shrimp production review - global aquaculture alliance · pdf fileshrimp production review...

50
Shrimp Production Review James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems University of Florida Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia Darryl Jory, Global Aquaculture Alliance

Upload: leliem

Post on 11-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Shrimp Production Review

James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems University of Florida

Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia Darryl Jory, Global Aquaculture Alliance

Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  World  Region:    1995  -­‐  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan. M. rosenbergii is not included.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Million MT

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Other Middle East / Northern Africa Americas India China Southeast Asia

2006 - 2011 Annual growth rate: 5.2%

-­‐6%

2015- 2018 Projected annual growth rate: 4.2%

In response to higher prices, increased production in India, Vietnam, Ecuador and Mexico led to an overall increase in world production in 2014. Production has fallen again in 2015.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Million MT

Southeast Asia China India Americas Middle East / NorthAfrica

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  by  Major  Producing  Regions:  2011  –  2018  

Impact of EMS: China, Thailand and Mexico reported declines in production in 2012/2013. China, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia reported lower production in 2015 relative to 2014.

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan. M. rosenbergii is not included.

4  Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook  (2006-­‐2016);  Chinese  Feed  Industry  Yearbook  (2009-­‐2012);  Freetrade.com.cn  (2012-­‐2014)          

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1000  

1200  

1400  

1600  

1800  

2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014  

Shrimp  Feed  (MT)  Thousand  MT  SHRIMP  FEED:  2012  to  2014  down  15%  

5  

Shrimp  Exports  from  China  

Source:  FAO  (2013);  World  Integrated  Trade  SoluTon  Database  (2005-­‐2015):  hUp://wits.worldbank.org  

0  

100  

200  

300  

400  

500  

600  

2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015  

Shrimp  Exports  (Product  Weight)  Shrimp  Exports  (Product  Weight)  

2011-­‐2015  down  37%  

6  

China  –  Es3mated  Domes3c  Shrimp  Consump3on    (Round  Weight)  

Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook;  FAO  (2013);  World  Integrated  Trade  SoluTon  Database  (2005-­‐2015):  hUp://wits.worldbank.org  

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1,000  

1,200  

1,400  

1,600  

1,800  

2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015  

Thousand  MT  

Domes3c  Consump3on  

Note:  EsTmated  ConsumpTon  =  ProducTon  +  Import  -­‐  Export  

+60%  2010-­‐15  +123%  2005-­‐15    

7  

Marine  Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  China    by  Region  –  2015  and  2006  

2015  Total  =  1,161,340  MT.   2006  Total  =  732,315  MT.   Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook    

 -­‐        

 50    

 100    

 150    

 200    

 250    

 300    

 350    

 400    

 450    

Guangdong   Guangxi   Shandong   Hainan   Fujian     Other  

Thousand  MT   Share: 36.4%

20.1%  

9.3%   9.1%   9.1%  15.9%  

Shrimp  Aquaculture  by  Major  Producing  Regions:    2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  

-0.20%

13.70%

4.20%

32.90%

-1.70%

4.90%

10.30%

2.50%1.60%

-0.50%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Southeast Asia China India Americas Middle East / NorthAfrica

Average Annual Growth Rate

2011-2014 2014-2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan. M. rosenbergii is not included.

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.8

Million MT

China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Both China and Thailand expect to make a partial recovery by 2018.

Thailand moved from second to fifth place in the region.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Thousand MT

Bangladesh Malaysia Philippines Taiwan

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Malaysia has been heavily impacted by disease but a partial recovery is expected by 2018. Strong growth is expected in Bangladesh.

0

100

200

300

400

Thousand MT

Ecuador Mexico Brazil

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

The most significant growth is expected in Ecuador, reaching nearly 400 thousand tons by 2018. Production in Brazil will remain more or less flat.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Thousand MT

Honduras Nicaragua Guatemala Peru Venezuela

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Disease issues are affecting and will affect growth in Honduras and Nicaragua. Venezuela is projecting steady growth through 2018

0

2

4

6

8

10

Thousand MT

Panama Belize Costa Rica El Salvador Colombia

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Uneven growth is expected in the minor producing nations of Latin America.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Thousand MT

Saudi Arabia Egypt Madagascar Australia New Caledonia

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Other  Repor3ng  Countries:  2011  –  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Saudi Arabia is expected to ramp up production of P. vannamei.

World  Shrimp  Aquaculture  (including  M.  rosenbergii)    by  Species:  1995  -­‐  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

Million MT

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other

65%  

71%  

52%  

72%  

16%  12%  

75%  

64%  

77%  74%  

Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.  

