strategic transportation investments and prioritization 2018-10-22آ  public transportation in p5.0

Download Strategic Transportation Investments and Prioritization 2018-10-22آ  Public Transportation in P5.0

Post on 31-May-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • Strategic Transportation Investments and Prioritization

    October 8, 2018

    NCDOT PTD Training Conference

  • Today’s Roadmap

    • STI Prioritization Process

    • Building the STIP

    • P5.0 Public Transportation Scoring

    • Looking to P6.0

  • 3

    “Article 14B. Strategic Prioritization Funding Plan for Transportation Investments.

    § 136-189.10. Definitions. The following definitions apply in this Article:

    $

    Statewide Mobility

    $

    Regional Impact

    $

    Division Needs

  • 4

    20192020-2029 July 2019

  • STI Prioritization Process

  • Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) Law

    Overwhelming support

    Prioritizes Capital Expenditures across all modes (Mobility/Expansion + Modernization)

    Needs-based

    Directly ties funding to prioritization results

    Funding (HTF and Federal-Aid)

    6

  • Prioritization Workgroup

    7

    § 136-189.11. Transportation Investment Strategy Formula.

    (h) Improvement of Prioritization Process. – The Department shall

    endeavor to continually improve the methodology and criteria used to

    score highway and non-highway projects pursuant to this Article,

    including the use of normalization techniques, and methods to

    strengthen the data collection process. The Department is directed to

    continue the use of a workgroup process to develop improvements to

    the prioritization process.

  • 8

    40% of Funds 30% of Funds 30% of Funds

    Statewide Mobility

    Regional Impact

    Division Needs

    Focus  Address Local Needs • Selection based on 50% Data & 50% Local Input

    • Funding based on equal share for each Division (14) = ~$50M / yr

    Focus  Address Significant Congestion and Bottlenecks • Selection based on 100% Data

    • Projects Programmed prior to Local Input Ranking

    Focus  Improve Connectivity within Regions • Selection based on 70% Data & 30% Local Input

    • Funding based on population within Region (7)

    Estimated $28B in Funds for SFY 2020-2029

    How STI Works

  • 9

    regions & divisions

  • STI Law Eligibility Definitions Mode Statewide Mobility

    Highway

    • Interstates (existing & future) • NHS routes (July 1, 2012) • STRAHNET • ADHS Routes • Uncompleted Intrastate

    projects • Designated Toll Facilities

    Aviation Large Commercial Service Airports ($500K cap)

    Bicycle- Pedestrian N/A

    Public Transportation N/A

    Ferry N/A

    Rail Freight Service on Class I Railroad Corridors

    Regional Impact

    Other US and NC Routes

    Other Commercial Service Airports not in Statewide ($300K cap)

    N/A

    Service spanning two or more counties (10% cap)

    Vessel or infrastructure expansion

    Rail service spanning two or more counties not in Statewide

    Division Needs

    • All County (SR) Routes • Federal-Aid Eligible Local

    Roads

    All Airports without Commercial Service (General Aviation) ($18.5M cap)

    All projects ($0 state funds)

    All other service, including terminals and stations

    Replacement vessels

    All other service, including terminals and stations (no short lines)

  • 11

    STI Law Highway Scoring Overview Mode Statewide Mobility

    Eligible Projects • Statewide

    Overall Weights 100% Quantitative Data

    Quant. Criteria

    • Benefit-Cost • Congestion • Economic Comp. • Safety • Freight • Multimodal • Pavement Condition • Lane Width • Shoulder Width

    Notes: Projects Selected Prior to Local Input

    Regional Impact

    • Statewide • Regional

    70% Quantitative Data / 30% Local Input

    • Benefit-cost • Congestion • Safety • Freight • Multimodal • Pavement Condition • Lane Width • Shoulder Width • Accessibility and connectivity to

    employment centers, tourist destinations, or military installations

    Quant. Criteria can be different for each Region

    Division Needs

    • Statewide • Regional • Division

    50% Quantitative Data / 50% Local Input

    • Benefit-cost • Congestion. • Safety • Freight • Multimodal • Pavement Condition • Lane Width • Shoulder Width • Accessibility and connectivity to

    employment centers, tourist destinations, or military installations

    Quant. Criteria can be different for each Division

  • Non-Highway Criteria

    12

    Separate prioritization processes for each mode • Minimum of 4 quantitative criteria • Criteria based on 0-100 point scale with no bonus points

