spacecraft loads analysis
TRANSCRIPT
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 1
This presentation is distributed to the students of the University of Liege
Satellite Engineering Class – November 21, 2011
This presentation is not for further distribution
Spacecraft Loads Analysis An Overview
Adriano Calvi, PhDESA / ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 2
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - Contents
1. Introduction and general aspects2. Mechanical environment3. Requirements for spacecraft structures4. Mathematical models and structural analyses5. Spacecraft mechanical testing6. Mathematical models validation7. Conclusions
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 3
Example of satellite structural design conceptExample of satellite structural design concept
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 4
What is Loads AnalysisWhat is Loads Analysis
• The task of loads analysis
– Loads analysis substantially means establishing appropriate loads for design and testing.
• The goal or purpose of loads analysis
– Nearly always to support design or to verify requirements for designed or built hardware.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 5
Spacecraft loads analysis processSpacecraft loads analysis process…… disciplinesdisciplines
It is 3 years that I work in thiscompany. Now, finally I have
understood what I do, butstill I have to understand why.
• “Legal aspects”Requirements, contracts…
• “Philosophical aspects”General logic, verification approach, criteria…
• PhysicsStructural dynamics, validation of mathematical models, criteria…
• MathematicsComputational models, verification of models…
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 6
““OrganizationsOrganizations”” and and ““Levels of AssemblyLevels of Assembly”…”… an examplean example
• Launcher Authority
• Spacecraft Authority
• Spacecraft Prime Contractor
• Payload Contractor
• Other Contactors
• Spacecraft + launcher
• Spacecraft
• Spacecraft
• Instruments/sub-systems
• Units/components/parts
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 7
Levels of AssemblyLevels of Assembly
RFFE
RPM
RFFE
RPM
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 8
Design Loads CyclesDesign Loads Cycles
A load cycle is the process of:
• Generating and combining math models for a proposed design• Assembling and developing forcing functions, load factors, etc. to
simulate the critical loading environment• Calculating design loads and displacements for all significant
ground, launch and mission events• Assessing the results to identify design modifications or risks• Then, if necessary, modifying the design accordingly or choosing to
accept the risk
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 9
Design loads cycle processDesign loads cycle process
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 10
Loads and Factors
Expendable launch vehicles,pressurized hardware and manned system Test Logic
Common Design LogicSatellitesTest Logic
Limit Loads - LL
Design Limit LoadsDLL
x Coef. A
DYL
x Coef. B
DUL
x Coef. C
x KQ x KA
QLAL
x KQ x KA
QL
AL
Incr
easi
ng L
oad
Leve
lECSS E-ST-32-10
“Protoflight” “Prototype”
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 11
2. Mechanical environment2. Mechanical environment
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 12
Mechanical loads are caused by:Mechanical loads are caused by:• Transportation• Rocket Motor Ignition Overpressure• Lift-off Loads• Engine/Motor Generated Acoustic Loads• Engine/Motor Generated Structure-borne Vibration Loads• Engine/Motor Thrust Transients• Pogo Instability, Solid Motor Pressure Oscillations• Wind and Turbulence, Aerodynamic Sources• Liquid Sloshing in Tanks• Stage and Fairing Separation Loads• Pyrotechnic Induced Loads• Manoeuvring Loads• Flight Operations, Onboard Equipment Operation
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 13
AccelerationsAccelerations…… some remarkssome remarks
• The parameter most commonly used (in the industry) to “define the motion of a mechanical system” is the acceleration
• Good reasons: accelerations are directly related to forces/stresses and “easy” to specify and measure
• In practice accelerations are used as a measure of the severity of the mechanical environment
• Some “hidden” assumptions– Criteria for equivalent structural damage (e.g. shock response spectra)
Note: failures usually happen in the largest stress areas, regardless if they are the largest acceleration areas!
– Rigid or static determinate junction (e.g. quasi-static loads)• Important consequences
– Need for considering the “actual” (e.g. “test” or “ flight”) boundary conditions (e.g. for the purpose of “notching”)
– Need for a “valid” F.E. model (e.g. to be used for force and stress recovery)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 14
Launch mechanical environmentLaunch mechanical environment
• Steady state accelerations• Low frequency vibrations• Broad band vibrations
– Random vibrations– Acoustic loads
• Shocks
• Loads (vibrations) are transmitted to the payload (e.g. satellite)through its mechanical interface• Acoustic loads also directly excite payload surfaces
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 15
““SteadySteady--statestate”” and lowand low--frequency transient accelerationsfrequency transient accelerations
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 16
Acoustic LoadsAcoustic Loads
• During the lift off and the early phases of the launch an extremely high level of acoustic noise surrounds the payload
• The principal sources of noise are:– Engine functioning– Aerodynamic turbulence
• Acoustic noise (as pressure waves) impinging on light weight panel-like structures produce high response
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 17
Broadband and high frequency vibrationsBroadband and high frequency vibrations
Broad band random vibrations are produce by:• Engines functioning• Structural response to broad-band acoustic loads• Aerodynamic turbulent boundary layer
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 18
ShocksShocks
Mainly caused by the actuation of pyrotechnic devices:• Release mechanisms for stage and satellite separation• Deployable mechanisms for solar arrays etc.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 19
ShocksShocks
Time [t] Frequency [Hz]
[g][g]
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 20
Static and dynamic environment specification (typical ranges)Static and dynamic environment specification (typical ranges)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 21
Static and dynamic environment specification (typical ranges)Static and dynamic environment specification (typical ranges)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 22
QuasiQuasi--Static Loads (accelerations)Static Loads (accelerations)• “Loads independent of time or which vary slowly, so that the dynamic
response of the structure is not significant” (ECSS-E-ST-32). Note: this is the definition of a quasi-static event!
