sleeve leaks

56
PREVENTION and Treatment of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Dr Rutledge

Upload: drr-rutledge

Post on 01-Nov-2014

1.273 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

PREVENTION and Treatment of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Dr Rutledge Where does it occur? ONE PLACE! This is “Tiger Country” – remember that! Managing Complications FIRST Prevent Complications Managing Leaks First Prevent Leaks!! Examples of Complacency Sleeve Gastrectomy Leak “Sleeve Gastrectomy & Risk of Leak: Systematic Analysis of 4,888 Patients” “Risk of leak is low at 2.4%" Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1509-15. Epub 2011 Dec 17. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sleeve leaks

PREVENTIONand

Treatment of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

Dr Rutledge

Page 2: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

• Where does it occur?

• ONE PLACE!

Page 3: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

• Where does it occur?

• ONE PLACE!

• This is “Tiger Country” – remember that!

Page 4: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

Page 5: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

• Where does it occur?

• ONE PLACE!

• This is “Tiger Country” – remember that!

Page 6: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve LeakA Tragedy of Unimaginable Proportions

• Sleeve gastrectomy severe complications: is it always a reasonable surgical option?

• Moszkowicz D, Chevallier JM.• Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,

University Paris 5, Paris, France.• Obes Surg. 2013 May;23(5):676-86.

Page 7: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve LeakSleeve gastrectomy severe complications

• Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG.

• An endoscopic stent was tried in nine patients but failed in 84.6 % of cases within 20 days (1-161). Seven patients (32 %) necessitated total gastrectomy within 217 days (0-1,915 days) for conservative treatment failure.

Page 8: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve LeakSleeve gastrectomy severe complications

• Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG.

• Procedures under general anesthesia were required in 41 % of cases, organ failure was found in 55 % of cases, and central venous device infection in 40 %.

• Mortality rate was 4.5 % (n = 1). Patients with unfavorable evolution of LSG complications (death or additional gastrectomy) had more previous bariatric procedure (82 % vs. 18 %, p = 0.003). Median time to cure was 310 days (9-546 days).

Page 9: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve LeakSleeve gastrectomy severe complications

• CONCLUSIONS:

• LSG exposes severe complications occurring in patients with benign condition.

• Endoscopic stents entail high failure rate. • Total gastrectomy is required in one third of

the cases.

Page 10: Sleeve leaks

Managing ComplicationsManaging Complications

FIRSTFIRST Prevent ComplicationsPrevent Complications

Page 11: Sleeve leaks

Managing Leaks

First Prevent Leaks!!

Page 12: Sleeve leaks

Error in Thinking of Complications in Surgery

Often Said:

If you are not having complications;

You are not doing surgery

Implying

Complications are Inevitable & little can be done to prevent them

They are expected

Page 13: Sleeve leaks

Safety & Bariatric Surgery Fear Complacency

• When surgeons Don’t rigorously adhere to

• Rules/Checklist in managing patients, their team & themselves

Page 14: Sleeve leaks

Safety & Bariatric Surgery Complacency

• Error: Neglect careful attention

• pre, Intra & post-op management guidelines

• (e.g. Leak Prevention Rules)

Page 15: Sleeve leaks

Safety & Bariatric Surgery Fear Complacency

• Even worse, • Some surgeons choose to Some surgeons choose to

operate knowing of operate knowing of major problems with major problems with their patient or their team their patient or their team

• (Misunderstand Seriousness of Complications)

Page 16: Sleeve leaks

Examples of ComplacencyComplacencySleeve Gastrectomy Leak

• “Sleeve Gastrectomy & Risk of Leak: Systematic Analysis of 4,888 Patients”

• “Risk of leak is low at 2.4%"

• Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1509-15. Epub 2011 Dec 17. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

Page 17: Sleeve leaks

“Risk of leak is low at 2.4%"

Imagine an AirlineReleases the following statement:

“Risk of Airplane Crashes are Low at only 2.4%"

Page 18: Sleeve leaks

The Mindset of Commitment to Excellence

Make the CommitmentTo yourself and to your

Patient:“Failure is Not an Option”

Page 19: Sleeve leaks

Objectives

Adoption of Mindset to Prevent Complications (Failure is Not & Option)

Fight ComplacencySpecific Techniques to

AVOID complications1. Know your Enemy (List Complications)2. Management of Complications

Page 20: Sleeve leaks

FIRST:Don’t Manage Complications? Prevent, Prevent, Prevent

Page 21: Sleeve leaks

Complication Managementvs.

Complication Prevention

Better to Prevent a Leak than to be

Expert in Managing a Leak

Page 22: Sleeve leaks

Volume PerformanceNew Surgeons = More Complications

Page 23: Sleeve leaks

Complications Decreasewith Experience

Page 24: Sleeve leaks

New Surgeons are Dangerous & Deadly Surgeons

Complications decline to logarithm of the surgeons’

Training & Experience

Page 25: Sleeve leaks

Learning Minimally-Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery

• The typical number of operations to overcome the learning curve was between 75 & 125 operations

• Furthermore, more than one such operation per week was necessary to maintain good results.

