roy lichtenstein and the comic strip

Roy Lichtenstein and the Comic StripAuthor(s): Albert BoimeSource: Art Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Winter, 1968-1969), pp. 155-159Published by: College Art AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/775210 .

Accessed: 14/06/2014 20:09

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

College Art Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Art Journal.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 185.44.77.82 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:09:15 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=caa

http://www.jstor.org/stable/775210?origin=JSTOR-pdf

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp


Albert Boime

Roy Lichtenstein and the Comic Strip'

The original shock of Lichtenstein's paintings of en- larged details from comic strips has by now faded, and we

may perhaps profit by examining more closely their formal characteristics. The controversy initially provoked by these themes-especially in connection with such aesthetic criteria as "transformation" and "legitimacy"-consistent- ly neglected the comic strip from the standpoint of its own

expressive features.2 If, as many critics believe, Lichten- stein's paintings have quality and significance beyond the shock of innovation, we might inquire what the artist dis- covered in comic strips and how he successfully exploited them for easel painting, especially the manner in which Lichtenstein related pictorial structure to subject matter.

The comic strip shares many features in common with its early forerunners like medieval blockbooks and

manuscripts; they are all basically self-contained pictorial units combining both text and illustration on a single leaf or page. However, what distinguishes the type of pictorial narrative known as a "comic strip" from the woodcut and

manuscript page (sometimes also employing a sequence of

panels) is the particular presentation of written narrative in connection with the illustration. Specifically, it is the "balloon" used as a vehicle for dialogue that distinguishes the comic strip from its forerunners. In earlier illustrations, text and dialogue were generally enclosed in plaques, banners or scrolls bearing little relation to individual characters, or they appeared below the illustrations in the form of legends.3 As in the Biblia Pauperum or Brandt's Ship of Fools, each picture was accompanied by a legend expressing a moral or didactic theme. This prac- tice was later adopted by humorous illustrators in the form of "he-she" cartoons, and presently survives in the "gag" cartoons of popular periodicals. Although the balloon device had been used in political cartoons as early as the eighteenth century, it was not considered fashion- able for sophisticated illustration. George Cruikshank, in the 1820s, was perhaps the first to employ systematically the balloon in book illustration.4 But he stands as an iso- lated example in this respect, and apparently had few successors until the end of the century.

Before the balloon could be adopted by cartoonists the comic strip itself had to be developed for mass news- paper use. A major innovation in this development oc- curred in the 1840s, when the Swiss artist, Rudolphe

The author is an assistant professor at the New York State University, Stony Brook, Long Island, where he teaches courses in nineteenth and twentieth century art. His special field of interest is in academic painting of the nineteenth century,. I

Toepffer, employed a sequential narrative based on a series of panels.5 Later, in this country, F. M. Haworth fur- thered this development by using the panels in a cumula- tive sequence, leading up to a dramatic climax.6 By the last decade of the nineteenth century the distinctive com-

