service delivery assessment

50
Introduction This document is one of a number of self-assessments of important p organisation has adopted the better practice guidance available from OGC (the Office of Governme The self-assessment scheme is composed of a simple questionnaire wh next in order to improve the overall process capability. The assessment is based on a generic fr elements which need to be in place for process management and for it to satisfy the overall in To establish where a particular organisation stands in relation to questions should be answered. The questions are weighted, i.e. those which are deemed as having a sli answer at each level of capability. These questions are denoted by a ‘M’ symbol. Rationale of the self-assessment scoring system Figure 1 illustrates the rationale of the scoring system used in th Prerequisites, ascertains whether the minimum level of prerequisite items are available to support the pr whether there are organisational policy statements, business object guidance in the transformation or use of the prerequisite items. At the lowest levels of the framework model (see Figure 1), the que activities. At higher levels more specific ITIL terms are used, based on the assumption that Organisa the ITIL vocabulary. Level 2: Process Capability, examines the activities being carrie set of activities are being performed. Level 2.5: Internal Integration seeks to ascertain wheth fulfill the process intent. Level 3: Products, examines the actual output of the process to en Level 3.5: Quality Control, is concerned with the review and verification of the process output to Level 4: Management Information, is concerned with the governance o information produced from the process in order to support necessary management decisions. Level 4 interfaces and relationships between the discrete process and other this level, for IT Service Management, use of full ITIL terminology Level 5: Customer Interface, is primarily concerned with the on-goi it remains optimised towards meeting the needs of the customer. The goal of the self-assessment questionnaires is not to test wheth the self-assessing organisation an 1.5 Management intent 2 Process Capability Management 1 Prerequisite 4

Upload: krishna-kalyan

Post on 23-Nov-2014

62 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Service Delivery Assessment

Introduction

This document is one of a number of self-assessments of important processes, enabling you to establish the extent to which your organisation has adopted the better practice guidance available from OGC (the Office of Government Commerce).

The self-assessment scheme is composed of a simple questionnaire which enables you to ascertain which areas should be addressed next in order to improve theoverall process capability. The assessment is based on a generic framework which recognises that there are a number of structural elements which need to be in place for process management and for it to satisfy the overall intent and meet the needs of the customer.

To establish where a particular organisation stands in relation to the process capability framework, a variable number of questions should be answered. The questions are weighted, i.e. those which are deemed as having a slightly higher significance are considered mandatory for a 'Yes' answer at each level of capability. These questions are denoted by a ‘M’ symbol.

Rationale of the self-assessment scoring system

Figure 1 illustrates the rationale of the scoring system used in this questionnaire. The initial level of the framework, Level 1: Prerequisites, ascertains whether the minimum level of prerequisite items are available to support the process activities. Level 1.5: Management Intent, establishes whether there are organisational policy statements, business objectives (or similar evidence of intent) providing both purpose and guidance in the transformation or use of the prerequisite items.

At the lowest levels of the framework model (see Figure 1), the questionnaire is written in generic terms regarding products and activities. At higher levels more specific ITIL terms are used, based on the assumption that Organisations’ achieving higher level scores are more likely to use the ITIL vocabulary.

Level 2: Process Capability, examines the activities being carried out. The questions are aimed at identifying whether a minimum set of activities are being performed. Level 2.5: Internal Integration seeks to ascertain whether the activities are integrated sufficiently in order to fulfill the process intent.

Level 3: Products, examines the actual output of the process to enquire whether all the relevant products are being produced. Level 3.5: Quality Control, is concerned with the review and verification of the process output to ensure that it is in keeping with the quality intent.

Level 4: Management Information, is concerned with the governance of the process and ensuring that there is adequate and timely information produced from the process in order to support necessary management decisions. Level 4.5: External Integration, examines whether all the external interfaces and relationships between the discrete process and other processes have been established within the organisation. At this level, for IT Service Management, use of full ITIL terminology may be expected. Level 5: Customer Interface, is primarily concerned with the on-going external review and validation of the process to ensure that it remains optimised towards meeting the needs of the customer.

The goal of the self-assessment questionnaires is not to test whether there is complete conformance with ITIL. The aim is to give the self-assessing organisation an idea how well it is performing compared to ITIL best practice. The questionnaire also aims to create awareness of management and control issues that may be addressed to improve the overall process capability.

Figure 1: The rationale of the self-assessment scoring system.

1.5 Management intent

2 Process Capability

3.5 Quality Control

Management

1 Prerequisites

4 Managament information

Page 2: Service Delivery Assessment

Introduction

This document is one of a number of self-assessments of important processes, enabling you to establish the extent to which your organisation has adopted the better practice guidance available from OGC (the Office of Government Commerce).

The self-assessment scheme is composed of a simple questionnaire which enables you to ascertain which areas should be addressed next in order to improve theoverall process capability. The assessment is based on a generic framework which recognises that there are a number of structural elements which need to be in place for process management and for it to satisfy the overall intent and meet the needs of the customer.

To establish where a particular organisation stands in relation to the process capability framework, a variable number of questions should be answered. The questions are weighted, i.e. those which are deemed as having a slightly higher significance are considered mandatory for a 'Yes' answer at each level of capability. These questions are denoted by a ‘M’ symbol.

Rationale of the self-assessment scoring system

Figure 1 illustrates the rationale of the scoring system used in this questionnaire. The initial level of the framework, Level 1: Prerequisites, ascertains whether the minimum level of prerequisite items are available to support the process activities. Level 1.5: Management Intent, establishes whether there are organisational policy statements, business objectives (or similar evidence of intent) providing both purpose and guidance in the transformation or use of the prerequisite items.

At the lowest levels of the framework model (see Figure 1), the questionnaire is written in generic terms regarding products and activities. At higher levels more specific ITIL terms are used, based on the assumption that Organisations’ achieving higher level scores are more likely to use the ITIL vocabulary.

