rosat observations of cepheus ob3: the discovery of low-mass stars
TRANSCRIPT
ROSAT observations of Cepheus OB3: the discovery of low-mass stars
Tim Naylor1 and A. C. Fabian2
1Department of Physics, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG2Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA
Accepted 1998 September 25. Received 1998 September 21; in original form 1996 December 18
A B S T R A C T
We present X-ray images of the high-mass star-forming region Cepheus OB3, in which we
discover over 50 point sources, the majority of which are T Tauri stars. We use the ratio of high-
mass to low-mass stars to constrain the initial mass function, and ®nd that it is consistent with
that for ®eld stars. This supports the picture that there is little difference between high-mass
and low-mass star-forming regions. The presence of low-mass stars between the high-mass
stars and the molecular cloud they are ionizing argues against mechanisms whereby heating of
the cloud inhibits low-mass star formation. Finally, the ef®ciency of star formation in this
region is shown to be of the order of a few per cent.
Key words: stars: formation ± stars: luminosity function, mass function ± stars: pre-main-
sequence ± open clusters and associations: general ± open clusters and associations:
individual: Cepheus OB3 ± X-rays: stars.
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
The observational distinction between the high- and low-mass star-
forming regions is gradually being eroded. The Orion OB associa-
tion, traditionally viewed as a high-mass star-forming region, has
long been known to harbour low-mass T Tauri stars, and Walter et al.
(1994) have discussed the low-mass stars in the Upper Sco associa-
tion (Sco OB2-2). Recently, Schulz, BerghoÈfer & Zinnecker (1997)
and Gregorio-Hetem et al. (1998) have also presented X-ray
observations of distant OB regions which seem to show the
presence of T Tauri stars. The data presented here con®rm this
view, with the discovery of low-mass stars in another OB region,
Cepheus OB3. Walter & Boyd (1991) have shown that the com-
plementary case, that low-mass, or T associations, should contain
high-mass stars is probably correct, at least for Taurus-Auriga.
If there is no physical distinction between these two types of star-
forming region, then it would seem natural to assume that there is
just one star formation mechanism which operates within them. The
strongest evidence in favour of such a mechanism would be a
universal initial mass function (IMF), although if there were
different mass functions, this would not necessarily rule out a
single star formation mechanism. Despite the large number of mea-
surements now available, there is no strong evidence against a
ubiquitous IMF for stars greater than 1 M(, although the evidence
becomes weaker as the IMF becomes more structured below this mass.
Furthermore, measurements that span a large range of mass, particu-
larly those that cover both the late-type and early-type stars, are rare.
2 T H E C E P H E U S O B 3 A S S O C I AT I O N
The Cepheus molecular cloud is clearly visible on sky survey plates
as a region of low stellar density. The outlines traced by the stars
match the J � 1 ! 0 12CO maps of Sargent (1977, 1979) well. The
molecular cloud is structured, with a strong CO peak at its most
north-western point, known as Cepheus B. Outside Cepheus B, to
the north and west of the cloud, lies the stellar association Cepheus
OB3 (see Fig. 1). It is divided by Blaauw (1964) into two popula-
tions, OB3b being younger than OB3a. These ages are, however, the
subject of some controversy, since the turn-off ages are 7.5 and
5.5 Myr (Jordi, Trullols & GaladõÂ-EnrõÂquez 1996), whilst the
expansion ages are 0.72 and 0.48 Myr (Garmany 1973).
There are obvious signs of star formation activity on the edge of the
molecular cloud closest to the OB3b association. This north-western
edge of the cloud is bounded by an optical H II region Sh 2-155
(Sharpless 1959), in which material is being driven off the cloud by
the O7n star HD 217086 (Panagia & Thum 1981). A trapezium of
stars appears to have recently emerged from the edge of the cloud
(Testi et al. 1995), and Cepheus B itself is thought to be in the early
stages of contraction towards becoming a new cluster of stars.
Perhaps the most important aspect of Cep OB3 is the very
favourable viewing angle at which we see the progression of star
formation. As the surface of the cloud is being eroded by the
radiation from one or more of the early-type stars, the cloud edge
moves eastwards across our ®eld of view, with the newly emergent
stars clear of the molecular cloud and to the west. This is in contrast
to the rather awkward view we have of the Orion OB1 region, where
the stars lie between the cloud and ourselves.