• “Combination of static and low frequency loads into an equivalent static load specified for design purposes as C.o.G. acceleration” (e.g. NASA RP-1403, NASA-HDBK-7004). Note: this definition is fully adequate for the design of the spacecraft primary structure. For the design of components the contribution of the high frequency loads, if relevant, is included as well!
• CONCLUSION: quasi static loading means under steady-state accelerations (unchanging applied force balanced by inertia loads). For design purposes (e.g. derivation of design limit loads, selection of the fasteners, etc.), the quasi-static loads are normally calculated by combining both static and dynamic load contributions. In this context the quasi static loads are equivalent to (or interpreted by the designer as) static loads, typically expressed as equivalent accelerations at the C.o.G.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 23
3. Requirements for spacecraft structures3. Requirements for spacecraft structures
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 24
Typical Requirements for Spacecraft Structures• Strength• Structural life• Structural response• Stiffness• Damping• Mass Properties• Dynamic Envelope• Positional Stability• Mechanical Interface
• Basic requirement: the structure shall support the payload and spacecraft subsystems with enough strength and stiffness to preclude any failure (rupture, collapse, or detrimental deformation) that may keep them from working successfully.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 25
Requirements evolutionRequirements evolution
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 26
Some definitionsSome definitions• Design:
– The process used to generate the set information describing the essential characteristics of a product (ECSS-P-001A)
– Design means developing requirements, identifying options, doinganalyses and trade studies, and defining a product in enough detail so it can be built (T. P. Sarafin)
• Verification:– Confirmation by examination and provision of objective evidence that
specified requirements have been fulfilled (ISO 8402:1994)– Verification means providing confidence through disciplined steps that
a product will do what it is supposed to do (T. P. Sarafin)
• Note: we can “prove” that the spacecraft satisfies the measurable criteria we have defined, but we cannot “prove” a space mission will be successful
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 27
Design requirements and verificationDesign requirements and verification
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 28
Examples of (Mechanical) Requirements (1)• The satellite shall be compatible with 2 launchers (potential candidates:
VEGA, Soyuz in CSG, Rockot, Dnepr)... • The satellite and all its units shall withstand applied loads due to the
mechanical environments to which they are exposed during the service-life…• Design Loads shall be derived by multiplication of the Limit Loads by a design
factor equal to 1.25 (i.e. DL= 1.25 x LL)• The structure shall withstand the worst design loads without failing or
exhibiting permanent deformations.• Buckling is not allowed.• The natural frequencies of the structure shall be within adequate bandwidths
to prevent dynamic coupling with major excitation frequencies…• The spacecraft structure shall provide the mounting interface to the launch
vehicle and comply with the launcher interface requirements.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 29
Examples of (Mechanical) Requirements (2)• All the Finite Element Models (FEM) prepared to support the mechanical
verification activities at subsystem and satellite level shall be delivered in NASTRAN format
• The FEM of the spacecraft in its launch configuration shall be detailed enough to ensure an appropriate derivation and verification of the design loads and of the modal response of the various structural elements of the satellite up to 140 Hz
• A reduced FEM of the entire spacecraft correlated with the detailed FEM shall be delivered for the Launcher Coupled Loads Analysis (CLA)…
• The satellite FEMs shall be correlated against the results of modal survey tests carried out at complete spacecraft level, and at component level for units above 50 kg…
• The structural model of the satellite shall pass successfully qualification sine vibration Test.
• The flight satellite shall pass successfully acceptance sine vibration test.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 30
Spacecraft stiffness requirements for different launchersSpacecraft stiffness requirements for different launchers
Launch vehicle manuals specify minimum values for the payload natural (fundamental) frequency of vibration in order to avoid dynamic coupling between low frequency dynamics of the launch vehicle and payload modes
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 31
4. Mathematical models and structural analyses4. Mathematical models and structural analyses
• 4.1 Dynamic analysis types - Overview
• 4.2 Effective mass concept
• 4.3 Launcher/Spacecraft coupled loads analysis
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 32
Dynamic analysis typesDynamic analysis types• Real eigenvalue analysis (undamped free vibrations)
– Modal parameter identification, etc.• Linear frequency response analysis (steady-state response of
linear structures to loads that vary as a function of frequency)– Sine test prediction, transfer functions calculation, LV/SC CLA etc.
• Linear transient response analysis (response of linear structures to loads that vary as a function of time).
– LV/SC CLA, base drive analysis, jitter analysis, etc.• “Shock” response spectrum analysis
– Specification of equivalent environments (e.g. equivalent sine input),– Shock test specifications, etc.