Level 2: Process Capability, examines the activities being carried out. The questions are aimed at identifying whether a minimum set of activities are being performed. Level 2.5: Internal Integration seeks to ascertain whether the activities are integrated sufficiently in order to fulfill the process intent.

Level 3: Products, examines the actual output of the process to enquire whether all the relevant products are being produced. Level 3.5: Quality Control, is concerned with the review and verification of the process output to ensure that it is in keeping with the quality intent.

Level 4: Management Information, is concerned with the governance of the process and ensuring that there is adequate and timely information produced from the process in order to support necessary management decisions. Level 4.5: External Integration, examines whether all the external interfaces and relationships between the discrete process and other processes have been established within the organisation. At this level, for IT Service Management, use of full ITIL terminology may be expected. Level 5: Customer Interface, is primarily concerned with the on-going external review and validation of the process to ensure that it remains optimised towards meeting the needs of the customer.

The goal of the self-assessment questionnaires is not to test whether there is complete conformance with ITIL. The aim is to give the self-assessing organisation an idea how well it is performing compared to ITIL best practice. The questionnaire also aims to create awareness of management and control issues that may be addressed to improve the overall process capability.

Figure 1: The rationale of the self-assessment scoring system.

Instructions:

Enter your contact details (in worksheet named 'Contact Details') so we can send you a comparison of your results against all other respondents after you submit your completed assessment.

Although we would prefer you to complete ALL assessments we will still process your data if you are only interested in a particular assessment and do not wish to complete the rest.

Every assessment worksheet begins with and introduction to that particular assessment.If you scroll down the page you will come to the assessment itself - the assessment is not immediately after the introduction because you may want to print the worksheet off so we have designed it so every printed page will start and end at a convenient position for easy reading.At the end of every assessment you will find a graph comparing your scores against the highest attainable. Starting at Level 1: Pre-requisites, answer the questions with a Y (Yes) or a N (No) in the grey cells adjacent.Each section has a minimum score to achieve before you move onto the next level. You will be told you if you pass or fail a section. If you do not reach the minimum requirement you can still complete the rest of the assessment to see if how well you fair in all section. With this in mind the assessment requires honesty in its completion. There is nothing to be gained by presenting an outcome that is not based on true answers.

The grey cells are the only editable regions so you do not have to worry about changing/deleting anything you shouldn't.

Email your completed assessment to

Alternatively post it to: Ida Wilson, OGC, Research & Delivery (WFD), Rosebery Court, St. Andrew's Business Park, Norwich NR7 0HS.Ida Wilson

2.5 Internal Integration

4.5 External Integration

1 Prerequisites

Other Processes

Page 3: Service Delivery Assessment

Introduction

This document is one of a number of self-assessments of important processes, enabling you to establish the extent to which your organisation has adopted the better practice guidance available from OGC (the Office of Government Commerce).

The self-assessment scheme is composed of a simple questionnaire which enables you to ascertain which areas should be addressed next in order to improve theoverall process capability. The assessment is based on a generic framework which recognises that there are a number of structural elements which need to be in place for process management and for it to satisfy the overall intent and meet the needs of the customer.

To establish where a particular organisation stands in relation to the process capability framework, a variable number of questions should be answered. The questions are weighted, i.e. those which are deemed as having a slightly higher significance are considered mandatory for a 'Yes' answer at each level of capability. These questions are denoted by a ‘M’ symbol.

Rationale of the self-assessment scoring system

Figure 1 illustrates the rationale of the scoring system used in this questionnaire. The initial level of the framework, Level 1: Prerequisites, ascertains whether the minimum level of prerequisite items are available to support the process activities. Level 1.5: Management Intent, establishes whether there are organisational policy statements, business objectives (or similar evidence of intent) providing both purpose and guidance in the transformation or use of the prerequisite items.

At the lowest levels of the framework model (see Figure 1), the questionnaire is written in generic terms regarding products and activities. At higher levels more specific ITIL terms are used, based on the assumption that Organisations’ achieving higher level scores are more likely to use the ITIL vocabulary.

Level 2: Process Capability, examines the activities being carried out. The questions are aimed at identifying whether a minimum set of activities are being performed. Level 2.5: Internal Integration seeks to ascertain whether the activities are integrated sufficiently in order to fulfill the process intent.

Level 3: Products, examines the actual output of the process to enquire whether all the relevant products are being produced. Level 3.5: Quality Control, is concerned with the review and verification of the process output to ensure that it is in keeping with the quality intent.

Level 4: Management Information, is concerned with the governance of the process and ensuring that there is adequate and timely information produced from the process in order to support necessary management decisions. Level 4.5: External Integration, examines whether all the external interfaces and relationships between the discrete process and other processes have been established within the organisation. At this level, for IT Service Management, use of full ITIL terminology may be expected. Level 5: Customer Interface, is primarily concerned with the on-going external review and validation of the process to ensure that it remains optimised towards meeting the needs of the customer.

The goal of the self-assessment questionnaires is not to test whether there is complete conformance with ITIL. The aim is to give the self-assessing organisation an idea how well it is performing compared to ITIL best practice. The questionnaire also aims to create awareness of management and control issues that may be addressed to improve the overall process capability.

Figure 1: The rationale of the self-assessment scoring system.

3 Products

3.5 Quality Control

4 Managament information

Page 4: Service Delivery Assessment

Introduction

This document is one of a number of self-assessments of important processes, enabling you to establish the extent to which your organisation has adopted the better practice guidance available from OGC (the Office of Government Commerce).

The self-assessment scheme is composed of a simple questionnaire which enables you to ascertain which areas should be addressed next in order to improve theoverall process capability. The assessment is based on a generic framework which recognises that there are a number of structural elements which need to be in place for process management and for it to satisfy the overall intent and meet the needs of the customer.