Throughout this paper we will use the distance and reddenings
for Cep OB3b derived by Moreno-Corral et al. (1993) of 900 6 100
pc (which is consistent with most measurements) and AV � 2:9.
3 O B S E RVAT I O N S
We observed a ®eld centred on the O7n star HD217086 with both
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 302, 714±722 (1999)
q 1999 RAS
the ROSAT PSPC and HRI, a log of the observations being given in
Table 1. Fig. 2 shows the two PSPC images, and the HRI image. The
bright source at the centre of all the observations is the O7n star,
which lies in the northern section of what appears to be a cluster of
X-ray sources. In addition to the point sources, there is underlying
unresolved diffuse X-ray emission. The Einstein IPC observation of
this ®eld (Fabian & Stewart 1983) detected the X-ray emission from
this cluster, but was unable to resolve it into individual sources.
There are virtually no X-ray sources to the south-east, which is
unsurprising as this is the region of the molecular cloud (see Fig. 1).
There are, however, a few sources to the north and east of the main
cluster. The variability of several sources between the two PSPC
observations is obvious, the most spectacular example being the
source to the north-east of the O7n star (Star 45 in Table 2), which,
aside from the O7n star, is the brightest object in the ®rst PSPC
observation, and yet is barely detected in the second (see also
Table 2). There is almost certainly also variability between the
PSPC and HRI observations, but the different passbands of the two
instruments should make us cautious about such an interpretation of
the data on a source-by-source basis.
We ®rst created a catalogue of all the X-ray sources we detected
by searching the central 40-arcmin diameter of the HRI and two
PSPC images using the point-source search algorithm of Allan
(1992), which is also described brie¯y in, for example, Jeffries,
Thurston & Pye (1997). We searched to a level of 4.5j at a given
position in the PSPC images, and 4.25j in the HRI images, which
simulation shows should result in less than one spurious source per
image (Jeffries et al.. 1997; Jeffries, private communication). Each
of the source lists contained at least three objects that could be
identi®ed with stars in the HST GSC. This allowed us to carry out a
bore sight correction, and sum the two PSPC images, so that a
further search for sources could be carried out. As a result of this,
the maximum error in either RA or declination between an X-ray
position and a GSC position was 15 arcsec for the combined PSPC
image, and 7 arcsec for the HRI. The bore sight correction was
applied to each list, before attempting to combine them to produce
a single catalogue for the whole association. Since many of the
sources are variable, we searched for positional coincidences
amongst the lists, ignoring the ¯ux levels of the objects. Sources
within 15 arcsec were considered to be the same object. This
separation is suf®ciently large that it may occasionally result in
two sources being assumed to be one object, when in fact they are
unrelated. However, in the statistical analysis presented later, it is
better that this occurred, than that a single object should be
represented twice in our catalogue.
Once the lists had been merged, the coordinates for each object
were taken from the best available source, i.e., the HRI where
available, otherwise the combined PSPC image or, in two cases, the
single PSPC images. These positions are presented in Table 2. We
then evaluated the ¯ux at each of these positions in all three
observations, correcting for the gross vignetting, and in the case
of the PSPC, the vignetting due to both the thin and thick wires.
Where the ¯ux was either unmeasurable with the point-source
search algorithm, or below the error, we calculated a 1j upper
limit. Both the ¯uxes (with 1j errors) and limits are presented in
Table 2.
With these ¯uxes, we carried out a more formal variability
analysis. First, we looked for sources that varied between the two
PSPC observations at greater than the 99 per cent con®dence level,
®nding that Sources 21, 22, 23, 36, 44 and 45 did so. Next, we
searched for variability within each observation for the observations
of sources which had more than 50 detected photons, excepting
Sources 6 and 7 which are too close to allow reliable photometry.
For each source we extracted a light curve in bins of 1000 s for the
PSPC and 2000 s for the HRI, and then tested to see if the resulting
light curves were consistent with a constant ¯ux using a x2 test.