• Vibro-acoustics (FEM/BEM, SEA) & Random vibration analysis– Vibro-acoustic test prediction & random vibration environment definition– Loads analysis for base-driven random vibration
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 33
Reasons to compute normal modes (real eigenvalue analysis)Reasons to compute normal modes (real eigenvalue analysis)• To verify stiffness requirements• To assess the dynamic interaction between a component and its
supporting structure• To guide experiments (e.g. modal survey test)• To validate computational models (e.g. test/analysis correlation)• As pre-requisite for subsequent dynamic analyses• To evaluate design changes• Mathematical model quality check (model verification)• Numerical methods: Lanczos,…
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 34
Real eigenvalue analysisReal eigenvalue analysis
Note: mode shape normalizationScaling is arbitrary
Convention: “Mass”, “Max” or “Point”
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 35
Mode shapesMode shapes
Cantilever beam Simply supported beam
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 36
Satellite Normal Modes Analysis
Mode 1: 16.2 Hz Mode 2: 18.3 Hz
INTEGRAL Satellite (FEM size 120000 DOF’s)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 37
Frequency Response AnalysisFrequency Response Analysis
• Used to compute structural response to steady-state harmonic excitation
• The excitation is explicitly defined in the frequency domain• Forces can be in the form of applied forces and/or enforced
motions• Two different numerical methods: direct and modal• Damped forced vibration equation of motion with harmonic
excitation:
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 38
Frequency response considerationsFrequency response considerations
• If the maximum excitation frequency is much less than the lowestresonant frequency of the system, a static analysis is probably sufficient
• Undamped or very lightly damped structures exhibit large dynamicresponses for excitation frequencies near natural frequencies (resonant frequencies)
• Use a fine enough frequency step size (Δf) to adequately predict peak response.
• Smaller frequency spacing should be used in regions near resonant frequencies, and larger frequency step sizes should be used in regions away from resonant frequencies
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 39
Harmonic forced response with dampingHarmonic forced response with damping
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 40
Transient Response AnalysisTransient Response Analysis
• Purpose is to compute the behaviour of a structure subjected to time-varying excitation
• The transient excitation is explicitly defined in the time domain• Forces can be in the form of applied forces and/or enforced motions• The important results obtained from a transient analysis are typically
displacements, velocities, and accelerations of grid points, andforces and stresses in elements
• Two different numerical methods: direct (e.g. Newmark) and modal(e.g. Lanczos + Duhamel’s integral or Newmark)
• Dynamic equation of motion:
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 41
Modal Transient Response AnalysisModal Transient Response Analysis
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 42
Transient response considerationsTransient response considerations
• The integration time step must be small enough to represent accurately the variation in the loading
• The integration time step must also be small enough to represent the maximum frequency of interest (“cut-off frequency”)
• The cost of integration is directly proportional to the number of time steps• Very sharp spikes in a loading function induce a high-frequency transient
response. If the high-frequency transient response is of primary importance in an analysis, a very small integration time step must be used
• The loading function must accurately describe the spatial and temporal distribution of the dynamic load
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 43
““ShockShock”” response spectrum (and analysis)response spectrum (and analysis)• Response spectrum analysis is an approximate method of
computing the peak response of a transient excitation applied to a structure or component
• There are two parts to response spectrum analysis: (1) generation of the spectrum and (2) use of the spectrum for dynamic responsesuch as stress analysis
• Note 1: the “part (2)” of the response spectrum analysis has a limited use in structural dynamics of spacecraft (e.g. preliminary design) since the accuracy of the method may be questionable
• Note 2: the term “shock” can be misleading (not always a “physical shock”, i.e. an environment of a “short duration”, is involved. It would be better to use “response spectrum”)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 44
Generation of a response spectrum (1)Generation of a response spectrum (1)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 45
Generation of a response spectrum (2)Generation of a response spectrum (2)• the peak response for one oscillator does not necessarily occur at the
same time as the peak response for another oscillator• there is no phase information since only the magnitude of peak response is
computed• It is assumed in this process that each oscillator mass is very small relative
to the base structural mass so that the oscillator does not influence the dynamic behaviour of the base structure
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 46
Shock Response Spectrum. Some remarksShock Response Spectrum. Some remarks• The 1-DOF system is used as reference structure (since the
simplest) for the characterization of environments (i.e. quantification of the severity → equivalent environments can be specified)
• In practice, the criterion used for the severity is the maximum response which occurs on the structure (note: another criterion relates to the concept of fatigue damage…)
• A risk in comparing two excitations of different nature is in the influence of damping on the results (e.g. maxima are proportional to Q for sine excitation and variable for transient excitation!)