  • 13

    Quantitative Score Building Blocks

    MEASURES

    SCORE

    CRITERIA

    DATA

    Required by STI Law

    • Names predefined by STI Law for Highway Projects

    • Minimum quantity defined for Non-Highway Projects

    • Weights est. by Workgroup

    • Established by Workgroup • Formulas used to generate criteria

    scores

    • Identified by Workgroup • Existing inputs used in formulas to generate measure values

  • Local Input Points

    14

    Use in Regional Impact & Division Needs  All Modes

    # of Points per Area = Base of 1,000 points + 100 additional points for every 50,000 in pop.

    • Max 2,500 points per area • Same allocation for REG and DIV • 100 point max per project per category

    MPOs, RPOs, & Divisions required to have approved methodology for point assignment

  • 15

    Total Score Building Blocks

    MEASURES

    TOTAL SCORE

    CRITERIA

    DATA

    QUANT. SCORE

    Division Local Input

    Points

    MPO/ RPO Local Input

    Points

  • 16

    P5.0 Highway Criteria & Weights (Default)

    Statewide Mobility

    Congestion = 30% Benefit-Cost = 25% Freight = 25% Safety = 10% Economic Comp. = 10%

    -- --

    Funding Category

    QUANTITATIVE LOCAL INPUT

    Data Division MPO/RPO

    Regional Impact

    Congestion = 20% Benefit-Cost = 20% Safety = 10% Accessibility/Connectivity = 10% Freight = 10%

    Division Needs

    Congestion = 15% Benefit-Cost = 15% Safety = 10% Accessibility/Connectivity = 5% Freight = 5%

    100%

    70%

    50% 25% 25%

    15% 15%

    Note: Region A and Divisions 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, and 14 use Area-Specific Criteria Weights

  • Building the STIP

  • Prioritization feeds the STIP

    18

    Prioritization 1.0 and 2.0 prior to STI Law passing

    Prioritization 3.0 (P3.0)  2016-2025 STIP

    P4.0  2018-2027 STIP (Current Adopted STIP)

    P5.0  is feeding 2020-2029 STIP

  • 20

    Statewide Mobility

    Regional Impact

    Division Needs

    • Local input points assigned

    • Total scores calculated • Projects programmed

    • Projects programmed based on quant. score

    • Local input points assigned

    • Total scores calculated • Projects programmed

    Projects Submitted • Data reviewed • Quantitative scores calculated

    STI Scoring Process

    40%

    30%

    30%

    STI Funding

    Statewide Mobility

    Regional Impact

    Division Needs

  • 22

    STIP

    Committed Projects

    Project Development

    Time

    Funding Category Allocations

    Priority Ranking & Normalization

    STI Law Provisions

    STIP Development – 3 Iterations

  • STI Legislation Funding Caps and Restrictions Impacting Programming

    Statewide Mobility corridor cap

    Funding limits on airport projects in all categories

    Funding limits on Regional Impact transit projects

    Funding limit on light rail and

    commuter rail projects

    Prohibition on using state funds to match federal-aid for independent

    bicycle and pedestrian projects

    23

  • P5.0 Public Transportation Scoring

  • Public Transportation in P5.0

    • Project eligibility based on STI law

    • Minimum total project cost = $40,000 (same as P4.0) • Replacement vehicles funded through other methods • Allowed to request between 10% and 90% of total

    project cost (up to legislative cap) • Project entry requirements (per PTD)

    25

    Statewide Regional Division

    Public Transportation N/A

    “Service spanning two or more counties and serving more than one municipality” (based on route and not provider)

    “Service not included in Regional”; “Multimodal terminals and stations serving passenger transit systems” (includes all facilities)

  • Public Transportation in P5.0

    STI Legislative Caps

    • Funding limits on Regional Impact projects: amount of funds programmed to Public Transportation projects cannot exceed 10% of any Region’s allocation (includes commuter rail, intercity rail, and light rail)

    • Funding limit on light rail and commuter rail projects: total state funding for a project cannot exceed 10% of the estimated (submitted) project cost

    26

Recommended

View more >