screening of recently seized new psychoactive … · screening of recently seized new psychoactive...

1
SCREENING OF RECENTLY SEIZED NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN URINE OF POTENTIAL CONSUMERS AND URBAN WASTEWATER Alberto Celma 1* , Lubertus Bijlsma 1 , Juan V. Sancho 1 , Félix Hernández 1 , Mario Joao Dias 2 , Susana Simões 2 , Noelia Salgueiro 3 , Sara Castiglioni 3 , Ettore Zuccato 3 1 Research Institute for Pesticides and Water (IUPA), University Jaume I, Castellón, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciencias Forenses (INMLCF), Lisbon, Portugal. 3 IRCCS-Istituto di Recerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Milan, Italy. 3) Screening of NPS CONCLUDING REMARKS 2) Sample collection INTRODUCTION 1) Database creation New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) are constantly being developed as legal substitution of traditional drugs of abuse. Although the traditional drugs maintain popular, new drugs are regularly introduced, changing the drug market ceaselessly [1]. Monitoring NPS and its consumption is challenging as these compounds are normally missed in routine drug analysis, users do often not exactly know what they consume and information available is limited of what is being sold. Furthermore, very little information exists on metabolism of these newly introduced NPS [2]. This highlights the need of applying a strategic workflow making use of modern analytical techniques to face this novel public health safety challenge. The workflow presented in this work consists of three stages: i) The creation of a database with around 200 NPS, including NPS recently reported to the National Early Warning Systems (EWS) of Spain and Italy and the EWS of the European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). ii) The collection of urine samples of individuals suspected of drug consumption, pooled urine samples from festivals and urban wastewater samples. iii) The screening of NPS using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry with a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyzer. Although the database is under constant development, including NPS reported to be present in wastewaters around Europe, new compounds appearing in the market, as well as metabolites reported in the literature, the workflow applied allowed the detection of several unchanged NPS in urine and wastewater samples, which indicates that consumption of some of these compounds is a reality. The absence of reference standards for several NPS found, as well as for some NPS metabolites, made it unfeasible the full confirmation of some compounds in the urine/wastewater samples analyzed. However, accurate-mass full-spectrum data provided by HRMS allowed their detection / identification with high degree of reliability. The subsequent acquisition of reference standards, when available, will allow the unequivocal confirmation of their identity. [1] Reid, M. and Thomas, K. (2016), ‘New psychoactive substances: analysis and site-specific testing’, pp. 5765 in Assessing illicit drugs in wastewater: advances in wastewater-based drug epidemiology, EMCDDA Insights 22, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [2] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Europol (2016), EU Drug Markets Report: In-Depth Analysis, EMCDDAEuropol Joint publications, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [3] Hernández, F., Castiglioni, S., Covaci, A., de Voogt, P., Emke, E., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Ort, C., Reid, M., Sancho, J.V., Thomas, K.V., van Nuijs, A.L.N., Zuccato, E., Bijlsma, L., Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater, Mass Spectrom. Rev. (2016). doi:10.1002/mas.21525 [4] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Europol EMCDDA Joint Report on a new psychoactive substance: 4methylethcathinone., 2010. [5] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Methoxetamine Report on the risk assessment of 2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(ehtylamino)cyclohexanone (methoxetamine) in the framework of the Council Decision on new psychoactive substances, 2014. doi:10.2810/44197. REFERENCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the financial support of NPS-Euronet (HOME/2014/ JDRUG/AG/DRUG/7086), co-funded by the European Union. Dr. Lubertus Bijlsma acknowledges NPS-Euronet (HOME/2014/ JDRUG/AG/DRUG/7086), co-funded by the European Union, for his post- doctoral fellowship. Dr. Félix Hernández acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for financial support in the field of illicit drug research (Ref. CTQ2015-65603-P). Alberto Celma acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for his predoctoral grant (Ref. BES-2016-076914). This publication reflects the view only of the authors, and the European Commission and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness can not be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Synthetic Cannabinoid; 42% Tryptamine; 3% Other; 9% Synthetic Opioid; 4% Cathinone; 25% Phenethylamine; 17% Database of 217 NPS Collection of Urine samples of potential consumers: o Emergency Rooms and Drug Addiction Treatment Departments: individual urine samples from suspect consumers o Music festivals: Pooled urine samples from volunteers