strategies for restoring tree seedling recruitment in high conservation value tropical montane...
TRANSCRIPT
Applied Vegetation Science 18 (2015) 121–133
Strategies for restoring tree seedling recruitment inhigh conservation value tropical montane forestsunderplantedwith cardamom
Balram Dhakal, Michelle A. Pinard, I.A.U. Nimal Gunatilleke, C.V. Savitri Gunatilleke &David F.R.P. Burslem
Keywords
Cardamom cultivation; Forest restoration;
Forest understorey cultivation; Knuckles forest;
Natural regeneration; Restoration strategies;
Tree seedlings
Abbreviations
KFR = Knuckles Forest Reserve;
GLMM = generalized linear mixed models;
NMS = non-metric multidimensional scaling
Nomenclature
Dassanayake & Clayton (1997); Dassanayake &
Fosberg (1980)
Received 21 April 2014
Accepted 21 July 2014
Co-ordinating Editor: Martin Hermy
Dhakal, B. (corresponding author,
Pinard, M.A. ([email protected]) &
Burslem, D.F.R.P. ([email protected]):
Institute of Biological and Environmental
Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Cruickshank
Building, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24
3UU, UK
Gunatilleke, I.A.U.N. ([email protected]) &
Gunatilleke, C.V.S. ([email protected]):
Department of Botany, University of
Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
Abstract
Question: What strategies are most appropriate for restoring tree seedling
recruitment whilst avoiding the spread of invasive plant species in high conser-
vation value tropical forests disturbed by planting a shade-demanding crop?
Location: Knuckles Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka (7°210–7°240 N, 80°450–80°480 E).
Methods: An experiment was conducted to test the effects of clipping or
removal of established cardamom plants on recruitment of native tree seedlings
and spread of non-native plants in a tropical montane forest with abandoned
cardamom stands in the understorey. The number and composition of tree seed-
ling emergents, the cover of herbaceous plants and the recovery of cardamom
were assessed for 3 yr.
Results: Tree seedling recruitment was higher in plots from which above-
ground cardamom biomass had been removed through slashing (mean � SE
per 5 m2; 28.9 � 2.70) and those where cardamom plants had been removed
completely through uprooting (32.2 � 3.17), or when dead cardamom leaves
and stems were removedwith small-scale extraction of pods (22.5 � 2.16), than
in unmanipulated control plots (16.6 � 1.13) over 15 mo. The species composi-
tion of tree seedling emergents did not differ in response to removal of carda-
mom. However, the cover of herbaceous plants, including the non-native
invasive Ageratina riparia, increased in response to removal of cardamom.
Recovery of cardamomwas higher when the plants had been slashed thanwhen
entire plants were uprooted and removed.
Conclusion: Slashing or uprooting cardamom plants is a potential strategy for
restoring tree seedling recruitment in forests with abandoned cardamom stands
in the understorey, but these interventions would need to be repeated annually
over many years to be successful, and they risk promoting expansion of the
cover of herbaceous plants, including non-native species. Hence, this approach
would be labour-intensive and costly. An alternative approach to promoting tree
seedling emergence and establishment is to clear dead cardamom leaves and
stems, and to encourage small-scale extraction of pods from the residual carda-
mom plants. Harvesting pods reduces the likelihood that the crop will be sus-
tained in situ through natural regeneration, and supplies an income to local
communities, which would enhance the social acceptability of the intervention.
Introduction
Many tropical forests globally have been underplanted
with shade-demanding cash crops such as cardamom and
coffee (Kumar et al. 1995; Perfecto et al. 1996; Bhagwat
et al. 2008). Cultivation within forests is an important
means of generating income for many communities living
close to forest margins (McNeely & Schroth 2006). How-
ever, the cultivation and management of crops in forests
may involve the selective removal of canopy trees,
121Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
persistent removal of understorey vegetation, including
seedlings and saplings of canopy trees, and fertilizer appli-
cation, which may impact tree regeneration processes
(Ashton et al. 2001; Reyes et al. 2006) andmodify the spe-
cies composition and size structure of the tree community
(Parthasarathy 1999; Ashton et al. 2001; Dhakal et al.
2012). In addition, herbaceous plants including non-native
species may become dominant in response to disturbance
during cultivation and exert negative effects on tree seed-
lings (Aide et al. 1995; Hall et al. 2011). When the planta-
tions are abandoned, the residual agricultural crop,
together with disturbance-responsive understorey plants,
may compete with tree seedlings for resources such as soil
moisture, nutrients and light, and thus hinder tree seedling
establishment (Aide et al. 1995; Holl et al. 2000; Zimmer-
man et al. 2000; Slocum et al. 2006; G�omez-Aparicio
2009). Consequently, forests may fail to recover naturally
(Aide et al. 2000), and interventions to restore regenera-
tion processes then become necessary (Lamb et al. 2005).
However, detailed studies on techniques for restoring for-
ests disturbed through cultivation of understorey crops are
lacking, despite a major focus on restoration of abandoned
deforested lands and pastures (Aide et al. 1995; Hooper
et al. 2005; Slocum et al. 2006; Holl et al. 2011). A sound
understanding of the constraints to tree seedling recruit-
ment in these human-modified forests is critical for devis-
ing management options that will enhance forest
conservation and the sustained delivery of ecosystem ser-
vices.
Removal of shrubs, herbs and lianas has been shown to
enhance the regeneration of tree species in many diverse
contexts (Hartman & McCarthy 2004; Royo & Carson
2006; Minden et al. 2010; Kettenring & Adams 2011). For
example, removal of the fern Dicranopteris pectinata Willd
enhanced tree seedling regeneration in a degraded forest
in the Dominican Republic (Slocum et al. 2004, 2006),
and clearance of the shrub Acanthus pubescens Thomson ex
Oliv. increased growth of planted tree seedlings in a logged
forest in Uganda (Duclos et al. 2013). By analogy, it can be
postulated that removal of the relict crop from a forest un-
derstorey may facilitate natural regeneration of the resid-
ual tree community. The simplest method of removal
would be slashing or uprooting the crop to release emer-
gent tree seedlings from competition for light, soil moisture
and nutrients. In addition, the soil disturbance associated
with uprooting the cropmay further enhance regeneration
by burying recently dispersed seeds, to protect them from
surface-active predators and pathogens, and to unearth
seeds that are buried beyond the reach of germination trig-
gers (Pearson et al. 2003; Gallery et al. 2007). The addition
of the trash obtained from slashing and uprooting the crop
may contribute to a substantial pool of organic matter or
nutrients on the forest floor and/or create a physical
barrier to seedling emergence, but no data are available to
evaluate these components of the intervention.
