scopus - introduction
DESCRIPTION
SCOPUS - Introduction. Alvaro Ybarra Muguruza Account Manager Spain [email protected]. 21.2M pre-1996 records 29.5M post-1995 records >50M records 64k pre-1996 conf events 10.5k post-1995 c onf events 5.7M total conference records (10 %) 844k book items. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SCOPUS - INTRODUCTION
Alvaro Ybarra MuguruzaAccount Manager [email protected]
The broad source for research answers
20,000Peer reviewed journals
393Trade journals
371Book series
A rich and extended coverage including
21.2M pre-1996 records 29.5M post-1995 records>50M records
64k pre-1996 conf events 10.5k post-1995 conf events5.7M total conference records (10%)
844k book items
Content from > 5,000 publishers “Articles in Press” from > 3,750 titles Abstracts going back to 1823 40 languages covered 380 M integrated scientific websites 24M Patents
21,000 active titles
240Conf. series
Total average processing time: 5 days
Breadth of coverage across subject areas
More than 20,000 titles in Scopus, titles can be in more than one subject area
Health Sciences 6,300• (100% Medline)• Nursing• Dentistry • etc.,
Social Sciences 6,350• Psychology• Economics• Business• A&H • etc.,
Life Sciences 4,050• Neuroscience• Pharmacology• Biology • etc.,
Physical Sciences 6,600• Chemistry• Physics • Engineering• etc.,
Geographical distribution of titles
5,0000
Wider coverage gives a more accurate picture of the research landscape
How is content selected?
More expansive coverage does not meanlower standards
Titles are selected by the independent
Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB)
Focus on quality through selection by independent CSAB, because:
•Provide accurate and relevant search results for users
•No dilution of search results by irrelevant or low quality content
•Support that Scopus is recognized as authoritative
•Support confidence that Scopus is “reflecting the truth”
•Assurance that titles selected by Scopus meet the highest ethical standards
Scopus selection criteria
Journalpolicy
• Convincing editorial concept/policy• Level of peer-review• Diversity in geographic distribution of editors• Diversity in geographic distribution of authors
Quality ofcontent
• Academic contribution to the field• Clarity of abstracts• Quality and conformity with stated aims & scope• Readability of articles
Journal standing
• Citedness of journal articles in Scopus• Editor standing
Regularity • No delay in publication schedule
Online availability
• Content available online• English-language journal home page• Quality of home page
Minimum criteria
• Peer-review
• English abstracts
• Regular publication
• References in Roman script
• Publication ethics statement
Titles reviewed
Jan-1
1
Feb-1
1
Mar-11
Apr-11
May-11
Jun-1
1Ju
l-11
Aug-11
Sep-11
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jan-1
2
Feb-1
2
Mar-12
Apr-12
May-12
Jun-1
2Ju
l-12
Aug-12
Sep-12
Oct-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%(n=2,976, January 2011 – December 2012)
2012: Total 1,271 titles reviewed of which 47% accepted
Num
ber o
f titl
es re
view
ed
Acce
ptan
ce ra
te
Claiming who you are
Many researchers that too closely resemble one another.
Dr. Lee Dr. Lee Dr. Lee
Researchers publish under name variations.
Dr. LeeDr. J. LeeDr. James Lee
The Challenge: Scholarly Name Ambiguity
Dr. James Lee46533489
Open Research and Contributor ID (ORCID)Aims to solve the name ambiguity problem in research and scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers for individual researchers
The Solution: The ORCID Registry
Dr. LeeDr. J. LeeDr. James Lee
By issuing unique identifiers to all researchers, ORCID aims to facilitate discovery and evaluation for researchers, institutions, scholarly societies and publishers.
46533489
Joins faculty or student body
Joins scholarly society
Applies for grant
Submits manuscript
The (Future) Benefits of ORCID
Get your own ORCID
Link to add to ORCID, opens the Scopus to
ORCID feedback wizard
Who is looking at you?
Scopus customers world wide
Low PenetrationMid-level PenetrationHigh Penetration
(2012 Analysis, by customer count)
China: 10%US: 37%
Leading research institutes use Scopus
Rank Name of Institute Country1 University of Cambridge UK2 Harvard University US 3 Yale University US4 University College London UK5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology US6 University of Oxford UK7 Imperial College London UK8 University of Chicago US9 California Institute of Technology US10 Princeton University US11 Columbia University US12 University of Pennsylvania US13 Stanford University US14 Duke University US15 University of Michigan US16 Cornell University US 17 Johns Hopkins University US 18 McGill University Canada19 ETH Zurich Switzerland20 Australian National University Australia
Scopus
Non-Scopus
Top decision making bodies around the world use Scopus data
More than 95 of the world’s top Laboratories, Institutes and Ranking Bodies use Scopus for evaluation
www.journalmetrics.com
More accuracy, More transparency, More options, More metrics!
API integration using Scopus data
Scopus
Requests dynamic Scopus Cited-by number to display on website
Use API to extract basic bibliographic data
1. Title2. Author3. Basic bibliographic
metadata
http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-services/integration
And finally…
Books
Funding data
Export limit increased to 20,000
Thank you!