srilanka politicsdocx

7/27/2019 srilanka politicsdocx

1/12

POINT OF VIEW

Is Vigneswaran fit to be Chief Minister of Tamils?H L D Mahindapala

The effusiveness with which the pro-separatist/13A lobby has hailed former Judge C. V.

Vigneswaran as the next rising star for the salvation of Tamils is too premature. Knowing the twistsand turns that politics take in Sri Lankan politics only a fool or a knave would dare to predict the

outcome soon after he was nominated to be the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Northern Province

elections in September. The Tamils have produced many saviours before Vigneswaran -- all of whom

misled the Jaffna Tamils and let them down by relying excessively on their self-importance,

arrogance and over-inflated strength which never existed except in their racist imagination. To make-

believe that Vigneswaran is going to carve out a new path is as good as believing, as some Tamils

and "political scientists" still do, that Prabhakaran or his avatar is on the way from his secret hiding

place to lead the Tamils.

Take, for instance, the recent history replete with false prophets. The active Tamil lobby, in Sri

Lanka and abroad, hero-worshipped and went down on their knees pinning all their hopes on their

new, invincible "Surya Devan" who led them straight to Nandikadal. Earlier they canonized S. J. V.

Chelvanayakam, as the non-violent Gandhian who handed the Tamil people to "Surya Devan". He

was the iconic false prophet who lured the Tamils, particularly the children of Jaffna, all the way

from Vadukoddai to Nandikadal with his racist tunes.

His son-in-law, Prof. A. J. Wilson, elevated him to the level of "Thanthati

Chelva" - the caring father of his people" (p. viii - S. J.V. Chelvanayakam and the crisis of Sri

Lankan Tamil Nationalism, 1947 - 1977, A Political Biography) The psycho-babble used to justify

this title was that Chelvanyakam had no father (his father who was living in Ipoh, Malaysia dumped
http://www.dailynews.lk/sites/default/files/news/2013/07/19/z_p08-Chief01-1.jpghttp://www.dailynews.lk/sites/default/files/news/2013/07/19/z_p08-Chief01-1.jpg


2/12

him in Tellipallai when he was only four and never saw him again until he was on his death bed. So,

Prof. Wilson argues, Chelvanayakam decided to be the father to the Tamil people.) In the end he

proved to be the kind of father that led his children to a watery grave with elusive promises of

unattainable Eelam.

Another Chelvanayakam

Then there were some who looked up to

India as their saviour and guardian who

handed the Tamils to Varadaraja Perumal

who had to leave everything, including his

theorizing ministers, and run as fast as his

legs could carry him to India. The high

priests in Tamil Catholic Church were

another lot, quite positive that God was on

their side and went about concocting a new

"Tamil theology" to justify Tamil violence.

Like "Thanthai Chelva" the fathers in the

Church also handed over the Tamil

children placed in their custody to

Prabhakaran. They even hijacked the statue of Holy Mary into Tamil Tiger territory in the belief that

she could be forced to be on their side.

The latest is the excitement of "political scientists" who are revved up and racing up the newspaper

columns somewhat like Mangala Samaraweera who had discovered a new sexy site of LGBTs

(Lesbians, Gay, Bisexuals and Transgender) in cyber space. Vigneswaran's jump from Hulftsdorp to

the snake pit in Jaffna has all the hallmarks of Jaffna Tamils returning to "Thanthai Chelva" -- the

Pied Piper of Jaffna whose legacy was to turn Jaffna into one mass grave.

