supplementary figure 1. expression of hormone receptors in cultured t47d and mcf7 cells. a)...
TRANSCRIPT
Supplementary Figure 1. Expression of hormone receptors in cultured T47D and MCF7 cells. A) Immunocytochemistry of estrogen receptor-α (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), or glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Green stain – hormone receptor expression; blue stain (nuclei; DAPI). B) Immunohistochemistry of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded pellets of cultured T47D and MCF7 cells stained for estrogen receptor-α (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), or glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Red stain – hormone receptor expression; green stain – cytokeratin; blue stain – DAPI (nuclei).
Supp Figure 1
GR ERPR
T47
DM
CF
7
10x
A
BGR ARMRPR
MC
F7
T47
D
A
T47D, CK5/Dapi
1µM
10x
Veh 10µM
B
Supp Figure 2
MCF7
0 0.1 10
1
2
3
4
Dexamethasone (µM)
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
) ***
***
0 0.1 1 100
2
4
6
8
Dexamethasone (µM)
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
T47D
****
***
Supplementary Figure 2. A) Induction of CK5+ cells in cultured T47D and MCF7 lines in response to increasing concentrations of Dex for 6 days. B) Representative images of immunocytochemistry for CK5 in T47D cultures exposed to 0, 1 or 10 µM Dex for 6d.
Supp Figure 3
T47D
Veh Dex Prg Ald0
2
4
6
8Veh
RU-486
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
****
****
MCF7
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
Veh Dex Prg Ald0
5
10
15 Veh
RU-486***
Supplementary Figure 3. Flow cytometric analysis of CK5+ cells (percent) in T47D (left) and MCF7 (right) cultures treated with Veh, Dex, Prg or Ald in the absence and presence of RU-486 for 6 days. Mean ± SEM are shown.
C
A B
Supp Figure 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 >70
20
40
60
80
100 2d
5d
***
*
Number of CK5+ cells per cluster
Nu
mb
er o
f C
K5+
clu
ster
s
0d 1d 4d 6d0
2
4
6
8
10
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
*
***
****
Dexamethasone (days)
T47D, CK5/Dapi
2d 5d0dDex
40x
Supplementary Figure 4. Time course of glucocorticoid-induction of CK5+ cells in T47D and MCF7 cell cultures. A) Flow cytometric analysis of % CK5+ cells in T47D cultures continue to increase through 6 days. CK5+ cells expand in clusters with larger clusters appearing by Day 5 compared to Day 2 as quantified in (B) with representative immunocytochemistry images showing CK5 (red) and DAPI (blue) (C). Flow cytometric analysis of % CK5+ cells in MCF7 cultures showing rapid Dex-induction of CK5+ cells as early as 2 days (D). qRT-PCR analysis of time course of Dex induction of CK5 transcripts in T47D cultures.
D MCF7
%C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
0d 2d 5d0
5
10
15
E T47D
4hr 16hr 24hr 48hr0
5
10
15
20 VehDex
**
**
CK
5 m
RN
A (
Fol
d in
duct
ion)
Supp Figure 5
Supplementary Figure 5. T47D cell tumor xenograft growth data prior to (Ctrl) and post- (Tam) tamoxifen treatment in mice. Xenografts were allowed to establish until day 40 (Ctrl tumors; red arrow), when half of the mice were sacrificed and tumors collected for CK5 staining (n=5). The remaining mice (n=5) then received slow release tamoxifen pellets (10mg/90 day release) s.c. on Day 45 through Day 105, at which time the mice were sacrificed and tamoxifen-resistant tumors (blue arrow) collected for CK5 staining.
Time (Days)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 10090
Tum
or
volu
me
(mm
2)
Tamoxifen
800
600
400
200
0
Ctrltumors
Tam-resistant tumors
Supp Figure 6
Veh Dex
CK
5/B
cl6
C
BAT47D
0 10Dex (μM) 3 10.30.10.01 0.03
Bcl6
GAPDH
4 8 16 24 480
MCF7
Dex (h)
Bcl6
GAPDH
MCF7
20x
Supplementary Figure 6. A) Dose-dependent induction of BCL6 protein by dexamethasone in T47D cell cultures by western blot. B) Time course of Bcl6 protein expression in MCF7 cells treated with Dex. C) Representative image showing induction of Bcl6 (green) and CK5 (red) in MCF7 cells. D) Western blot showing efficacy of Bcl6 protein knockdown in T47D cells treated with or without dexamethasone by increasing doses of two independent shRNAs delivered by lentiviral infection. NTC – non-target control shRNA.
