saving costs in transport for dialysis patients september 2010 sr maggie farrell, senior sister mrs...
TRANSCRIPT
SAVING COSTS IN TRANSPORT FOR
DIALYSIS PATIENTS
September 2010
Sr Maggie Farrell, Senior Sister
Mrs Jacqueline Tansley, Senior Dialysis Renographer
Dr Patrick Harnett, Consultant Physician
Southend Hospital Renal Unit
INTRODUCTION
• Haemodialysis patients are required to attend the renal unit frequently and regularly for dialysis treatment
• These patients are often dependent on hospital transport to enable them to attend for their treatment
• The introduction of new practices on The Renal Unit at Southend University Hospital has improved the service as well as significantly reducing transport costs
PROBLEM
• Cause of patient complaint
• Long waiting times for patients
• Patient addresses over wide area
• Uncoordinated journeys
• Pressure on hospital transport services
• Increasing transport costs
METHODOLOGY
• Mobility status reassessed for all patients on ambulance transport
• Geographic data was collected and mapped
• Data was analysed and patients were regrouped into closest postcode areas
• Individual patients spoken to re changes
METHODOLOGY cont
• Letter sent to patients informing them of proposed changes
• Systematic approach used to coordinate patients days and treatment times
Close liaison with Transport Providers – eg meetings were arranged with the
Ambulance service and volunteer drivers
• Revised transport schedules produced
Mon1
Mon1
Mon1
Mon1
Mon2Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon2
Mon3
Mon3Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1
Tue1 Tue1
Tue1 Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Tue3
Mon1 Mon2 Mon3 Tue1 Tue2 Tue3
RESULTS
• Number of patients requiring transport reduced from 51% to 34%
• 12 patients came off ambulance transport
• Number of journeys reduced by approx 33%
• Patient waiting times significantly reduced
ANNUAL FIGURESBefore Changes After Changes
No. on hospital transport 66 44
Taxi journeys 300-350 approx 0
Costs
Saving
£6,000
£0
£6000
Volunteer drivers journeys 3,000 approx 1,536
Costs
Saving
£13,350
(£4.45 per journey)
£6,830
£6520
Hospital Car Transport Journeys 11,500 approx 6,300
Costs
Saving
£86,250
(£7.50 per journey)
£47,250
£39,000
Ambulance (£8,892 per pt per year) 18 6
Costs
Savings
Total Saving
£160,056 £53,352
£106,704
£158,224
Southend Hospital Ambulance journeys for dialysis patients
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10
Number of patients travelling by ambulance per month.
CONCLUSION
• Following a review of our entire transport arrangements, significant improvements were made to all areas relating to the transport experience.
• Our results showed that by grouping together patients from the same area a reduction in the number of journeys was apparent resulting in significant cost savings.
• 22 patients came off hospital transport completely
• The new transport arrangements on-going.
RELEVANCE
• Good transport service plays a vital role in the formation of patient views and attitudes towards dialysis, improving patients’ experience and attendance.
• Significant cost saving-£158,224
• Better and more cost effective transport service developed in line with recent Department of Health recommendations.
• Enquiries from other Renal Units
Supporting the Quality, Innovation,
Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) agenda What is QIPP?
The most important challenge facing the NHS is to deliver a service with quality as its organising principle through a period of significant financial challenge. Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) is the NHS response to this challenge – a response that will be designed and delivered locally.
How do you access NHS Evidence?
Go to www.evidence.nhs.uk. You can also download a version for mobile phones so you can search for information on the go.
How does NHS Evidence support the Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) agenda?
NHS Evidence brings you evidence-based success stories. The QIPP collection showcases practical examples of how NHS organisations are improving quality whilst making efficiency savings. The collection will provoke ideas and discussions about how staff locally and nationally can deliver ‘more for less’.
Reasons to get involved:
•The NHS must not lose its focus on quality because of the economic challenges it faces•Addressing inefficiencies to benefit patient care is the responsibility of all in the NHS•Trusts will become known as local, regional and national beacons of best practice•There is an urgent imperative to introduce better ways of doing things
Reasons to get involved:
•The NHS must not lose its focus on quality because of the economic challenges it faces•Addressing inefficiencies to benefit patient care is the responsibility of all in the NHS•Trusts will become known as local, regional and national beacons of best practice•There is an urgent imperative to introduce better ways of doing things
Share your success
•NHS Evidence needs your help to build a comprehensive QIPP collection of best practice so we are calling on all NHS organisations and all NHS Trusts to contribute examples of best practice to the QIPP collection.•Got something to smile about? If you’ve been involved in a successful QIPP initiative, why not share it with your NHS colleagues? Visit the NHS Evidence website to find out how.
Beacons of best practice
”
East Berkshire Community HospitalEnd of Life Care ProjectRolled out in just 6 weeks, the pilot project helped 20 staff from St Mark’s and Upton Community Hospitals to broaden their expertise during 1-week secondments to Thames Hospicecare.
Step 2. Collaborative mentoring
Secondees worked with hospice team, tracking progress against core competencies. Staff identified changes needed in community hospital
Step 3. Improving community practice
Nurses learned the importance of small touches. New practices include sending condolence cards with bereavement service information
During After
Step 1. Identifying objectives
Project leaders identified individuals’ knowledge gaps (such as managing symptoms, holistic assessment and advanced care planning)
Before
Rosemary Martin, End of Life Service ManagerBerkshire East Community Health Services
“ Utilising community hospitals is a cost-effective option for end of life care. After our secondment project, staff feel much more confident in delivering this. I would strongly encourage other organisations to submit their own examples for the QIPP collection, so that we can all learn from each other.
”
Southend Hospital NHS Trust has slashed its bill for dialysis transport services by almost 60% after tailoring transport to users’ individual needs. Users’ home addresses were mapped into closest postcode districts and treatment times were adjusted. Mobility of people using ambulance transport was reassessed .
Total annual dialysis transport costs were reduced from £277,000 to £113,732. The most significant saving was in ambulance costs, which were reduced from £160,056 to £53,352 after reassessing eligibility. An average PCT would save around £164,000 in the first year so considerable savings could be made nationwide.
drop in dialysis transport costs
Case studi
esCase
studies
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Strict control, monitoring and regular updating of transport arrangements
• Regular patient assessment by physiotherapists
• Regular meetings with volunteer drivers and the ambulance service
Vote for Southend
• Established cost savings
• Improvement in quality
• Transferable process• “Beacon of best
practice”
Vote for Southend
• Sustained effect on quality and cost
• Improvement on good practice
Southend Hospital Ambulance journeys for dialysis patients
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10
Vote for Southend
• Possible large scale national savings
• £25,500,000+
• We will talk about it again.