Removal of a residual abandoned crop from a forest un-
derstorey may trigger tree seedling recruitment, but only if
the recovery of the crop is kept in check. Crop plants may
recover by germination of seeds buried in the soil or by re-
sprouting from stumps. In addition, soil disturbance and
increased light availability, which are consequences of the
intervention, may provide opportunities for non-native
species to colonize or spread (Pascarella et al. 2000), as
many such species preferentially colonize disturbed sites
(Bellingham et al. 2005). In turn, colonization by
non-native species may result in profound changes to the
understorey vegetation. Therefore the assessment of strate-
gies for restoring tree seedling recruitment requires a con-
sideration of these wider impacts on development of the
forest understorey community after manipulations that
eliminate the abandoned residual crop.
In this study we established an experiment to examine
strategies to restore recruitment of tree seedlings in a high
conservation value tropical montane forest in Sri Lanka
that is affected by long-term cultivation, followed by plan-
tation abandonment, of the high-value, shade-tolerant
perennial spice crop, cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum
L. Maton). We hypothesized that the abandoned stands of
cardamom would impose barriers to tree regeneration and
therefore that removal of cardamom would restore tree
regeneration. The following specific questions were
addressed.
1. Does the active removal of entire cardamom plants,
and/or just above-ground leaf and stem material, enhance
the number of tree seedling emergents?
2. Does removal of cardamom biomass change the species
composition of emergent woody plant seedlings?
3. Does the recovery of cardamom and/or colonization by
other herbaceous plants increase in response to removal of
cardamom biomass and emerge as potential barriers to tree
seedling recruitment inmanipulated stands?
Methods
Study site
This study was conducted from January 2008 to June 2011
in the Knuckles Forest Reserve (KFR) of central Sri Lanka
(7°210–7°240 N, 80°450–80°480 E; Balasubramaniam 1988;
Appendix S1a). The KFR extends over an area of
21,000 ha and contains a range of natural vegetation types
as well as patches of human-induced grasslands, areas of
shifting cultivation and plantations of Pinus caribaea Mor-
elet (IUCN 1994). It is floristically very rich and also serves
as an important watershed, providing water for irrigation
and hydropower generation. The study site was located in
lower montane rain forest at 1032–1274 m a.s.l. close to
Applied Vegetation Science122 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
Riverston (7°310 N, 80°440 E) in the northeastern part of
KFR. The 10-yr average annual rainfall at the study site is
3381 mm and the mean monthly temperature is 18–26 °C(MSP 2009). The most abundant tree species in natural
lower montane forests are Calophyllum spp., Hortonia flori-
bunda Wight ex Arn., Ilex walkeri Wight, Macaranga indica
Wight andMaesa indica Roxb. (Dhakal 2011).
Cardamom (Zingiberaceae) is a perennial herbaceous
crop bearing a pseudo-stem that extends up to 2–3-m in
height, with pods (harvested as a spice) at ground level
(Appendix S1b). It grows in a cool and humid climate and
has a productive life of 10–15 yr (Dhakal 2011). Official
records show that about 3000 ha of forest in KFR have
been cultivated with cardamom (IUCN 1994). However,
during 3 yr of fieldwork in the KFR we observed very little
natural forest without planted cardamom; hence this fig-
ure is likely to be a significant underestimate of the total
area under cultivation. Cardamom cultivation in the
greater part of the KFR, including our study sites, started
more than a century ago (Gurusinghe 1988) and contin-
ued until 1985. After that, managed plantations were
abandoned because the area was incorporated within the
Knuckles Conservation Area (17500 ha), which has pro-
tected status that prohibits cardamom cultivation (IUCN
1994). The KFR is now part of the Central Highlands of Sri
Lanka World Heritage Site, and there is current interest in
developing management interventions to enhance the
conservation value of forests underplanted with carda-
mom in the past.
Plot establishment and experimental manipulations
In order to examine the options for restoring tree regenera-
tion, an experiment was established in March 2008 in
eight blocks of land possessing forests with abandoned car-
damom. Mean (�SE) density of cardamom plants in these
abandoned plantations was 6098 � 500 ha�1 and the
basal area of trees (≥5 cm DBH) was 30.8 � 3.20 m2 ha�1
(Dhakal et al. 2012). In each block, six 10-m 9 10-m plots
were established in random locations but separated by a
minimum distance of 4 m (Appendix S1c) to accommo-
date the following treatments: (1) cardamom stems cut/
slashed at ground level and removed from the plots (SL);
(2) cardamom stems cut at ground level and cardamom
biomass (trash) placed uniformly across the cleared plots
(ST); (3) cardamom stems uprooted and removed entirely
from the plots (UP); (4) cardamom stems uprooted and
cardamom biomass (trash) placed uniformly across the
cleared plots (UT); (5) plots managed by removal of dead
cardamom stems and leaves (cleaning) every 3 mo and
pods harvested every 3 mo according to conventional
methods for the area (CL); and (6) abandoned cardamom
stands retained in an unmanipulated state (AB). The treat-
ments were allocated randomly to the plots within each
block.
Before the treatments were applied, the DBH of trees
≥5 cm on all plots was measured and all trees were identi-
fied by comparison with voucher specimens in the
National Herbarium at Peradeniya (PDA). One 1-m 9 5-m
seedling emergence quadrat was then established in a
random location in each 5-m 9 5-m quadrat of all
10-m 9 10-m plots in the study (total 192 seedling quad-
rats). Experimental treatments were imposed in March
2008 and seedlings were censused fortnightly in each seed-
ling emergence quadrat between April 2008 and June
2009. All newly emerged seedlings were tagged, given a
unique number and identified to morphotype. A photo-
graph of each new seedling was taken to establish a refer-
ence digital archive. For all morphotypes, specimens were
collected from outside the experimental plots and voucher
specimens were identified with the assistance of botanists
at the University of Peradeniya and by reference to
specimens in the National Herbarium (PDA). The extent of
cardamom recovery, i.e., new cardamom seedlings on all
plots and sprouts from cut stems and rhizomes that had
been dug up and then left in situ on plots fromwhich stems
had been slashed or uprooted, was measured in each seed-
ling emergence quadrat in March 2009, 1 yr after the
treatments had been applied. All new cardamom plants in
the plots were then removed by slashing or uprooting
immediately after completing this enumeration.
In March 2009 the cover of all live herbs (<1-m tall),
including new cardamom plants, was measured in each
seedling emergence quadrat using a 20-cm 9 50-cm
frame. Each plot was divided into five 1 m 9 1 m sections
and cover was measured in ten 20-cm 9 50-cm sub-quad-
rats in each section. After manipulation, the non-native
species Ageratina riparia (Regel) R. M. King & H. Rob.