Pooled urine samples from portable toilets Collection of Urban Wastewater: o Pooled Urban Wastewater collected during local festivities > 900 samples from 6 hospitals 37 samples from 4 music festivals 9 wastewater samples INSTRUMENTATION (UHPLC- QTOF MS) SAMPLE TREATMENT SCREENING CRITERIA SCREENING ANALYSIS UHPLC (Acquity UHPLC, Waters) Column: Cortecs® C18 2.7μm 2.1x100 mm Mobile phase: A: H 2 O 0.01 % HCOOH B: MeOH 0.01% HCOOH Flow: 0.3 mL min -1 Volume injection: 20 μL QTOF MS (Xevo G2 QTOF, Waters) ESI+ mode Acquisition Mass range: 50 to 1000 m/z units Sampling cone: 25 V MS E Low Energy Function (LE): 4 eV High Energy Function (HE): 10-40 eV Capillary voltage: 0.7 kV Source Temperature: 130 ºC Gradient 0 min 10 % B 14-16 min 90 % B 16.1 min 10 % B 18 min 10 % B Screening parameters [3]: Retention time (Rt) Accurate m/z ions Mass errors Isotope pattern (Cl, Br…) Standard available Detection Identification Rt agreement Two ions (Q and q) Q mass error < 5 ppm q mass error < 5 ppm Isotope pattern OPTION 1 Rt agreement One ion (Q) Mass error < 5 ppm Isotope pattern or OPTION 2 Rt agreement Two ions (Q and q) Mass error > 5 ppm Isotope pattern Standard unavailable Tentative identification Expected ion (Q) present with mass error < 5 ppm Compatible isotopic pattern (Cl, Br…) One or more fragment ions (q), - in agreement with data reported - compatible with the chemical structure of the candidate (mass error < 5 ppm) Confirmation required with reference standard Individual urines from Hospitals Pooled urines from Music Festivals Urban Wastewater Hydrolysis Hydrolysis HLB SPE MCX SPE HLB SPE MCX SPE 1.25 mL urine sample LC-QTOF MS Deglucuronidation (β-glucuronidase from E.Coli) pH 7, 55ºC for 1 hour 25 mL sample +75mL Milli-Q H 2 O Oasis HLB (generic cartridge) Elution: 5ml MeOH LC-QTOF MS 100 mL sample (pH 2) Oasis MCX (cationic exchange cartridge) El.: 5ml MeOH (2% NH 3 ) LC-QTOF MS 6 1 1 4 2 1 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Cathinones Phenetylamines Tryptamines Others Confirmed Tentatively Identified Confirmed Tentatively Identified Individual Urines from Hospitals Methoxetamine (MXE) 3,4-dimethoxy-α-PVP 4-methylmethylphenidate α-methyltryptamine Pooled Urines from Music Festivals 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC) 4-fluoromethcathinone (4-FMC) 4-methylethcathinone (4-MEC) 3,4-dimethoxy-α-PVP 3-methoxymethcatinone (3-MeOMC) bk-DMDBP (Dipentylone) α-methyltryptamine α-PVP 4’-chloro-α-PPP Urban Wastewater Mephedrone (4-MMC) Methylone Butylone p-methoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) 2-phenethylamine RESULTS Cathinones 62% Phenethylamines 19% Tryptamines 6% Other 13% 4-Methylethcathinone (4-MEC) Recreational psychostimulant Alert released in March 2010 by EMCDDA [4] Submitted to control and criminal penalties in EU in December 2010 [4] Found in Pooled Urine Sample from Music Festivals 4-MEC Standard Rt = 3.66 min LE HE m/z 174.12763 (-0.36 ppm) m/z 159.10407 (-4.58 ppm) m/z 145.08837 (-5.37 ppm) m/z 131.07312 (-2.90 ppm) m/z 119.08859 (-4.11 ppm) m/z 91.05414 (-0.99 ppm) m/z 192.13848 (0.98 ppm) (Confidential Sample ID) (Confidential Sample ID) Music Festival Sample LE HE m/z 174.12752 (-4.31 ppm) m/z 131.07235 (-8.77 ppm) m/z 119.08489 (-9.90 ppm) m/z 159.10320 (-10.0 ppm) m/z 145.08832 (-5.72 ppm) m/z 192.13840 (0.57 ppm) Rt = 3.76 min (ΔRt < 0.2min) Methoxetamine (MXE) Ketamine analogue Health and Social risks assessed by EMCDDA in April 2014 [5] Several intoxications across EU reported in 2014 [5] Found in Individual Urine Sample from Hospital Individual Urine Sample LE HE m/z 248.16397 (-2.17 ppm) Rt = 4.08 min (ΔRt > 0.2min) (Confidential Sample ID) (Confidential Sample ID) m/z 203.10614 (-2.56 ppm) m/z 203.10642 (-1.18 ppm) m/z 175.11148 (-1.48 ppm) m/z 121.06479 (-2.89 ppm) m/z 91.05489 (7.25 ppm) (Confidential Sample ID) (Confidential Sample ID) Individual Urine Sample (Spiked with MXE 200ppb) Rt = 4.09 min (ΔRt > 0.2min with Std.) (ΔRt < 0.2min with Spiked) LE HE m/z 248.16411 (-1.61 ppm) m/z 203.10635 (-1.52 ppm) m/z 175.11155 (-1.09 ppm) m/z 121.06523 (3.63 ppm) m/z 203.10626 (-1.97 ppm) m/z 91.05489 (7.25 ppm) Spiked sample required for confirmation m/z 119.0849 m/z 174.1275 m/z 159.1032 m/z 192.1384 A database containing more than 200 recently seized compounds was created based on the information provided by different national and international authorities. Approximately 1000 samples were collected with an strategic sampling process in locations with high probability of NPS consumption. A total of 19 NPS were found in urine samples from hospitals and music festivals and in urban wastewater. The majority of NPS detected were cathinones (62%) which agrees with reports of EMCDDA on NPS consumption. No synthetic cannabinoids were found. Probably, this was due to the fact that these type of compounds are highly metabolised and therefore no ‘original’ compound is excreted. [M+H] + , Sample EMCDDA UNODC EWS from Spain and Italy Seizures Notifications Clinical & Forensic cases Frag. 1, Sample Frag. 2, Sample [M+H] + , Standard [M+H] + , Spiked Sample No Rt agreement! Expected ion ([M+H] + ) with mass error < 5ppm Fragments according with structure (and Std.) with < 5 ppm Isotope pattern Rt agreement with Std. (± 0.2min) Urban Wastewater Hospitals Music Festivals