Dex
Bcl6
ShRNA
- + + + + +
NTC Bcl6
Bcl6-shRNA-1
Bcl6-shRNA-2
D
Veh
Dex
Prl
Dex/Prl
Time (h) 0 1 8 16 24 48 72 0 1 8 16 24 48 72
Bcl6 pStat5C
Dex
Ald
Bcl6
GAPDH
Bcl6
GAPDH
Steroid
Prl (nM) 0.4 0.9 2 4 9 20- - 20
- -+ + + + + + +
B
ZR75.1
MCF7
T47D
Dex - + +-
Prl
Bcl6 GAPDH
+ +- -
- + +-
+ +- -
ASupp Figure 7
D
Veh Prl
Bcl6
GAPDH0Ald(µM) 10.30.10.01 0.030.001 0.003 0 10.30.10.01 0.030.001 0.003
10.30.10.01 0.03
Bcl6
GAPDH
Dex(µM) 103 0 10.30.10.01 0.03 1030
MC
F7
T47
D
Supplementary Figure 7. Prolactin effectively suppresses basal and 3-ketosteroid-induced Bcl6 protein in various ERα+ human breast cancer cell lines. Western blot showing effective knockdown of basal and Dex-induced Bcl6 protein in T47D, MCF7 and ZR75.1 cultured cell lines (A). Western blot showing effective knockdown of basal Bcl6 protein or Bcl6 protein induced by Dex or Ald in T47D cells (B). Western blot showing sustained knockdown of basal Bcl6 protein or Bcl6 protein induced by Dex in T47D cells, with parallel sustained tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat5 (C). Western blot showing effective knockdown of Bcl6 protein even at high doses of Dex (upper panels) or Ald (lower panels) in MCF7 cells (D).
Supp Figure 8
0-10
310
310
410
5
α-CK5 (Alexa Fluor-488)
0-10
310
310
410
5
α-CK5 (Alexa Fluor-488)
VehDexPrgAldDHTEst
PrlDex+PrlPrg+PrlAld+PrlDHT+PrlEst+Prl
T47DA
T47D
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
Veh Dex Prg Ald0
5
10
15 Veh
Prl
EGF
Prl+EGF
BMDA-MB-231
% C
K5+
cel
ls (
FIT
C+
)
Veh Dex Prg Ald DHT Est0
2
4
6
8
10Veh
Prl
C
Supplementary Figure 8. Representative flow cytometry data showing reversal of CK5 induction by 3-ketosteroids Dex, Prg, Ald and DHT by prolactin cotreatment in T47D cells (A). Flow cytometry data documenting effective suppression of Dex-induced CK5 cell population in T47D cells by prolactin but not EGF (B). Flow cytometry data showing that the ERα-negative mesenchymal cell line MDA-MB-231 does not respond to 3-ketosterids with CK5+ cell induction and also shows absence of suppressive prolactin response (C).
Luminal A Luminal B
Her2+ TNBC
GR/CK/DAPI
Supp Figure 9
20x
Supplementary Figure 9. Representative images of GR expression in breast cancer subtypes by immunofluorescence staining. GR (red), pan-cytokeratin (green), and DAPI (blue) (A). Relative quantitative expression of ER, PR and CK5 in ER+ breast cancer subgroups ER+/CK5-/Ki67lo (Luminal A-like), ER+/CK5-/Ki67hi (Luminal B-like), and ER+/CK5+ (Luminobasal-like) (B).
ERα+/CK5-/Ki67lo ERα+/CK5+ERα+/CK5-/Ki67hi
CK5
PRER
2.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2.5
3.0
Rel
ativ
e Q
uan
tita
tive
Exp
ress
ion
(lo
g) ***
****
p <0.001p <0.05
***
A
B
*
Supp Figure 10
A
B
Supplementary Figure 10. Recursive partitioning regression tree models were developed for CK5 and BCL6 mRNA expression levels (A) or CK5 and BCL6 protein expression levels (B) where splitting decisions are based on optimization of the log-rank statistic, and plotted using partykit package in R. End nodes are then amalgamated based on homogeneity of hazard ratio, here labeled as L (low) and H (high).
6.465 6.465
9.537 9.537
8.019 8.019
8.952 8.952
7.233 7.233
7.684 ≥ 7.684
n = 9
0 4 8 120
0.20.40.60.8
1
BCL6
8.556 8.556
n = 22
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 20
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 23
00.20.40.60.8
1
9.069 9.069
9.124 9.124
n = 8
00.20.40.60.8
1
9.615 9.615
n = 10
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 32
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 13
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 8
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 13
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 12
00.20.40.60.8
1
BCL6
BCL6
BCL6
BCL6
BCL6
CK5
CK5
CK5
CK5
≥
≥
≥
≥
≥
≥
0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12
≥
≥
≥
6
8
5
4
13
12
15
3
2
1
L L L L H H H H H H H
1565.717 1565.7172
940.119 940.119
n = 13
0 100 2000
0.20.40.60.8
1
813.704 813.7045
750.706 750.706
n = 24
00.20.40.60.8
1
3719.381 3719.381
n = 9
00.20.40.60.8
1
637.166 637.16610
8755.707 8755.707
n = 10
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 14
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 74
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 17
00.20.40.60.8
1n = 9
00.20.40.60.8
1
CK5
CK5
BCL6
≥
≥
≥
≥
≥
≥
≥
0 100 200 0 100 200 0 100 200 0 100 200 0 100 200 0 100 200 0 100 200
BCL6
7
9
CK5
4
CK5
1
CK5
HHHLLLLL