent pipe flow
http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/calc_pipe_friction.cfm#calc
Nome relatore
15Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
Improvement of the aerodynamic design of modern turbines for heavy duty gas turbines
Way of major performance improvements: improve the overall engine cycle efficiency (higher hot gas temperatures at the turbine inlet and higher pressure ratios).
Use of thermal barrier coatings sprayed on blading surfaces of turbine front stages (hot gas temperatures).
Changes in surface quality: 1) the spraying process itself 2) erosion of the coatings under operating conditions
Typically the surface roughness increases due to the coating process.
It is of interest to understand the impact of surface roughness on blade aerodynamic losses
Nome relatore
16Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
Nome relatore
17Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
Nome relatore
18Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
Nome relatore
19Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
Nome relatore
20Example IV. Turbine blade aerodynamics
An experimental test series is presented which was carried out to understand the impact of surface roughness on turbine blade aerodynamics.
Measurements of the total pressure losses of the test profiles and total pressure loss differences between profiles or profile sections of different surface finish.
The Reynolds number dependency was measured.
It was found that maximum loss increase due to surface roughness
occurs at the highest Reynolds number tested.
Maximum loss increase due to the highest surface roughness analysed is 40% at nominal flow conditions compared to a hydraulically smooth reference
blade.
Nome relatore
21Example V. Efficiency of centrifugal pumps
Maximum improvement of efficiency for several smoothing steps (estimated by theoretical calculations for medium size pump of 180 m3/h)
Nome relatore
22
Surface topography
1. None of the conventional parameters is an intrinsic property of a surface.
2. All surface parameters vary with the scale over which they are measured.
3. To apply a surface measurement to an engineering problem it is essential that
the scale of the problem and the scale of the measurement are related.
[Imagine to take a 1:50000 geographic map and progressively enlarging it by linear
factor of 10. The smallest feature we could resolve would be 100 m across. After one
enlargement the topography starts to have an engineering effect; height variations with
a wavelength of 10 m will cause vibrations in the suspension of an aircraft as it lands.
After another enlargement to 1 m a similar effect will be produced on the suspension of
road and rail vehicles. Amplitudes on this scale may vary from 10 to 100 m. ….].
Nome relatore
23
Surface topography: functional filtering
LH
Pow
er
1 / Wavelenght
“Functional filtering”: to obtain finite numerical
values for surface paraneters it is necessary to
reject certain portions of the spectrum at both its
short-wavlength and its long wavelength measured.
Nome relatore
24Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
25Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
26Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
27Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
28Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
29Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
30Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
31Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
32Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
33Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
34Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
35Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
36Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
37Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
38Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
39Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
40Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
41Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
42Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
43Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
44Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
45Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
46Terminology and parameters
Nome relatore
47Terminology and parameters