To establish where a particular organisation stands in relation to the process capability framework, a variable number of questions should be answered. The questions are weighted, i.e. those which are deemed as having a slightly higher significance are considered mandatory for a 'Yes' answer at each level of capability. These questions are denoted by a ‘M’ symbol.

Rationale of the self-assessment scoring system

Figure 1 illustrates the rationale of the scoring system used in this questionnaire. The initial level of the framework, Level 1: Prerequisites, ascertains whether the minimum level of prerequisite items are available to support the process activities. Level 1.5: Management Intent, establishes whether there are organisational policy statements, business objectives (or similar evidence of intent) providing both purpose and guidance in the transformation or use of the prerequisite items.

At the lowest levels of the framework model (see Figure 1), the questionnaire is written in generic terms regarding products and activities. At higher levels more specific ITIL terms are used, based on the assumption that Organisations’ achieving higher level scores are more likely to use the ITIL vocabulary.

Level 2: Process Capability, examines the activities being carried out. The questions are aimed at identifying whether a minimum set of activities are being performed. Level 2.5: Internal Integration seeks to ascertain whether the activities are integrated sufficiently in order to fulfill the process intent.

Level 3: Products, examines the actual output of the process to enquire whether all the relevant products are being produced. Level 3.5: Quality Control, is concerned with the review and verification of the process output to ensure that it is in keeping with the quality intent.

Level 4: Management Information, is concerned with the governance of the process and ensuring that there is adequate and timely information produced from the process in order to support necessary management decisions. Level 4.5: External Integration, examines whether all the external interfaces and relationships between the discrete process and other processes have been established within the organisation. At this level, for IT Service Management, use of full ITIL terminology may be expected. Level 5: Customer Interface, is primarily concerned with the on-going external review and validation of the process to ensure that it remains optimised towards meeting the needs of the customer.

The goal of the self-assessment questionnaires is not to test whether there is complete conformance with ITIL. The aim is to give the self-assessing organisation an idea how well it is performing compared to ITIL best practice. The questionnaire also aims to create awareness of management and control issues that may be addressed to improve the overall process capability.

Figure 1: The rationale of the self-assessment scoring system.

Instructions:

Enter your contact details (in worksheet named 'Contact Details') so we can send you a comparison of your results against all other respondents after you submit your completed assessment.

Although we would prefer you to complete ALL assessments we will still process your data if you are only interested in a particular assessment and do not wish to complete the rest.

Every assessment worksheet begins with and introduction to that particular assessment.If you scroll down the page you will come to the assessment itself - the assessment is not immediately after the introduction because you may want to print the worksheet off so we have designed it so every printed page will start and end at a convenient position for easy reading.At the end of every assessment you will find a graph comparing your scores against the highest attainable. Starting at Level 1: Pre-requisites, answer the questions with a Y (Yes) or a N (No) in the grey cells adjacent.Each section has a minimum score to achieve before you move onto the next level. You will be told you if you pass or fail a section. If you do not reach the minimum requirement you can still complete the rest of the assessment to see if how well you fair in all section. With this in mind the assessment requires honesty in its completion. There is nothing to be gained by presenting an outcome that is not based on true answers.

The grey cells are the only editable regions so you do not have to worry about changing/deleting anything you shouldn't.

Email your completed assessment to

Alternatively post it to: Ida Wilson, OGC, Research & Delivery (WFD), Rosebery Court, St. Andrew's Business Park, Norwich NR7 0HS.

4.5 External Integration

3 Products

5 Customer Interface

Customer

Page 5: Service Delivery Assessment

Your Contact Details

Name:

Organisation:

Address 1:

Address 2:Address 3:Address 4:Postcode:E-mail:

Type of Organisation:If Other please specify:

Page 6: Service Delivery Assessment
Page 7: Service Delivery Assessment

Service Level Management

Service level management is the name given to the processes of planning, negotiating, co-ordinating, monitoring, and reporting on Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The process includes the on-going review of service achievement to ascertain that the required service quality is maintained and wherever necessary improved.

SLAs contain specific targets against which performance can be evaluated. They also define the responsibilities placed on all parties, in particular binding Service Delivery to offer an agreed quality of service so long as the users constrain their demands within agreed limits. The relationship between Service Delivery and its customers is therefore put on to a formal business-like footing similar to those which exist between Service Delivery and its suppliers. When used in conjunction with the financial management process, service level management provides the basis for running Service Delivery as a business or profit centre.

Service level management provides a number of benefits not least of which is that it enables specific targets to aim for and against which service quality can be monitored and measured. Furthermore, service monitoring will allow weaknesses in existing services to be identified, so that the quality of service provision can be improved.

Page 8: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Service Level Management(Y)es or (N)o

Level 1 - Pre-requisites

M

FAILLevel 1.5 - Management Intent

M

FAILLevel 2 - Process Capability

MMM

FAILLevel 2.5 - Internal Integration

M

FAILLevel 3 - Products

M

FAILLevel 3.5 - Quality Control

M

1. Are at least some service level management (SLM) activities established within the organisation, e.g. service definition, negotiation of SLA's etc?

2. Have you identified the customers for your IT services? 3. Are service attributes identified? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

4. Has the purpose and benefits of service level management been disseminated within the organisation?

5. Has the appropriate data on which to base service levels been determined?

6. Are there agreed procedures by which Service Level Agreements are negotiated and reviewed? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

7. Have responsibilities for service level management activities been assigned?

8. Has a catalogue of existing services been compiled?

9. Are there mechanisms for monitoring and reviewing existing service levels?

10. Does the service catalogue give a clear and accurate picture of all services being provided?

11. Are all customer service requests verified?12. Do you have a mechanism leading to service improvement?13. Are services prioritised in the service catalogue?14. Do you have a mechanism for scheduling service implementations?15. Are the majority of services covered by SLAs?16. Have all existing SLAs been reviewed and agreed by customers?

17. Do the majority of SLAs have underpinning contracts and OLAs in place?

18. Are there mechanisms in place to monitor and measure all items in existing SLAs?

19. Are SLAs reviewed on a regular basis?20. Are the majority of SLAs, OLAs and underpinning contracts current?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 6 other answers 'Y'

21. Do you compare service provision with the agreed service levels?

22. Do you have a mechanism for keeping your service catalogue in line with new/changed services?

23. Do you use service records to provide management and customers with meaningful information on the quality of service?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

24. Are standard service reports produced regularly?

25. Are the services and their components explicitly defined and what is excluded documented in SLA's?

26. Do SLAs have clearly identified key targets for service hours, availability, reliability, support, response times and change handling?

27. Are service components identified as configuration items (CIs)?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

28. Are the standards and other quality criteria for SLM documented?

Page 9: Service Delivery Assessment

M

FAILLevel 4 - Management Information

M

M

FAILLevel 4.5 - External Integration

M

FAILLevel 5 - Customer Interface

M

MMM

M

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions FAIL

29. Are the personnel responsible for SLM activities suitably trained?

30. Does the organisation set and review either targets or objectives for SLM?

31. Does the organisation use any tools to support SLM? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

32. Do you provide management with information concerning service targets and actual performance?

33. Do you provide management with information concerning trends in service level breaches?

34. Do you provide management with information concerning standard service offerings?

35. Do you provide management with information concerning number of requests for new/changed services?

36. Do you provide management with information concerning trends in service level request?

37. Are SLA monitoring charts provided to give an overview of how achievements have measured up to targets?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

38. Does SLM actively involve Availability Management regarding service levels?

39. When negotiating service levels does SLM consult other service delivery and support areas like Capacity Management, Financial Management for IT Services, Service Desk and Change Management?

40. Is SLM consulted by Change Management concerning potential impact of changes to agreed service levels?

41. Does SLM ensure that the service catalogue is integrated and maintained as part of the Configuration Management database (CMDB)?

42. Does SLM ensure that the incident and problem handling targets included in SLAs are the same as those in the Service Desk tools?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

43. Do you check with the customer if the activities performed by Service Level Management adequately support their business needs?

44. Do you check with the customer that they are happy with the services provided?

45. Are you actively monitoring trends in customer satisfaction?

46. Are you feeding customer survey information into the service improvement agenda?

47. Are you monitoring the customers value perception of the services provided to them?

Page 10: Service Delivery Assessment

0

2

Service Level Management Results

Your Score

Page 11: Service Delivery Assessment

Service Level Management

Service level management is the name given to the processes of planning, negotiating, co-ordinating, monitoring, and reporting on Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The process includes the on-going review of service achievement to ascertain that the required service quality is maintained and wherever necessary improved.

SLAs contain specific targets against which performance can be evaluated. They also define the responsibilities placed on all parties, in particular binding Service Delivery to offer an agreed quality of service so long as the users constrain their demands within agreed limits. The relationship between Service Delivery and its customers is therefore put on to a formal business-like footing similar to those which exist between Service Delivery and its suppliers. When used in conjunction with the financial management process, service level management provides the basis for running Service Delivery as a business or profit centre.

Service level management provides a number of benefits not least of which is that it enables specific targets to aim for and against which service quality can be monitored and measured. Furthermore, service monitoring will allow weaknesses in existing services to be identified, so that the quality of service provision can be improved.

Page 12: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Service Level Management

0000

0

0

0

0

00000000000

0000

00

0

0

00

000

0

Page 13: Service Delivery Assessment

0000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

000

0

0

Page 14: Service Delivery Assessment

0

2

Service Level Management Results

Your Score

Page 15: Service Delivery Assessment

Financial Management for IT Services

Financial management for IT services is concerned with helping the business to assess whether its IT Service is doing the best it can with the money it has. The business has to understand the true costs of providing a service and manage these costs professionally. Financial Management of IT Services implements IT Accounting and Budgeting processes, and often Charging processes for these IT Services, allocating IT expenditure to services and recovering the costs of those services from the business customers to whom they are provided. Budgeting enables an organisation to: -Predict the money required to run IT Services for a given period -Ensure that actual spend can be compared with predicted spend at any point -Reduce the risk of overspending -Ensure that revenues are available to cover predicted spend (where charging is in place)

IT Accounting enables an organisation to: -Account for the money spent in providing IT Services -Calculate the cost of providing IT Services to both internal and external customers -Perform cost-benefit or Return-on-Investment analyses -Identify the cost of changes

Charging enables an organisation to: -Recover the costs of the IT Services from the customer of the service -Operate the IT organisation as a business unit if required -Influence user and customer behaviours

The scope of Financial Management of IT Services is taken to cover hardware, software, people, accommodation, external services (e.g. outsourced application development), and transfers (eg IT Service buying PCs on behalf of a business customer).

Page 16: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Financial Management for IT Services(Y)es or (N)o

Level 1: Pre-requisites

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 1.5: Management Intent

M 0

0

0

0

FAIL 0

Level 2: Process Capability

M 0

M 0

M 0

0

0

0

0

0000

0

000

FAIL 0Level 2.5: Internal Integration

1. Are at least some financial management activities established within the organisation, e.g. cost forecasting, expenditure budgeting, service cost management?

2. Are financial management activities assigned to specific individuals or functional areas?

3. Has the organisation established financial data recording for workloads, services, hardware and software?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

4. Have the purpose and benefits of financial management for IT services been disseminated within the organisation?

5. Has the scope of financial management activities and any applicable pricing policies been determined?

6. Have goals for financial management in relation to IT expenditure and charging (IT cost recovery) been made explicit?

7. Are there agreed procedures covering the calculation and registration of IT costs?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

8. Have responsibilities for various financial management activities been assigned?

9. Are there explicit procedures for expenditure planning and budgeting?

10. Are budgets monitored and are there regular reports on expenditure vs budget?

11. Are there explicit procedures for procuring goods and services?

12. Are there suitable mechanisms for capturing and allocating incurred costs?

13. Do you have procedures for forecasting unit costs for resources / services?

14. Is there a defined process for managing service costs?

15. Have limits been set for capital and operational expenditure?

16. Have you determined a pricing policy?17. Do you have procedures for planning cost recovery?18. Do you have procedures for determining items which will incur service charges?19. Do you have procedures for collecting cost and charging data at regular intervals?

20. Do you have procedures for escalation in case of budget overruns?

21. Do you have procedures for reporting on income?

22. Do you have procedures for compiling summaries on income versus expenditure?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 5 other answers 'Y'

Page 17: Service Delivery Assessment

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 3: Products

M 000

0

0

000

FAIL 0Level 3.5: Quality Control

M 0

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 4: Management Information

M 0

M 0

0

0

0

0

0

23. Does Financial Management for IT Services have responsibility for the completeness and correctness of the IT service delivery expenditure and income reports?

24. Are charging rates, if any, determined and evaluated on the basis of actual cost information and charging policy?

25. Is the cost classification and registration in line with the defined formal cost allocation structure? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

26. Are standard reports concerning expenditure and income produced on a regular basis?

27. Are budgets provided for all activities?

28. Is the sum of items costed equal to the total cost of providing the IT Services?

29. Are price lists available and understood by customers?

30. Do you produce invoices for your customers, based on the central cost allocation and cost recovery structure?

31. Are invoices simple, accurate and issued on time?32. Do you establish formal budgets for each customer?33. Are audits conducted on a regular basis?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 3 other answers 'Y'

34. Are the standards and other quality criteria applicable to financial management activities explicit and applied?

35. Are the personnel responsible for financial management activities suitably trained?

36. Does the organisation set and review either targets or objectives for financial management?

37. Does the organisation use suitable tools to support the financial management process? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

38. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning forecasts of IT service delivery expenditure?

39. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning actual costs of providing resources and services against planned costs?

40. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning financial targets for cost recovery?

41. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning estimated amount and cost of resources to be provided or 'sold' during the next financial year?

42. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning actual income by resource, service and customer against planned income?

43. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning performance of managing service costs against financial target?

44. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning actions necessary to achieve financial targets?

Page 18: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

FAIL 0

Level 4.5: External Integration

M 0

M 0

M 0

0

0

M 0

M 0

0

0

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 5: Customer Interface

M 0

M 0

M 0

M 0

M 0

FAIL 0

45. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning analysis of deviations from plans?

46. Does Financial Management for IT Services provide information concerning the current charging policies & IT Accounting methods?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 3 other answers 'Y'

47. Do you hold regular meetings with interested parties in which financial management matters are discussed?

48. Does Financial Management exchange information with Service Management covering cost total, broken down by business area?

49. Does Financial Management exchange information with Service Management covering revenue total, broken down by business area?

50. Does Financial Management exchange information with Service Management covering problems and costs associated with IT accounting?

51. Does Financial Management exchange information with Service Management covering information pertinent to service charging?

52. Does Financial Management exchange information with Capacity Management to determine pricing policy?

53. Does Financial Management exchange information with Capacity Management to forecast unit costs?

54. Does Financial Management exchange information with Capacity Management for planning cost recovery?

55. Does Financial Management exchange information with Change Management in order to manage service costs (review of service levels, prices charged for resources, etc.)?

56. Does Financial Management exchange information with Configuration Management concerning procured items?

57. Does Financial Management exchange information with Configuration Management to forecast unit cost?

58. Does Financial Management exchange information with Configuration Management for capturing and allocating input costs?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

59. Do you check with the customer if the activities performed by financial management adequately support their business needs?

60. Do you check with the customer if they are happy with the services provided?

61. Are you actively monitoring trends in customer satisfaction?

62. Are you feeding customer survey information into the service improvement agenda?

63. Are you monitoring the customers value perception of the services provided to them? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answer 'Y'

Page 19: Service Delivery Assessment

0

5

Financial Management Results

Your Score

Page 20: Service Delivery Assessment

Capacity Management

The aim of Capacity Management is to match the supply of IT resources to customer demands for them. The process is needed to support the optimum and cost-effective provision of IT services by helping organisations to match their IT resources to the demands of the business. It is concerned with having the appropriate IT capacity and with making the best use of it. The demand for IT resources is based on agreeing with users of IT services, levels to which those services will be delivered, based on business requirements and embodied within service level agreements. The customer's needs are assessed by forecasting the likely growth in demand for current services and by sizing new service elements. The desired service levels required can then be agreed with service users, based on business needs. The sub-processes associated with capacity management are concerned with forecasting workload, sizing applications, and maintaining a Capacity Plan in order to meet existing and future needs. The Capacity Plan is beneficial to both Systems Management and Purchasing in order to gain visibility of the schedule and likely infrastructure changes necessary to maintain service at the required levels.

Assumed process conditions: The scope of Capacity Management is assumed to be such that the entire technical IT infrastructure is embraced. The infrastructure will include the network and everything that is attached to the network such as servers and access points (terminals and PCs). The scope of the process should include both operational and development environments.

Page 21: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Capacity Management(Y)es or (N)o

Level 1: Pre-requisites

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 1.5: Management Intent

M 0000

0

FAIL 0Level 2: Process Capability

M 0

M 0

M 0

M 0

0000

0

00000

FAIL 0Level 2.5: Internal Integration

M 0

1. Are at least some capacity management activities established within the organisation, e.g. monitoring of usage and performance, capacity planning, sizing of service elements etc?

2. Are capacity management activities assigned to specific individuals or functional areas?

3. Are monitors available for hardware, software, networking & peripherals and does Capacity Management have access to them?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

4. Have the purpose and benefits of capacity management been disseminated within the organisation?

5. Has the scope of capacity management been determined?

6. Is the organisation committed to a corporate capacity management plan which includes future business requirements?

7. Is the organisation committed to producing a Capacity Plan?

8. Is the organisation committed to the proactive management of the capacity of the network, servers and desk-top equipment?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

9. Have responsibilities for capacity management activities been assigned?

10. Is there a process in place to ensure future business requirements for IT services are incorporated into capacity management plans?

11. Does the organisation have a process to ensure that there is sufficient capacity to support planned services?

12. Are services detailed in SLA's monitored, measured and growth/performance predicted?

13. Are there mechanisms for analysing system usage and for reporting on performance?

14. Are service elements both defined and sized for new services? 15. Is actual performance against agreed service levels recorded?

16. Do you model systems behaviour under various workloads and provide tuning recommendations?

17. Is Capacity Management incorporated into all change and project planning processes?

18. Is the utilisation of each resource and service monitored on an on-going basis?

19. Are end-to-end service response times monitored? 20. Is trend analysis conducted to predict future resource management?

21. Do you perform market testing of new and emerging technologies?

22. Does the capacity management process provide input to the business continuity process?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 4 other answer 'Y'

23. Do you analyse business plans to ensure that there is sufficient capacity to support planned services in anticipated time-scales?

Page 22: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 3: Products

M 0M 0

0

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 3.5: Quality Control

M 0

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 4: Management Information

M 0

M 0

0

0

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 4.5: External Integration

M 0

M 0

M 0

0

0

24. Do you analyse usage and performance data in order to optimise resource utilisation?

25. Are required service levels and forecasts used to define and size service elements?

26. Do you identify variances, trends and deviations from plans in the utilisation of resources?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

27. Do you have a Capacity Management Database?28. Do you maintain a Capacity Plan?

29. Is the Capacity Management Database aligned with the Configuration Management Database?

30. Are standard reports concerning performance produced on a regular basis?

31. Are standard reports concerning the use and allocation of key resources produced on a regular basis?

32. Do you produce forecasts of new workloads and their resource requirements?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

33. Are the standards and other quality criteria applicable to capacity management activities explicit and applied?

34. Are the personnel responsible for capacity management activities suitably trained?

35. Does the organisation set and review either targets or objectives for capacity management?

36. Does the organisation have suitable tools to support capacity management activities? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

37. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning resource utilisation?

38. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning infrastructure requirements for maintaining service levels?

39. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning performance trends?

40. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning utilisation of chargeable resources?

41. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning details of proposed new workloads?

42. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning recommendations based on technology trends / emerging technology?

43. Does Capacity Management provide information concerning variances between planned and actual capacity utilisation? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answer 'Y'

44. Do you hold regular meetings with interested parties in which capacity management matters are discussed?

45. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Service Level Management concerning services and workloads to be monitored?

46. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Service Level Management concerning proposed service levels for new workloads?

47. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Financial Management for IT Services concerning chargeable resource utilisation?

48. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Configuration Management to obtain details of IT components and workload deployment across them?

Page 23: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 5: Customer Interface

M 0

M 0M 0M 0

M 0

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions FAIL 0

49. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Change Management for details of any changes proposed to existing workloads and to feed back the results of a performance impact analysis?

50. Does Capacity Management exchange information with IT Service Continuity Management to incorporate ITSCM requirements for all recovery options into the Capacity Plan?

51. Does Capacity Management exchange information with IT Service Continuity Management to assess the impact of RFCs on recovery options?

52. Does Capacity Management share use of the CMDB and other common tools for planning, monitoring and alerting with Availability Management?

53. Does Capacity Management exchange information with Applications Management regarding the development of new and existing systems? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 3 other answers 'Y'

54. Do you check with the customer if the activities performed by Capacity Management adequately support their business needs?

55. Do you check with the customer if they are happy with the services provided?

56. Are you actively monitoring trends in customer satisfaction?

57. Are you feeding customer survey information into the service improvement agenda?

58. Are you monitoring the customers value perception of the services provided to them?

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Capacity Management Results

Your Score

Page 24: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Capacity Management Results

Your Score

Page 25: Service Delivery Assessment

IT Service Continuity Management

IT service continuity management (ITSCM) is concerned with the organisation’s ability to continue to provide a pre-determined and agreed level of IT services to support the minimum business requirements following a business service interruption.

ITSCM is a vital subset of, and provides support to the overall business continuity management (BCM) process by ensuring that the required IT services / facilities (including computer systems, networks, applications, telecommunications, technical support and Service Desk) can be recovered within required and agreed business time-scales.

The ITSCM process is based on the identification of the required, minimum levels of business operation that are required following an incident, and the necessary systems, facilities and service requirements. It is driven by these business needs, not by the perceived needs of the IT community, and requires senior management commitment.

The process covers:

Risk / Priority Analysis: Examining the risks and threats to IS services, and the development of an IT risk reduction or mitigation programme to deliver the continuity requirements necessary to provide the required level of business operation. The identification of business operational priorities influences the determination of critical services and data, and their relative priorities in the event of a contingency situation (e.g. a disaster).

Planning for Contingency: This covers the development, proving, sign-off and ongoing maintenance of plans to be invoked in the event of a range of contingency scenarios. The main product is a detailed set of contingency plans.

Risk Management: This covers the active management of identified risks, beyond the normal recovery procedures embodied in the contingency plans, with particular emphasis on prevention or reduction of risk.

Page 26: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: IT Service Continuity(Y)es or (N)o

Level 1: Pre-requisites

M 0

00

FAIL 0Level 1.5: Management Intent

M 0

M 0

0

00

0

FAIL 0Level 2: Process Capability

M 0

M 00

0

0

0

0

0

000

FAIL 0Level 2.5: Internal Integration

M 0

0

0

1. Are at least some IT service continuity activities established within the organisation, e.g. business impact assessment, development of recovery plans?

2. Have the minimum operational requirements been determined by the business?

3. Has the organisation developed a business continuity strategy? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

4. Has the purpose and benefits of IT service continuity planning been disseminated within the organisation?

5. Is there senior management commitment for the implementation of IT service continuity measures?

6. Has the scope of IT service continuity activity been determined – i.e. identifying, prioritising and documenting all business critical processes?

7. Has a business impact analysis been carried out?

8. Is there regular testing of the IT Service Continuity Management procedures?

9. Are the necessary resources being made available for the complete business continuity life-cycle stages through a strategic directive?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

10. Have responsibilities for IT service continuity activities been assigned?

11. Have the minimum business critical requirements been determined through business impact analysis?

12. Has a risk assessment been conducted?

13. Is there an overall co-ordination plan for implementation, including emergency response, damage assessment, salvage, identification of vital records etc?

14. Have the ITSCM components for business continuity been identified?

15. Is there a check-list covering the specific actions required during all stages of recovery of the system?

16. Is there a formal procedure for testing and reviewing contingency plans?

17. Is there an IT risk reduction or mitigation programme to implement mechanisms in order to deliver the continuity requirements?

18. Is there a formal procedure for invoking recovery?

19. Is guidance on the invocation process readily available, including details of associated action and decision points?

20. Has a crisis management team been established?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 4 other answers 'Y'

21. Is ITSC management responsible for the completeness of the IT contingency plans?

22. Do business continuity planners inform ITSC management of the required service criticality / priority?

23. Are ITSCM plans regularly reviewed, and the procedures and processes tested and updated where necessary?

Page 27: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

FAIL 0Level 3: Products

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 3.5: Quality Control

M 0

M 0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 4: Management Information

0

0

M 0

0

0

0

M 0

FAIL 0Level 4.5: External Integration

M 0

M 0

M 0

M 0

M 0

24. Is there an established planning structure clearly identifying responsibility for overall co-ordination of the recovery?

25. Are the technical activities necessary in order to invoke the contingency measures fully documented, so that IT personnel can undertake recovery actions? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

26. Are reports concerning risk assessments and risk mitigation measures produced regularly?

27. Does ITSC management produce reports on alternative IT contingency planning options that would provide potentially acceptable service levels for cost consideration?

28. Are formal Requests for Change issued in order to amend ITSCM arrangements? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

29. Are the standards and other quality criteria for ITSCM made explicit and applied?

30. Are the personnel responsible for ITSCM activities suitably trained?

31. Does the organisation set and review either targets or objectives for ITSCM?

32. Does the organisation use any tools or proprietary methods for conducting risk assessments and/or keeping the IT contingency plans up-to-date? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

33. Does ITSC management provide information concerning areas and nature of vulnerability to the continuation of business operations?

34. Does ITSC management provide information concerning IT contingency planning options?

35. Does ITSC management provide information concerning the IT contingency plans?

36. Does ITSC management provide information concerning changes to the IT contingency plans?

37. Does ITSC management provide information concerning verification tests of recovery plans?

38. Does ITSC management provide information concerning risk mitigation (source and nature of risk, proportion avoided / reduced)?

39. Does ITSC management provide information concerning effectiveness of business continuity strategy? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 3 other answers 'Y'

40. Are regular meetings held with business continuity planners (BCM)?

41. Does ITSC management exchange information with Availability Management for risk mitigation?

42. Does ITSC management exchange information with Availability Management for testing availability management components of the plan, including operating level agreements / support contracts?

43. Does ITSC management exchange information with Change Management for consideration of changes which may affect the currency and accuracy of IT Continuity Plans?

44. Does ITSC management exchange information with Change Management for assessment of proposed changes and actions necessary to avoid / reduce risks?

Page 28: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

FAIL 0Level 5: Customer Interface

M 0

M 0M 0M 0

M 0

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions FAIL 0

45. Does ITSC management exchange information with Capacity Management for consideration of capacity / storage risks and implications?

46. Does ITSC management exchange information with Capacity Management for specific capacity / storage requirements for recovery plan tests?

47. Does ITSC exchange information with Service Level Management for cross-references between SLAs and IT contingency plans, and specific service levels during contingency or recovery situations?

48. Does ITSC management exchange information with Configuration Management for contingency requirements and final configuration details, ensuring currency of configuration details used?

49. Does ITSC management exchange information with Configuration Management for full relationship between components and services?

50. Does ITSC management exchange information with Problem Management and Incident Management for reviewing major incidents?

51. Does ITSC management exchange information with Problem Management and Incident Management for discussion of problems where cause / resolution is possibly within the domain of ITSC management?

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 4 other answers 'Y'

52. Do you check with the customer if the activities performed by ITSC management adequately support their business needs?

53. Do you check with the customer that they are happy with the services provided?54. Are you actively monitoring trends in customer satisfaction?

55. Are you feeding customer survey information into the service improvement agenda?

56. Are you monitoring the customers value perception of the services provided to them?

Page 29: Service Delivery Assessment

0

2

IT Service Continuity Results

Your Score

Page 30: Service Delivery Assessment

Availability Management

Availability management is the optimisation of the availability and reliability of IT services and of the supporting IT infrastructure and organisation, in order to ensure that the requirements of the business are met. Availability management entails systematically undertaking preventative and corrective maintenance of IT services, within justifiable cost. Technical, organisational, procedural, security and contractual aspects have an important role in this process.

The aspects of availability management to be covered by this questionnaire are:

Reliability: the capability of an IT component to perform a required function under stated conditions for a stated period of time.

Maintainability: the capability of an IT component or IT service to be retained in, or restored to, a state in which it can perform its required functions.

Serviceability: a contractual term which is used to define the availability of IT components as agreed with external organisations supplying and maintaining these components.