Before rushing into predictions about the new messiah, who has been hiding his political identity

under a wig provided by the hated 'Sinhala State", it is necessary to take a close look at the origins

and the message to assess his quality and capabilities. What is new in Vigneswaran that can raisehopes for the future of the war-weary Tamils? What's new in his message that was not there in

message of the others that went before and failed? Even a brief glance at the new man, Vigneswaran,

will reveal that he is nothing more than another Chelvanayakam with a beard. His memorial lecture

on "Thanthai Chelvanayakam" - obviously a calculated political prelude to step into his shoes --

delivered on the 36th anniversary at the New Kathiresan Hall, Bambalapitiya on 26/4/2013 doesn't

Lakshman Kadirgamar S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike


3/12

reveal anything new. There is hardly anything in it to distinguish himself from the racist "Thanthai"

who dragged peninsular politics to the extremes of violence embedded in the Vadukoddai Resolution.

Vigneswarn's language is the same. His ideology is the same. His solutions are the same. He is even

predicting/hinting about the next stage of violence like Chelvanayakam. So what else is new in

peninsular politics?

Let's begin with the usual mantra chanted by all Tamil leaders who refuse to take responsibility for

their past follies that led their people to Nandikadal. Among other things Vigneswaran told his Daily

Mirror video interviewer that the Tamils have been made "second-grade citizens". Blaming the

"Sinhala state" has been the perennial political line of northern leaders to divert attention from their

own political, social, religious, moral and institutional failures. Vigneswaran repetition of the old

complaint about discrimination, second-class citizens et al, sums up the general accusations against

the Sinhala-Buddhist majority.

Northern Provincial Council

Vigneswaran's statement should be treated with great importance not only because he is a former

judge of the Supreme Court who is supposed to be guided by hard evidence but also because he is

emerging as the leader of the Jaffna Tamils eclipsing M. Sumanthiram - a real possibility confirmed

by Vigneswaran's appointment as the nominated candidate of the TNA for the Chief Ministership if

they win the Northern Provincial Council in September.

His parrot-like repetition of Vadukoddai propaganda raises a

fundamental question that is relevant to assess his role in shaping the politics of the immediate future:Can the former Supreme Court Judge, Vigneswaran, provide credible, testable and provable evidence

of being treated as a "second-grade citizen" using his own case as an example. If there is anyone who

should know how a Tamil was treated as a "second -grade citizen" he should be the one to know it

because he was born and bred in Colombo. He was educated in a "Sinhala state" school - the most

prestigious one at that, Royal College. Did his Sinhala class-mates and teachers treat him as a low-


4/12

caste in Jaffna who could not sit on chairs, or even enter schools of high-castes? Or was he accepted

as an equal and given right to share everything with dignity with the Sinhala Royalists?

After Royal he would have gone through the mill, going through law college, and then climbing up

the judicial rung until he ended up in the Supreme Court. Can he cite examples that obstructed hispassage upwards simply because he was treated as a "second grade" Tamil? If, however, he did

encounter slights, discrimination, second-class treatment why didn't he leave the racist/fascist Sinhala

state, as he labels it elsewhere, and serve in Prabhakaran's courts, or in his Vanni law school? After

all it was a Tamil state, with a Tamil police, Tamil judiciary and Tamil jails. What was holding him

back?

Well, if he thinks he is only one swallow that does not make summer, can he ask his fellow-TNA

colleague, M. Sumanthiram, who also went to his alma mater, the "Sinhala state" school, Royal

College, and passed through the same process at Law College, what humiliations he experienced as a

"second-grade" Tamil? If by any chance he did can Sumanthiram compare it to the humiliation and

oppression suffered by the low-caste Tamils in Jaffna whose schools were burnt down to prevent

fellow-Tamils from learning the subject taught to him free of charge by the Sinhala state school

accused of discriminating against the Tamils? Which Sinhala student refused to attend school

because "a second-grade Tamil" was in the class run by the oppressive "Sinhala state"?

English-speaking class

If two examples are not enough, perhaps, Vigneswaran could substantiate his case with a third by

citing the case of "Paki" Saravanamuttu - another Tamil who is supposed to be a product of

discrimination of the south. He, in fact, goes wining, dining, dancing - not to mention the other

"...ings" -- with the family of Bandaranaikes, the demonized Sinhala icon by Vigneswaran and his ilk.