Shrimp  Aquaculture  (including  M.  rosenbergii)  in  Asia  by  Species:  1995  -­‐  2018  

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Million MT

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other

60%  

67%  

45%  

68%  

0%  0.2%  

70%  

59%  

72%  70%  

Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.  

World  Landings  of  Wild-­‐Caught  Shrimp  by  Species  

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Million MT Others

Northern white shrimp(Penaeus setiferus)

Common shrimp(Crangon crangon)

Northern brown shrimp(Penaeus aztecus)

Banana prawn (Penaeusmerguiensis)

Argentine red shrimp(Pleoticus muelleri)

Fleshy prawn (Penaeuschinensis)

Giant tiger prawn(Penaeus monodon)

Northern prawn(Pandalus borealis)

Southern rough shrimp(Trachipenaeuscurvirostris) Akiami paste shrimp(Acetes japonicus)

Source: FAO (2016).

World  Produc3on  of  Shrimp    Capture  Fisheries  &  Aquaculture  

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Million MT

Capture Fisheries Aquaculture

Aquaculture accounted for 54% of world shrimp supplies in 2014.

28%  

51%  

52%  

26%  

54%  

53%  49%  

Sources: FAO (2016); GOAL (2014, 2016). Notes: M. rosenbergii is not included. China includes freshwater production of P. vannamei.

World  Produc3on  of  Shrimp  by  Species  Capture  Fisheries  &  Aquaculture  Combined  

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

28%  

40%  42%  

39%  

4%  

Sources: FAO (2016); GOAL (2014, 2016). Notes: M. rosenbergii is not included. China includes freshwater production of P. vannamei.

P. vannamei is the most important species in the world, with virtually all production coming from aquaculture.

Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.  

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by    Size  Categories  –  Aggregate  2015  

9%

12%

17%

15%

19%

12%

8%4%4%

6%9%

16%

21%

19%

13%

10%

8%

9%

29%

21%

13%

8%

9%

6%9%

18%

21%

18%

12%

10%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

US Imports - HLSO Asia Americas World

>70

61-70

51-60

41-50

31-40

26-30

21-25

15-20

<15

Source: GOAL (2015).

Expected  Trends  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    Size  Categories  -­‐  GOAL  Survey  2016  

Size  Category   Asia   Americas   World  

<15   Decrease/Stable   Stable   Decrease/Stable  

15-­‐20   Decrease/Stable   Decrease/Stable   Decrease/Stable  

21-­‐25   Stable   Stable   Stable  

26-­‐30   Stable   Increase   Stable  

31-­‐40   Increase/Stable   Increase   Increase/Stable  

41-­‐50   Increase   Stable   Increase  

51-­‐60   Increase   Stable   Increase  

61-­‐70   Increase/Stable   Increase   Increase  

>70   Increase   Decrease   Increase/Stable  

India, Indonesia and Vietnam expect increased production of smaller counts.

GOAL  2016  Survey  Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by    

 Product  Form  –  Aggregate  2016    

40%

7%13%

15%

4%8%

29%

56%

22%

38%

19%

32%

20%

21%23%

16%

7%10%

9%10%2%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

US Imports Asia Americas World

OtherForms

Breaded

Cooked

Peeled

Green /Head-off

Green /Head-on

Expected  Trends  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    Product  Form  -­‐  GOAL  Survey  2015  

Product  Form   Asia   Americas   World  

Green  /  Head-­‐on   Stable/Decrease   Stable/Increase   Stable  

Green  /  Head-­‐off   Increase   Stable/Decrease   Stable/Increase  

Peeled   Stable/Increase   Stable   Stable/Increase  

Cooked   Stable   Stable   Stable  

Breaded   Increase   Stable/Decrease   Increase  

Other  Forms   Increase   Decrease   Increase  

For a number of years there has been a trend for increased production of green / head-on

shrimp in Ecuador for the European and Asian markets.

Diseases ***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal

Seed stock quality & availability Access to disease-free broodstock

***International market prices Production costs - Others

Product quality control Environmental management Feed quality and availability

Production costs - Fuel Access to Credit

Banned chemicals / antibiotic use ***International trade barriers

Market coordination Infrastructure

Public Relations Management Conflicts with other users

Not Important Extremely Important

Moderately Important

GOAL  2016  Survey  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    

All  Countries  

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

International market prices

Diseases

Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal

Environmental management

Access to disease-free broodstock

Seed stock quality & availability

International trade barriers

Production costs - Fuel

Access to Credit

Production costs - Others

2016 2015

Worldwide  Top  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture:      2016  Survey  vs.  2015  Survey  

Not Important Extremely Important

Moderately Important

Diseases Seed stock quality & availability

***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal Access to disease-free broodstock

Product quality control ***International market prices Environmental management Feed quality and availability

Production costs - Others Banned chemicals / antibiotic use

Production costs - Fuel ***International trade barriers

Access to Credit Infrastructure

Market coordination Conflicts with other users

Public Relations Management

Not Important Extremely Important

Moderately Important

GOAL  2016  Survey  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    

Asia  

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal ***International market prices

Diseases Access to disease-free broodstock

Production costs - Others Access to Credit

Production costs - Fuel Seed stock quality & availability

***International trade barriers Market coordination

Feed quality and availability Banned chemicals / antibiotic use

Infrastructure Environmental management

Product quality control Public Relations Management

Conflicts with other users

Not Important Extremely Important

Moderately Important

GOAL  2016  Survey  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    

La3n  America  

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

Diseases

International market prices

Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal

Seed stock quality & availability

Product quality control

Access to disease-free broodstock

Production costs - Others

Environmental management

Feed quality and availability

Production costs - Fuel

Asia Americas

GOAL  2016  Survey  Top  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture      

Asia  vs.  La3n  America  

Not Important Extremely Important

Moderately Important

GOAL  2016  Survey  Global  economic  condi3ons  will  be  be`er  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others  

Strongly  Agree   Philippines  

Agree   Bangladesh,  Taiwan,  Vietnam   Brazil,  Ecuador,  Mexico,  Venezuela  

Neutral/No  Opinion   China,  India,  Indonesia,  South  Korea,  Thailand   Honduras,  Nicaragua  

Australia,  Madagascar,  New  

Caledonia,  Saudi  Arabia  

Disagree   Malaysia   Panama,  Peru   Egypt

Strongly  Disagree  

Americas:  more  posi3ve  than  last  year    Asia:    li`le  less  posi3ve  than  last  year  

GOAL  2016  Survey  Feed  prices  will  be  lower  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others  

Strongly  Agree  

Agree   Madagascar  

Neutral/No  Opinion  Malaysia,  Philippines,    

South  Korea  Brazil,  Ecuador,  Mexico,  Nicaragua,  Venezuela  

Disagree  Bangladesh,  China,  India,  

Indonesia,  Taiwan,  Thailand,  Vietnam  

Honduras,  Panama,  Peru  Australia,  Egypt,  New  Caledonia,  Saudi  

Arabia

Strongly  Disagree  

About  same  perspec3ve  as  last  year  

GOAL  2016  Survey  The  global  shrimp  market  will  strengthen  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others  

Strongly  Agree   Philippines  

Agree   Bangladesh,  China,  Indonesia,  South  Korea,  Taiwan,  Vietnam   Ecuador,  Peru,  Venezuela  

Madagascar,  New  Caledonia,  Saudi  

Arabia  

Neutral/No  Opinion   India,  Malaysia,  Thailand   Brazil,  Honduras,  Mexico,  Nicaragua,  Panama  

Disagree   Australia,  Egypt

Strongly  Disagree  

Americas:  Same  perspec3ve  as  last  year    Asia:  More  market  strengthening  than  last  year  

Trends in Trade

Source: USDC/NMFS (2016) * Estimate

Imports from Thailand declined sharply (by 68%) between 2010 and 2014, with a slight recovery taking place in 2015 (from 65

to 74 thousand tons). India and Indonesia have become the top exporters to the U.S. market, accounting for 44% of imports in

2016.

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016*

Tho

usa

nd M

T

Other

Malaysia

Peru

Mexico

China

Vietnam

Thailand

Ecuador

Indonesia

India

U.S. Shrimp Imports

Down 12% between 2011-13, Up 17% between 2013-16

U.S.  Landings  of  Wild-­‐Caught  Shrimp  

0

50

100

150

20019

8019

8119

8219

8319

8419

8519

8619

8719

8819

8919

9019

9119

9219

9319

9419

9519

9619

9719

9819

9920

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

14

OthersPinkWhiteBrown

Source: USDC/NMFS (2016)

Thou

sand

MT

Source: USDC/NMFS (2016).

Real prices increased sharply during 2013 but returned to previous levels in 2014 and early 2015. Real prices have remained stable over the last 12 months.

Trends in U.S. Shrimp Import Prices

0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

10  1990  

1991  

1992  

1993  

1994  

1995  

1996  

1997  

1998  

1999  

2000  

2001  

2002  

2003  

2004  

2005  

2006  

2007  

2008  

2009  

2010  

2011  

2012  

2013  

2014  

2015  

2016  

2000  USD

/lb  

<15/lb   31-­‐40   >70/lb   Peeled   Composite  

Source: Urner Barry (2016).

Coinciding with falling supplies from Thailand, wholesale shrimp prices began rising in 2010 with the sharpest increase taking place in 2013. Prices declined during 2014 and 2015 as other countries (India, Indonesia, Ecuador, Vietnam) increased their exports to the U.S. The

increase in prices during 2016 is partially driven by low harvests from the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fisheries.

 (2.00)    (1.00)  

 -­‐          1.00      2.00      3.00      4.00      5.00      6.00      7.00      8.00      9.00    

Jan-­‐99  

Jul-­‐9

9  Jan-­‐00  

Jul-­‐0

0  Jan-­‐01  

Jul-­‐0

1  Jan-­‐02  

Jul-­‐0

2  Jan-­‐03  

Jul-­‐0

3  Jan-­‐04  

Jul-­‐0

4  Jan-­‐05  

Jul-­‐0

5  Jan-­‐06  

Jul-­‐0

6  Jan-­‐07  

Jul-­‐0

7  Jan-­‐08  

Jul-­‐0

8  Jan-­‐09  

Jul-­‐0

9  Jan-­‐10  

Jul-­‐1

0  Jan-­‐11  

Jul-­‐1

1  Jan-­‐12  

Jul-­‐1

2  Jan-­‐13  

Jul-­‐1

3  Jan-­‐14  

Jul-­‐1

4  Jan-­‐15  

Jul-­‐1

5  Jan-­‐16  

Jul-­‐1

6  

USD

/lb  

Farmed,  C&SA  White,  26-­‐30   Farmed,  Southeast  Asian,  26-­‐30   Premium,  White  -­‐  Tiger  

P. Monodon vs. P. vannamei U.S. Wholesale Prices

European Shrimp Imports from Extra-EU Countries

Down 9% between 2011-13, Up 7% between 2013-16

Source: Eurostat (2016). * Estimate

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016*

Tho

usa

nd M

T

Others

Morocco

China

Bangladesh

Canada

Greenland

Vietnam

Argentina

India

Ecuador

Spanish Shrimp Imports

Down 16% between 2011-13, Up 9% between 2013-16

Source: Eurostat (2016). * Estimate

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016*

Tho

usa

nd M

T

Others

Tunisia

Morocco

Belgium

Peru

India

Nicaragua

China

Ecuador

Argentina

French Shrimp Imports

Down 9% between 2010-14, Up 10% between 2014-16

Source: Eurostat (2016). * Estimate

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016*

Tho

usa

nd M

T

Others

Nicaragua

Spain

Venezuela

Madagascar

Vietnam

Netherlands

Belgium

India

Ecuador

Imports from Ecuador and India have increased dramatically since 2000,

currently accounting for nearly 38% of the import market.

Japanese Shrimp Imports

Down 25% between 2011-15, Up 4% in 2016

Source: Japan Customs (2016). * Estimate

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016*

Tho

usa

nd M

T

Others

Myanmar

Canada

Russia

Argentina

China

India

Indonesia

Thailand

Vietnam

Declining imports were caused primarily by lower shipments from Thailand, which went down from

80 thousand tons in 2012 to 36 thousand tones in 2015, with no substantial increase in 2016.

 Conclusions    

   2014  to  2015  -­‐5%    2015  to  2016  +2%    

 Expected  global  growth  rate  2015-­‐18  about  +4%  per  year  

(Less  bullish  about  than  recovery  last  year)    

Disease  -­‐  Biggest  Constraint  Esp.  Asia  Followed  by  cost  and  availability  of  quality  seed  stock  

 2017  -­‐  Expecta3ons  Higher  feed  prices;    

Stronger  shrimp  markets  (esp.  in  Asia)  Leaning  bullish  on  global  economic  condi3ons      

(Asia  less  bullish  &  Americas  more  bullish  than  last  year)  

   

Thank  You    

[email protected]  h`p://isfs.ins3tute.ifas.ufl.edu  

   

BONUS  SLIDES  

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:    2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  

-1.70%

11.50%14.40% 13.70%

-22.70%

2.30%

4.90%

-2.30%-0.50%

7.10%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India

Average Annual Growth Rate

2011-2014 2014-2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:    2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  

-1.60%

2.50%

9.30%

16.30%

-3.10%

1.70%

7.10%

3.80%

6.80%

-7.00%-10%

-8%-6%-4%-2%0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

Bangladesh Malaysia Philippines Taiwan South Korea

Average Annual Growth Rate

2011-2014 2014-2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018. M. rosenbergii is not included.

