s olidarity and p oliteness drs. liliek soepriatmadji, m.pd

9
SOLIDARITY AND POLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.

Upload: felix-morrison

Post on 23-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

SOLIDARITY AND POLITENESSDrs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.

Page 2: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

ADJUSTING WORDS TO FIT OCCASION Maintaining face

Respect Self-esteem Avoid open disagreement, personal topics

Avoid Face Threatening Acts (FTA's) Use politeness strategies:

1. DO FTA: 1. Bald On Record

no effort to minimize threats to the "face“ 2a. Positive Politeness

in some way imposing/forcing 2b. Negative Politeness

confirm that the relationship is friendly 3. Off-Record-indirect strategy

no direct imposition/force 2. DON’T DO FTA

Page 3: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

FTA face-threatening act

negative face (the act impeding the freedom of actions)

positive face (the wish that one’s wants be desired by others)

language function are resources of FTA Requests potentially threaten one’s face because they

may restrict the freedom to act according to one’s will Refusals may threaten one’s positive face because he

may be disfavoured

Page 4: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

STRATEGIES FOLLOWING AN FTA

1. Without redressive action: direct refusals, such as “I refuse”. 2. On record (with redressive action): explicit refusal (+) with or without politeness

strategy (-). 3. Off record: no explicit refusal but with a hint indicating speaker’s refusal. 4. Don’t do the FTA: giving up refusing.

Page 5: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

RESPECT REPRESENTATION Honorific (polite speech) Softening devices:

Hedges Question Indirect expression Address term Soft volume Low pitch Avoid slangs and taboo/dirty words

Page 6: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

DIRECTNESS AND INDIRECTNESS The use of vocative The use of direct expression, as in:

Offer: Can I take you some drink, please?

Imperative: Do you mind if you open the door? I need to be alone.

Page 7: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

FACTORS AFFECTING DIRECTNESS Age: the old tend to be more indirect than the young. Sex: females prefer indirect expression. Residence: the rural population tends to use more indirectness than the

urban. Mood: while angry, people tend to use more directness. Occupation: those who study social sciences tend to use more indirectness

than those who study natural sciences. Personality: the extroverted tend to use more directness than the

introverted. Topic: while referring to a sensitive topic, a taboo, people usually opt for

indirectness (euphemism). Place: when at home, people tend to use more directness than when they

are elsewhere. Communicative environment/setting: when in an informal climate, people

tend to express themselves in a direct way. Social distance: those who have closer relations tend to talk in a more

direct way. Time pressure: when in a hurry, people are likely to use direct expressions. Position: when in a superior position, people tend to use more directness to

their inferiors.

Page 8: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

HARMONIOUS INTERACTION Goffman (1967): politeness as appreciation through

avoidance or presentation of rituals Leech (1983): politeness as forms of behaviour aimed at

creating and maintaining harmonious interaction Politeness Principle (Leech):

Tact maxim: Minimize cost to other. Maximize benefit to other. Generosity maxim: Minimize benefit to self. Maximize cost to

self. Approbation maxim: Minimize dispraise of other. Maximize

dispraise of self. Modesty maxim: Minimize praise of self. Maximize praise of

other. Agreement maxim: Minimize disagreement between self and

other. Maximize agreement between self and other. Sympathy maxim: Minimize antipathy between self and

other. Maximize sympathy between self and other.

Page 9: S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd

Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd. © 2008

FACTORS DETERMINING POLITENESS BEHAVIOURS Leech, 1983; Brown and Levinson, 1987:

Social distance (intimate, acquaintance, stranger) Social status (low, high, equal) Gender (same gender, opposite gender)