So where is the discrimination?

After all Vigneswaran has entered politics with a reputation of having a sharp legal mind and he

knows that there is nothing better in law and in politics than hard evidence to prove his case. He can't

claim that the three cases mentioned above are exceptions. Referring to his own case, it is his moral

and political duty to prove how a second-class Tamil could get a first-class job in the highest court ofthe Sinhala racist state.

Yes, the three cases mentioned above prove discrimination. But it is not ethnic discrimination. It is

class discrimination. If you belong to the right class there is no discrimination. Whether in Jaffna or

Colombo if you belong to the English-speaking, middle or lower-middle class doors can open with

ease. The elitism of the English-speaking class was far superior to ethnicity (the "kaduwa" of the JVP)


5/12

and had the power to power to break through all barriers. Even in Jaffna it is not all Tamil-speaking

people that succeeded. It is the Vellahla English-speaking Saivite elite that dominated peninsular

politics and jobs in the public service. The non-English-speaking Tamils and Sinhalese have been

relegated always to the kitchen. Though a token place was given to the non-Vellahlas in the Federal

Party, by and large, the peninsular political culture was dominated by the English-speaking Vellahla

elite before and under S. J. V. Chelvanayakam. So who was practicing discrimination against whom?

Though language issue is raised as key plank in the Jaffna Tamil politics it had hardly anything to do

with language discrimination on racist lines. As usual Tamil mytho-maniacs project it as if S. W. R.

D. Bandaranaike introduced it to displace Tamil and downgrade Tamil culture. Bandaranaike may be

guilty of many sins but he was never bent on eliminating or downgrading Tamil. In fact, the Sinhala

Only Bill was introduced not to downgrade Tamil but to overthrow English.

The Vellahla-Saivite-English-speaking elite dominating the public service took it as a blow to the

Tamils not because it affected their Tamil language but because they mistakenly assumed it was a

racist act to deprive them of entry and/or promotion in the public service - the only growth industry

of the time. Besides, the hostile reaction to the Sinhala Only Bill came not only from the Tamil elite

but also from the English-speaking elite in all communities because they were the 6 per cent minority

that ruled the nation. The Sinhala Only Bill was a blow to their power, prestige and purse. It was

meant to overthrow the colonial elite. As remnants left behind by the departing colonial master they

all ganged up against Bandaranaike to preserve their privileges and perks. And our leading "political

scientists" believe that they are uttering political profundities when they regurgitate Tamil

propaganda against Bandaranaike.

Public servants

The clear proof of Bandaranaike's liberal approach to the Tamil minority - despite knowing the

virulent extremism of Tamil racism launched by G. G. Ponnambalam - is in suspending the Sinhala

Only Act passed in 1956 until 1960. In the meantime, he passed the Tamil Language Special

Provisions Act giving Tamils the right run the north and east in Tamil, recognizing their legitimate

needs. He gave any public servant who refused to work in Sinhalese the right to retire with full

pension rights, even if he was a new recruit. To those Tamils who decided to remain in service heoffered free tuition, in Sinhalese.

He also insisted that Sinhalese public servants should learn Tamil. Tamil tutors were hired by the

state to teach them Tamil and the Sinhalese too had to qualify in Tamil for promotions and

increments. How much more liberal can a state in transition, breaking away from centuries of

colonial baggage, be in promoting the welfare of the public and public servants? But Chelvanayakam,


6/12

whipping up the communal cry, went round the kachcheris urging the Tamil public servants not to

learn Sinhalese and when they failed the exams qualifying for promotions and increments he

complained discrimination by the Sinhala state. This is another example of Tamil leaders misleading

their own people and blaming the failures of Tamils on the Sinhalese.

It is the duty of every state to serve the people in their mother tongues as far as possible. How

effective could a Sinhalese doctor in a government hsopital be in serving a Tamil patient in Sinhalese

or English? How effective could a Tamil doctor be in serving a Sinhalese patient in Tamil or English?