'This study investigates the problem of transformation in Lichtenstein's art within the framework of formal analysis exclusive of technical inventions. The effect of enlargement, the "tightening" of the original comic drawing and the simulated Ben Day process are features that have already been treated effectively in other con- texts. The fundamental studies are Robert Rosenblum, "Roy Lichtenstein and the Realist Revolt," Metro 8, March 1963, pp. 38 if.; Lawrence Alloway, "Roy Lichten- stein," Studio International, vol. 175, January 1968, pp. 25 if. Other articles of note are John Coplans, "An In- terview with Roy Lichtenstein," Artforum, vol. II, no. 4, October 1963, p. 31; Gene R. Swenson, "What is Pop Art?," Art News, vol. 62, November 1963, pp. 25, 62-63; Bruno Alfieri, "The Arts Condition: 'Pop' means 'Not Popular'," Metro 9, April 1965, pp. 5 if.; Ellen H. John- son, "The Image Duplicators-Lichtenstein, Rauschen- berg and Warhol," Canadian Art, vol. 23, January 1966, pp. 12 if.; Bruce Glaser, "Oldenburg, Lichtenstein, War- hol: A Discussion," Artforum, vol. IV, no. 6, February 1966, pp. 20 if.; Richard Hamilton, "Roy Lichtenstein," Studio International, op. cit., pp. 20 ff. 2 See Erle Loran, "Pop artists or copy cats?," Art News, vol. 62, September 1963, pp. 48 ff. 'However, there are exceptions in medieval art where text is made to emanate from individual figures. See E. Mdle, Religious Art from the Twelfth to the Eigh- teenth Century, New York, 1959, Pl. 32; A. Grabar and C. Nordenfalk, Early Medieval Painting, Lausanne, 1957, p. 167. I am grateful to my colleague, Prof. Jacques Guil- main, for these examples. 'Both Gillray and Rowlandson occasionally used balloons in their political and social satires, but generally their dialogue vehicles retained the vestigial character of banners and scrolls. The balloon contours themselves were often no more than a wispy thread-as if the artists wished to make them as unobtrusive as possible. 5E. H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion, N.Y., 1960, pp. 336 f. 6 In a sense, the work of Haworth was foreshadowed by Wilhelm Busch, who employed the sequential form in

tiny vignettes. But Haworth separated the individual

panels and elaborated his themes in the modern format. See W. Hofmann, Caricature from Leonardo to Picasso, New York, 1957, p. 121.

155 Boime: Roy Lichtenstein and the Comic Strip



;1 ::I-::::i--:::::?:~:::"i:;:i~:::;::-'."l :----?;? ?:-?-;;?;-;;???;;?-?::;-???? .::::::::::::::::::::::l:i.:i:i:i:l:I:1: ::i-:::::::::;:: iil':ljiii?iil':iiiiill ii:l:'l:l:l:l:-i_: :::jiEj;iiiiiili.i:ililii:-iiiii:i:il jijiiii

- ii8ci'iiiiiii ::::;-:-::::;,: :::: :~~~ iiiii'~iiiii8iiiiiiiiii'iiii'i . ..:,:.:_ irsiiiii;i:: iiiii iiaiiiliiiiiiiti:ililiiililiiiiiiirili ~ li~_ii

:::::::r::::::::::::::-9:? gililiiiiiiilllilililiiil ~::::::::i:,::::: i~5k~jliili~i ~~-bT; I~i~a~a~ ~: Xi~i~s~~iii

iiiii iiiii iiii a iii iiili!iiiiiiw.iiii ~iaiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiii :: ig~--i-~ illl a:::i::: ::::::::_::::: $ii ?

"':"':"" :iiii:8iiiiii I:i ~ii~lilil!: '::i:iiiiiIiiii.iiiiiia ?i''''~':'.~ ':':' '''' ~i:!~ii.iiiiii:i?i.i.ili:iiii~

""'"'.'" :::"

~% irii:ji~iiil

Fig. 1. Roy Lichtenstein. I Can See the Whole Room . . . and There's Nobody In

it! 1961. Oil on Canvas. Collection Mr. and Mrs. Burton Tremaine, New York.

ponents of the modern comic strip were present except for the balloon-still rejected in favor of the legend device. James Swinnerton, an American pioneer of the comic strip, once stated that at that time the balloon was considered archaic, belonging to a style buried with

Cruikshank.7 But in 1896 the written word moved back into the drawing with the advent of Richard Outcault's Yellow Kid. This strip was indirectly responsible for the revival of the balloon device; for the Yellow Kid's night- shirt, the focal point of the strip, carried written messages.

'Cited in W. C. Gaines, ""Narrative Illustration," Print, Summer 1942, p. 32. 'C. Waugh, The Comics, New York, 1947, p. 11.

9Curiously, Hogarth's treatise illustrates a comparison between two "kinds" of fingers bearing a remarkable

afinity with the fingers in the Roper panel and Lichten- stein picture. Hogarth described the first as "a straight coarse finger," and the other as possessing the qualities of "the taper dimpled one of a fine lady." See William Hogarth, The Analysis of Beauty, London, 1753, p. 65 and Pl. II, figs. 82-83. To my mind there is a striking analogy between Lichtenstein's transformation and the

Hogarthian concern for "grace"-as if Lichtenstein ap- plied "the line of beauty" to the comic panel. Significant, too, is the fact that Hogarth and Lichtenstein are related to each other and to the tradition they bracket tending to elevate comic imagery to the status of "high" art. See E. H. Gombrich, "Imagery and Art in the Romantic Period," Burlington Magazine, vol. 91, June 1949, pp. 152 ff.

TROOPER/--- I CAN Si EE THE WOEROOM! .... AN#

TE.RE *$..NOBOD INIT"

Fig. 2. Enlargement of a panel from William Overgard's comic strip, Steve Roper.

Then in 1897, Rudolph Dirks, the creator of the Katzen- jammer Kids for the New York Journal, began to experi- ment with balloon lines and found that his visual humor was enhanced by this device." Subsequently, with the de- mand for greater variety the balloon became a permanent addition to all comics.

The use of the balloon in comic strips is crucial to their effectiveness as a communicating medium. This can be seen by comparing present-day comics with the forerunners which made use of the legend below the illustration. In the latter, where a number of characters are present the identity of the speakers is confused and the action circumscribed. The advantage of the balloon lies in its ability to permit action to unfold clearly while directly pointing to each speaking character. It thus distinguishes individuals in any situation, conveys dialogue from figures off-stage and even gives utterance to inanimate ob- jects. And through the clever use of what is known as a "thought" balloon the reader is permitted access to an otherwise hidden level of a character's consciousness. As a result of these advantages, the balloon, once a disquieting device for the cartoonist, is now an intricate part of our visual vocabulary. It is employed to such an extent in comics, advertising and other mass media that it is no lon- ger read merely as a conventional symbol for speech but is identified as speech itself. The present success of the comic strip was in large measure dependent on the balloon device.

In the work of Lichtenstein based on comic strips the most significant element in his compositional structure is the balloon. The appearance of this feature in every case almost indicates its importance in the mind of the artist as an integral part of the original panel. It is noteworthy also, that the titles of the pictures are in- variably derived from the balloon dialogue. For Lichten- stein the effectiveness of the painting requires the pres- ence of the balloon. For example, the adaptation of the Steve Roper panel I Can See the Whole Room and

ART JOURNAL XXVIII 2 156



.:::--:::,EN6 iA :::EM ENT- . iiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliii •

li~i~i~iil

!!

Siiiiiiiii ili ::::: ii~ i :irii!i iiiiii ili iI lii:si i iii" :- i i~ii i~ii~. i'

............... JJ iiiiiiii ii iiiii i i iiiiiii.i ii.iii.i...iiii.i.: .......... iiiiiiiliiiil :L Lif~ ii:~il _a::R:isiiiiiiiiiliiaiiii

........... . . . . . . . . .........l

................ ? ... ..... .....................................

.............................. .................

............... - ..........

i:iiii6siiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i'i'•i~'.~i~~~: Si 'i-iii:ilili: i iliiiiiiiiiiii•

................................

iiiiiiii'i:iiil'?iii ii iiiiiiiii-i-i~iiii-iii

........................................... ....... ... . ..............

MEN,.............. ~ ~ i~

Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ii • N • !iiiil:i:i:.lliiiiiiiiiji

Fig. 3. Roy Lichtenstein, The Engagement Ring. 1961. Oil on Canvas. Courtesy of the

Leo Castelli Gallery, New York.

_iii~iiiiiii ~ --'--lii-l-i-Li--- -. --- - ----- -- -:

p:::::p::::: ii~i~iiiiRl M ~ ... . ......

ii:i- -i

... ~"''''''''''''.................i~' . .. .. ... ... ...

Fig. 5. Roy Lichtenstein. Hopeless. 1963. Magna on Canvas. Courtesy of the Leo

Castelli Gallery, New York.

There's Nobody In It! employs the balloon as a unifying element in the composition. (figs. 1 and 2). It extends the breadth of the painting, providing a balance wholly lacking in the original panel. Moreover, the contours of Lichtenstein's balloon form a series of diverging curves which recur throughout the work, and give it a rhythm- ical unity. This feature is repeated in the overlapping peephole cover, in the speaker's mouth and in the joints

.. .. .. . ~iE:I??i?:: ???:?1~~~:~ ::

------NOT A N:::::: -MV4Te~i'

r?.

I$ IT ? iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

iliiii... .................. ~iiiiiiiiii"~S~. ...........ii ........................:::::::: ~r~ l~;~i~_iiiiiiiii l~iiiiiii.......... ............ii~'i j

Fig. 4. Enlargement of a panel from Martin Branner's comic strip, Winnie Winkle.

::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::-:::::i:::-:::::::::i:-i:i: lililliliiiiii:lilililillll:l::ili9ilil :: ::-:::::: 'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisI nisrirr ... p-::il~p_:-:~::::::::::::: ?:::%:i:::l

'-";-~':-~::::: ""::-' *.:-' :'""IZ -I-- :-::::::~:::::::: I-:-i16_::':::x:,:,~::::::::x::::::s?::: iii?r iiiiii.iiiiiliiiriiiiii4rli\lilb 3BI:i:i jlj~x::l:::~::::~ ~ieililililiii::ii'iiiiiiili:i:i:iri:i: :::::-:-:-:-'-i:i:i:iii-::--:::--:-:-:,j i-i:ilii:li:i:i::::::::::::::::::::::: IiiiiiiiP:ilii~dir~8iiii~iii~ ,,~:-::aiiiiiliril:ii~~iiiii:iiirl Wii::iiiiiii ~iiiiii,:j Bli iii-i :::::":

::::?7j:;:::::::::::::~::::::::~.~~ijii~ jpWj~:I~_~ :,l:j,:,ii:iliiiii.ili:iiiiiiii:i:i:i: :::-::::::::: ::i:'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ?:::::-:-:-:~:'::::::::::::::::::i:iiii ;;i:;i:i:I:i:l::-r:i:I:i::?:?:?:::?::::: :~? ::::::-: :::-:::-:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :---:::i-::-::i:i:i:i:i:i:i-i-iiiii:iiii ~i;i;::iii:?~i,'~~:.:iii:~ i?iiiii,-iri:ii:i:iiiii~iilili:iiiil~r,:lil~r:lii:i-::i:iri-ilili-i:i:iiiii ~:::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

::-,:::i::~: i:r:::?i::;::::::: ::::::1:::::::,::::-:-:: :':i':'::'::I'::::: :.:.:.:.::'-:~:'::::::::::?: I-la;::::::`:::::.:::::1::::::::::j::::: ::;ji;::*.:::jj:::::y: :::i ::?:-:-::::i: :; :r?:l::::::: ::::::;: iiii:::::":$'iii;;I::;llg:;r:li,,i. i..;:::::::: i:::::::::::::::?:j:::::';::::::::iL:i: ::::::::i:ii:i:?:::::::-i:iki;?i'D)X:i ir'B~ii.liiii,,,1 :::::1~::1::::::;,?i:ii:'''''~i''j'i'::,i:,:`?: '::'::::-:- :::::::::j,:::::i'-:'il;':0,j:I- ::-::'::'::;~:':-::i.':::'jj .I:::::::::Y',-_? -:::::^:,::,:? .`:::j,::::::2:::: ::*~:::::::::~-;'i::::: '::::::::i':::`:::: li-li:-:it:-.:;ii ? ::::.:::i?::::i::1:ji:l:: li::::::,::?: :::;i--:: .:: ""'l'''"~:j~~iiiii~a;:i::jii '::i::i:i:i::::::::::::\::;ii:::::r: ?-:?;:;:::? :::8:i:li:?:i:j-:?:?::?::::i:::::s:;::;j r

::::::i:::i-:::??__:liXiii?L'I~:ii-lr ;: :::::::r::::?:::?::??:? :i:::::::j:i:'i:i':I'"i'''''"''~~ii-i~~ ?::-:-:::::?:l?:::ii::?::?::?:

i: :i ~;iislir~-iiiiii~:iiii9i!~:i~-i~ i:::::i~:i:::: ?:?:?:?j:::::'ii:::::.;:?:?:: :-:-:::::::^-':':::i:::lr::: "":' ::ii:::':::::j:.:.:.:.:

:i::i:::?::?::: ::::::i::j:::ll:::::::::j:::i::'::::

::r-.ii::::::::::ni-:j:::::: :-::::iii:::::::

:::::::::i::::::::::::::::

Fig. 6. Enlargement of an anonymous comic book panel.

of his finger.9 Perhaps it is most obvious in the parallel arcs found in the extreme right of the balloon and the outer edges of the peephole and its cover. There can be no doubt that these swooping curves, lacking in the

original panel, are fundamental to the artist's compositional intent.

In another work, Engagement Ring, based on a

panel from the Winnie Winkle series, the difference from the original is apparent and the balloon is entirely transformed (figs. 3 and 4). Lichtenstein has eliminated the right hand section of the panel and extended the width of the window to connect the two figures. The balloon is now larger in proportion to the compositional structure and overlaps both heads, linking them in an indissoluble bond. Significantly, the stem of the balloon is interwoven into the general design; it mirrors the con-

cavity of the wavy hair and is taken up by the undulat-

ing S-curves that frame the woman's face. This is not




- --- - --- --------- - -- - - - -------- ----- --------- iilii, 1:: ::: i:::::::IT 6A :-r

2WI COIID ..W.OO NO. 4iiii" ~

/U 1014AFii-":'~:s;::' :~~;ii ---~i~~is:iiii A C E !:: l1il:11;~~;iili~:~::":`:-;~-~::::::::::::::::

. . . . . . . . . .'::-l'~l~lil_

~:i~ B~`iii':''''':'::':'':':'22

::i-~lli~iiis :~i?~.:::,:.......... .......~i_~~ :i

A-m-~:l

iili:i~ii~~:::_~ l~li~i:::::i~:::ii~i ii "::In": Mo??::l,- ?i~i 'iiiilii~'i ,::i:::

NI,::::;:'B ;";

Fig. 7. Roy Lichtenstein. Brattata. 1962. Oil on Canvas. Courtesy of the Leo Castelli

Gallery, New York.

fortuitous. The artist has grasped an understanding of the balloon's flexibility for his art while at the same time

sustaining the comic allusion. In a later work, Hopeless, the most obvious change from the original panel is to be found in the location and shape of the balloon (figs. 5 and -6). As in the preceding work, Lichtenstein has eliminated all dead space from the panel and adjusted a floating balloon to overlap the close-up head. The

density of the composition in the painting is due to this

adjustment, and the result is a compactness lacking in the original panel. It may be noted that the increased volume of the balloon provides a counterbalance to the

large mass represented by the girl's head. In the Brattata the balloon is modified from the

original to correspond more closely to the shape of the

pilot's visor (figs. 7 and 8). As in the Engagement Ring the balloon stem is carefully brought into compositional play with regularly recurring features in the picture. Departing from the straight stem of the original panel Lichtenstein repeats his own crescent shape in the speed lines of the falling plane, in the highlights of the visor and around the knob on the control panel. Its arc

parallels the curve of the helmet and recurs in the contours of the pilot's profile. An even more significant change is Lichtenstein's formal emphasis of the cartoonist's visual "sound effect" of machine-gun fire (Brattata) not only in size and color but in the increased tilt which counter- balances the mass of the falling plane. A comparison with the original also reveals how Lichtenstein uses the bal-

PqATWAST6EI 1STAK--EC4$F/T MflE2AAF T 4A 17 7

T CA 0 COL- SHOOrAT ,

MORe 7C'O MAKE A CE.