• The absolute acceleration spectrum is used, which provides information about the maximum internal forces and stresses
• The shock spectrum is a transformation of the time history which is not reversible (contrary to Fourier transform)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 47
Shock Response SpectrumShock Response Spectrum
(A) is the shock spectrum of a terminal peak sawtooth (B) of 500 G peak amplitude and 0.4 millisecond duration
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 48
Random vibration (analysis)Random vibration (analysis)• Random vibration is vibration that can be described only in a
statistical sense• The instantaneous magnitude is not known at any given time;
rather, the magnitude is expressed in terms of its statistical properties (such as mean value, standard deviation, and probability of exceeding a certain value)
• Examples of random vibration include earthquake ground motion, wind pressure fluctuations on aircraft, and acoustic excitation due to rocket and jet engine noise
• These random excitations are usually described in terms of a power spectral density (PSD) function
• Note: in structural dynamics of spacecraft, the random vibration analysis is often performed with simplified techniques (e.g. based on “Miles’ equation” + effective modal mass models)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 49
Random noise with normal amplitude distributionRandom noise with normal amplitude distribution
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 50
Power Spectral Density (conceptual model)Power Spectral Density (conceptual model)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 51
Sound Pressure Level (conceptual model)Sound Pressure Level (conceptual model)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 52
VibroVibro acoustic analysis at spacecraft levelacoustic analysis at spacecraft level
• Detailed analysis using Finite Elements (FE), Boundary Elements (BEM) and Statistical Energy Analysis (SEA)
• Random levels on units and instruments can be compared to specifications or qualification levels
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 53
4. Mathematical models and structural analyses4. Mathematical models and structural analyses
• 4.1 Dynamic analysis types - Overview
• 4.2 Effective mass concept
• 4.3 Launcher/Spacecraft coupled loads analysis
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 54
Modal effective mass (1)Modal effective mass (1)
• It may be defined as the mass terms in a modal expansion of the drive point apparent mass of a kinematically supported system
– Note: driving-point FRF: the DOF response is the same as the excitation• This concept applies to structure with base excitation • Important particular case: rigid or statically determinate junction• It provides an estimate of the participation of a vibration mode, in
terms of the load it will cause in the structure, when excited• Note: avoid using: “it is the mass which participates to the mode”!
Dynamic amplification factor
Modal reaction forces
Base (junction) excitation
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 55
Modal effective mass (2)Modal effective mass (2)
• The effective mass matrix can be calculated either by the “modal participation factors” or by using the modal interface forces
• Normally only the values on the leading diagonal of the modal effective mass matrix are considered and expressed in percentageof the structure rigid body properties (total mass and second moments of inertia)
• The effective mass characterises the mode and it is independent from the eigenvector normalisation
Gen. mass
Resultant of modal interface forces
i-th mode Rigid body modes
Modal participation factorsEffective mass
Eigenvector max value
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 56
Modal effective mass (3)Modal effective mass (3)
• For the complete set of modes the summation of the modal effective mass is equal to the rigid body mass
• Contributions of each individual mode to the total effective mass can be used as a criterion to classify the modes (global or local) and an indicator of the importance of that mode, i.e. an indication of the magnitude of participation in the loads analysis
• It can be used to construct a list of important modes for the test/analysis correlation and it is a significant correlation parameter
• It can be used to create simplified mathematical models (equivalent models with respect to the junction)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 57
Example of Effective Mass table (MPLM test and FE model)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 58
4. Mathematical models and structural analyses4. Mathematical models and structural analyses
• 4.1 Dynamic analysis types - Overview
• 4.2 Effective mass concept
• 4.3 Launcher/Spacecraft coupled loads analysis
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 59
A5 Typical Sequence of eventsA5 Typical Sequence of events
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 60
A5 Typical Longitudinal Static AccelerationA5 Typical Longitudinal Static Acceleration
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 61
Sources of Structural Loadings (Launch)Sources of Structural Loadings (Launch)
Axial-Acceleration Profile for the Rockot Launch Vehicle
g8
7
6
5
4
32
1
0t, s150 200 250 300100500
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
acce
lera
tion
[m/s
2 ]
t [s]
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 62
Axial Acceleration at Launcher/Satellite Interface (Engines Cut-off)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
acce
lera
tion
[m/s
2 ]
t [s]
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 63
Load Factors for Preliminary Design (Ariane 5)Load Factors for Preliminary Design (Ariane 5)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 64
QuasiQuasi--Static Flight Limit loads for Dnepr and SoyuzStatic Flight Limit loads for Dnepr and Soyuz
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 65
Launcher / Satellite C.L.A.