Chelvanayakam's policy was to force the people to learn the language of the public servants, which

was English, instead of the public servants learning Tamil or Sinhalese. Chelvanayakam's cry of

racism was accepted by the "political scientists" who take to Tamil propaganda without examining

the facts on the ground.

Most of all, the bogey of cultural genocide was raised by Chelvanayakam in raising his war-cry

against the Sinhala Only Bill.

He and his bandwagon predicted that the Sinhala Only Act would mark the beginning of the end of

Tamil language and culture. Over fifty years have passed since the passing of the Sinhala Only Act.

No one has yet written the obituary of the Tamil language or culture though our "political scientists"

are shedding crocodile tears for the imminent death of the great Tamil culture - nothing of which,

incidentally, has come from Jaffna. However, if the Tamil language is so decrepit and feeble as to

fall over and die because of one legislative piece passed by the "Sinhala state" then it certainly

deserves to be buried without any ceremony.

Vigneswaran recycles all this propaganda in his memorial lecture on "Thanthai Chelva". No doubt,

hearing the same old mantra is music to the "political scientists" and their pillion riders as the revival

of the Tamil separatism. But is it the kind of message needed to break away from a devastating and

destructive past? "Thanthai Chelva" paved the path to the decimation of the entire Tamil leadership -

most of whom were his partners in Eelam Inc -- and a whole generation of Tamil children. Is his

born-again avatar, Vigneswaran, following his footsteps to wipe out the remaining Jaffna Tamils

from the red earth of Jaffna?

Tamil leaders

Knowing how his people suffered at the hands of the IPKF and Prabhakaranist saviours is his task to

take the Tamil people back to square one in Vadukoddai? Or take them to a speedy reconciliation,

away from the nightmarish politics of the failed Tamil leadership? The agenda he has spelt out in his

"Thanthai Chelva's" speech predicts ominously a set back to the whole process of reconciliation. Is


7/12

reconciliation to be found in going back to the failed past? Or in mapping out a new path for the

long-suffering Tamils misguided by the self-serving false prophets who thrived in a culture of either

violent casteism or racism?

Judicial systemIn regurgitating the failed Vadukoddai ideology he is not exhibiting any courage or vision. He is far

removed from the polished, pragmatic and perceptive Lakshman Kadirgamar - the Obama of Sri

Lankan who broke through racist barriers and rose to new heights promising ethnic harmony and

unity. Kadiragamar earned the respect of the enlightened political spectrum outside the dogmatic

fascist Prabhakaranists at a time when the Tamil tide was running against his visionary future. More

than any other group it was the Sinhalese who embraced him. He was the one Tamil whom the

Sinhalese respected as a trustworthy Tamil who could build bridges of hope. He had charisma. He

had stature. He could inspire confidence. He was brilliant.

Vigneswaran lacks these qualities of going out to reach to the other side. His pedestrian speech on

Chelvanayakam confirms that he is not locked inside an ideological box but in the coffin of

Chelvanayakam. After Prabhakaran decimated the entire Tamil leaders he looks good in the absence

of other talented leaders. He stands out as the one-eyed man in the land of the blind. But neither his

Memorial lecture on Chelvanayakam nor his interview with the Daily Mirror revealed any promise of

taking the war-weary Tamil-people into the promised land of peace. Like cosmopolitan Kadirgamar

he has the capacity, if he decides to do so, to carve out new and pragmatic paths for his people. But

he too steeped in the racist ideology of Vadukoddai to see the future in a new light.

In his interview with the Daily Mirror he justified the TNA for acting as prisoners of Prabhakaran.

What else could they do, he argued? In other words, he is saying that if was a judge in Prabhakaran's

courts he would have given judgements to please his "Sun God". He had the courage to be

independent in the 'Sinhala state" because the judicial system - however flawed it is or was - gave

him the freedom to be just and fair. But if he was in Prabhakaran's judiciary he would have happily

been a stooge like the TNA.

