salt tolerance of some oats (avena sativa l.) varieties at germination and seedling stage
TRANSCRIPT
J. Agronomy & Crop Science, 156, 123—127 (1986)© 1986 Paul Parey Scientific Publishers, Berlin and HamburgISSN 0044-2151
Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi~284003, India
Salt Tolerance of Some Oats {Avena sativa L.) Varietiesat Germination and Seedling Stage
O. p. S. VERMA and R. B. R. YADAVA
Authors' address: O. P. S. VERMA and Dr. R. B. R. YADAVA, Division of Plant Improvement,Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Pin-284003, India
With 3 tables
Received May 21, 1985; accepted July 1, 1985
Abstract
Soil salinity is the serious problem of the arid and semi-arid tracts of the world. It causes greatlosses to agriculture by lowering the yields of various crops. However, such soil may be utilizedeither after reclaimation or by growing tolerant plant species. The degree of salt tolerance variesnot only with plant species but the different varieties of the same species show variation in salttolerance. Germination and seedling stages have a bearing on plant development at later stages ofgrowth and ultimately crop yield. Therefore, in the present investigation, twelve varieties ofoats viz., Colabagh, Kent,JHO-801,JHO-802,JHO-810,JHO-815,JHO-816, S-3021, S-2688,Chauripatti, UPO-201 and Sierra were tested for their relative salt tolerance to increasing levelsof salinity in those combination of salts which nearly exist in the natural salt affected soils. Seedswere sown in petri dishes and were exposed to five salinity (40, 80, 120, 160 and 200 me/L. ofsalts) levels. The germination percentage, root and shoot length and dry weight of the seedlingsdecreased with increase in salinity. In general, varieties JHO-815, JHO-802, JHO-816 andUPO-201 were found to be more tolerant at germination and seedling stages.
Introduction
Seed germination and early seedling growth phases are considered critical for raising asuccessful crop as they indirectly determine the crop stand density and consequently theyield of resultant crop (GELMOND 1978). Generally plants are most sensitive to salinityduring germination or early seedling growth (CARTER 1975) due to increase in the osmoticpressure of the soil solution (BERNSTEIN 1961) or toxicity to the embryo on the seedling(RUDOLFS 1925, MEHTAand DESAI 1958). Oats {Avena sativa L.) is an important cereal cropgrown all over the world for fodder as well as grain. Information on salt tolerancebehaviour of oats is inadequate. Therefore, it was thought of worthwhile to study thedegree of salt tolerance of oats varieties at the germination and seedling stage.
Materials and Methods
Twelve varieties of oats {Colabagh, Kent, JHO-801, JHO-802, JHO-810, JHO-815, JHO-816, S-3021, S-2688, Chauripatti, UPO-201 and Sierra) were selected for this study. The salt
U.S. Copyright Clearance Center Code Statement: 0044-2151/86/5602-0123$02.50/0
124 VERMA and YADAVA
solutions having the concentrations of 0, 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200 m.e./l were prepared indistilled water by dissolving NaCl, CaCl2 and Na2SO4 in the ratio of 7 : 2 : 1. Distilled waterwas used as control. The experiment was conducted in laboratory at room temperature in petridishes. Twenty healthy seeds of each variety were sown in each petri dish (11 cm) lined withfilter paper and having 4 ml solution of each salt concentration along with control in threereplicates. The germination percentage was recorded after every 24 hours till the 10th day of thesowing. Data on root and shoot length and dry weight of seedlings from each replicate wererecorded on the last day of germination count. Salt tolerance of each variety was worked out onthe basis of critical diff^erence.
