supply chain modularity
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Construction Modularity
Des Doranhttp://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/bbs/bbsstaff/bm_staff/desdoran
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
The research
• Undertaken Summer 2009
• 3 case studies of UK Modular Building Manufacturers located in Hull, UK
• To determine the nature and scope of modularity within the construction sector
• Exploratory study to inform future larger scale research
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Why?
• Very little research
• A growing area
• Many opportunities
• Access
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Research aims
• To determine how modularity is defined within the construction sector
• To understand the key differences between modular and non-modular construction
• Compare construction modularity with other sectors
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
The sector
• Modular construction is valued at over £2bn
• Applications include Hospitals, Schools, administration buildings, prisons, retail outlets
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Construction modularity
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Benefits of modular construction
• Off-site benefits (labour, material waste, storage requirements, welfare provision)
• Programme benefits (increased up front commitment, quality and speed of installation)
• Manufacturing benefits (lean operations)
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
The cases
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
The findings
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Defining modularity
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Distinguishing between modular and non-modular
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
The modular design process
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Limitations of construction modularity
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Pure modular Hybrid Non-modular
Modular continuum
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Value transfer activity
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Initial findings• Conceptually, modularity clearly articulated• Modular construction competes on speed and
quality• Modular construction costs more than
traditional on-site construction• Limited evidence of effective buyer-supplier
relationships• Significant constraints impede modular
construction
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland
Thank you
My profile is available on:http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/bbs/bbsstaff/bm_staff/desdoran
IPSERA 2010, Lappeenranta, Finland