strategy for e&p companies
TRANSCRIPT
Notable Example - ApacheStrategic Transactions Over Last 5 Years
• Monetized GOM Shelf
• Formed Egypt JV with
Sinopec (sold 1/3 interest)
• Exited Argentina
• Divested Deepwater GOM
development projects
• Exited Australia
E&P - Reason for Failure and Success
Common Reasons for Failure
‘Scatter Gun’ approach
Extremely diversified portfolio and
failure to deliver projects
Weak balance sheet
No clear exit strategy
Common Reason for Success
FOCUS – Offset the advantage of size
through strategic differentiation
COMPETENCE – Recognize where in
the chain you have competence and
exploit it
“If you don’t have a competitive advantage, don’t compete.” ~
Jack Welch
Five key questions for smaller E&P companies
What do we want to be known for in the future? What are our aspirations regarding our reputation,
capabilities, and performance?
How big do we want to be? What should our targets be for production and reserves?
What is our target balance between operatorship and nonoperatorship of portfolio assets? What mix
will help us best realize our growth ambitions? Are we restricted by limitations in our in-house
capabilities?
What is our appetite for risk? How much exposure to geopolitical, technical, commercial, and other
risks are we willing to take on?
Which financing approach is needed to support our growth strategy? What is the right balance
between debt and equity? How should we finance capital expenditures?
Source: https://www.bcgperspectives.com/
What do we want to be known for in the
future? Integrated E&P Players (eg. Anadarko, Premier Oil, Apache)
Anadarko developed a balance portfolio of assets across technologies, geographies, and phases of their
lifecycle
Explorers (eg. Cairn Energy, Kosmos Energy)
Focus on exploration of frontier areas and early monetization of discoveries
Regional Specialists (eg. Afren, Pacific Rubiales Energy and Pluspetrol)
Concentrate on specific countries or regions where they have an established presence and high degree of
familiarity.
Non-conventional specialists (eg. Candian Oil Sands, Chesapeake Energy, Husky Energy)
Focus on development of nonconventional resources (heavy oil, shale oil and oil sands)
Operation Specialists (eg. Occidental Petroleum, Perenco, Black Elk)
Emphasize efficient extraction of resources from existing field
Non-operator E&P players (eg. Mitsui & Co., Galp Energia)
Use their relationship with NOC’s and governments to gain access to high-quality assets but do not act
as operator.Source: https://www.bcgperspectives.com/
How big do we want to be?
Volume Vs. Value
Strategic ambitions with
combination of volumes with value
creation and sustainability
Non-operating investment
- fast and less complex
- fail to create competency and
credibility
Operated investment
- create credibility and competency
that can drive future growth
- brings additional organizational
complexity, heavy fixed cost base,
responsibilities of an operator
What is our target balance between operatorship
and non-operatorship?
Desired pace of growth vs. capabilities
What is our appetite for risk?
Exposure to geopolitical, technical, commercial and other risks
Add something about annual growth rates of smaller companies
What financing approach is needed to support growth
strategy?
Up-front capital investment – how big it can support?
Cash flow from investment – how much time it takes to grow?
Lack of clear value proposition may affect funding from parent company
Integrated Oil Players
Anadarko Petroleum
Operates through three segments - Oil and Gas Exploration
and Production; Midstream; and Marketing.
In E&P it has balance portfolio of assets across technologies,
geographies, and phases of their lifecycle
Source: IHS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Reserves (MMBOE)2,422 2,539 2,560 2,792 2,858
Production (BOEPD) 641,553 673,973 733,333 777,626 856,164
Revenue (US$ MM)10,507 13,060 13,149 13,913 15,540
Net Income (US$
MM) 1,750 1,327 2,496 2,366 3,565
Back
Explorers---- Value Vs. Volumes
Selling new discoveries is the strategy of explorers to support high returns
Prominent companies that achieved higher
returns because of disposal:-
•Cairn Energy, through spin-off of its Indian
subsidiary, sold discoveries with net volumes of
around 1,100 mmboe for US$8.4 billion
•Andarko sold discoveries with net volumes
around 600 mmboe (assets included US Gulf of
Mexico deepwater) for US$ 3.6 billion
•Repsol sold discoveries with net volumes of
around 1,100 mmboe (assets in Brazil) for US$ 4
billion
•Marathon sold discoveries with net volumes of
around 400 mmboe (assets include deepwater
Angola) for US$ 2.7 billion
Back
Regional Specialists
Afren
Source: ‘IHS 2010 2011 2012 2013
Reserves (MMBOE) 79.77 184.98 209.69 286.00
Production (BOEPD) 13,653 18,402 41,068 46,347
Revenue (US$ MM) 319.45 596.66 1,498.80 1,601.90
Net Income (US$ MM) 74.26 170.63 252.11 270.59
Back
Nonconventional Specialists
Chesapeake Energy
Canadian Oil Sands
Husky Energy
Chesapeake Energy Corp. (Chesapeake)
Canadian Oil Sand
Source: HIS
2010 2011 2012 2013
Reserves (MMBOE)759.00 724.00 693.00 651.00
Production (BOEPD)91,225 91,225 92,443 87,358
Revenue (US$ MM)3,061.54 3,917.24 3,704.48 3,916.51
Net Income (US$ MM)894.97 1,232.76 1,019.41 935.57
Back
Operation Specialists
Perenco
Perenco is an independent oil & gas company with a balanced portfolio of producing
fields, development projects and exploration prospects. A core component of
Perenco’s strategy has been to be the operator of its assets.
Black Elk
Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC is an independent oil and gas company
headquartered in Houston, Texas. The Company's seasoned industry executives have
extensive exploitation experience and knowledge with a demonstrated track record
of increasing reserves and production while lowering costs.
Occidental Petroleum
Occidental Petroleum Corporation engages in the acquisition, exploration, and
development of oil and gas properties in the United States and internationally. The
company operates in three segments: Oil and Gas; Chemical; and Midstream,
Marketing and Other.
Back