Simultaneous determination of multiproduct batch and full truckload shipment schedules
Post on 21-Jun-2016
Embed Size (px)
Available online 20 August 2008
Full truckload shipments
Supply chain coordination
A fundamental premise of the well-known economic lot-scheduling problem (ELSP) is
that the nished products are consumed at continuous rates, i.e. their respective cycle
utilized various mathematical programming techniques,
mixed integer programming (Delporte and Thomas, 1977).Efforts along these lines, however, have experienced
ms ise arelems.mial-
time algorithms if NP is identical to P (polynomial class),
decades have been dedicated towards developing heur-
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Int. J. Productio
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Int. J. Production Economics 118 (2009) 1111170925-5273/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.015istics for obtaining near-optimal solutions, rather thanoptimization (e.g. Madigan, 1968; Stankard and Gupta,1969; Doll and Whybark, 1973; Goyal, 1973; Haessler andHogue, 1976; Saipe, 1977; Elmaghrabi, 1978; Haessler,
Tel.: +12158951449; fax: +12158952907.E-mail address: email@example.com as linear programming (Maxwell, 1964), dynamicprogramming (Bomberger, 1966; Elmaghrabi, 1978) and
or (b) proved to be permanently intractable. Therefore,most efforts in solving the ELSP during the last threefeasible production schedule at minimum total relevantcost are the fundamental issues of the ELSP. The ELSP hasreceived considerable research attention over the years.Past attempts to solve this problem optimally have
NP-hard (Luenberger, 1973). The NP class of problesolvable in nondeterministic polynomial time. Therno efcient algorithms known for this class of probThis class of problems can be (a) solved by polynoThe classical economic lot-scheduling problem (ELSP)involves the production of multiple products in a singlefacility or machine, which can process only one item at atime. The determination of each products lot size and a
gets larger and have concluded that the optimization ofthe ELSP becomes either inefcient or impossible for evenrelatively small problems.
Insuring the feasibility of a schedule in the ELSPappears to be a major factor of complexity, since it is1. Introductionhowever, employing complex distribution networks, nished goods inventories from
manufacturing plants are usually shipped in bulk to succeeding stages along the
distribution process. Moreover, existing transport economies often tend to favor full
truckload (TL), rather that partial or less than truckload (LTL) shipments, for economical
movement of such goods. The scenario examined here, however, involves a set of
products, for which individual TL shipments are uneconomical. As a remedy, we
construct a model for taking advantage of TL rates by combining LTL quantities of the
items into a full load. We adopt the common cycle approach for the ELSP, in conjunction
with a common replenishment cycle, as a coordination mechanism that is simple to
analyze and implement. This is integrated with a periodic full truckload shipping
schedule. Such effective coordination of production and shipment schedules is likely to
result in a more streamlined supply chain. The concepts developed are illustrated
through a simple numerical example.
& 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
increasing computational inefciency as the problem sizeEconomic lot scheduling inventories are depleted on the basis of unit transactions. In todays supply chains,Simultaneous determination of mutruckload shipment schedules
Department of Decision Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19063, U
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
journal homepage: wwproduct batch and full
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Banerjee / Int. J. Production Economics 118 (2009) 1111171121979; Park and Yun, 1984; Panayiotopoulos, 1983; Gengand Vickson, 1988; Davis, 1990) and by constructingfeasibility conditions (e.g. Vemuganti, 1978; Boctor,1982; Hsu, 1983; Davis, 1990).