Mode 18: 2.93 Hz Mode 53: 16.9 Hz
A5 / Satellite Recovered System Mode shapes
• CLA: simulation of the structural response to low frequency mechanical environment
• Main Objective: to calculate the loads on the satellite caused by the launch transients (lift-off, transonic, aerodynamic gust, separation of SRBs…)
• Loads (in this context): set of internal forces, displacements and accelerations that characterise structural response to the applied forces
• Effects included in the forcing functions : thrust built-up, engine shut-down/burnout, gravity, aerodynamic loads (gust), separation of boosters, etc.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 66
Ariane-5 Dynamic Mathematical ModelPAYLOAD
UPPER COMPOSITE
EAP+EAP-
EPC
– Dynamic effects up to about 100 Hz– 3D FE models of EPC, EAP, UC– Dynamic Reduction using Craig-Bampton formulation– Incompressible or compressible fluids models for liquid
propellants– Structure/fluid interaction– Nearly incompressible SRB solid propellant modeling– Pressure and stress effects on launcher stiffness– SRB propellant and DIAS structural damping– Non-linear launch table effects
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 67
Sizing flight events (CLA with VEGA Launcher)Sizing flight events (CLA with VEGA Launcher)
1. Lift-off (P80 Ignition and Blastwave)
2. Mach1/QMAX Gust
3. P80 Pressure Oscillations
4. Z23 Ignition
5. Z23 Pressure Oscillations
6. Z9 Ignition
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 68
CLA OutputCLA Output• LV-SC interface accelerations
– Equivalent sine spectrum
• LV-SC interface forces– Equivalent accelerations at CoG
• Internal responses– Accelerations,– Displacements– Forces– Stresses– …
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 69
Payload / STS CLAPayload / STS CLA
Lift-off Force Resultant in X [lbf]
Lift-offMain Fitting
I/F ForceX Dir. [N]
Lift-offMain Fitting
I/F ForceZ Dir. [N]
Lift-offKeel Fitting
I/F ForceY Dir. [N]
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 70
Shock Response Spectrum and Equivalent Sine Input
• A shock response spectrum is a plot of maximum “response” (e.g. displacement, stress, acceleration) of single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems to a given input versus some system parameter, generally the undamped natural frequency.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 71
SRS/ESI of the following transient acceleration:
QSRSESI
ESI
ESI
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 72
ESI for Spacecraft
CLA (Coupled Load Analysis)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
50
100
150
200
250
SR
S [m
/s2 ]
frequency [Hz]
SRSQSRSESI
ESI
12
Q
SRSESI
SRS
Difference is negligible for small damping ratios
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 73
/[ sm
][s
2.41
[Hz
]/[ sm 2.46
2DOF2DOF]/[ sm
][s
01.0Hz23frequencynatural
[Hz
Hz23frequencynatural 1.97 01.0
]/[ sm
Transient responseTransient response
Frequency response at ESI levelFrequency response at ESI level
SDOFSDOF
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 74
5. Spacecraft testing5. Spacecraft testing
5.1 Introduction and general aspects
5.1 Mechanical testsModal survey testSinusoidal vibration testAcoustic noise testShock testRandom vibration test
5.2 Over-testing and… under-testing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 75
Testing techniques Testing techniques –– Introduction (1)Introduction (1)
• Without testing, an analysis can give completely incorrect results• Without the analysis, the tests can represent only a very limited reality
• Two types of tests according to the objectives to be reached:– Simulation tests for structure qualification or acceptance– Identification tests (a.k.a. analysis-validation tests) for structure
identification (the objective is to determine the dynamic characteristics of the tested structure in order to “update” the mathematical model)
• Note: identification and simulation tests are generally completely dissociated. In certain cases (e.g. spacecraft sine test) it is technically possible to perform them using the same test facility
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 76
Testing techniques Testing techniques –– Introduction (2)Introduction (2)
• Generation of mechanical environment– Small shakers (with flexible rod; electrodynamic)– Large shakers (generally used to impose motion at the base)
• Electrodynamic shaker• Hydraulic jack shaker
– Shock machines (pyrotechnic generators and impact machines)– Noise generators + reverberant acoustic chamber (homogeneous and
diffuse field)• Measurements
– Force sensors, calibrated strain gauges– Accelerometers, velocity or displacement sensors
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 77
Classes of tests used to verify requirements (purposes)Classes of tests used to verify requirements (purposes)
• Development test– Demonstrate design concepts and acquire necessary information for
design• Qualification test
– Show a design is adequate by testing a single article• Acceptance test
– Show a product is adequate (test each flight article)• Analysis validation test
– Provide data which enable to confirm critical analyses or to change (“update/validate”) mathematical models and redo analyses
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 78
Tests for verifying mechanical requirements (purposes)Tests for verifying mechanical requirements (purposes)
• Acoustic test– Verify strength and structural life by introducing random vibration
through acoustic pressure (vibrating air molecules)– Note: acoustic tests at spacecraft level are used to verify adequacy of
electrical connections and validate the random vibration environments used to qualify components
• (Pyrotechnic) shock test– Verify resistance to high-frequency shock waves caused by separation
explosives (introduction of high-energy vibration up to 10,000 Hz)– System-level tests are used to verify levels used for component testing
• Random vibration test– Verify strength and structural life by introducing random vibration
through the mechanical interface (typically up to 2000 Hz )
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 79
Tests for verifying mechanical requirements (purposes)Tests for verifying mechanical requirements (purposes)
• Sinusoidal vibration test– Verify strength for structures that would not be adequately tested in
random vibration or acoustic testing– Note 1: cyclic loads at varying frequencies are applied to excite the
structure modes of vibration– Note 2: sinusoidal vibration testing at low levels are performed to verify
natural frequencies– Note 3: the acquired data can be used for further processing (e.g.
experimental modal analysis)– Note 4: this may seem like an environmental test, but it is not.
Responses are monitored and input forces are reduced as necessary (“notching”) to make sure the target responses or member loads are not exceeded.