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jan-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SCREENING OF RECENTLY SEIZED NEW PSYCHOACTIVE … · SCREENING OF RECENTLY SEIZED NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN URINE OF POTENTIAL CONSUMERS AND URBAN WASTEWATER Alberto Celma1*,

SCREENING OF RECENTLY SEIZED NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES

IN URINE OF POTENTIAL CONSUMERS AND URBAN WASTEWATER

Alberto Celma1*, Lubertus Bijlsma1, Juan V. Sancho1, Félix Hernández1, Mario Joao Dias2, Susana Simões2, Noelia Salgueiro3,

Sara Castiglioni3, Ettore Zuccato3

1 Research Institute for Pesticides and Water (IUPA), University Jaume I, Castellón, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciencias Forenses (INMLCF), Lisbon, Portugal.

3 IRCCS-Istituto di Recerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Milan, Italy.

3) Screening of NPS

CONCLUDING REMARKS

2) Sample collection

INTRODUCTION

1) Database creation

New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) are constantly being developed as legal substitution of traditional drugs of abuse. Although the traditional drugs maintain popular, new drugs are regularly introduced, changing the drug market ceaselessly

[1]. Monitoring NPS and its consumption is challenging as these compounds are normally missed in routine drug analysis, users do often not exactly know what they consume and information available is limited of what is being sold. Furthermore,

very little information exists on metabolism of these newly introduced NPS [2]. This highlights the need of applying a strategic workflow making use of modern analytical techniques to face this novel public health safety challenge. The workflow

presented in this work consists of three stages: i) The creation of a database with around 200 NPS, including NPS recently reported to the National Early Warning Systems (EWS) of Spain and Italy and the EWS of the European Monitoring Center

for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). ii) The collection of urine samples of individuals suspected of drug consumption, pooled urine samples from festivals and urban wastewater samples. iii) The screening of NPS using ultra-high

performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry with a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyzer.

Although the database is under constant development, including NPS reported to be present in wastewaters around Europe, new compounds appearing in the market, as well as metabolites reported in the literature, the workflow applied

allowed the detection of several unchanged NPS in urine and wastewater samples, which indicates that consumption of some of these compounds is a reality. The absence of reference standards for several NPS found, as well as for some NPS

metabolites, made it unfeasible the full confirmation of some compounds in the urine/wastewater samples analyzed. However, accurate-mass full-spectrum data provided by HRMS allowed their detection / identification with high degree of

reliability. The subsequent acquisition of reference standards, when available, will allow the unequivocal confirmation of their identity.

