ssp 2005 06 pstr publicviewsongrizzlybearmanagement 0
DESCRIPTION
http://foothillsri.ca/sites/default/files/null/SSP_2005_06_Pstr_PublicViewsonGrizzlyBearManagement_0.pdfTRANSCRIPT
BACKGROUND
The Foothills Model Forest is used extensively for human activities including industry,
hunting, recreation, tourism, and transportation. Levels of human activities and landscape
conditions are related to grizzly bear numbers and population health. The Foothills Model
Forest Grizzly Bear Research Program has done extensive research on these relationships,
however less is known about the public’s values and opinions on grizzly bears and grizzly
bear conservation. It is understood that managing for a sustainable population of
grizzlies in the FtMF may require society to make choices between human activities and
conservation of grizzly bears. Therefore, it is important to understand how well informed
the public is about grizzly bears, how they feel about them, and the social acceptability of
management options for conservation.
METHODS
A study was undertaken in 2004 to better understand the public’s willingness to make trade-
offs between economic development, recreational activities and grizzly bear conservation.
Mail surveys were administered to residents of Jasper (n = 388); residents of FtMF (i.e. Hinton
and surrounding communities) (n = 660); and residents of Edmonton (n = 652). Response
rate on the survey was 67%.
RESULTS
Respondents’ environmental value orientations, knowledge of grizzly bears, attitudes towards
grizzly bears, views on the sustainability of grizzly bear populations in the FtMF and perceived
risk factors, management preferences, views of public involvement, and demographic
information were all measured through this study.
All groups had a very positive attitude towards grizzly bears. For example, they agreed
that grizzly bears are important to the balance of nature; that it is important Alberta
always has a sustainable grizzly bear population, and that grizzly bears have a right to
exist for their own sake regardless of human concerns. They also disagreed that it is a
grizzly bear’s nature to want to kill humans and that grizzly bears are a nuisance. FtMF
and Edmonton residents shared similar positive attitudes toward grizzly bears, while
Jasper residents had a significantly more positive attitude.
CONCLUSIONS
• Residents of the Foothills Model Forest (i.e. residents of Jasper, Hinton and surrounding
communities) and Edmonton have positive views towards grizzly bears but are not well
informed about grizzly bears.
• There is support for making some sacrifices of industrial development and economic
opportunities to enhance grizzly bear conservation.
• Some management options that restrict hunting (such as a temporary ban on hunting
grizzly bears) and access (such as a temporary closure of roads) were supported.
• Jasper residents differed from FtMF and Edmonton residents. They were better informed,
had more positive views of grizzly bears, and were more supportive of reduced industrial
activity.
• Opposition to some of the management options appears to be driven primarily by specific
interest groups, including hunters, recreational off-road vehicle users, and Foothills Model
Forest residents employed in the mining sector.
3. WHAT ARE THE PUBLICS’ PREFERENCES FOR GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT IN THE
FtMF?
Different management options are available to land and resource managers, including:
education, bear management (i.e. bear proofing areas, relocation, and law enforcement
patrols), public access management, and hunting of grizzly bears. Respondents indicated
whether they opposed or favoured resource management options, on a scale of 1 to 5,
with 1 = strongly oppose and 5 = strongly favour.
3c. Public access to crown lands:
All groups support temporary closure of roads or trails to recreational off-road vehicle
use (Fig. 5). However, there is less support among Jasper and Edmonton residents for
permanent closure to recreational off-road vehicles and FtMF residents are opposed
to permanent closures to recreational off-road vehicles. Further analysis revealed
opposition to permanent closures is associated primarily with off-road vehicle users in
all three groups.
All groups support establishing more protected areas with no industrial activity or
recreational off-road vehicle use. FtMF residents are significantly less supportive of
establishing more protected areas.
3d. Hunting of grizzly bears:
All groups were in favour of reducing the number of hunting licences, a temporary ban
on hunting until populations are sustainable, and training hunters in bear identification.
However, there was less support among Jasper and Edmonton residents for a permanent
ban on hunting and FtMF residents were opposed to a permanent hunting ban. Further
analysis revealed that opposition to a permanent hunting ban was associated primarily
with hunters in all three groups.
3a. Is the public willing to change existing industrial facilities and operations so the
needs of grizzly bears are better addressed?
All groups favoured changing existing industrial operations to better address grizzly bear
needs, although FtMF residents (i.e. residents, of Hinton, and surrounding communities)
were less in favour of changes than residents of Jasper and Edmonton (Fig. 3).
All groups opposed new industrial developments in grizzly bear habitat. FtMF residents
were the least opposed and Jasper residents the most opposed. FtMF residents neither
favoured nor opposed new mining development. Further analysis revealed that support
for new mining developments was strongest among people in the FtMF group who have
someone in their household employed by the mining sector.
3b. Education and other management options:
There is very strong support among all three groups for educating forest users, bear
proofing areas, moving dangerous bears, and increasing law enforcement patrols to deal
with poachers.
P U B L I C V I E W S O NG R I Z Z LY B E A R M A N A G E M E N T
S O C I A L S C I E N C E P R O G R A M
Box 6330, Hinton AB T7V 1X6T: (780) 865-8330F: (780) [email protected]
R.C.G. Stumpf-Allen, B.L. McFarlane, and D.O.T. WatsonNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service,
Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
1. WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC KNOW ABOUT GRIZZLY BEARS?
Responses to 10 true or false statements allowed us to guage public knowledge about
grizzly bears. None of the groups demonstrated high knowledge about grizzly bears.
Jasper residents were the most informed and Edmonton residents were the least informed
about grizzly bears (Fig 1.).
2. HOW DOES THE PUBLIC FEEL ABOUT GRIZZLY BEARS?
Public attitudes towards grizzly bears were assessed using 13 statements rated on a
scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). An attitudinal score was created
by summing the responses and reclassifying the total scores to reflect either positive
or negative attitudes toward grizzly bears (2= very positive, 0 = neutral, and -2 = very
negative).