• Individual learning curves varied markedly proving the need for good monitoring and/or mentoring in the initial phase.

• Circulation. 2013 Jun 26. Learning Minimally-Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Cumulative Sum Sequential Probability Analysis of 3895 Operations from a Single High Volume Center Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Mohr FW. Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Page 26: Sleeve leaks

RNY: Long learning curve of 500 cases

RNY technically challenging 2,281 cases 1999 - 2011

Complications diminished with increased experience 

Stabilized <2.5% after the first 500 cases Mortality rate .43%,

main causes of death PE & Leaks (.14% each)Op time & Complications significantly reduced

after a long learning curve of 500 cases Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Feb 11. Overcoming the learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A 12-

year experience. El-Kadre L, Tinoco AC, Tinoco RC, Aguiar L, Santos T. Department of Surgery, São José do Avaí Hospital, Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Page 27: Sleeve leaks

Surgeons' experience with laparoscopic fundoplication

• Complications of laparoscopic fundoplication are more likely during the initial 20 cases

• Experience with the procedure shorter operating time & fewer complications, conversions, & early dysphagia

• Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1377-82. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Surgeons' experience with laparoscopic fundoplication after the early personal experience: does it have an impact on the outcome? Salminen P, Hiekkanen H, Laine S, Ovaska J. Department of Surgery, Turku University Central Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland. [email protected]

Page 28: Sleeve leaks

What can we learn from the Airline Industry

Failure is Not an Option

Page 29: Sleeve leaks

Unacceptable Outcomes Revisional Surgery After Failed Or

Complicated Sleeve

Early complication rate 23.4%;

Staple line leak 5.4%, Bleeding was 8.1% Obes Surg. 2012 Dec;22(12):1903-8. Indications & short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after

failed or complicated sleeve gastrectomy. van Rutte PW, Smulders JF, de Zoete JP, Nienhuijs SW.Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Page 30: Sleeve leaks

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band

800 patients underwent LSG, with 90 as a revisional procedure for failed LAGB

Operative complications included 5.5 % leak & 4.4 % hemorrhageConclusions: “We advocate this

procedure as a good bariatric option (?)

Obes Surg. 2013 Mar;23(3):300-5. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)-a good bariatric option for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Yazbek T, Safa N, Denis R, Atlas H, Garneau PY. Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Page 31: Sleeve leaks

Bariatric Surgery Complications

LeakBleedingVenous thrombosis/PEInfections, PneumoniaSBO from abdominal herniaStricture/ObstructionTechnical ErrorsArq Gastroenterol. 2013 JaSanto MA, Pajecki D, Riccioppo D, Cleva R, Kawamoto F, Cecconello I.Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Unit, Discipline

of Digestive Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School (Unidade de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica, Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected]

Page 32: Sleeve leaks

Leak Prevention

Leak Location:

EG Junction (Think Sleeve)

Prevention: Simple:

AVIOD EG Junction!

Page 33: Sleeve leaks

Learning from Sleeve Leak Experience

"Division of the posterior fundic vessels is also performed."

(NO NO NO)

“The angle of His is then dissected free from the left crus of the diaphragm.”

(NO NO NO)

"Careful attention on dissection must be taken due to the risk of splenic or esophageal injury"

(NO NO NO)

Prevention: Simple:

AVIOD the EG Junction!

Page 34: Sleeve leaks

Learning from Sleeve Leak Experience

In 75-95% the leak location near the

gastro-esophageal junction

Prevention: Simple:

FEAR the EG Junction!

Page 35: Sleeve leaks

Fundamentals of Gastro-Intestinal Healing

Meticulous HemostasisSLOW Staple Gun Firing Avoid damage to staple

lineDo Not Touch the Staple

LineGentle & precise

handling of tissues

Page 36: Sleeve leaks

Fundamentals of Gastro-Intestinal Anastomosis Healing

Approximately 3-mm gap between two sutures

Care not to apply excessive tension to prevent cut-through of seromuscular layer

It is necessary to include submucosa carefully because it is the strongest layer of the bowel wall and gives strength to anastomosis.

Page 37: Sleeve leaks

Handle tissue gently & precisely

“approximate, do not strangulate” to avoid ischemia of the bowel wall at the anastomosis. 

For stapled anastomoses, use the correct staple height for the tissue thickness.

Too short & ischemia; Too long, & bleeding or leakThe common staple height for the small bowel

& colon is 3.5 blue, 3.5 mm For the thicker stomach, green, 4.8 mm

Page 38: Sleeve leaks

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials single- vs two- layer intestinal anastomosis 

Six trials were analyzed, comprising 670 participants (single-layer group, n = 299; two-layer group, n = 371).