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 80
RockotRockot Dynamic SpecificationDynamic Specification
Marketed by: Eurockot
Actually flight qualified
Manufactured by: Khrunichev
Capability: 950 kg @ 500 km
Launch site: Plesetsk
Environment Level
Sine vibration Longitudinal= 1 g on [5-10] Hz 1.5 g at 20 Hz 1 g on [40-100] Hz
Lateral = 0.625 g on [5-100] Hz
Acoustic
31.5 Hz = 130.5 dB 63 Hz = 133.5 dB 125 Hz = 135.5 dB 250 Hz = 135.7 dB
500 Hz = 130.8 dB 1000 Hz = 126.4 dB 2000 Hz = 120.3 dB
Shock 100 Hz = 50 g 700 Hz = 800 g 1000 Hz 1500 Hz = 2000 g
4000 Hz 5000 Hz = 4000 g 10000 Hz = 2000 g
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 81
5. Spacecraft testing5. Spacecraft testing
5.1 Introduction and general aspects
5.2 Mechanical testsModal survey testSinusoidal vibration testAcoustic noise testShock testRandom vibration test
5.3 Over-testing and… under-testing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 82
Modal survey test (identification test)Modal survey test (identification test)Purpose: provide data for dynamic mathematical model validation Note: the normal modes are the most appropriate dynamic characteristics for the identification of the structure
• Usually performed on structural models (SM or STM) in flight representative configurations
• Modal parameters (natural frequencies, mode shapes, damping, effective masses…) can be determined in two ways:
– by a method with appropriation of modes, sometimes called phase resonance, which consists of successively isolating each mode by an appropriate excitation and measuring its parameters directly
– by a method without appropriation of modes, sometimes called phase separation, which consists of exciting a group of modes whose parameters are then determined by processing the measurements
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 83
Different ways to get modal data from testsDifferent ways to get modal data from tests
• Hammer test
• Vibration test data analysis
• Dedicated FRF measurement & modal analysis
• Full scale modal survey with mode tuningIncr
easi
ng e
ffor
t
Dat
a co
nsis
tenc
y
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 84
Modal Survey Test vs. Modal Data extracted from the Sine Vibration Test
• Modal Survey:– requires more effort (financial and time)– provides results with higher quality
• Modal Data from Sine Vibration:– easy access / no additional test necessary– less quality due to negative effects from vibration
• fixtures / facility tables not indefinitely stiff• higher sweep rate (brings along effects like beating or control instabilities)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 85
Ariane 5 Ariane 5 -- Sine excitation at spacecraft base (Sine excitation at spacecraft base (sine-equivalent dynamics)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 86
Test Set-up for Satellite Vibration Tests
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 87
Herschel on Hydra
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 88
Acoustic test (objectives)Acoustic test (objectives)
• Demonstrate the ability of a specimen to withstand the acoustic environment during launch
• Validation of analytical models
• System level tests verify equipment qualification loads
• Acceptance test for S/C flight models
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 89
Ariane 5 Ariane 5 –– Acoustic noise spectrum under the fairingAcoustic noise spectrum under the fairing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 90
Shock test. Objectives and remarksShock test. Objectives and remarks
• Demonstrate the ability of a specimen to withstand the shock loads during launch and operation
• Verify equipment qualification loads during system level tests
• System level shock tests are generally performed with the actual shock generating equipment (e.g. clamp band release)
• or by using of a sophisticated pyro-shock generating system (SHOGUN for ARIANE 5 payloads)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 91
Shock machine (metalShock machine (metal--metal pendulum impact machine)metal pendulum impact machine)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 92
Random Vibration Test (vs. Acoustic Test)Random Vibration Test (vs. Acoustic Test)
Purpose: verify strength and structural life by introducing random vibration through the mechanical interface
• Random Vibration– base driven excitation– better suited for Subsystem / Equipment tests– limited for large shaker systems
• Acoustic– air pressure excitation– better suited for S/C and large Subsystems with low mass / area
density
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 93
Random vibration test with slide tableRandom vibration test with slide table
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 94
5. Spacecraft testing5. Spacecraft testing
5.1 Introduction and general aspects
5.2 Mechanical testsModal survey testSinusoidal vibration testAcoustic noise testShock testRandom vibration test
5.3 Over-testing and… under-testing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 95
Overtesting:Overtesting:an introductionan introduction(vibration absorber effect)(vibration absorber effect)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 96
Introduction to overtesting and notching• The qualification of the satellite to low
frequency transient is normally achieved by a base-shake test
• The input spectrum specifies the acceleration input that should excite the satellite, for each axis
• This input is definitively different from the mission loads, which are transient
• Notching: “Reduction of acceleration input spectrum in narrow frequency bands, usually where test item has resonances” (NASA-HDBK-7004)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 97
GOCE on ESTEC Large Slip Table Herschel on ESTEC Large Slip Table
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 98
The overtesting problem (causes)• Difference in boundary conditions between test and flight
configurations – during a vibration test, the structure is excited with a specified input
acceleration that is the envelope of the flight interface acceleration, despite the amplitude at certain frequencies drops in the flightconfiguration (there is a feedback from the launcher to the spacecraft in the main modes of the spacecraft)
• The excitation during the flight is not a steady-state sine function and neither a sine sweep but a transient excitation with some cycles in a few significant resonance frequencies