[1] Reid, M. and Thomas, K. (2016), ‘New psychoactive substances: analysis and site-specific testing’, pp. 57–65 in Assessing illicit drugs in wastewater: advances in wastewater-based

drug epidemiology, EMCDDA Insights 22, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

[2] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Europol (2016), EU Drug Markets Report: In-Depth Analysis, EMCDDA–Europol Joint publications, Publications

Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

[3] Hernández, F., Castiglioni, S., Covaci, A., de Voogt, P., Emke, E., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Ort, C., Reid, M., Sancho, J.V., Thomas, K.V., van Nuijs, A.L.N., Zuccato, E., Bijlsma, L.,

Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater, Mass Spectrom. Rev. (2016). doi:10.1002/mas.21525

[4] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Europol – EMCDDA Joint Report on a new psychoactive substance: 4—methylethcathinone., 2010.

[5] European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Methoxetamine – Report on the risk assessment of 2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-(ehtylamino)cyclohexanone (methoxetamine)

in the framework of the Council Decision on new psychoactive substances, 2014. doi:10.2810/44197.

REFERENCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors acknowledge the financial support of NPS-Euronet (HOME/2014/

JDRUG/AG/DRUG/7086), co-funded by the European Union. Dr. Lubertus Bijlsma acknowledges

NPS-Euronet (HOME/2014/ JDRUG/AG/DRUG/7086), co-funded by the European Union, for his post-

doctoral fellowship. Dr. Félix Hernández acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Economy and

Competitiveness for financial support in the field of illicit drug research (Ref. CTQ2015-65603-P).

Alberto Celma acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for his predoctoral

grant (Ref. BES-2016-076914). This publication reflects the view only of the authors, and the European

Commission and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness can not be held responsible for any

use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Synthetic

Cannabinoid; 42%

Tryptamine;

3%Other; 9%Synthetic Opioid; 4%

Cathinone;

25%

Phenethylamine;

17%

Database of

217 NPS

Collection of Urine samples of potential consumers:

o Emergency Rooms and Drug Addiction Treatment Departments:

individual urine samples from suspect consumers

o Music festivals:

• Pooled urine samples from volunteers

• Pooled urine samples from portable toilets

Collection of Urban Wastewater:

o Pooled Urban Wastewater collected during local festivities

> 900 samples from 6

hospitals

37 samples from 4

music festivals

9 wastewater

samples

INSTRUMENTATION (UHPLC- QTOF MS)SAMPLE TREATMENT SCREENING CRITERIA

SCREENING ANALYSIS

UHPLC (Acquity UHPLC, Waters)

Column: Cortecs® C18 2.7µm 2.1x100 mm

Mobile phase: A: H2O 0.01 % HCOOH

B: MeOH 0.01% HCOOH

Flow: 0.3 mL min-1

Volume injection: 20 µL

QTOF MS (Xevo G2 QTOF, Waters)

ESI+ mode

Acquisition Mass range: 50 to 1000 m/z units

Sampling cone: 25 V

MSE Low Energy Function (LE): 4 eV

High Energy Function (HE): 10-40 eV

Capillary voltage: 0.7 kV

Source Temperature: 130 ºC

Gradient

0 min 10 % B

14-16 min 90 % B

16.1 min 10 % B

18 min 10 % B

Screening parameters [3]:Retention time (Rt) – Accurate m/z ions – Mass errors – Isotope pattern (Cl, Br…)

Standard available

Detection Identification

•Rt agreement

•Two ions (Q and q)

•Q mass error < 5 ppm

•q mass error < 5 ppm

• Isotope pattern

OPTION 1•Rt agreement

•One ion (Q)

•Mass error < 5 ppm

• Isotope pattern

or

OPTION 2•Rt agreement

•Two ions (Q and q)

•Mass error > 5 ppm

•Isotope pattern

Standard unavailable

Tentative identification

•Expected ion (Q) present with mass error < 5 ppm

•Compatible isotopic pattern (Cl, Br…)

•One or more fragment ions (q),- in agreement with data reported

- compatible with the chemical structure of the candidate

(mass error < 5 ppm)

Confirmation required with reference

standard

Individual urines from

HospitalsPooled urines from Music

FestivalsUrban Wastewater

Hydrolysis Hydrolysis

HLB SPE

MCX SPE

HLB SPE

MCX SPE

1.25 mL urine sample

LC-QTOF MS

Deglucuronidation(β-glucuronidase from E.Coli)

pH 7, 55ºC for 1 hour

25 mL sample

+75mL Milli-Q H2O

Oasis HLB(generic cartridge)

Elution: 5ml MeOH

LC-QTOF MS

100 mL sample (pH 2)

Oasis MCX(cationic exchange cartridge)

El.: 5ml MeOH (2% NH3)