(native to Mexico and Central America), an aggressive
invader of forest understorey environments, started to
colonize some plots. Therefore, the percentage of the
A. riparia cover was estimated separately in the plots using
the same procedure. In February 2009, a hemispherical
photograph was taken at the centre of each seedling
emergence plot at seedling height (15-cm) using a Nikon
Coolpix 995 camera and FC-E8 0.21 9 Nikon fisheye lens
(Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
In June 2011, 39 and 27 mo after the first and second
applications of experimental cardamom removal treat-
ments, respectively, the number and height of all living
seedlings (both those from the inventories in 2008/9 and
the new recruits establishing during the interval 2009–
2011) were recorded in each seedling emergence quadrat.
The extent of cardamom recovery was measured in each
seedling emergence quadrat on plots exposed to cardamom
removal treatments in 2009, although it was not possible
123Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations
to distinguish new seedlings from re-sprouts on this occa-
sion. The cover of herbaceous plants and A. riparia were
estimated separately by implementing the same proce-
dures as in previous inventories.
Data analysis
To account for the nesting of plots within blocks of the car-
damom plantation, generalized linear mixed models
(GLMM) implemented using the glmmPQL function in the
MASS package (Venables & Ripley 2002) of R v. 1.11.1 (R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AT) were
used to analyse seedling emergence (cumulative over
15 mo and final densities at the 2009 and 2011 censuses),
herbaceous plant cover, A. riparia cover and cardamom
recovery data. Graphical methods were used to assess how
well the models fit the data.
Cumulative counts of seedlings emergence over 15 mo
(April 2008–June 2009) were obtained by summing across
the four 5 m2 seedling emergence quadrats nested in each
plot. Two models were fitted to data on counts of seedling
emergence in the experimental treatments with treatment
considered a fixed effect, and plot nested within block and
blocks as random effects. In the first model, seedling counts
were compared among four treatments i.e. plots in unma-
nipulated abandoned cardamom plantation (AB), plots in
which cardamom stands were cleaned through removal of
dead cardamom stems and leaves (CL), and plots in which
all cardamom biomass had been removed to ground level
by slashing (SL) or removed entirely by uprooting (UP),
with removal of the cardamom trash in both cases. The
model was initially fitted with treatment AB (unmanipu-
lated cardamom plantation) as a baseline to generate con-
trasts with the three other treatments, and then the order
of terms was switched and the model refitted in order to
generate all possible pair-wise contrasts among treatments
(Table 1). The second model fitted data on counts of seed-
ling emergence to the factorial combination of cardamom
removal treatments (slashing vs uprooting) and fate of
dead cardamom plant material after manipulation
(removal vs retention on plots) using a two-way structure
that included the interaction of these factors.
The final density (per quadrat) of seedlings at the cen-
suses in 2009 and 2011, the recovery of cardamom (seed-
lings and sprouts separately) in 2009, the cover of
herbaceous plants in 2009 and 2011 and the mean height
of seedlings per seedling emergence plot were analysed
using analogous models with appropriate probability
Table 1. Summary of the output of GLMM models comparing densities of emerged woody plant seedlings across treatment plots in 2009 and 2011 in
Knuckles Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. The treatments in the experiment were: abandoned cardamom stands retained in an unmanipulated state (AB); plots
managed by removal of dead cardamom stems/cleaning and removal of pods (CL); cardamom stems were slashed at ground level and removed (SL); carda-
mom stems were slashed at ground level and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (ST); cardamom stems were uprooted and removed
entirely from the plots (UP); cardamom stems were uprooted and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (UT). In Model 2, data were combined
to test the two-way interaction between treatments with removal (SL + UP) or retention (ST + UT) of trash and slashing (SL + ST) or uprooting (UP and UT).
In all models, treatment was considered a fixed effect, and plots nested within blocks and blocks as random effects.
Model terms Contrasts df Cumulative number of
seedlings
Densities of seedlings
in 2009
Densities of seedlings
in 2011
Coefficients P Coefficients P Coefficients P
Model 1: AB vs CL, SL, UP Intercept 99 2.81 <0.01 3.71 <0.01 2.01 <0.01
Treatment AB vs CL 22 0.29 0.11 0.17 0.43 0.17 0.26
Treatment AB vs SL 22 0.53 <0.01 0.22 0.14 0.05 0.74
Treatment AB vs UP 22 0.64 <0.01 3.01 <0.01 �0.04 0.81
Model 1: CL vs AB, SL, UP Intercept 99 3.09 <0.01 1.79 <0.01 2.19 <0.01
Treatment CL vs AB 22 0.29 0.11 �0.79 0.43 �0.13 0.26
Treatment CL vs SL 22 0.24 0.16 0.11 0.48 �0.12 0.41
Treatment CL vs UP 22 0.35 0.04 0.59 0.01 �0.21 0.18
Model 1: SL vs AB, CL, UP Intercept 99 3.34 <0.01 2.25 <0.01 2.07 <0.01
Treatment SL vs AB 22 �0.53 0.01 �0.26 0.14 �0.01 0.94
Treatment SL vs CL 22 �0.23 0.16 �0.12 0.48 0.12 0.43
Treatment SL vs UP 22 0.11 0.49 0.34 0.06 �0.09 0.57
Model 1: UP vs AB, CL, SL Intercept 99 3.44 <0.01 2.59 <0.01 1.97 <0.01
Treatment UP vs AB 22 �0.64 <0.01 �0.59 <0.01 0.08 0.63
Treatment UP vs CL 22 �0.35 0.04 �0.46 0.01 0.21 0.19
Treatment UP vs SL 22 �0.11 0.49 �0.39 0.06 0.09 0.57
Model 2: Removed vs retained +
Uprooted vs slashed +
two-way interaction
Intercept 96 3.39 <0.01 4.11 <0.01 1.91 <0.01
Removed vs retained (Rr) 21 �0.06 0.29 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.29
Uprooted vs slashed (Us) 21 �0.04 0.45 �0.07 0.60 0.15 0.45
Rr 9 Us 21 0.17 0.27 0.03 0.59 �0.32 0.27
Applied Vegetation Science124 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
distributions. The survival of seedlings (the seedlings that
were tagged during 2009 and survived until the 2011 cen-
sus) at the plot level was analysed using glmmPQL models
with a binary response variable (survived vs died) follow-
ing Crawley (2008). To account for the large number of
zero records in the cardamom recovery and A. riparia
cover data in 2011, zero-inflated models were imple-
mented using the zeroinf1 function in the pscl package of
R (Zuur et al. 2009). The associations among densities of
tree seedlings, new cardamom seedlings, cardamom re-
sprouts and cover of all herbaceous plants and A. riparia
were analysed separately using Pearson’s product moment
correlation coefficients.
Hemispherical photographs were analysed using the
software Winphot 5.0 (ter Steege 1996) to determine a
value of canopy openness for each plot. Canopy openness
was assessed among treatments using glmmPQL models,
withmean percentage of canopy openness in each plot cal-
culated from the canopy openness measured in each seed-
ling emergence plot as a response variable, but differences
in canopy openness among plots and the effect of introduc-
ing canopy openness as an additional covariate in GLMM
models were non-significant. The relationships between
canopy openness, and herbaceous growth and seedling
density per quadrat were examined using the Pearson’s
product moment correlation coefficient. The patterns of
seedling community composition and its association with
canopy openness were visualised using non-metric multi-
dimensional scaling (NMS) using the software PC-ORD 5
(McCune & Grace 2002). The NMS ordinations were con-
ducted using the Sørensen distance measure with 50 runs
of real data and 50 runs of randomized data to generate a
Monte Carlo test of significance (McCune & Grace 2002).
Random starting configurations were used with a maxi-
mum of 200 iterations for each run. A three-dimensional
solution was chosen for the final iterative ordination, and
the best end point in the preliminary analysis was used as
the starting point in the final run. In order to reduce the
‘noise’ from infrequent species, species that were observed
only once or twice were excluded from the NMS analysis.
Results
Effect of cardamom eradication treatments onwoody
plant seedling recruitment and species composition
The manipulations imposed on the treated plots in aban-
doned cardamom plantations generally increased seedling
emergence of woody plants over 15 mo relative to unma-
nipulated plots (Fig. 1a, Table 1). Cumulative emergence
of seedlings over 15 mo from which just dead cardamom
stems and leaves had been removed (CL) was not differ-
ent, but was significantly higher on plots where the carda-
mom plants had been cleared to ground level (SL; +74%)
or uprooted and removed entirely (UP; +93%) than on
unmanipulated plots (AB). However, the cumulative
number of seedlings was not different in the plots where
cardamom stems were cleaned and the plots where carda-
mom stems were removed either by slashing or uprooting.
There was no difference between the treatments that
removed just the above-ground cardamom biomass (SL)
or the entire plants (UP), and no effect of adding (ST and
UT) or removing (SL and UP) the cardamom trash in the
plots, on cumulative emergence of seedlings over 15 mo
(Fig. 1a, Table 1). A similar pattern of response to treat-
ments was obtained for seedling density on plots in 2009,
except that in this case clearing the above-ground carda-
mom biomass alone had no effect on seedling density,
whereas uprooting the entire cardamom plants increased
mean seedling density by 10% relative to the unmanipu-
lated control plots (Fig. 1b). By the time of the census in
June 2011, 27 mo after the last application of cardamom
removal treatments, differences in the density of seedlings
among treatments had disappeared (Fig. 1b). This equal-
ization of mean density of seedlings among treatments
between the censuses in 2009 and 2011 occurred because
percentage seedling survival during this interval was sig-
nificantly lower in response to the removal of cardamom
above-ground biomass (mean � SE per 5 m2 plot:
14 � 0.6%) or entire plants (8.0 � 2.3%) than on the
unmanipulated control plots (16 � 2.1%; Appendix S6).
Mean seedling height did not differ among treatments in
either 2009 or 2011 (Appendix S6).
A total of 664 live seedlings were recorded in the plots
during the census in June 2009, with 83% (53 out of 64)
of morphotypes identified to species (Appendix S2). A total
of 1531 seedlings were recorded on the plots at the final
census in June 2011, and 86% (56 out of 65) of the mor-
photypes were identified to species (Appendix S2). Ordina-
tion with NMS of the communities of seedling emergents
suggested that removal of cardamom did not affect species
composition in either 2009 or 2011 (Appendix S3a,b). Glo-
chidion coriaceum and Rauvolfia densiflora (in 2009) and Psy-
chotria nigra and R. densiflora (in 2011) were the most
abundant germinants, although Actinodaphne elegans and
Symplocos cochinchinensis were the common species of over-
storey trees ≥5 cmDBH on the plots (Table 2a,b).
Cover of herbaceous plants and Ageratina riparia after
experimental cardamommanipulations
The cover of herbaceous plants in March 2009, 1 yr after
treatments were first applied, was lower on plots that had
been treated by removal of dead cardamom stems and
leaves than on plots of the unmanipulated control treat-
ment. However, mean cover of herbaceous plants was
higher by 16% and 20%, respectively, on plots where the
125Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations
cardamom had been cleared to ground level or removed
entirely than on plots that had not been manipulated
(Fig. 2a, Appendix S4). Cover of herbaceous plants did not
differ between the two types of cardamom removal treat-
ment nor in response to the removal or return of the carda-
mom trash to the plots (Fig. 2a). By June 2011, the cover
of herbaceous plants had equalized across all treatments
(Fig. 2a). The cover of herbaceous plants in March 2009
was positively correlated with seedling density
(r [n = 190] = 0.41, P < 0.01), and canopy openness
(r [n = 190] = 0.21, P = 0.04), but in June 2011 herba-
ceous plant cover was not correlated with seedling density
(r [n = 190] = 0.17, P = 0.36) or the density of new
cardamom plants on plots where they had previously been
removed (r [n = 126] = �0.10, P = 0.59).
The cover of Ageratina ripariawas highly variable within
and among treatments at the censuses in 2009 and 2011
(Fig. 2b). Generalized linear mixed models on the data
from March 2009 failed to detect consistent differences
among treatments (Appendix S4), while zero-inflated
models fitted to the data from June 2011 to account for the
high frequency of zero counts in the data set suggested that
A. riparia cover did differ among treatments. Inspection of
mean values suggests that removal of entire cardamom
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
AB CL SL ST UP UT
Mea
n cu
mul
ativ
e num
ber o
f se
edlin
gs p
er(5
m2 )
seed
ling
emer
genc
e pl
ot
Treatments over 15 mo
0
5
10
15
20
AB CL SL ST UP UT AB CL SL ST UP UT
2009 2011
Mea
n se
edlin
g de
nsity
per
(5 m
2 ) se
edlin
g em
erge
nce p
lot
Treatments in two census periods
b
b
b
ab
aa
a
ab
(a)
(b)
Fig. 1. Mean � SE (a) cumulative number of tree seedlings that emerged over the first 15 mo following the establishment of the experiment, and (b)
mean tree seedling density per 5-m2 quadrat in June 2009 and June 2011 in a montane forest in Knuckles Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. Cardamom stands were
either abandoned and retained in an unmanipulated state (AB); managed by removal of dead cardamom stems/cleaned (CL); slashed at ground level and
cardamom trash removed (SL); slashed at ground level and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (ST); cardamom stems uprooted and
removed entirely from the plots (UP); or cardamom stems uprooted and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (UT). Lowercase letters denote
significant (P < 0.05) differences among treatments AB, CL, SL and UP (1a and 1b in 2009); treatments ST and UT were not significantly different from SL
and UP for total cumulative emergence or density of seedlings in 2009, and no plots differed among treatments in 2011 for 1b (Table 1).