• The objective of notching of the specified input levels is to take into account the real dynamic response for the different flight events. In practice the notching simulates the antiresonances in the coupled configuration
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 99
Notching
ESI (equivalent sine)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 100
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 101
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 102
Random vibration test: notching of test specificationRandom vibration test: notching of test specification
Illustration of notching of random vibration test specification,at the frequencies of strong test item resonances
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 103
6. Mathematical models validation6. Mathematical models validation
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 104
Validation of Finite Element Models(with emphasis on Structural Dynamics)
“Everyone believes the test data except for the experimentalist, and no one believes the finite element model except for the analyst”
“All models are wrong, but some are still useful”
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 105
Verification and Validation Definitions (ASME Standards Committee: “V & V in Computational Solid Mechanics”)
• Verification (of codes, calculations): Process of determining that a model implementation accurately represents the developer’s conceptual description of the model and the solution to the model
– Math issue: “Solving the equations right”
• Validation: Process of determining the degree to which a model is an accurate representation of the real world from the perspective of the intended uses of the model
– Physics issue: “Solving the right equations”
Note: objective of the validation is to maximise confidence in the predictive capability of the model
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 106
Terminology: Correlation, Updating and Validation• Correlation:
– the process of quantifying the degree of similarity and dissimilarity between two models (e.g. FE analysis vs. test)
• Error Localization:– the process of determining which areas of the model need to be modified
• Updating:– mathematical model improvement using data obtained from an associated
experimental model (it can be “consistent” or “inconsistent”)
• Valid model :– model which predicts the required dynamic behaviour of the subject
structure with an acceptable degree of accuracy, or “correctness”
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 107
Some remarks on the validation of “critical analyses”
• Loads analysis is probably the single most influential task in designing a space structure
• Loads analysis is doubly important because it is the basis for static test loads as well as the basis for identifying the target responses and “notching criteria” in sine tests
• A single mistake in the loads analysis can mean that we design and test the structure to the wrong loads
• We must be very confident in our loads analysis, which means we must check the sensitivity of our assumptions and validate the loads analysis that will be the basis of strength analysis and static testing
• Note: Vibro-acoustic, random and shock analyses are usually “not critical” in the sense that we normally use environmental tests to verify mechanical requirements
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 108
Targets of the correlation(features of interest for quantitative comparison)
Characteristics that most affect the structure response to applied forces
• Natural frequencies• Mode shapes• Modal effective masses• Modal damping• …• Total mass, mass distribution • Centre of Gravity, inertia• Static stiffness• Interface forces• …
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 109
Correlation of mode shapesCorrelation of mode shapes
• Spacehab FEM coupled to the test rig model & Silhouette
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 110
GOCE modal analysis and survey testGOCE modal analysis and survey test
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 111
CrossCross--Orthogonality Check (COC) and Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) Orthogonality Check (COC) and Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC)
• The cross-orthogonality between the analysis and test mode shapes with respect to the mass matrix is given by:
• The MAC between a measured mode and an analytical mode is defined as:
aTm MC
as
Tasmr
Tmr
asTmr
rsMAC
2
Note: COC and MAC do not give a “useful” measure of the error!
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 112
Columbus: Cross-Orthogonality Check up to 35 Hz (target modes) TEST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
FEM Err.% [Hz] 13.78 15.80 17.20 23.81 24.23 24.65 25.36 25.59 26.59 27.19 27.53 28.87 30.19 30.55 32.73 33.15 33.86 34.57 35.21 36.16
1 -2.94 13.37 1.00
2 -0.95 15.65 1.00
3 -1.73 16.90 0.99
4 -3.26 23.03 0.93 0.35
5 -1.16 23.95 0.34 0.93
6 -2.00 24.16 0.95
7 -1.98 24.86 0.95 0.27
8 -0.12 25.56 0.86
9 -0.95 26.34 0.22 0.90
10 -2.65 26.47 0.95
11 -0.40 27.42 0.26 0.96
12 -3.65 27.82 0.82 0.27
13 -6.00 28.38 0.46 0.89
15 1.19 30.91 0.26 0.95
17 1.63 33.26 0.94 0.21 0.32
18 - 33.71 0.64 0.34 0.62
19 -4.72 34.45 0.95
20 1.21 34.99 0.57 0.81
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 113
Soho SVM – Cross-Orthogonality CheckF.E.M.
1 2 3 4 8 9 10 15 21 26 29 30 31TEST Err. % Freq. Hz 34.83 37.24 44.07 45.19 51.51 52.68 55.46 62.18 70.92 77.99 81.53 82.25 84.42
1 2.87 35.86 0.87 0.462 0.00 37.24 0.47 0.873 4.17 45.99 0.874 4.78 47.46 0.77 0.245 -3.39 49.82 -0.33 0.766 0.96 53.19 0.75 0.227 2.10 56.65 0.79 0.218 58.67 -0.28 -0.35 -0.229 60.24 -0.30 -0.22 0.46 0.4610 3.30 64.30 0.6111 66.40 0.21 0.3212 67.50 0.45 -0.4313 68.73 -0.3814 69.6815 71.6916 72.71 0.37 -0.3317 3.30 73.34 0.21 0.8518 74.7819 75.6320 78.77 -0.2421 82.1222 7.72 84.51 0.7623 5.54 86.31 0.87 -0.2324 7.21 88.64 0.6425 5.45 89.29 -0.33 0.6326 94.4427 97.1528 99.56
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 114
GOCE GOCE -- MAC and Effective MassMAC and Effective Mass
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 115
Lack of Matching between F.E. Model and Test• Modelling uncertainties and errors (model is not completely physically
representative)– Approximation of boundary conditions– Inadequate modelling of joints and couplings– Lack or inappropriate damping representation– The linear assumption of the model versus test non-linearities– Mistakes (input errors, oversights, etc.)