Results and Discussion
The germination percentage decreased from 86.94 to 72.91 per cent with increasingsalinity levels upto 200 m.e./l (Table 1). However salt concentration of 40 m.e./l did notaffect the germination percentage adversely over control treatment. Salinity levels of 80 and120 m.e./l were statically at par between themselves, but caused significant reduction ingermination as compared to low salinity level. Increase in the salinity to 180 and 200 m.e./llowered the germination percentage significantly. The germination percentage above 90per cent was recorded in vzrieties JHO-816, UPO-201, Colahagh ^nd JHO-815 and thelowest being with variety S-2688. Though interaction between variety and salinity levelwas found to be non-significant but variety JHO-816 continued to record highestgermination percentage at all the levels of salinity. Similar results were reported earlier fordifferent crops (BERNSTEIN and HAYWARD 1968, WAHAB et al. 1967, BHUMBLA and SINGH
1965, ABICHANDANI and BHATT 1965, MALIWAL and PALIWAL 1967, SARIN and NARAYANAN
1968).In general there was significant reduction in root and shoot length with each increment
of salinity levels from 0 to 200 m.e./l, with the result that seedlings recorded a root andshoot length of only 4.69 and 6.59 cm respectively at highest level of salinity (Table 2).Variety JHO-802 produced significantly longer root and shoot as compared to otherstrains. However, varieties JHO-816 and JHO-815 also resulted in longer roots and
Table 1 Percentage of germination of the oats varieties at different levels of salinity
Varieties
ColabaghKent
J HO-801JHO-802JHO-810JHO-815JHO-816
S-3021
S-2688Chouripotti
UPO - 201
Sierra
Mean
100.00
81 66
95,0088,33
93 3398,33
10000
900048,338166
)00 00
71,66
8694
0
(90.00)(65 00)(79.55)
(70,50)(75.24)(8569)
(90 00)
(74 08)(4404)
(65,00)(90.00)(57.86)
40
100,00
76,66
933385.00
88 3398 33
10000
866646,668166
100,0071.66
8569
(90,00)(61,14)
(78,09)
(67 40)(70.11)(85 69)
(90,00)
(68,66)
(40.08)(64,69)
(90.00)
(57.86)
Salt concentration
80
95,00
66,66
88,3383.338166
98 33100.00
85.00450076,3396,66
68,33
82,21
(7955)(5483)
(7069)(6614)(6469)(8569)
(90 00)
(67 40)(42 12)(62,40)
(81,38)(55 82)
1
95.0065.00
8500
83.3381,6695.00
9666
816643.3373.3395,006666
80.13
( m e . / I )
20
(79,55)
(53.86)
(67,40)
(6595)(64.69)(79.55)
(8138)
(64.69)(41,16)(59,00)
(78,08)(54,08)
160
91,6665,0083.33
80.0080.008833
96,66
76,6636 6666,66
95.00
63,33
76,94
(73 40)(53,81)
(65.61)
(60,21)(63.54)(70.11)
(83.85)
(6114)(37 25)(54,75)(79,55)
(50,82)
200
86,3356.66
81,6675,00750088.33
9666
70,0031,6661,669333
5666
72,91
(70,11 )(48.86)
(64,69)(60,07)(60.07)(70.50)
(8385)
(56 99)(34.18)(51,75)(78,09)(48.80)
Mean
949968,6087 77
824983,3394.44
98,33
8166419473.8896.66
66,38
C D . at 5% levelVariety 3.42Salinity 2.41Variety X Salinity —• Figures in parenthesis are angular transformed values of germination percentage.
Salt Tolerance of Some Oats Varieties at Germination and Seedling Stage 125
shoots. Different oat varieties interacted significantly with salinity levels with regard tolength of root and shoot. A critical perusal of data reveal that the adverse effect of saltconcentrations became more pronounced beyond salinity level of 120 m.e./l. Therefore, itappears that the soluble salts at higher salinity levels have become sufficient to suppressgrowth as suggested by NIEMAN(1962).