Applied Vegetation Science126 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
plants by uprooting stimulated an increase in A. riparia
cover, although variance among plots of this treatment
remains high (Fig. 2). There was no evidence that return-
ing the cardamom trash to the plots after slashing or
uprooting influenced A. riparia cover. Ageratina riparia
cover in March 2009 was not correlated with seedling
density (r [n = 190] = 0.03, P = 0.68), but was positively
correlated with the cover of other herbaceous plants
(r [n = 190] = 0.30, P < 0.01) and canopy openness
(r [n = 190] = 0.49, P < 0.01). In June 2011, A. riparia
cover was negatively correlated with woody plant seedling
density (r [n = 190] = �0.61, P < 0.01), but positively
correlated with the cover of other herbaceous plants
(r [n = 190] = 0.51, P < 0.01) and canopy openness
(r [n = 190] = 0.49, P < 0.01).
Cardamom recovery after manipulation
The mean density (�SE) of cardamom stems per
10-m 9 10-m plot at the time the experiment was estab-
lished in the abandoned cardamom plantation was 65 � 9
plot�1. The density of new cardamom seedlings in March
2009was about 300% and 800%higher in plots where the
cardamom had been cleared to ground level and uprooted,
respectively, than in plots of the unmanipulated control
treatment, while removing just dead cardamom leaves and
Table 2. Relative abundance of the ten most abundant species of: (a) seedling emergents, expressed as percentage of all seedlings in 2009 (total germi-
nants = 664) and 2011 (total germinants = 1531), and (b) overstorey species (individuals ≥5 cm DBH in 2009; total number = 486) expressed as a percent-
age of all trees on experimental plots in montane forest underplanted with cardamom in Knuckles Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka.
Family Species Life form Percentage of
total germinants
(a) Seedling emergents
2009
Euphorbiaceae Glochidion coriaceum Tree 9.0
Apocynaceae Rauvolfia densiflora Tree 7.2
Rubiaceae Psychotria nigra Shrub 7.2
Chloranthaceae Sarcandra chloranthoides Shrub 6.0
Rutaceae Acronychia pedunculata Tree 4.8
Unknown Unknown sp. Unknown 4.7
Euphorbiaceae Macaranga peltata Tree 3.3
Euphorbiaceae Macaranga indica Tree 3.0
Symplocaceae Symplocos cochinchinensis Tree 2.9
Myrtaceae Syzygium fergusoni Tree 2.9
2011
Rubiaceae Psychotria nigra Shrub 26.0
Apocynaceae Rauvolfia densiflora Tree 12.6
Chloranthaceae Sarcandra chloranthoides Shrub 7.4
Euphorbiaceae Macaranga peltata Tree 6.8
Symplocaceae Symplocos cochinchinensis Tree 3.7
Myrtaceae Syzygium fergusoni Tree 3.4
Rutaceae Acronychia pedunculata Tree 3.3
Euphorbiaceae Glochidion coriaceum Tree 2.7
Myrsinaceae Ardisia gardneri Tree 2.6
Myrsinaceae Maesa indica Tree 2.5
Family Species Life form Percentage of
total trees sampled
(b) Overstorey species ≥5 cm DBH
Lauraceae Actinodaphne elegans Tree 23.3
Symplocaceae Symplocos cochinchinensis Tree 16.3
Anacardiaceae Nothopegia bedoomi Tree 12.9
Rutaceae Acronychia peduculata Tree 10.3
Myrtaceae Eugenia twaitessii Tree 7.82
Theaceae Camellia sinensis Tree 4.73
Rubiaceae Psychotria thwaitesii Tree 4.12
Euphorbiaceae Macaranga peltata Tree 3.70
Euphorbiaceae Mallotus phillippinensis Tree 3.50
Euphorbiaceae Macaranga indica Tree 2.47
127Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations
stems did not increase new cardamom seedling density over
the control treatment (Fig. 3, Appendix S5). There was no
effect of returning the cardamom trash to the plots on the
recruitment of new cardamom seedlings (Fig. 3). The
height of new cardamom seedlings was increased more in
unmanipulated cardamom plots and the plots where carda-
mom had been removed to ground level than the plots
where cardamomhad been removed completely, but height
did not differ among other treatments (Appendix S6).
The cardamom plants in March 2009 re-sprouted in the
plots where cardamom had been cleared to ground level
(Fig. 3). Uprooting the entire cardamom plants reduced
resprouting to zero as long as the rhizomes were removed
from the plots; however, when the uprooted cardamom
rhizomes were returned to the plots there is evidence that
they survived and re-sprouted to a similar extent as the
plants that were retained by slashing (significant interac-
tion: t = �2.71, P = 0.01; Appendix S5). The mean height
of sprouts did not differ among treatment plots (Appendix
S6). The density andmean height of new cardamom plants
recorded in June 2011 (seedlings and re-sprouts could not
be distinguished at this stage) did not differ among treat-
ments (Fig. 3, Appendix S5, S6).
The density of cardamom seedlings across all plots in
March 2009 was not correlated with woody plant seedling
density (r [n = 190] = 0.03, P = 0.78), but the density of
cardamom re-sprouts was positively correlated with seed-
ling density across all plots where cardamom stems were
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
AB CL SL ST UP UT AB CL SL ST UP UT
2009 2011
Mea
n co
ver
of h
erbs
(% p
lot–1
)
Treatments in two cesus periods
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
AB CL SL ST UP UT AB CL SL ST UP UT
2009 2011
Cov
er o
f Ageratina
(% p
lot–1
)
Treatments in two census periods
cc
b
a
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. Mean (�SE) percentage cover of (a) all herbaceous plants including Ageratina riparia, and (b) A. riparia alone recorded per 5-m2 quadrat in March
2009 and June 2011 for plots where cardamom stands were abandoned and retained in an unmanipulated state (AB); plots managed by removal of dead
cardamom stems (CL); plots where cardamom stems were slashed at ground level and removed (SL); plots where cardamom stems were slashed at
ground level and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (ST); plots where cardamom stems were uprooted and removed entirely from the
plots (UP); and plots where cardamom stems were uprooted and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (UT), in a montane forest in Knuckles
Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. In (a) lowercase letters denote significant (P < 0.05) differences among treatments AB, CL, SL and UP in 2009; treatments ST and
UT were not significantly different from SL and UP in 2009, and no plots differed significantly among treatments in 2011 (Appendix S4).
Applied Vegetation Science128 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
removed by slashing or uprooting (r [n = 66] = 0.37,
P < 0.05). The density of cardamom plants in June 2011
was not correlated with woody plant seedling density
(r [n = 126] = 0.08, P = 0.59).
Discussion
Effects of cardamom removal onwoody plant seedling
emergence
The removal of relict cardamom plants promoted a short-
term increase in the emergence of seedlings of woody
plants in abandoned cardamomplantations in high conser-
vation value tropical lower montane forest in Sri Lanka.