Only Source 23 in PSPC1 was inconsistent at a greater than 99 per
cent con®dence level. This, and the null results of our other tests, are
reported in Table 2. Since the total number of photons detected in
the PSPC1 observation of Source 23 is small, all one can say with
certainty is that the source is brighter at the beginning of the
observation than at the end.
To be certain of the nature of these sources, we required spectro-
scopy of their optical counterparts. To generate candidates for
spectroscopic observations, we ®rst checked the positions against
the HST GSC. We report the 10 positive results in Table 2. The
modal magnitude (in 1-mag bins) of the HST GSC in this region is
13. Thus we expect that the catalogue of stars outside the region of
our CCD data is complete to about 12th magnitude.
The optical ¯ux limit from the GSC is above the ¯ux we would
expect for T Tauri stars, and so we required deeper imaging of the
®elds. Thus we observed the region using the 0.6 m Thornton
re¯ector at Keele Observatory during the night of 1995 December
29. The system uses an ST6 CCD camera at the f =4:5 Newtonian
ROSAT observations of Cepheus OB3 715
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Figure 1. A schematic of the Cepheus OB3b region. The dashed line marks
the lowest CO contour, taken from Sargent (1977); the molecular cloud is to
the lower left of this line. The solid line is the brightest part of the Ha nebula
Sh 2-155, and is another way of marking the edge of the cloud. The open
circles are the early-type members of the Cepheus OB3b association taken
from BHJ and Sargent (1977), with the O7n star BHJ 41 marked. The crosses
are the sample of coronal X-ray sources discussed in the text. The dotted
circle is the PSPC inner support ring, and represents the extent of the area
searched for X-ray sources.
Table 1. Log of ROSAT observations.
Instrument Date start Date end Total exposure Bore sight correction
PSPC 1992 July 29 1992 July 30 4252 s �1:s0, ÿ0500
PSPC 1992 December 27 1993 January 6 6357 s ÿ1:s1, �0300
HRI 1994 July 21 1994 July 24 20308 s ÿ0:s7, ÿ0100
focus, and in our case we used a Johnson V-band ®lter. We observed
four ®elds for two min each, covering a region of approximately 14
by 17 arcmin2, centred on RA 22h 56:m7, Dec. �628410 (J2000). The
images were dark-subtracted, and combined into a single image
that we could use for astrometry. We searched for positional
coincidences between our X-ray detections and the optical ®eld.
We chose to accept correlations within 7 arcsec of an HRI position,
and 15 arcsec of a PSPC position, irrespective of whether the
counterparts were from the GSC or our own data. The results are
listed in Table 2.
We measured optical magnitudes for the counterparts using the
aperture photometry algorithm described in Naylor (1998). In
addition to the long exposures, we obtained a single 10-s exposure
that had stars in common with all four long exposures, allowing us
to transfer all the data to a single zero-point. Since the short
exposure also contained both Stars 40 and 41 of Blaauw, Hiltner
& Johnson (1959, hereafter BHJ), we used their photometry of these
stars to calculate our overall zero-point. We have not attempted any
colour correction, but the correction for this system is comparable
with our quoted accuracy (0.1 mag). The faintest objects visible in
the optical data correspond to about V � 16:8, which is an approxi-
mately 10j detection. We will use this as the upper limit to the
optical ¯ux for those sources which have empty error boxes. The
chance of a random correlation between a star brighter than
V � 16:8 in our CCD images and, say, a 10-arcsec radius error
circle is highly dependent on position within the association,
because the stellar density changes dramatically across the ®eld-
of-view. For the densest parts of the cluster, however, it is around 10
per cent. Thus we expect one or two of our 16 identi®cations based
on the CCD imaging alone are spurious.
716 T. Naylor and A. C. Fabian
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Figure 2. The X-ray images from observations PSPC1 (upper left), PSPC2 (upper right), HRI (bottom left) and PSPC2 overlayed on the Digitised Palomar Sky
Survey (bottom right). The lowest contour is at 0.1 counts per 15-arcsec pixel. Each subsequent contour is at a factor of 2 greater counts than the last. The PSPC
images have been smoothed with the adaptive routine described in Ebeling, White & Rangarajan (1997), and are for the 0.5±2 keV band.