• Scatter in manufacturing– Uncertainties in physical properties (geometry, tolerances, material properties)
• Uncertainties and errors in testing– Measured data or parameters contain levels of errors– Uncertainties in the test set-up, input loads, boundary conditions etc.– Mistakes (oversights, cabling errors, etc.)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 116
Test-Analysis Correlation CriteriaThe degree of similarity or dissimilarity establishing that the correlation between measured and predicted values is acceptable
ECSS-E-ST-32-11 Proposed Test / Analysis Correlation Criteria
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 117
7. Conclusions7. Conclusions
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 118
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - Contents
1. Introduction and general aspects2. Mechanical environment3. Requirements for spacecraft structures4. Mathematical models and structural analyses5. Spacecraft mechanical testing6. Mathematical models validation7. Conclusions
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 119
Final VerificationFinal Verification
Consist of:
• Making sure all requirements are satisfied (“compliance”)
• Validating the methods and assumptions used to satisfy requirements
• Assessing risks
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 120
Criteria for Assessing Verification Loads (strength)Criteria for Assessing Verification Loads (strength)
• Analysis: margins of safety must me greater that or equal to zero
• Test: Structures qualified by static or sinusoidal testing– Test loads or stresses “as predicted” (test-verified math model and test
conditions) are compared with the total predicted loads during the mission (including flying transients, acoustics, random vibration, pressure, thermal effects and preloads)
• Test: Structures qualified by acoustic or random vibration testing– Test environments are compared with random-vibration environments
derived from system-level acoustic testing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 121
Final Verification (crucial points)Final Verification (crucial points)
• To perform a Verification Loads Cycle for structures designed and tested to predicted loads
– Finite element models correlation with the results of modal and static testing
– Loads prediction with the current forcing functions– Compliance with analysis criteria (e.g. MOS>0)
• To make sure the random-vibration environments used to qualify components were high enough (based on data collected during the spacecraft acoustic test)
Note: in the verification loads cycle instead of identifying required design changes (design loads cycle) the adequacy of the structure that has already been built and tested is assessed
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 122
““Technical inconsistenciesTechnical inconsistencies””
• Uni-axial vibration and shock test facilities• Low frequency transient often simulated at the subsystem and
system assembly level using a swept-sine vibration test• Infinite mechanical impedance of the shaker (and the standard
practice of controlling the input acceleration to the frequency envelope of the flight data)
• Vibro-acoustic environment often simulated at the subsystem and units assembly level using a random vibration test
• Test levels largely based on computational analyses (we must validate critical load analyses!)
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 123
““NEW TRENDSNEW TRENDS””• Protoflight vs prototype
• Testing (force limited vibration testing)
• Computational mechanics– Vibro-acoustic analysis– Random vibration analysis
• Complexity of the Industrial organization
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 124
BibliographyBibliography• Sarafin T.P. Spacecraft Structures and Mechanisms, Kluwer, 1995• Craig R.R., Structural Dynamics – An introduction to computer methods, J. Wiley
and Sons, 1981• Clough R.W., Penzien J., Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, 1993• Ewins D.J., Modal Testing – Theory, practice and applications, Research Studies
Press, Second Edition, 2000• Wijker J., Mechanical Vibrations in Spacecraft Design, Springer, 2004• Girard A., Roy N., Structural Dynamics in Industry, J. Wiley and Sons, 2008• Steinberg D.S., Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment, J. Wiley and Sons,
2000• Friswell M.I., Mottershead J.E., Finite Element Model Updating in Structural
Dynamics, Kluwer 1995• Ariane 5 User’s Manual, Arianespace, http://www.arianespace.com/
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 125
Bibliography Bibliography -- ECSS DocumentsECSS Documents• ECSS-E-HB-32-26 Spacecraft Loads Analysis (to be published)• ECSS-E-ST-32 Space Project Engineering - Structural• ECSS-E-ST-32-03 Structural finite element models• ECSS-E-ST-32-10 Structural factors of safety for spaceflight
hardware • ECSS-E-ST-32-02 Structural design and verification of
pressurized hardware• ECSS-E-ST-32-11 Modal survey assessment• ECSS-E-ST-32-01 Fracture control
• ECSS-E-10-02 Space Engineering - Verification• ECSS-E-10-03 Space Engineering - Testing
Spacecraft Loads Analysis - A. Calvi 126
THE END!Acknowledgements:
TAS France for the data concerning the project SENTINEL-3ALENIA SPAZIO, Italy, for the data concerning the projects GOCE, COLUMBUS,
MPLM and SOHOEADS ASTRIUM, UK, for the data concerning the project AEOLUS and
EarthCAREESA/ESTEC, Structures Section, NL, for the data concerning ARIANE 5 FE
model and LV/SC CLA