Table 2 Average root and shoot length (an) of the seedlings of oats varieties at different levelsof salinity
Varieties
Colabogh
Kent
JHO-801
JHO - 802
JHO-810JHO-815
JHO-816
S-3021
S-2688Chauripatti
UPO - 201
Sierra
Mean
VarietySalinityVariety X
0
Root
13.86
11 33
16.20
15.36
12.1616.26
13.86
7.60
876
15.15
1386
15.60
13.33
Salinity
Shoot
14.10
12.03
1266
17.50
12.9013.76
16.53
13.06
8.43
16.03
1306
15.40
1378
40
Root
14.00
9 23
13.70
16.10
14.301290
12.33
8.43
573
11.86
10 23
9.86
11.55
Shoot
13 20
10.53
13 16
16.76
12.3014.80
1653
12.50
7.36
13 66
12.73
11.46
1291
CD. :Root0.640.461.60
Root
12.66
8.63
11 23
1293
9.3010.53
1176
8.10
426
1023
9.23
700
9.65
it 5°/
Salt concentration (m
80
Shoot
11.16
9.33
11 16
15.80
10.0014.23
1593
1123
5.06
12.63
11.73
n.30
1163
'o levelShoot0.390.270.96
Root
9.60
5.83
803
11.26
8.469.56
11.03
5.46
2.86
8.26
7.30
5.40
7.75
120
Shoot
670
6.73
663
15.80
6.7312.96
1573
6.80
470
11.26
10.20
9.03
9.43
e./l
Root
5.96
2.96
3.93
9.90
476
7.83
8.10
276
2.43
6.90
7.03
353
5.50
)
160
Shoot
3.40
323
343
14.03
4.1310.50
12.03
4.90
2.96
1056
9.36
8.90
7.28
Root
4.70
2.80
3 20
7.86
3.667.03
7.53
2.53
2.03
633573
2.93
4.69
200
Shoot
216
2.70
3.10
13.43
3.40
10.30
11.66
3.70
2.70
9.40
8.33
7.73
659
Mean
Root
10.13
6.79
9.38
12.23
8.7710.68
10.76
5.81
434
979
8.89
7.38
Shoot
8.45
7.42
835
15.55
8.2412.71
14.73
8.69
5.20
12.25
10.98
10.63
Table 3 Average dry weight of the 10 days seedlings (mg/5 seedlings) of oats varieties atdifferent levels of salinity
varieties
Colabagh
Kent
JHO - 801
JHO - 802
JHO-810
JHO-815
JHO-816
S-3021
S-2688
Chauripatti
UPO - 201
Sierra
Mean
VarietySalinityVariety X
0
4766
3166
5066
59.00
50.33
6500
60 33
31.33
30 33
53.00
47 66
49.66
48.05
Salinity
40
45.66
26.33
46.00
59.00
44.66
63.66
56.00
3133
29.33
50.66
46 66
39 33
44.88
c
Salt concentration
80
45.33
26.33
44.33
56.00
39.00
62.33
54.66
2900
20.66
4333
46.66
39.33
42.24
.D. a t5%2.010.724.92
(m.e . / l )
120
36.66
24.33
34.66
55.33
36.00
5666
4933
2200
2000
42 33
43.00
32.33
37.71
160
2433
17.33
2333
4666
25.00
4633
4666
1566
9.00
40.33
3433
30 33
29.94
200
14.66
1100
19.66
45.66
22.00
4400
43.33
13.33
9.00
38.66
33 33
30.66
27 10
r*lcrUI 1
357122.83
3644
53.60
36.16
56 33
5171
23.77
1972
4471
41 94
36 94
126 VERMA and YADAVA
Like root and shoot length, dry weight of seedlings also decreased signficantly with theincreasing levels of salinity, as the dry weight of seedlings decreased from 48.05 mg undercontrol treatment to 27.10 mg under highest level of salinity (Table 3). However, the effectwas more pronounced beyond salinity level of 120 m.e./l. Variety JHO-815 recordedsignificantly highest dry weight as compared to other varieties. Varieties JHO-802 andJHO-816 were also found to give higher seedling dry weight at different levels of salinity.Variety S-2688 was found to accumulate lowest dry weight (19.72 mg). The significantinteraction between varieties into salinity levels indicate that varieties Colabagh, JHO-801,JHO-815, JHO-816, S-3021 showed the susceptibility to a salinity level of beyond 80 m.e./1. This effect was pronounced at low level of salinity in varieties Kent, JHO-810 and Sierra.On the other hand varieties JHO-802 and UPO-201 possessed the ability of tolerating asalinity level of 120 m.e./l without significant reduction in the dry weight of seedlings. Acritical perusal of data reveal that adverse of salinity was more pronounced on the seedlinggrowth rather that on germination. This.may perhaps be due to accumulation of highamounts of salts causing toxicity (AYERS and HAYWARD 1948, OTA and YASUE 1957, WAHAB
1961). The y^rietits JHO-815, JHO-802, JHO-816 and UPO-201 proved to be relativelymore salt tolerant over other varieties indicating distinct variability in the varieties for salttolerance.