: -: - -

•.. . .... :.•:.,.::,•

:~ . . ..

-


loon in his correction from two to four as the number of downed planes required "to make Ace." The balloon

quite effectively becomes the proper vehicle for authen- ticated fact.

Torpedo-Los! displays again the artist's awareness of the balloon as an essential factor in the comic allusion (figs. 9 and 10). Eliminating the ponderous balloons in the original panel, he adopted his own from a subsequent panel in the same sequence. With respect to the general masses of the composition the balloon's exclusion may not have been detrimental. But in this case the dialogue itself is ingeniously interwoven into the general design. The three alphabetic characters comprising the word "LOS" are clues to the composition's organic design. The "L" is mirrored in the angle formed by the captain's hand and the vertical contour of his head and in that of the periscope. The "O" is repeated in the tubing of the periscope handle and in smaller details throughout the work. The oblique "S" recurs in the highlight of the captain's hat just left of the balloon, in the contours of the hat itself, in the shadow that falls along the left side of the captain's face, in the lines around his nose and in the curvilinear tubing of the periscope. Thus the

dialogue enclosed within the balloon is visually ex-

ploited in the interests of compositional structure.

Perhaps the outstanding example of Lichtenstein's use of the balloon as a positive pictorial device is found in his presumed "self-portrait' '-the Image Duplicator (figs. 11 and 12). In the original panel the balloon was

ART JOURNAL XXVIII 2 158



Uj: ~: XA;

williiiF? ........... iiiii~~c~jli'~" .......iii .... . .. ..... I- ... . . ..II:i I~~itii ?.:ii~iiii~ aiiii :__~

Fig. 9. Roy Lichtenstein. Torpedo-Los! 1963. Magna on Canvas. Courtesy of the Leo Castelli Gallery, New York.

YUASK HT

WHAT 90 YOU KiVO

ABOUTFAl V /MAGE*( PICA TOP.,? ... ...

: :W4

om #

Mi * #*i#il i

#~k~:t-)` 4 ,, # ~U #.WW

w-Ag.i~gii

Fig. 11. Roy Lichtenstein. Image Duplicator. 1963. Magna on Canvas. Courtesy of the Leo Castelli Gallery, New York.

only partially visible and overlapped the frame lines of the left side. In the painting Lichtenstein carefully cen- tered it and closely correlated its shape with that of the face. The cloud-like configuration of the balloon is

PeRHAP6 IT IS W17H THE SAMa I7t#?P6FPO 'AtOTHER SHIP. HOLS IN ME> HUtLL, Footc

HERR KAPrTA NO-- r7 IS THR 30t3 /A

W H iiiiHii• i•!•VAiii E! !•I NK??? HEAP

WITH T"e SALVACE-160,MUNK HiF'AP ~OE6TROYEP rT CW E li jZ ~i~~

Wl L L, CO I A C-,-7,A IN #14*6?41e,

. ....


ma mooiiliii 7NAiiiii: ii:ii ll-ii--:-i

C70 You~i~i

ZIA P.ijll~jji'ii.-ii

Ro. AFi"~i''-~-i:~~:;~

. . . .. . . . . .. . .


picked up by the contours of the face and repeated in the areas of indentation around the bridge of the nose. At the same time, the stem of the balloon is linked to the face through its undulating line which parallels the curve of the right eyebrow. As in the previous work the balloon provides the key to the entire compositional organization, and indeed, is the critical feature uniting all parts of the picture.

In conclusion we may say that the assimilation of comic imagery into Pop Art depended on the cultural saturation of that imagery; and the vitalizing effect of its devices and conventions became the conceptual and structural components of the artist working in the Pop Art mode.




roy lichtenstein and the comic strip

Documents