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
22h 55m 56 57 58 59Right Ascension (2000)
62° 30′
35
40
45
50
55
63° 00′
Dec
linat
ion
(200
0)
58 00 30 57 00 30 56 00
Right Ascension (2000)
ROSAT observations of Cepheus OB3 717
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Ta
ble
2.
Cat
alo
gu
eo
fso
urc
es.
Co
un
tsksÿ
1H
aL
i6708AÊ
Sta
rJ2
000
Po
siti
on
HR
IP
SP
C1
PS
PC
2V
EW
(AÊ
)E
W(A
Ê)
Com
men
tsO
ther
nam
es
12
25
41
8.1
+6
240
11
(P)
<0
.06
6.9
46
2.0
16.1
16
1.6
39.3
(GS
C)
GS
C4282.0
772
22
25
42
3.8
+6
235
53
(P)
<0
.03
4.9
76
1.9
44.2
16
1.4
9
32
25
44
1.6
+6
24
13
0(H
)0
.36
60
.14
<1
.01
0.9
36
0.8
6
42
25
44
3.7
+6
240
21
(P)
<0
.20
2.9
16
1.5
44.9
26
1.4
7
52
25
45
6.2
+6
24
24
7(H
)0
.51
60
.18
<0
.52
<0.9
3
62
25
45
6.8
+6
234
20
(P)
0.1
76
0.1
22
0.7
66
3.0
515.3
96
2.3
210.3
(BH
J)E
arly
B(B
HJ)
BH
J26,
GS
C4282.0
780
72
25
50
1.2
+6
23
33
8(H
)0
.52
60
.18
15
.24
62.8
610.3
06
2.0
5
82
25
50
3.5
+6
24
93
0(H
)0
.93
60
.23
1.6
36
1.1
30.9
56
0.8
211.9
(BH
J)la
teB
/ear
lyA
(BH
J)B
HJ2
7,
GS
C4282.0
501
92
25
50
7.4
+6
244
21
(P)
<0
.10
12
.06
62.3
49.9
96
1.8
3
10
22
55
08
.0+
62
39
03
(P)
<0
.36
1.5
26
1.2
25.1
66
1.4
2
11
22
55
17
.8+
62
38
07
(H)
0.4
46
0.1
6<
0.4
50.8
56
0.7
4
12
22
55
22
.2+
62
54
49
(P)
<0
.12
6.5
16
1.8
71.4
56
0.9
7
13
22
55
27
.0+
62
43
32
(H)
0.7
36
0.2
03
.79
61.3
71.5
46
0.7
915.3
0.8
0.3
1L
ate
K-s
tar
14
22
55
29
.1+
62
47
38
(P)
0.2
46
0.1
32
.71
61.2
03.2
66
1.0
9
15
22
55
31
.2+
62
33
11
(P)
<0
.13
1.7
66
1.2
24.8
76
1.3
815.1
16
22
55
37
.1+
62
41
32
(P)
0.3
66
0.2
03
.06
61.2
12.1
56
0.9
116.8
17
22
55
38
.0+
62
47
52
(H)
0.6
96
0.2
41
.93
61.0
54.2
76
1.2
3E
mpty
box
18
22
55
38
.8+
62
51
05
(H)
1.5
46
0.2
91
1.2
86
2.2
111.9
26
1.9
412.1
(GS
C)
GS
C4282.0
319
19
22
55
48
.7+
62
40
06
(H)
0.5
66
0.2
12
.07
61.0
51.6
76
0.8
3E
mpty
box
20
22
56
01
.1+
62
47
54
(P)
<0
.15
<0
.99
3.2
96
1.0
3E
mpty
box
21
22
56
06
.9+
62
45
34
(H)
0.7
96
0.2
43
.64
61.3
19.7
96
1.6
712.1
4.9
<0.0
3E
arly
-type
(IN
T)
GS
C4282.0
550
22
22
56
10
.1+
62
54
44
(H)
0.7
16
0.2
11
.95
61.1
39.2
86
1.7
8
23
22
56
15
.8+
62
40
14
(P)
<0
.13
17
.58
62.5
87.6
06
1.5
413.3
-7.3
0.2
5V
aria
ble
inP
SP
C1
at99.1
%co
n®
den
ce.