He excuses TNA for being silent in the Vanni. But, on the contrary, the "Sinhala state" gave themprotection and the full freedom to oppose it with all their might, even when they were acting as

stooges of Prabhakaran. This defence of TNA's silence also explains his silence as judge when an

innocent man was sentenced by one of his fellow-judges to jail. He was complicit in that crime. No

judge could be exonerated from the crime of sentencing an innocent man to jail. In his own

confession before the entire bar he admitted that an innocent man was sent by a fellow-judge for a

crime he did not commit and he did nothing about it. He knew how corrupt the official and the


8/12

unofficial bar is but Judge Vigneswaran did nothing about it. He did not even report it to the

authorities nor did he provide remedial measures to the victim of a heinous judgment. How credible

can he be in the eyes of the public when he poses as the righteous man now standing up for human

rights?

Political goals

In a perverse sense he has demonstrated his capacity to be a chief minister because that is what chief

ministers do routinely: give a wink and nudge to the crimes committed under his regime.

Vigneswaran is very good at covering up or justifying crimes. He told the Daily Mirror that the TNA

was not for violence knowing very well that they were all committed Vadukoddians who never

rejected or deviated from Tamil violence to achieve their political goals, as stated in the Vadukoddai

Resolution. As stated earlier, he went on to manufacture excuses for going along with Prabhakaranist

violence. If Vigneswaran's argument is that the TNA MPs had to be silent as they had no option in

facing the oppressive force of Prabhakaran's regime how come they had all the opportunities to

oppose the "Sinhala state" which they denigrate as fascist/racist? Doesn't this prove that the Jaffna

Tamils were far better off under the hated "Sinhala states" at all times than under their Tamils

saviours, whether they were the inhuman Vellahla fascists in feudal and colonial times or

Prabhakaran's low-caste fascists in the post-Chelvanayakam period in the Vanni?

So what guarantee is there that Vigneswaran is going to be any better than his predecessors? Isn't his

elevation to Jaffna leadership a confirmation of the habitual and incorrigible Jaffna trend of

producing only Prabhakarans and their extremist fathers like "Thanthai Chelva"?

Wake up Jaffna! Your future is about to be hijacked and dragged back to the failed past! And when

that happens you and your pillion riders will, no doubt, take great delight in blaming the "Sinhala

state". That is predictable. But political theorizing apart, when it comes to personal loss and suffering

whom will you blame as you watch helplessly your children being forcibly plucked from your bosom

or school and dragged into another needless war waged by the next Prabhakaran? Who was it who

dragged the whole of Jaffna into Nandikadal with the blessings of "Thanthais" in verti, on the one

hand, and soutanes in the Holy Church, on the other?

Ultimately, it comes down to one simple question: does Jaffna plan to co-exist peacefully in a

multicultural, multi-lingual, multi-religious state or go to war once again in search of an elusive

Eelam with no guarantee of winning it, with or without the military capabilities of another fascist

Prabhakaran?


9/12

- See more at:http://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-

tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpuf

.

.

,,

..

...

,

: "?"

.

.?

:.

. .

, ,

,,
http://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpufhttp://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpufhttp://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpufhttp://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpufhttp://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpufhttp://www.dailynews.lk/?q=features/vigneswaran-fit-be-chief-minister-tamils#sthash.Y4EtW63k.dpuf


10/12

.

,

,

.. .

. ..

, , ,

. ,

.

:,

?

:,,.

.

.

..

.

.

.

:

.?

:.,

. .

.,

.

.

.


11/12

: . .

.?

:. .

.

.,

. ,

.

,

.

.

.

.

.

,

"?"

50.

,,

.,

,

.

:,

.,

.,,

.?

:.

,

,.

,

.


12/12

srilanka politicsdocx

Documents