Studio - the Multiuser Database for Petrel

Improving Decision Making with Subsurface Data

Norwegian Petroleum Museum

17th April 2013

Tim Hollis

Studio Business Manager, Scandinavia

Topics

• Typical Petrel Data Environment (Reference Projects)

• Studio Data Environment

• Dealing with the Interpretation to Data Trap

• Bring your Petrel Data into the future with you

Typical Petrel Data Environment

UTM31

UTM32

UTM34

User 1 User 2

Wells 2D Seismic 3D Seismic Cultural Results

User 3

Studio Data Environment

UTM31

UTM32

UTM34

User 1 User 2

Wells 2D Seismic 3D Seismic Cultural Results

User 3

Typical Petrel Data Environment

Copyright : Creative Commons Attribution license

Integration and Quality Tagging

Initialize Project Gather Data

Perform Initial Risk Uncertainty Assessment

Develop Scenarios

Select Development Concept

Generate Field Dev. Plan

Generate, Rank, Screen Model Realizations

SOW Project Plan Res. Char. Modeling Plan

Evaluate Scenarios, Risks and Economics

Conceptual Well Planning Static / Dynamic Modeling Workflow

Identify Opportunities Select

Concept Elaborate Development Options

Asset Teams and Business Processes Example: The Field Development Process

Decision Stage Gate Decision Stage Gate Decision Stage Gate

PR

AR AR AR

PR PR

PR

AR

PR PR

DEC DEC DEC DEC

PA PA PA PA

PA

Examples: Chevron CHPDP, Shell ORP, BP CVP, ENI OPDS, etc.

How Studio improves decision making:

• Single data source to manage

• Powerful Data Validation and Matching Rules

• Identify Data Quality at source

• Strong integration with existing knowledge capture tools

• Bring your data with you into the future

Thank you