Needless to say that within the framework of supplychain management, the ELSP has an important role to playin terms of coordinating the activities of the variousmembers of such systems. In recent years, a great deal ofresearch has focused on issues of coordinating supplyand demand within this context (see, e.g. Goyal andGupta (1989) and Thomas and Grifn (1996) for surveys).Much of the existing research on ELSP, however, assumesthat the inventory depletion rate for each of the multipleitems is uniform, which would be the case if customerdemands are satised directly from the manufacturingfacility. In most of todays global rms, supply chainsconsist of complex distribution networks, involvingproduction plants, vehicle terminals, warehouses, distri-bution centers, retail outlets, etc. In such cases, thenotion of uniform product demands at a productionfacility is an incorrect representation of the real world.In reality, inventory depletions at a manufacturing plantoccur in discrete, sizeable lots, as a result of bulkshipments, that take advantage of transportation econo-mies of scale. Thus, for achieving streamlined supply chainstructures, it is necessary to link or coordinate theproduction schedule with the outbound shipment sche-dule. Unfortunately, as mentioned above, there is a dearthof research that addresses the ELSP in terms of suchlinkages.
This paper is an attempt to ll this research gap and re-examine the ELSP for developing a procedure for integrat-ing the production schedule of multiple items into ashipment plan. In other words, the primary focus here liesin coordinating the manufacturing process with thetransportation function. In shipping goods from manu-facturing facilities to subsequent stages of the supplychain, truck shipments are perhaps the most commonlyused means. Such transportation can be either fulltruckload (TL) or less than truckload (LTL) shipments.Although truck shipping rate structures are often complex,generally speaking, TL shipments are substantially lessexpensive, on a cost per unit basis, than LTL shipments(see, e.g. Chopra and Meindl, 2004). Under certaincircumstances, though, the demand rate of a productmay not be sufciently large to warrant periodic indivi-dual TL shipments, since such large delivery lots mayresult in excessive inventory holding costs, negating theadvantage of low transportation costs. Nevertheless, ifthere is a group of such relatively low-demand productsthat are shipped from a source to various demandlocations, it may be possible to combine several partialtruckloads of individual products to constitute a fulltruckload, thus obtaining the relative advantage of TLrates, in conjunction with lower inventory levels at thedestination locations. In this study, we examine a scenariosuch as this.
In our proposed procedure for coordinating theproduction schedule of multiple products (in an ELSPenvironment) with their shipments to several demandlocations, the common production cycle approach (see,details).6. Each of the products is transported via truck and sold
at one or more given demand location(s). For any ofthese products, however, its market demand rate isnot sufciently high to warrant full TL shipments. Onthe other hand, LTL shipments are relatively moreexpensive and undesirable.
7. Thus, TL shipments are made, where each truckload(capacitated by total weight and/or volume) containsa mix of all the products, which are delivered at theappropriate location(s).
8. For each TL shipment, a xed cost is incurred,regardless of the mix of products carried. In contrast,LTL shipment rate structures often entail a unitvariable shipping cost, based on the weight and/orthe volume of shipment.
9. During each production cycle, an integer number, K, ofthese TL shipments are made at equal intervals oftime.tion can indeed be optimal or near-optimal undercertain conditions (see, Jones and Inman (1989) forsufcient capacity to produce all the products exists.Secondly, from a practitioners viewpoint, the com-mon cycle method is relatively easy to understandand implement, especially when stable productionand transportation schedules need to be coordinatedon a routine basis. Finally, the common cycle solu-assumption, the rationale for its adoption is threefold.First, this approach ensures a feasible solution ifproduction cycle. Although this is a restrictiveng-distribution scenario, are made in this paper:
The operating environment is deterministic.Multiple products are produced in a capacitated batchproduction environment, with different productionrates for the various products. We assume, withoutloss of generality, zero setup times for all the products.If, in reality, the setup times are nonzero, they can beeasily incorporated into our model, outlined later.Only a single product may be produced at any giventime.Stockouts or shortages are not permitted.We adopt the common cycle solution to the ELSP,where each product is produced exactly once in everyTturiAssumptions and notation
he following assumptions, describing the manufac-shipment decisions, such as the one suggested inpaper, may result in a more coherent and efcient
ply chain.subsandindividual items. For simplicity of implementation,restrict the production cycle to an integer multiplethe delivery cycle. Under many circumstances, asstrated later through a numerical example andequent sensitivity analysis, coordinated productiondelitheMaxwell, 1964) is combined with the notion of avery (or replenishment) cycle that is common to all