samsung advanced institute of technology dfss & triz hyo june kim...

22
AMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim [email protected] r Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal Final Result Contradiction Resource Introduction of TRIZ 1. History of TRIZ 2. Contradiction 3. Su-Field Analysis 4. ARIZ 5. Technology Evolution 6. Trimming 7. Case Study 8. Knowledgist ver. 2.5

Upload: roxanne-cole

Post on 05-Jan-2016

292 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Introduction of TRIZ1. History of TRIZ2. Contradiction3. Su-Field Analysis4. ARIZ5. Technology Evolution6. Trimming 7. Case Study8. Knowledgist ver. 2.5

Page 2: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

History of TRIZ

Page 3: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

History of TRIZ

• 1926 15 October • 1940 First Invention (13-year-old) • 1946 Military serves in Patent department• 1946 Start of TRIZ development (20yr)• 1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors competition (23yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest

• 1956 Freedom, first publication in journal• 1958 Journalist and Science Fiction• 1961 First book about TRIZ• 1971 Lecture at University in Baku• 1974 Publication Abroad (Japan) • 1981 More than 300 school in USSR• TRIZCON held & AI established in USA

Page 4: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960, Altshuller researched “Contradiction”

Problem Solutionscalled “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)

OvercomingContradiction

Breakthrough

The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead to an invention. An Invention overcomes the contradiction.

Page 5: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”

Problem Solutionscalled “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)

Removal ofContradiction

Breakthrough

Page 6: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”

Problem Solutions called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)

Removal ofContradiction

Breakthrough

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

Two Kinds ofContradiction

TechnicalContradiction

PhysicalContradiction

40 Principles

Separation Principles

Page 7: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”

Two Kinds ofContradiction

TechnicalContradiction

PhysicalContradiction

Airplane : Speed , Weight .

Airplane : Landing Wheels must Exist, must not Exist.

(by the powerful engine) (by the larger weight of engine)

(for landing on earth) (for an air resistance at flying)

Chemical : Speed , Quality . (by temperature increase) (undesired reaction also starts)reaction

(Generally, as soon as an engineer solve one problem, another unexpected harmful results happen)

(Generally, by one reason, an engineer must choose an action. But simultaneously an engineer must choose count-action by another reason )

Bicycle : Chain must be Rigid and Flexible.

(to transfer big force) (for circular movement)

Page 8: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

PhysicalContradiction

Separation Principles

1. Separation in TIME2. Separation in SPACE3. Separation in SCALE....

Page 9: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”

PhysicalContradiction

Separation Principles

1. Separation in TIME2. Separation in SPACE3. Separation in SCALE....

Page 10: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

• 1946 ~ 1960, “Contradiction”

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction

TechnicalContradiction 40 Principles

1 Segmentation2 Separation…

35 Parameter change36 Phase transitions…

40 Composite materials

divide an object into independent partsmake an object easy to disassembleincrease the degree of fragmentation (or segmentation) of an object

separate an 'interfering' part (or property) from an object, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of an object

change an object`s physical state (e.g. to a gas, liquid, or solid),change the concentration or consistency,change the degree of flexibility,change the temperature.

use phenomena occurring during phase transitions (e.g. volume changes, loss or absorption of heat, etc.).

change from uniform to composite (multiple) materials

Page 11: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

Is there any method to use 40 principles with easy ?

Altshuller made standard vocabulary at engineering field as39 Engineering Parameters.

Page 12: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Contradiction

Recommended principles by Altshuller ; usually 3 or 4 principles among 40 principles

Page 13: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S1 and S2.

[ex : two parts of system the system itself and its product the system and its environment]

These substances interact or communicate through a field, F.

[ex : Mechanical Acoustic Thermal Chemical Electric Magnetic etc]

The relationship between the field and the two substances can be expressed in a Su-Field triangle.

This triangle diagram may be thought of the technological system.It is of course a very simple, abstract model.More detailed models can be made by adding more nodes, linking triangles together, etc.

Su-Field Analysis

• 1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource”

Page 14: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols for the connections between nodes.

Su-Field Analysis

• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource

If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents needs improvement ie, an inventive problem.

The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram, which would be a modification of the original diagram.

Page 15: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

Su-Field Analysis

• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource

76 Standard SolutionsInitial Problem Situation is

described as graphic method

The recommended solution by Altshuller for each specific situation is also described as graphic method

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents

Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents

described as graphic method called Su-Field Diagram

Page 16: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

ARIZ

• 1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving ProcessAttention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.

ARIZ Education at SAMSUNG by TRIZ Master Nikolai Khomenko

Page 17: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

ARIZ

• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process

Step 1. Analyzing the Problem

1.1. formulate the mini-problem1.2. define the conflicting elements1.3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction1.4. select a graphic model for further analysis1.5. intensify the conflict1.6. describe the problem model1.7. apply the inventive standards

Step 2. Analyzing the Problem Model2.1. define the operational zone (oz)2.2. define the operational time (ot)2.3. define the substance-field resources (sfr)

Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.

Page 18: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

ARIZ

• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process

Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (PhC)3.1. formulate IFR-13.2. intensify definition of IFR-13.3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level3.4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level3.5. formulate IFR-23.6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction

Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR)4.1. simulation with little creatures4.2. to take a"step back" from IFR4.3. using combination of substance resources4.4. using "void"4.5. using derived resources4.6. using an electrical field4.7. using a field and field-sensitive substance

Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.

Page 19: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

ARIZ

• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process

Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base5.1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems5.2. applying the problem-analogous5.3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions5.4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena

Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem6.1. transition to the technical solution6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems6.3. changing the problem6.4. reformulation of mini-problem

Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.

Page 20: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

ARIZ

• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process

Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction7.1 checking the concept of solution7.2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept7.3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds7.4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept

Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution8.1. estimate of changes for super-system8.2. find new application for obtained solution8.3. apply solution concept for other problems

Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process9.1. compare proposed process and real9.2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ

Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.

Page 21: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

TechnologyEvolution

Page 22: SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of Technology DFSS & TRIZ Hyo June Kim hjkim@sait.samsung.co.khjkim@sait.samsung.co.kr Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Ideal

SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ

Hyo June [email protected]

Theory of Inventive Problem Solving

Ideal Final ResultContradiction

Resource

1. History of TRIZ2. Contradiction3. Su-Field Analysis4. ARIZ5. Technology Evolution6. Trimming 7. Case Study8. Knowledgist ver. 2.5

These three part is done separated material.