Since the cardamom had been originally planted into the
forest understorey, these new recruits included seedlings
of resident canopy trees, as well as trees and shrubs that
had been retained during the cultivation phase or subse-
quently re-colonized (Dhakal et al. 2012). The increase in
seedling emergence in response to cardamom removal
may have arisen because increased light transmission to
the forest floor triggered the germination of photoblastic
seeds (Swaine &Whitmore 1988; Dupuy & Chazdon 1998;
Pearson et al. 2002), or because release from competition
for soil nutrients and water stimulated germination or
seedling emergence (G�omez-Aparicio 2009).Where carda-
mom was removed by uprooting, soil disturbance may
have triggered the germination of deeply buried and dor-
mant seeds (Pearson et al. 2003). This result is consistent
with studies demonstrating higher recruitment and/or sur-
vival of tree seedlings in forests after clearing non-native
invasive herbaceous or liana species (Sweeney et al. 2002;
Hartman &McCarthy 2004; Minden et al. 2010), although
in some cases the establishment of tree seedlings may
depend on the sustained removal of understorey plants
(Duclos et al. 2013). The species composition of emergent
seedlings did not differ substantially among the cardamom
removal treatments, which suggests that they originated
from a common source (such as the soil seed bank and/or
newly dispersed seeds) that was distributed uniformly with
respect to the distribution of treatments. However further
research is required to determine whether differences in
species composition in response to treatments would
emerge over longer time scales than the duration of this
experiment through differential effects on seedling demog-
raphy.
The effect of cardamom removal on seedling emergence
varied among the methods employed and diminished with
time since the treatments were imposed. Cumulative
emergence of seedlings over the first 15 mo of the experi-
ment was no different for plots on which cardamom had
been slashed or uprooted, but seedling density at the end
of this period was higher in response to the uprooting
treatment. This contrast suggests that survival of the new
emergents was greater in response to the removal of the
entire cardamom plant, possibly because recovery of the
cardamom through resprouting in the slashing treatment
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
AB CL SL ST UP UT SL ST UP UT SL ST UP UT
2009 new seedlings 2009 sprouts 2011 new plantsMea
n ca
rdam
om se
edlin
g de
nsity
per
(5 m
2 ) se
edlin
g em
erge
nce p
lot
Treatments in two cenus periods
c
a
b
a
Fig. 3. Mean (�SE) density of new seedlings and sprouts in March 2009, and all new cardamom plants in June 2011 recorded per 5-m2 quadrat for plots
where cardamom stands were abandoned and retained in an unmanipulated state (AB); plots managed by removal of dead cardamom stems (CL); plots
where cardamom stems were slashed at ground level and removed (SL); plots where cardamom stems were slashed at ground level and cardamom trash
placed uniformly across the plots (ST); plots where cardamom stems were uprooted and removed entirely from the plots (UP); and plots where cardamom
stems were uprooted and cardamom trash placed uniformly across the plots (UT), in a montane forest of Knuckles Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. Lowercase
letters denote significant (P < 0.05) differences among treatments AB, CL, SL and UP for new seedlings in 2009; treatments ST and UT were not significantly
different from SL and UP in 2009, and no plots differed significantly among treatments in 2011 (Appendix S5).
129Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations
imposed competition for soil resources that constrained
survival of new seedlings (Denslow et al. 2006; Duclos
et al. 2013). Differences among treatments in the density
of seedlings had disappeared entirely by June 2011, which
was 27 mo since the last imposition of cardamom removal
treatments. This suggests that cardamom removal stimu-
lates a short-term flush of seedling emergence of woody
plants, which is detectable over the first year following
treatment, but without further intervention there would
be negligible impact on longer-term seedling recruitment
of woody plants.
The equalization of seedling density across treatments
between June 2009 and June 2011 resulted from the lower
survival of tagged seedlings on plots from which the carda-
mom had been removed by uprooting than in the unma-
nipulated control plots or plots where the cardamom had
been removed by clearing, thus reversing the pattern of
lower mortality on these more disturbed plots in the first
15 mo of the experiment. This phase of higher mortality
on the cardamom removal plots between 2009 and 2011
coincided with an increase in the cover of herbs and the
non-native shrub Ageratina riparia on the cardamom
removal plots, which was already detectable in 2009 and
for A. riparia became more pronounced by 2011, particu-
larly on the plots disturbed by uprooting cardamom.
Expansion of non-native invasive species in response to
large-scale natural or anthropogenic disturbance has also
been observed in tropical montane forests in Jamaica and
Tanzania, respectively, but the mechanisms that deter-
mine the link between disturbance and colonization of
non-native species have not been determined (Belling-
ham et al. 2005; W. Dawson, D.F.R.P. Burslem, & P.E.
Hulme, submitted). The positive association between
A. riparia cover and canopy openness at our study site is
consistent with results from other tropical forests, showing
that canopy gaps promote the establishment of non-native
invasive plants (Rogers & Hartemink 2000; Peters 2001;
Baret et al. 2008). We conclude that removing cardamom
had complex time-dependent effects on seedling emer-
gence and recruitment that were partly mediated by inter-
actions with other members of the plant community
(Kettenring & Adams 2011).
Although removal of cardamom triggered new emer-
gence of woody plant seedlings in the short term, the spe-
cies that emerged in largest numbers, such as Glochidion
coriaceum, Psychotria nigra and Rauvolfia densiflora, are wide-
spread species of low conservation value. Furthermore, the
beneficial effects on woody plant recruitment were offset
over longer time periods by parallel increases in the cover
of other herbs and the non-native perennial A. riparia. Ele-
vated mortality of new seedling emergents in response to
competition with these herbs resulted in elimination of a
net benefit to clearing the cardamom within 2 yr of the
final treatment, and an expansion of the Ageratina cover
on the treated plots. These responses suggest that eradicat-
ing cardamom would only be effective as a strategy for
restoring tree seedling recruitment if it was sustained over
long periods and combined with control of herbs and non-
native invasive species. Similar conclusions have been
derived from experimental work on the control of invasive
species (Horvitz & Koop 2001; Denslow et al. 2006) and
vegetation invading open areas in logged forests (Duclos
et al. 2013; Schwartz et al. 2013).
A practical intervention for restoring tree seedling
recruitment in abandoned cardamom plantations
Our research suggests that cardamom eradication inter-
ventions would need to be repeated annually over many
years to be successful, and they risk promoting expansion
of the cover of herbaceous plants, including non-native
species unless these are also controlled. As a result, this
approach would be labour-intensive and costly and may
ultimately limit its uptake as a practical method for restor-
ing seedling recruitment over large areas of abandoned
plantation. Based on the experience derived from our
experiment, we estimate that ca. 25 or 40 person-days
would be required to slash or uproot, respectively, the car-
damom plants from 1 ha of forest. There is also a risk that
disturbance associated with repeated cycles of cardamom
eradication would increase soil erosion in the steep terrain
at this site (Sharma et al. 2007). Further research is
required to determine whether gradual reductions in car-
damom density over longer periods of time would be a
more effective strategy for restoring tree seedling recruit-
ment whilst avoiding the negative consequences of instan-
taneous large-scale removal.