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  Size  Categories  –    

Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  Asia  

7% 6% 7% 7% 5% 5%6%

5% 6%18% 16% 14% 17%

9% 9%

8%

10% 9%

29% 30% 30% 23%

15% 16%13%

15% 16%

22% 19% 20% 21%

19% 25% 18%17%

21%

10% 12% 10% 15%

19%18%

15% 21%19%

6% 7% 7%7%

15% 11% 14% 16% 13%

7% 5% 8%5%

12% 12% 13% 11% 10%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GOAL2008

GOAL2009

GOAL2010

GOAL2011

GOAL2012

GOAL2013

GOAL2014

GOAL2015

GOAL2016

>70

61-70

51-60

41-50

31-40

26-30

21-25

15-20

<15

69%

27%

46% 42%

39%

Disease problems in Asia led to the harvesting of smaller sizes since 2011.

42%

48%

65% 64% 61% 43% 50%

41% 42%

46%

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  Size  Categories  –    

Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  the  Americas  

16% 10% 11%9% 4% 7% 6%

9% 8%

18%19% 15%

15%8% 10%

18%16%

9%

16%20% 20%

22%

22%19%

25%25%

29%

16% 19% 22% 23%

24% 21%

18%19%

21%

15% 13% 15%12%

17% 18%

14%11%

13%

11% 10%10%

10%13% 10%

10% 4% 8%

6% 7%4%

8% 10% 14%6% 10% 9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GOAL2008

GOAL2009

GOAL2010

GOAL2011

GOAL2012

GOAL2013

GOAL2014

GOAL2015

GOAL2016

>70

61-70

51-60

41-50

31-40

26-30

21-25

15-20

<15

54%

60%

30% 40%

50%

42%

There was also a temporary trend towards smaller sizes in Latin America in 2011 and 2012.

30%

61%

25%

60%

30%

59%

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  Product  Form  –    

Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  Asia  

23%30%

22% 22%

20%18%

17% 20%

35% 30%23% 28% 25%

24%

24% 23%

22% 20%19% 18% 20% 16%

18% 15%

11% 12% 8% 12% 8% 7%9% 10%

8%3% 4% 6%

10% 10%

33%

6%17%24%

9%

10%

19%

22%18%

22%

18%

15%

9%

13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GOAL2008

GOAL2009

GOAL2010

GOAL2011

GOAL2012

GOAL2013

GOAL2014

GOAL2015

GOAL2016

OtherForms

Breaded

Cooked

Peeled

Green /Head-off

Green /Head-on

25% 42%

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  Product  Form  –    

Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  China  

4% 5% 9%

28%20% 25%

54%

22% 25%17% 15%14%

15%

13%5%

5%

3% 9%25%35% 33%

27%31%

30%

11%

24%20%

22%20% 16%

13%15% 25%

13%

22% 17%

27% 15% 20%10% 18% 10% 8%

13% 14%

5%10% 9% 9%

4% 5%9%

17% 15%

48%

5%14%

11%

4%

21%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GOAL2007

GOAL2008

GOAL2009

GOAL2010

GOAL2011

GOAL2012

GOAL2013

GOAL2014

GOAL2015

GOAL2016

OtherForms

Breaded

Cooked

Peeled

Green /Head-off

Green /Head-on

There has been a trend in China towards the production of green head-on/head-off and peeled shrimp relative to processed forms in recent years.

Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  Product  Form  –    

Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  the  Americas  

40% 44% 46% 50% 57% 52% 53%63%

56%

53% 46% 45% 31%

34%30% 24%

26%32%

6% 7% 7%

12%

6%14%

15%

6% 7%

3% 3%4% 3% 4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

GOAL2008

GOAL2009

GOAL2010

GOAL2011

GOAL2012

GOAL2013

GOAL2014

GOAL2015

GOAL2016

OtherForms

Breaded

Cooked

Peeled

Green /Head-off

Green /Head-on

The growing share of the green head-on form reflects an increased presence of

Ecuadorian shrimp in European and Asian markets.