supply chain modularity

22
Construction Modularity Des Doran http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/bbs/bbsstaff/bm_staff/d esdoran IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Upload: brunel-university

Post on 18-Dec-2014

625 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Supply Chain Modularity

Construction Modularity

Des Doranhttp://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/bbs/bbsstaff/bm_staff/desdoran

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 2: Supply Chain Modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 3: Supply Chain Modularity

The research

• Undertaken Summer 2009

• 3 case studies of UK Modular Building Manufacturers located in Hull, UK

• To determine the nature and scope of modularity within the construction sector

• Exploratory study to inform future larger scale research

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 4: Supply Chain Modularity

Why?

• Very little research

• A growing area

• Many opportunities

• Access

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 5: Supply Chain Modularity

Research aims

• To determine how modularity is defined within the construction sector

• To understand the key differences between modular and non-modular construction

• Compare construction modularity with other sectors

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 6: Supply Chain Modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 7: Supply Chain Modularity

The sector

• Modular construction is valued at over £2bn

• Applications include Hospitals, Schools, administration buildings, prisons, retail outlets

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 8: Supply Chain Modularity

Construction modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 9: Supply Chain Modularity

Benefits of modular construction

• Off-site benefits (labour, material waste, storage requirements, welfare provision)

• Programme benefits (increased up front commitment, quality and speed of installation)

• Manufacturing benefits (lean operations)

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 10: Supply Chain Modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

The cases

Page 11: Supply Chain Modularity

The cases

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 12: Supply Chain Modularity

The findings

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 13: Supply Chain Modularity

Defining modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 14: Supply Chain Modularity

Distinguishing between modular and non-modular

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 15: Supply Chain Modularity

The modular design process

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 16: Supply Chain Modularity

Limitations of construction modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 17: Supply Chain Modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 18: Supply Chain Modularity

Pure modular Hybrid Non-modular

Modular continuum

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 19: Supply Chain Modularity

Value transfer activity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 20: Supply Chain Modularity

Initial findings• Conceptually, modularity clearly articulated• Modular construction competes on speed and

quality• Modular construction costs more than

traditional on-site construction• Limited evidence of effective buyer-supplier

relationships• Significant constraints impede modular

construction

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 21: Supply Chain Modularity

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland

Page 22: Supply Chain Modularity

Thank you

My profile is available on:http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/bbs/bbsstaff/bm_staff/desdoran

IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland