self-administration of asthma medication in children and asthma control
TRANSCRIPT
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
VOLUME 125, NUMBER 2
Abstracts AB67
SU
ND
AY
262 ASHMI (Anti-Asthma Herbal Medicine Intervention) PreventsMaternal Transmission of Early Onset of Allergic AirwayInflammation and Mucus Cell Development in Offspring
I. Lopez Exposito, N. Birmingham, A. Castillo, X. M. Li; Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, New York, NY.
RATIONALE: Maternal asthma has been described as a risk factor for
asthma development in children. ASHMI has shown effectiveness in asth-
matics in a control clinical trial. We hypothesized treating asthmatic
mothers with ASHMI before pregnancy would reduce the risk of allergic
airway disease in mice.
METHODS: Female BALB/c mice were sensitized intraperitoneally
twice with ovalbumin (OVA) and alum followed by 3 weekly intra tracheal
challenges with OVA. Allergic airway responses were determined. These
asthmatic mothers (AS-M) were treated with ASHMI (AS-M/ASHMI)
for 6 weeks. Controls were untreated (AS-M/None). Naı̈ve mothers
(Naive-M) were used as additional controls. Mice were then mated with
normal males. Twelve day old offspring from each group received 3 con-
secutive daily intranasal (i.n.) OVA challenges. Two days later offspring
were sacrificed and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung histology
were performed. Serum OVA antibodies and cytokine profiles were also
determined.
RESULTS: Two days following the third i.n. challenge, total numbers of
BAL macrophages, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils in AS-M/
none offspring were significantly higher than in BAL of Naive-M off-
spring. AS-M/none offspring also contained many airway mucus cells.
In contrast, BAL cells from AS-M/ASHMI offspring were essentially the
same as Naı̈ve-M offspring, and no mucus cells were present.
Furthermore, AS-M/ASHMI offspring showed higher ratios of OVA-spe-
cific IgG2a vs IgG1 and Con A stimulated splenocyte production of
IFN-g vs IL-4, IL5 and IL13.
CONCLUSIONS: Offspring from asthmatic mothers developed allergic
airway responses in response to OVA challenge without prior systemic sen-
sitization. This predisposition can be reduced by a maternal treatment with
ASHMI before conception.
263 Physician Knowledge & Compliance with Updated AsthmaGuidelines
S. Fitzpatrick1, B. Silverman2, R. Joks1, A. Schneider2; 1SUNY Down-
state/Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, 2Long Island College
Hospital, Brooklyn, NY.
RATIONALE: The Expert Panel 3 asthma guidelines were updated in
2007. The revised paradigm for asthma management emphasizes control
and achieving that control by reducing both impairment and risk. This
study focuses on primary physician awareness of and compliance with
these changes.
METHODS: Physicians completed an online, anonymous survey consist-
ing of 16 questions. The data was compiled & analyzed using the online
Survey Monkey website.
RESULTS: A total of 85 surveys were collected (43 pediatric, 28 internal
medicine and 14 family practice). 54% of responding physicians reported
awareness that the asthma guidelines had been updated in 2007. Of the 5
domains used to assess patient impairment, the percentage of physicians
using each of these domains in practice ranged from 42% to 95%. Of the
3 domains used to assess patient risk, the percentage of physicians using
each of these domains ranged from 32% to 96%. 66% of physicians would
consider allergen immunotherapy for patients with mild/moderate persis-
tent allergic asthma. Only 26% of physicians were aware that omalizumab
is the only adjunctive therapy with demonstrated efficacy for severe persis-
tent allergic asthmatics. 66% of physicians schedule regular asthma spe-
cific office visits with the most frequent interval being every 3 months.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians play an important role in the
treatment of asthmatic patients. Adherence and knowledge of the asthma
guidelines, as assessed by the online questionnaire, needs improvement.
As such, better educational programs are needed to reinforce the current
guidelines in order to improve asthma outcomes.
264 Two Year Follow-Up of Patients with Chronic AutoimmuneUrticaria Treated with Omalizumab
A. P. Kaplan1, K. Joseph1, T. Murphy2, J. Ramey2, R. J. Maykut3, R. K.
Zeldin4; 1Medical university of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 2National
Allergy, Asthma, and Urticaria Centers of Charleston, Charleston, SC,3Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, SWITZERLAND, 4Novartis Pharmaceuti-
cals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
RATIONALE: In our proof of concept study, after 4 months of omalizu-
mab therapy for chronic autoimmune urticaria, seven patients responded
completely, four improved but required antihistamine therapy, and one
did not respond. We investigated the post-treatment clinical course over
the 2 years following discontinuation of omalizumab.
METHODS: Telephone interviews and/or out-patient office visits.
RESULTS: Of the 7 complete responders, 5 had no recurrence, one expe-
rienced a mild exacerbation 6 months later that spontaneously resolved,
and one experienced intermittent urticaria treated with as-needed hydrox-
yzine. Of the 4 patients with a partial response, one had mild urticaria for 6
months which then worsened requiring prednisone and diphenhydramine
for 1 year and is now treated with cetirizine; two have had continuous
mild urticaria for 2 years treated with cetirizine, and hydroxyzine respec-
tively; and one worsened immediately after omalizumab was stopped. This
patient required cyclosporine therapy for 1 ½ years and is now treated with
cetirizine. The non-responder received a 6-month tapering course of oral
corticosteroids and has been maintained on hydroxyzine.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest sustained improvement in symp-
toms of chronic autoimmune urticaria after discontinuation of omalizumab
therapy in most of the patients who responded to a 4-month treatment
protocol.
265 Self-Administration of Asthma Medication in Children andAsthma Control
B. Safier, L. Green, M. Ballow; SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY.
RATIONALE: In the pediatric asthmatic population, the impact of place
of residence and who administers asthma medication on asthma compli-
ance and control is unclear. However, some may assume that inner city
children who self-administer asthma medication would fare poorly in com-
parison with suburban patients whose parents administer medication.
METHODS: Parent and patient questionnaires were completed for 31
children (ages 4 to 18 years old) with moderate- to severe-persistent
asthma. Suburban asthmatic patients were managed by pediatricians.
Inner city asthmatic patients were managed in our allergy clinic.
Medication compliance was determined based upon reported number of
missed doses. Asthma control was based upon night symptoms, rescue in-
haler use, interference with activity, oral steroid use, ED visits, and hospital
admissions.
RESULTS: Comparison of suburban asthmatics managed by pediatricians
and inner city asthmatics managed by allergists yielded no significant dif-
ferences in medication compliance or asthma control. There was also no
significant difference in these parameters when comparing parent medica-
tion administration with patient medication self-administration in either
the suburban or inner city subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective asthma control is attainable in inner city chil-
dren with moderate to severe asthma; and the medication administrator
does not impact this control.