Data on leaks were available from all included studies.

Combined risk ratio 0.91 (95% CI = 0.49 to 1.69), & indicated no significant difference. 

Single- versus two- layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Satoru Shikata1,2†, Hisakazu Yamagishi1†, Yoshinori Taji2†, Toshihiko Shimada3† & Yoshinori Noguchi3 BMC Surgery 2006, 6:2 doi:10.1186/1471-2482-6-2

Page 39: Sleeve leaks

Note:NO ONE Recommends 3 or 4

Layer AnastomosesNo Staple Company

Recommends Oversewing the Staple Line

Page 40: Sleeve leaks

Leak: Prevention/Treatment

Bring in Good Healthy Vascularized Tissue

Page 41: Sleeve leaks

Omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak

•Leak in 3 pts with omentum wrapped around the anastomosis patients (3.1%) •14 (14.4%) patients leaked without using the omental patch•Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1857-62. Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak.Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Kashmir, India. [email protected]

Page 42: Sleeve leaks

Omental reinforcement for intraoperative RNY leak repair

•387 patients with 32 (8.26%) patients who had a staple line dehiscence or evidence of gastric pouch or gastrojejunostomy leak intraoperatively. •Leaks/dehiscences were repaired with sutures and then reinforced with omentum. •No leak Omental Patch Pts•Am Surg. 2009 Sep;75(9):839-42. Omental reinforcement for intraoperative leak repairs during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Madan AK, Martinez JM, Lo Menzo E, Khan KA, Tichansky DS. Division of Laparoendoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Avenue, Suite 4017, Miami, FL 33136, USA. [email protected]

Page 43: Sleeve leaks

Prevent Bleeding:“Go Slow

to Go Fast”

Case Mantra:“No Bleeding”“Easy Case”

Page 44: Sleeve leaks

How to Stop Bleeding: Direct Pressure - First Aid

Use the Stapler to Compress the

staple line wound

How to Stop Bleeding

Direct Pressure First Aid

Page 45: Sleeve leaks

Stapler Use

WarningsEnsure to select a stapler with the appropriate staple size for the

tissue thickness. Overly thick or thin tissue may result in unacceptable staple formation.

Do not attempt to remove the shipping wedge until the stapler is loaded into the instrument.

Do not squeeze the handle while pulling back the black retraction knobs.

Do not attempt to override the safety interlock; to do so will render the stapler nonoperational.

Failure to completely fire the stapler will result in an incomplete cut and incomplete staple formation, and may until in poor hemostasis.

Page 46: Sleeve leaks

Do Not Be ConfusedThere are Two Kinds of Leaks

1. Easy Leaks2. Terrible Disasters

How to tell the difference:Easy = 24 -48 hours

Terrible Disasters = All others

Page 47: Sleeve leaks

Management LeaksReexplore EARLY

Simple:In ANY Post Op Patient with ANY

ComplaintsDo: ReexploreDo Not: WBC, CXR or other Plain FilmDo Not: CT Scan or Gastrograffin

SwallowThe Only Answer Reexplore

Page 48: Sleeve leaks

Leak Management

Leak found 24-48hr

= Suture Repair

Leak Found More than 72 hours

= Trouble

Page 49: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

• Where does it occur?

• ONE PLACE!

• This is “Tiger Country” – remember that!

Page 50: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leak

• Where does it occur?

• ONE PLACE!

• For this to heal What has to happen?

Page 51: Sleeve leaks

Prevent LeaksDo Not Become Knowledgeable

in Treating Leaks

Page 52: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leaks

• Early Diagnosis and Treatment

• Ideally re-explore 24-48 hours

• Late Leak

• Stable vs Infected/Septic

• Stable NPO, NG Across the Leak, GI or IV Feeding, ABx, + Drainage

Page 53: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leaks

• Late Leak

• Infected/Septic

• NPO, NG Across the Leak, GI or IV Feeding, ABx, +Drainage

• Consider re-exploration

Page 54: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leaks

• Debride Necrotic Tissue.

• Drain abscess(s)

• Consider:

• Isolated Roux limb as a serosal patch to cover EG junction defect or as a side to side Thal patch

• Enteral Feeding Tube Below Leak

Page 55: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leaks

• The serosal side of jejunum (Thal patch), Bring the Roux limb up to the injured portion of the EG Junction

• A Roux-Y limb of jejunum, with its independent blood supply and normal healthy tissue may help control the leak by bringing in Healthy tissue to the EG Junction area

Page 56: Sleeve leaks

Sleeve Leaks

• Acute conversion of Leaking Sleeve to MGB is not advised

• The theoretical advantage decreasing the back pressure of the pylorus is not necessary when the esophagus, stomach pouch and gut are appropriately drained