Acknowledgement
Thanks are due to Director, Head, Division of Plant Improvement and Dr. R. N. CHOUBEY,Scientist S-2 (Plant Breeding) for providing facilities, encouragement and seed materialsrespectively.
Zusammenfassung
Salztoleranz einiger Hafersorten {Avena sativa L.)zum Zeitpunkt der Keimung und des Jugendwachstums
Die Salztoleranz von 12 Hafersorten {Avena sativa L.) wurde bei Versalzungsstufen von0, 40, 80, 120, 160 und 200 m.e./l in Petrischalen bei Raumtemperatur im Laboratoriumuntersucht. Die Keimungsprozente, Wurzel- und Sprofilangen sowie Trockengewichte derKeimpflanzen nahmen mit Anstieg der Versalzung ab. Grundsatzlich erwiesen sich dieSorten JHO-815, JHO-802, JHO-816 und UPO-201 salztoleranter als die anderen.
References
ABICHANDANI, C . T. , and P. N. BATT, 1965: Salt tolerance at germination of bajra {Pennisetumtyphoides) and jowar {Sorghum vulgare) varieties. Ann. Arid Zone 4, 36—46.
AYERS, A. D . , and H. E. HAYWARD, 1948: A method for measuring the effect of soil salinity ongermination with observation on several crop plants. Amer. Proc. Soil Sci. 13, 224—226.
BERNSTEIN, L., 1961: Osmotic adjustment of plants to saline media. I. Steady state. Am. J. Bot.48, 909—918.
, and H. E. HAYWARD, 1968: Physiology of salt tolerance. A Rev. PI. Physiol. 9, 25—46.BHUMBLA, D . R. , and N. T. SINGH, 1965: Effect of salts on seed germination. Sci. Cult. 31,
96—97.CARTER, D . L., 1975: Problems of salinity in Agriculture. In: A. PoLGAKOFF MAYBER and J.
GALE (Eds.), Plants in saline environments. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 7—24.GELMOND, H . , 1978: Problems in crop seed germination. In: U. S. GuPTA (Ed.), Crop
Physiology. Oxford and IBH Pubhshing Co., New Delhi, pp. 1—78.MALIWAL, G . L., and K. V. PALIWAL, 1967: Salt tolerance studies on some varieties of wheat and
barley at germination stage. Indian J. PI. Physiol. 10, 26—35.
Salt Tolerance of Some Oats Varieties at Germination and Seedling Stage 127
MEHTA, B . V., and R. S. DESAI, 1958: Effect of soil salinity on germination of some seeds. J. SoilWat. Conserv. India 7, 101—115.
NiEMAN, R. H., 1962: Some effects of sodium chloride on growth photosynthesis andrespiration of twelve crop plants. Bot. Gaz. 123, 279—285.
OTA, K., and T. YASUE, 1957: Studies on salt injury to crops. XL The difference of saltresistance in young wheat varieties. Res. Bull. 8, Fac. Agric. Gifu Univ., pp. U—22.
RUDOLFS, W . , 1925: Influence of water and salt solution upon absorption and germination ofseeds. Soil Sci. 20, 15—37.
SARIN, M . N . , and A. NARAYANAN, 1968: Effect of soil salinity and growth-regulators ongermination and seedling metabolism of wheat. Physiologia PL 21, 1201—1209.
WAHAB, A. , 1961: Salt tolerance of various varieties of agricultural crops at germination stage:Salinity problems in arid zone. Proc. of Teheran Symposium UNESCO, pp. 185.