As an alternative to this intensive eradication
approach, our study suggests that minimal management
of the crop through removal of dead cardamom stems
and leaves and collection of the fruits (pods) is not detri-
mental to emergence of seedlings of woody plants. Over
time, the propagule pressure from the crop would decline
if the pods are harvested rather than allowed to mature
and spread within the abandoned plantations, and thus
the density of adult cardamom plants would naturally
decline over time as the residual crop plants senesce and
die. As long as the crop is not fertilized or replanted, this
minimal intervention strategy would permit the estab-
lishment of tree seedlings that would eventually supple-
ment and replace the canopy-forming trees of larger size
classes (>15 cm DBH) that currently occur at low density
in the cardamom plantations (Dhakal et al. 2012). Adopt-
ing this strategy would also allow local people in commu-
nities surrounding the abandoned plantations to derive
an income by harvesting cardamom pods. Careful
Applied Vegetation Science130 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
management, enforcement and monitoring would be
required to ensure that re-establishing the extraction of
cardamom from the plantations does not provide incen-
tives to maintain or even intensify cardamom cultivation
activities in the forest (Hall et al. 2011).
A strategy for restoration based on minimal manage-
ment and harvesting of cardamom pods relies on the
assumption that cardamom plants will gradually disappear
from the forest as they age and senescewithout replacement.
This source of uncertainty requires additional research, but it
may be significant that themean density of cardamomplants
in unmanaged (abandoned) plantations tends to be lower
than in actively managed plantations in the Knuckles
Forest Reserve (Dhakal et al. 2012). The risks of maintain-
ing abandoned cardamom plantations in which the pods
are allowed to mature are also evident at our study sites,
because cardamom is beginning to spread into patches of
primary lower montane forest adjacent to abandoned
cardamom plantations (Dhakal et al. 2012). We propose
that a strategy of promoting gradual population decline of
cardamom from abandoned plantations through senes-
cence and inhibition of cardamom recruitment would be
most effective in restoring tree regeneration and reversion
to the community structure of natural primary forest.
Acknowledgements
We thank the UK Darwin Initiative (Project No. 15-010)
for financial support and the Forest Department of Sri
Lanka for granting permission to carry out research in
the Knuckles Conservation Area. We are also grateful to
Midland State Plantation for allowing us to carry out
research in their cardamom plantations. We are also
grateful to the Postgraduate Institute of Science, Univer-
sity of Peradeniya, for providing office facilities to carry
out this research.
References
Aide, T.M., Zimmerman, J.K., Herrera, L., Rosario, M. & Serrano,
M. 1995. Forest recovery in abandoned tropical pastures in
Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management 77: 77–86.
Aide, T.M., Zimmerman, J.K., Pasceralla, J.B., Rivera, L. &Marc-
ango-Vega, H. 2000. Forest regeneration in a chronose-
quence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for
restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 8: 328–338.
Ashton, M.S., Gunatilleke, C.V.S., Singhakumara, B.M.P. &
Gunatilleke, I.A.U.N. 2001. Restoration pathways for rain
forest in southeast Sri Lanka: a review of concepts and
models. Forest Ecology andManagement 154: 409–430.
Balasubramaniam, S. 1988. The major forest formations of the
Knuckles region. Paper presented on preparation of a man-
agement plan for the Knuckles forest. Forest Department,
SL.
Baret, S., Cournac, L., Thebaud, C., Edwards, P. & Strasberg, D.
2008. Effects of canopy gap size on recruitment and invasion
of the non-indigenous Rubus alceifolius in lowland tropical
rain forest on Reunion. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24: 337–
345.
Bellingham, P.J., Tanner, E.V.J. & Healey, J.R. 2005. Hurricane
disturbance accelerates invasion by the alien tree Pittosporum
undulatum in Jamaican montane rain forests. Journal of Vege-
tation Science 16: 675–684.
Bhagwat, S., Willis, K.J., Birks, H.J.B. & Whittaker, R.J. 2008.
Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends in Ecol-
ogy & Evolution 23: 261–267.
Crawley, M.J. 2008. The R book. JohnWiley, New York, NY, US.
Dassanayake, M.D. & Clayton, W.D. (eds.) 1997. A revised hand-
book to the Flora of Ceylon. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.,
NewDelhi, IN.
Dassanayake, M.D. & Fosberg, F.R. (eds.). 1980. Revised handbook
of the Flora of Ceylon. Vol. 1 – 3. Oxford and IBH Publishing
Co., NewDelhi, IN.
Denslow, J., Uowolo, A.L. & Hughes, R.F. 2006. Limitations to
seedling establishment in a mesic Hawaiian forest. Oecologia
148: 118–128.
Dhakal, B. 2011. Protected forest underplanted with cardamom:
impacts and opportunities for conservation and livelihoods.
PhD Thesis. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Dhakal, B., Pinard, M.A., Gunatilleke, I.A.U.N., Gunatilleke,
C.V.S.,Weerasinghe, H.M.S.P.M., Dharmaparakrama, A.L.S.
& Bruslem, D.F.R.P. 2012. Impacts of cardamom cultivation
onmontane forest ecosystems in Sri Lanka. Forest Ecology and
Management 274: 151–160.
Duclos, V., Boudreau, S. & Chapman, C.A. 2013. Shrub cover
influence on seedling growth and survival following logging
of a tropical forest. Biotropica 45: 419–426.
Dupuy, J.M. & Chazdon, R.L. 1998. Long-term effects of forest
re-growth and selective logging on the seed bank of tropical
forests in NE Costa Rica. Biotropica 30: 223–237.
Gallery, R.E., Dalling, J.W. & Arnold, A.E. 2007. Diversity, host
affinity, and distribution of seed-infecting fungi: a case study
with Cecropia. Ecology 88: 582–588.
G�omez-Aparicio, L. 2009. The role of plant interactions in the
restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta-analysis across
life-forms and ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 97: 1202–
1214.
Gurusinghe, P.de.A. 1988. Cardamom cultivation in the Knuck-
les range. A paper presented at the workshop on preparation
of a Management Plan for Conservation of Knuckles Forest.
Colombo, SL.
Hall, J.M., Gillespie, T.W. & Mwangoka, M. 2011. Comparison
of agroforests and protected forests in the East Usambara
Mountains, Tanzania. Environmental Management 48: 237–
247.
Hartman, K.M. & McCarthy, B.C. 2004. Restoration of a forest
understory after the removal of an invasive shrub, Amur
Honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii). Restoration Ecology 12: 154–
165.
131Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations
Holl, K.D., Loik, M.E., Lin, E.H.V. & Samuels, I.A. 2000. Tropical
montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barri-
ers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8: 339–
349.
Holl, K.D., Zahawi, R.A., Cole, R.J., Ostertag, R. & Cordell, S.
2011. Planting seedlings in tree islands versus plantations as
a large-scale tropical forest restoration strategy. Restoration
Ecology 19: 470–479.
Hooper, E.R., Legendre, P. & Condit, R. 2005. Barriers to forest
regeneration of deforested and abandoned land in Panama.
Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 1165–1174.
Horvitz, C.C. & Koop, A. 2001. Removal of non-native vines and
post-hurricane recruitment in tropical hardwood forests of
Florida. Biotropica 33: 268–281.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 1994.
Management plan for the conservation of the Knuckles for-
est. Phase II. IUCN in collaboration with the Forest Depart-
ment, Ministry of Forestry, Irrigation and Mahaweli
Development, SL.
Kettenring, K.M. & Adams, C.R. 2011. Lessons learned from
invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 970–979.
Kumar, B.M., Kumar, V.S. & Mathew, T. 1995. Floristic attri-
butes of small cardamom (Elettaria cardamom L. Maton)
growing areas in the Western Ghats of Peninsular India.
Agroforestry Systems 31: 275–289.
Lamb, D., Erskine, P.D. & Parrotta, J.A. 2005. Restoration
of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310: 1628–
1632.
McCune, B. & Grace, J. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities.
MjM Software Design, Glenden Beach, OR, US.
McNeely, J.A. & Schroth, G. 2006. Agroforestry and biodiver-
sity conservation – traditional practices, present dynamics,
and lessons for the future. Biodiversity Conservation 15: 549–
554.
Minden, V., Hennenberg, K.J., Porembski, S. & Boehmer, H.J.
2010. Invasion and management of alien Hedychium gardne-
rianum (kahili ginger, Zingiberaceae) alter plant species com-
position of a montane rainforest on the island of Hawaii.
Plant Ecology 206: 321–333.
MSP (Midland State Plantation). 2009. Climatic data of midland
state plantation. Midland State Plantation, Rattota, SL.
Parthasarathy, N. 1999. Tree diversity and distribution in undis-
turbed and human-impacted sites of tropical wet evergreen
forest in southernWestern Ghats, India. Biodiversity Conserva-
tion 8: 1365–1381.
Pascarella, J.B., Aide, T.M., Serrano, M.I. & Zimmerman, J.K.
2000. Land-use history and forest regeneration in the Cayey
Mountains, Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 3: 217–228.
Pearson, T.R.H., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Mullins, C.E. & Dalling, J.W.
2002. Germination ecology of neotropical pioneers: interact-
ing effects of environmental conditions and seed size. Ecology
83: 2798–2807.
Pearson, T.R.H., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Goeriz, R.E. & Dalling, J.W.
2003. Functional significance of photoblastic germination in
neotropical pioneer trees: a seed’s eye view. Functional Ecol-
ogy 17: 394–402.
Perfecto, I., Rice, R., Greenberg, R. & Van der Voort, M. 1996.
Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioSci-
ence 46: 598–608.
Peters, H.A. 2001. Clidemia hirta invasion at the Pasoh Forest
Reserve: an unexpected plant invasion in an undisturbed
tropical forest. Biotropica 33: 60–68.
Reyes, T., Luukkanen, O. & Quiroz, R. 2006. Small cardamom –
precious for people, harmful for mountain forests. Mountain
Research and Development 26: 131–137.
Rogers, H.M. & Hartemink, A.E. 2000. Soil seed bank and
growth rates of an invasive species, Piper aduncum, in the
lowlands of Papua New Guinea. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16:
243–251.
Royo, A.A. & Carson, W.P. 2006. On the formation of
dense understory layers in forests worldwide: conse-
quences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiver-
sity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research
36: 1345–1362.
Schwartz, G., Lopes, J.C.A., Mohrena, G.M.J. & Pe~na-Claros, M.
2013. Post-harvesting silvicultural treatments in logging
gaps: a comparison between enrichment planting and tend-
ing of natural regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management
293: 57–64.
Sharma, R., Xu, J. & Sharma, G. 2007. Traditional agrofor-
estry in the eastern Himalayan region: land management
system supporting ecosystem services. Tropical Ecology 48:
189–200.
Slocum,M.G., Aide, M.T., Zimmerman, J.K. & Navarro, L. 2004.
Natural regeneration of subtropical montane forest after
clearing fern thickets in the Dominican Republic. Journal of
Tropical Ecology 20: 483–486.
Slocum,M.G., Aide, M.T., Zimmerman, J.K. & Navarro, L. 2006.
A strategy for restoration ofmontane forest in anthropogenic
fern thickets in the Dominic Republic. Restoration Ecology 14:
526–536.
Swaine, M.D. & Whitmore, T.C. 1988. On the definition of eco-
logical species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio 5: 81–
86.
Sweeney, B.W., Czapka, S.J. & Yerkes, T. 2002. Riparian forest
restoration: increasing success by reducing plant competition
and herbivory. Restoration Ecology 10: 392–400.
ter Steege, H. 1996. Winphot 5: a programme to analyze vegeta-
tion indices, light and light quality from hemispherical pho-
tographs. Tropenbos Guyana Report 95-2. Tropenbos
Guyana Programme, Georgetown, GU.
Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with
S, 4th ed. Springer, New York, NY, US.
Zimmerman, J.K., Pascarella, J.B. & Aide, T.M. 2000. Barriers to
forest regeneration in an abandoned pasture in Puerto Rico.
Restoration Ecology 8: 350–360.
Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A. & Smith,
G.M. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with
R. Springer, Dordrecht, NL.
Applied Vegetation Science132 Doi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
Restoration strategies for cardamom plantations B. Dhakal et al.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article:
Appendix S1.Maps and photographs showing study site,
experimental plots and cardamom plant.
Appendix S2. List of seedling species that emerged in
seedling emergence quadrats.
Appendix S3. Non-metric multidimensional scaling
(NMS) ordination diagrams of experimental plot scores
and species scores in (a) 2009 and (b) 2011.
Appendix S4. Summary of the output of statistical mod-
els: cover of herbaceous plants and Ageratina riparia across
treatments in 2009 and 2011.
Appendix S5. Summary of statistical models: density of
new cardamomplants among treatments in 2009 and 2011.
Appendix S6. Statistical summary of seedling survival,
heights of woody seedlings and new cardamom seedlings
and re-sprouts.
133Applied Vegetation ScienceDoi: 10.1111/avsc.12129© 2014 International Association for Vegetation Science
B. Dhakal et al. Restoration strategies for cardamomplantations