structured technology decisions

17
STRUCTERED TECHNOLOGY DECISIONS JANUARY 6, 2014

Upload: jeffrey-stewart

Post on 19-May-2015

269 views

Category:

Business


4 download

DESCRIPTION

A Strategic Technology Selection Process Framework for the Transform Rockford Community Leveraging tried and true methodologies the Structured Technology Decisions process was developed for the Transform Rockford community. The Transform Rockford Technology Team’s mission is to provide robust, cost effective and easy to use technology to support the Transform Rockford mission. The framework leverages best practice analysis, maturity model development, required capability curation, assessment and evaluation by multiple evaluators. After scorecards are generated, structured decision making steps are taken to record decision criteria and ensure everyone has input to the eventual selection.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Structured Technology Decisions

S T R U C T E R E D T E C H N O L O G Y D E C I S I O N S J A N U A R Y 6 , 2 0 1 4

Presenter
Presentation Notes
A Strategic Technology Selection Process Framework for the Transform Rockford Community
Page 2: Structured Technology Decisions

“The Technology Team’s mission is to provide robust, cost effective and easy to use technology to support Transform Rockford.”

Presenter
Presentation Notes
To facilitate the creation and implementation of a strategic plan by the community for the purposes of dramatically improving the social and economic well-being of the community and its residents. Inclusion: Cultivate and support an environment that fully engages our community’s differences and diversity to ensure that individuals and organizations are heard, valued and supported. Caring: Show concern for the welfare of each person and foster a community culture that thinks and acts as one interactive and interdependent region. Respect: Embrace the knowledge and experiences of others by being attentive, listening well, and celebrate diversity as a strength and source of shared learning. Transparency: Foster an open process for maximum participant input and access to all information to enhance understanding and community ownership. Trustworthiness: Strive for integrity and reliable communication. Become committed to the highest levels of honesty and truthfulness. Consensus: Place the greater good of our region and its transformation ahead of self or organizational interests. Ideation: Balance our brainstorming and decision-making process with all points of view and measurable information. Responsibility: Pursue excellence and accountability of self and others by not shifting blame or taking improper credit. Participate to the fullest of our ability. Interconnectedness: Won’t compromise any jurisdiction’s or organization’s identity or decision authority, but rather look to partner and integrate shared values, goals and philosophies. A Proven Approach Inclusive Transformational and comprehensive strategies Alignment of public, private and nonprofit activities Held together by Shared Values An orderly, structured approach to becoming a great community “The Technology Team’s mission is to provide robust, cost effective and easy to use technology to support Transform Rockford.”
Page 3: Structured Technology Decisions

A Strategic Technology Selection Process Framework for the Transform Rockford Community

• It's the Vision Thing– An Overarching Process Vision

• What and Why– The Framework Process Destination

• Steps to Success– A Simple Stepwise Approach

Presenter
Presentation Notes
A “deciderer strategery” for a technical infrastructure for the community group
Page 4: Structured Technology Decisions

Overarching Process Vision

• Mission Statement Delivered– Evaluate and Select Standard Tools– Strategic Technology Roadmap– Advisory Leadership for Technology

• Shared Values Observed– Inclusion, Caring, Respect, Trustworthiness,

Transparency, Consensus, Ideation, Responsibility, Interconnectedness

• Proven Approach Practiced– An orderly, structured approach– Transformational and Comprehensive– Best Practices and Lesson Learned– Framework for Decision Making– Less is more as long as it's good

• Walk the Walk - Lead by Example

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Measure Twice and Cut Once Plan and prepare in a careful, thorough manner before taking action. Steal from the Best, Invent the Rest Picasso: "Good artists copy, great artists steal. “ Jobs: Apple "has always been shameless about stealing great ideas.” Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler Einstein: Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. “Frame” the issue, “Deliver” the evidence Strategic Frame Analysis: Providing the "evidence" for evidence based communications
Page 5: Structured Technology Decisions

Framework Process Destination

Deliverables

• Prioritized Features and Capabilities

• Evaluation models for technology criteria assessment

• Documented rationale for attribute weighting

• Options, risks, benefits, concerns, comments, recommendations, decisions

• Communication tools for all stakeholders

• Successful community collaboration delivery

Benefits

• Based upon long term goals while enabling short term objectives

• Alignment with overall transformation process and timeline

• High level roadmap for technical transformation

• Dynamic process for managing change

• Documented decision rationale for future reference

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Page 6: Structured Technology Decisions

Simple Stepwise Approach

Step 1 - Collect and Curate

Step 2 - Evaluate and Compare

Step 3 – ‘Deciderer Strategery’

Step 4 - Frame the Evidence

Step 5 - Record, Rinse, Repeat

Page 7: Structured Technology Decisions

Step 1 - Collecting and Curating

• Collect and Curate Requirements– Utilize questionnaires for requirements interviews– Draft lightweight Agile User Stories– Diagram UML Use Cases– Develop capabilities, features, needs, benefits

• Translate stories and needs into future state capabilities– ex. CRM system manages extensible contact data– ex. CRM can organize contacts into groups– ex. CRM support import and export of data and via API

Page 8: Structured Technology Decisions

Step 2 – Evaluate and Compare

• Prioritize features, capability requirements

• Research candidate tools and suites for ‘system’ components

• Assess pillars of success factors and best practice maturity levels

• Matrix the features, priorities, benefits, risks, TCO

Page 9: Structured Technology Decisions

Step 3 – ‘Deciderer Strategery’

R.A.P.I.D. Is not too Fast

• ‘R’ – “recommender” person who initiates or drives the process

• ‘I’ – “input” is consulted on recommendation before decision is made

• ‘A’ – “agree or approve” needed, an ‘I’ with power

• ‘D’ – “decide” has the final authority

• ‘P’ – “perform” is carried out after decision is made, often an ‘I’

Preparation Pays it Forward

• Score each feature by maturity and priority

• Draft risks, benefits, implications for review

• Gives time for stakeholders to review and comment

• ‘R’ should provide default recommended option

• Do not leave the decision to chance

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Pardon me President Bush for borrowing the phrase.
Page 10: Structured Technology Decisions

Step 4 – Frame the Evidence

• Understand phases of group change, communication is key

• Establish what we can agree on first and how decisions are made

• Document the options considered and scoring used by deciders

• Record the decision methods and participants and rationale

• Be transparent with process, options and documents• Use quick wins to establish process credibility for the

future

Page 11: Structured Technology Decisions

Step 5 – Record, Rinse, Repeat

• Document – Decision made and decider roles– Rationale of deciding factors – Any meeting notes and next steps

• Identify – Potential interactions with other decisions

made or pending• Publish

– Documentation records and materials– Enable reviewing and commenting by all

stakeholders– Recommendation of schedule for next

review cycle

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Page 12: Structured Technology Decisions

FIRST STEPS

An example of such as process used for collaboration file sync capabilities and the deliverables developed

Page 13: Structured Technology Decisions

Dimensions

Page 14: Structured Technology Decisions

Model

Page 15: Structured Technology Decisions

Assessment

Page 16: Structured Technology Decisions

Scorecard

Page 17: Structured Technology Decisions