stave 130 envelope

8
Stave 130 Envelope Peter Sutcliffe Strip Mechanics 20 th February Lancaster

Upload: haracha

Post on 22-Feb-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Stave 130 Envelope. Peter Sutcliffe Strip Mechanics 20 th February Lancaster. DC DC Converter-12° Stave angle. DC DC block size shown is 15 long x 6.5 wide x 7mm high. However, current CERN box is 10mm high. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stave 130 Envelope

Stave 130 Envelope

Peter SutcliffeStrip Mechanics

20th FebruaryLancaster

Page 2: Stave 130 Envelope

2

DC DC Converter-12° Stave angle• DC DC block size shown is 15 long x 6.5 wide x 7mm high. However, current CERN box is 10mm high.• ‘Potential’ clashes with opto package and locking point when fixed on the cylinder

• New slimmer opto for phase 2 and considering 1 opto per stave located on the ‘top’ side

10 mm hight DCDC box clashes with opto and locking point

DCDC box mounted on 0.5mm FR4 PCB (Ashley)PCB will be replaced with much thinner Kapton

7mm high DCDC box shows possible clash with locking bracket

Opto package

Locking bracket assy

New LightPeak package will solve the opto clash

Page 3: Stave 130 Envelope

3

DCDC Continued…Possible solutions for DCDC converter clash.1. Reduce the height to 5mm from 7mm

• This would still only give 2mm clearance to the locking point. Is this enough for installation tolerances?

2. Rotate the stereo modules 180°• This would mean having the power on the stereo tape on the opposite side of the stave i.e. locking

bracket side. 3. Shrinking the PCB board?

• Not sure as it may clash with the wire bonds…potential disaster.

Power side

Page 4: Stave 130 Envelope

Stave positions according to the LoI10° Angle

(Hessey and Hayward)

Layer No of Staves

Radii to Centre of Stave

0 28 405

1 36 519

2 44 631

3 56 762

4 (Stub)-not shown

64 862

5 72 1000

Page 5: Stave 130 Envelope

Potential Clashes

Worst CaseInner layer with 10° stave angle and 7mm hign DCDC

• Opto side –I think this will sort itself out i.e. slimmer opto packages or both opto packages on outer stave.

• Clash with DCDC to Locking point– Possible solutions:

Place power tracks on the opposite side of tape Make DCDC a planar coil with thickness less than 4mm Reduce size of the cylinder mounted locking point Something else…..……

Page 6: Stave 130 Envelope

Details of DCDC InterferenceWith 10°Stave angle (Layer 0)

If 7mm DCDC box is used, the clash with the locking bracket is 1.58mmTo obtain a clearance of say 2mm, the DCDC box would need to be 3.42mm

Page 7: Stave 130 Envelope

7

Possible solutions…Possible solutions for DCDC converter clash.1. Reduce the height to 3.5mm from 7mm

• This would still only give 2mm clearance to the locking point. Is this enough for installation tolerances?

2. Rotate the stereo modules 180°• This would mean having the power on the stereo tape on the opposite side of the stave i.e. locking

bracket side. 3. Shrinking the PCB board?

• Not sure as it may clash with the wire bonds…potential disaster.

Power side

Page 8: Stave 130 Envelope

8

Overall 10° End ViewThis view shows a possible solution.

Marcel has said that the opto packages could be placed on the ‘outside’ of the stave, which solves the problem on the outer rings.

Placing the power on the locking point side for the stereo angle modules would place the DCDC boxes between the locking points. Not sure how feasible this is.