LC-QTOF MS

6

1 1

4

2

1

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Cathinones Phenetylamines Tryptamines Others

Confirmed Tentatively Identified

Con

firm

edT

enta

tivel

y

Iden

tifi

ed

Individual Urines from

Hospitals

• Methoxetamine (MXE)

• 3,4-dimethoxy-α-PVP

• 4-methylmethylphenidate

• α-methyltryptamine

Pooled Urines from Music

Festivals

• 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC)

• 4-fluoromethcathinone (4-FMC)

• 4-methylethcathinone (4-MEC)

• 3,4-dimethoxy-α-PVP

• 3-methoxymethcatinone

(3-MeOMC)

• bk-DMDBP (Dipentylone)

• α-methyltryptamine

• α-PVP

• 4’-chloro-α-PPP

Urban Wastewater

• Mephedrone (4-MMC)

• Methylone

• Butylone

• p-methoxymethamphetamine

(PMMA)

• 2-phenethylamine

RESULTS

Cathinones

62%

Phenethylamines

19%

Tryptamines

6%

Other

13%

4-Methylethcathinone (4-MEC)

Recreational psychostimulant

Alert released in March 2010 by

EMCDDA [4]

Submitted to control and criminal

penalties in EU in December 2010 [4]

Found in Pooled

Urine Sample from

Music Festivals

4-MEC Standard

Rt = 3.66 minLE

HEm/z 174.12763

(-0.36 ppm)

m/z 159.10407

(-4.58 ppm)

m/z 145.08837

(-5.37 ppm)

m/z 131.07312

(-2.90 ppm)

m/z 119.08859

(-4.11 ppm)m/z 91.05414

(-0.99 ppm)

m/z 192.13848

(0.98 ppm)

(Confidential Sample ID)

(Confidential Sample ID)

Music Festival Sample LE

HE

m/z 174.12752

(-4.31 ppm)m/z 131.07235

(-8.77 ppm)

m/z 119.08489

(-9.90 ppm)m/z 159.10320

(-10.0 ppm)

m/z 145.08832

(-5.72 ppm)

m/z 192.13840

(0.57 ppm)

Rt = 3.76 min (ΔRt < 0.2min)

Methoxetamine (MXE)

Ketamine analogue

Health and Social risks assessed by

EMCDDA in April 2014 [5]

Several intoxications across EU reported

in 2014 [5]

Found in

Individual

Urine Sample

from Hospital

Individual Urine Sample LE

HE

m/z 248.16397

(-2.17 ppm)

Rt = 4.08 min(ΔRt > 0.2min)

(Confidential Sample ID)

(Confidential Sample ID)

m/z 203.10614

(-2.56 ppm)

m/z 203.10642

(-1.18 ppm)

m/z 175.11148

(-1.48 ppm)

m/z 121.06479

(-2.89 ppm)

m/z 91.05489

(7.25 ppm)

(Confidential Sample ID)

(Confidential Sample ID)

Individual Urine Sample (Spiked with MXE 200ppb)

Rt = 4.09 min(ΔRt > 0.2min with Std.)

(ΔRt < 0.2min with Spiked)

LE

HE

m/z 248.16411

(-1.61 ppm)

m/z 203.10635

(-1.52 ppm)

m/z 175.11155

(-1.09 ppm)

m/z 121.06523

(3.63 ppm)m/z 203.10626

(-1.97 ppm)

m/z 91.05489

(7.25 ppm)

Spiked sample required for confirmationm/z 119.0849

m/z 174.1275

m/z 159.1032

m/z 192.1384

A database containing more than 200 recently seized compounds was created based on the information provided by

different national and international authorities.

Approximately 1000 samples were collected with an strategic sampling process in locations with high probability of

NPS consumption.

A total of 19 NPS were found in urine samples from hospitals and music festivals and in urban wastewater.

The majority of NPS detected were cathinones (62%) which agrees with reports of EMCDDA on NPS consumption.

No synthetic cannabinoids were found. Probably, this was due to the fact that these type of compounds are highly

metabolised and therefore no ‘original’ compound is excreted.

[M+H]+, Sample

EMCDDA

UNODC

EWS from Spain and Italy

Seizures

Notifications

Clinical & Forensic cases

Frag. 1, Sample

Frag. 2, Sample

[M+H]+, Standard

[M+H]+, Spiked Sample

No Rt agreement!

• Expected ion ([M+H]+) with mass error < 5ppm

• Fragments according with structure (and Std.) with < 5 ppm

• Isotope pattern

• Rt agreement with Std. (± 0.2min)

Urban Wastewater

Hospitals

Music Festivals