Security: providing access to IT components or IT services under secure conditions.

Page 31: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Availability Management(Y)es or (N)o

Level 1: Pre-requisites

M

FAILLevel 1.5: Management Intent

M

FAILLevel 2: Process Capability

M

M

M

M

FAILLevel 2.5: Internal Integration

M

1. Are at least some availability management activities established within the organisation, e.g. monitoring of service components, analysis of service availability?

2. Are availability management activities assigned to specific individuals or functional areas?

3. Have the availability requirements of the business been identified and documented?

4. Are there mechanisms in place for identifying service (un)availability and IT component failure?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

5. Has the purpose and benefits of availability management been disseminated within the organisation?

6. Is the organisation committed to the monitoring of third party performance in relation to service targets?

7. Is your organisation committed to producing an IT service availability plan periodically? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

8. Have responsibilities for various availability management activities been assigned?

9. Is there a single point of accountability (process owner) for capacity management ?

10. Has the scope of availability management been established within the organisation?

11. Do you have procedures for monitoring, analysing, and forecasting service availability?

12. Do you have procedures for agreeing, monitoring and measuring contracted service support?

13. Is there an established process for improving IT system resilience?14. Do you have procedures for managing data backup and recovery?

15. Do you have defined targets for the availability, reliability and maintainability of IT infrastructure components that are documented and agreed in SLAs, OLAs and contracts?

16. Do you carry out monitoring and trend analysis of the availability, reliability and maintainability of IT infrastructure components?

17. Do you investigate the underlying reasons for unacceptable availability?

18. Do you produce and maintain an availability plan that prioritises and plans for IT availability improvements?

19. Are there explicit procedures for maintaining IT security?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 4 other answers 'Y'

20. Are service availability detailed requirements reviewed, registered and used to inform the IT availability plan?

21. Are service availability details used to identify trends and to forecast future service availability levels?

22. Are proposed changes to improve service availability underpinned with service availability trends and forecasts?

23. Are availability design criteria reviewed to provide additional resilience to prevent or minimise the impact on the business?

24. Are all new/changed configuration items designed and tested to meet the availability criteria?

Page 32: Service Delivery Assessment

FAILLevel 3: Products

M

FAILLevel 3.5: Quality Control

M

M

FAILLevel 4: Management Information

M

M

M

FAILLevel 4.5: External Integration

M

M

M

M

M

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

25. Are standard reports on IT service availability produced on a regular basis?

26. Is there an IT service availability plan and is it regularly reviewed?

27. Do the measures and reporting on availability, reliability and maintainability accurately reflect the perspectives of the business, User and IT support organisation?

28. Are formal Requests for Change issued to request service availability improvement measures? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

29. Are the standards and other quality criteria made explicit and applied to availability management activities?

30. Are the personnel responsible for availability management activities suitably trained?

31. Does the organisation set and review either targets or objectives for availability management?

32. Does the organisation use suitable tools to support the availability management process? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 1 other answer 'Y'

33. Does Availability Management provide information concerning service availability and component failure?

34. Does Availability Management provide information concerning response times?

35. Does Availability Management provide information concerning recommendations / proposed changes for improvements in IT service availability?

36. Does Availability Management provide information concerning dependency of IT services on the operational status of their components?

37. Does Availability Management provide information concerning evaluation of preventative measures?

38. Does Availability Management provide information concerning IT service availability plan?

39. Does Availability Management provide information concerning change assessments? Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 2 other answers 'Y'

40. Do you hold regular meetings with interested parties in which ITSCM matters are discussed?

41. Does Availability Management exchange information with Problem Management concerning IT service downtime?

42. Does Availability Management exchange information with Problem Management concerning configuration items which are the root cause of service disruption?

43. Does Availability Management exchange information with Problem Management concerning the need for change or preventative maintenance as proactive problem management measures?

44. Does Availability Management exchange information with Capacity Management for ensuring that the availability plan takes into account trends in system usage?

45. Does Availability Management exchange information with Change Management concerning proposed change assessments?

46. Does Availability Management exchange information with Change Management concerning changes necessary to improve IT service availability?

Page 33: Service Delivery Assessment

FAILLevel 5: Customer Interface

M

MMM

M

Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions FAIL

47. Does Availability Management exchange information with Service Management to agree targets for the availability, reliability and maintainability of the IT infrastructure components that underpin IT Service(s)?

48. Does Availability Management exchange information with ITSCM to formulate the availability and recovery design criteria for the IT infrastructure?

49. Does Availability Management exchange information with Financial Management for IT Services to assess the cost of non-availability of services and help justify improvements identified within availability plans?

50. Does Availability Management exchange information with the Service Desk concerning end-user complaints of poor IT service availability?

51. Does Availability Management exchange information with Configuration Management to obtain data on configuration items and mean time between failures?

52. Does Availability Management exchange information with Applications Management to ensure that IT service availability is considered within the development lifecycle?Minimum score to achieve this level: 'Y' for all mandatory ('M') questions + 4 other answers 'Y'

53. Do you check with the customer if the activities performed by Availability Management adequately support the business needs?

54. Do you check with the customer that they are happy with the services provided?

55. Are you actively monitoring trends in customer satisfaction?

56. Are you feeding customer survey information into the service improvement agenda?

57. Are you monitoring the customers value perception of the services provided to them?

0

5

Availability Management Results

Your Score

Page 34: Service Delivery Assessment

0

5

Availability Management Results

Your Score

Page 35: Service Delivery Assessment

ITIL Service Delivery Self Assessment: Availability Management

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

000

0

0

0

000

0

0

0

0

0

Page 36: Service Delivery Assessment

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Page 37: Service Delivery Assessment

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

000

0

0

0

5

Availability Management Results

Your Score

Page 38: Service Delivery Assessment

0

5

Availability Management Results

Your Score