G-s
tar
24
22
56
17
.9+
62
45
18
(H)
1.3
76
0.3
00
.86
60.7
4<
0.8
6E
mpty
box
25
22
56
20
.4+
62
43
26
(H)
0.9
16
0.2
69
.59
61.9
77.9
16
1.6
014.6
0.8
0.3
8(B
)K
-sta
r
26
22
56
20
.6+
62
52
21
(P)
0.2
76
0.1
61
.65
61.0
44.3
36
1.1
9
27
22
56
26
.1+
62
41
25
(H)
0.6
26
0.2
22
.52
61.1
02.5
36
0.9
515.3
28
22
56
27
.0+
62
39
23
(H)
1.1
66
0.3
06
.07
61.5
39.2
56
1.6
513.8
-14.0
0.3
2(B
)K
-sta
rG
SC
4282.0
472
29
22
56
28
.6+
62
45
29
(P)
<0
.05
6.9
26
1.6
65.1
36
1.2
415.5
30
22
56
30
.2+
62
52
09
(H)
0.7
06
0.2
43
.64
61.2
91.2
26
0.7
37.6
(GS
C)
GS
C4282.3
013
718 T. Naylor and A. C. Fabian
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Ta
ble
2±
con
tin
ued
Co
un
tsksÿ
1H
aL
i6708AÊ
Sta
rJ2
000
Po
siti
on
HR
IP
SP
C1
PS
PC
2V
EW
(AÊ
)E
W(A
Ê)
Com
men
tsO
ther
nam
es
31
22
56
35
.2+
62
56
02
(P)
0.1
56
0.1
15
.03
61.5
31.5
26
0.8
7
32
22
56
36
.3+
62
46
03
(H)
1.7
76
0.3
56
.40
61.6
38.0
06
1.6
015.2
0.5
0.5
0K
-sta
r
33
22
56
36
.7+
62
40
07
(H)
0.6
26
0.2
22
.33
61.0
61.3
46
0.7
812.9
1.0
0.1
7G
-sta
rG
SC
4282.0
703
34
22
56
38
.5+
62
37
14
(H)
2.3
76
0.3
91
5.1
46
2.4
320.6
76
2.3
914.2
0.6
0.3
8N
ot
var
iable
inP
SP
C2.
K-s
tar
35
22
56
39
.2+
62
45
13
(H)
0.9
56
0.2
84
.90
61.4
810.2
06
1.7
714.9
36
22
56
39
.3+
62
45
35
(P)
0.4
16
0.2
06
.19
61.7
313.3
86
2.0
5N
ot
var
iable
inP
SP
C2
37
22
56
43
.5+
62
42
00
(2)
0.2
86
0.1
72
.88
61.2
14.2
06
1.1
7E
mpty
bo
x
38
22
56
46
.5+
62
41
17
(P)
<0
.05
3.8
36
1.2
73.2
76
1.0
5E
mpty
bo
x
39
22
56
47
.1+
62
43
38
(H)
6.5
06
0.6
32
4.6
56
3.0
225.5
06
2.6
37.7
(BH
J)2.3
<0.1
Not
var
iable
inH
RI,
PS
PC
1or
PS
PC
2.
O7n
star
BH
J41,
GS
C4282.0
617
40
22
56
51
.9+
62
36
09
(P)
<0
.09
1.9
96
1.0
63.3
16
1.0
4E
mpty
box
41
22
56
52
.7+
62
39
06
(P)
<0
.30
<1
.20
4.4
96
1.2
0E
mpty
bo
x
42
22
56
55
.1+
62
42
23
(H)
1.0
86
0.2
79
.82
62.0
47.9
16
1.5
615.4
43
22
56
56
.9+
62
55
35
(H)
0.5
26
0.1
7<
0.6
0<
0.9
6
44
22
56
57
.3+
62
52
42
(P)
0.3
26
0.2
0<
0.7
24.6
56
1.1
813.5
(GS
C)
GS
C4282.0
450
45
22
57
01
.3+
62
45
52
(H)
0.8
26
0.2
52
2.7
86
2.8
71.6
76
0.7
8E
mpty
bo
x,
not
var
iable
inP
SP
C1
46
22
57
02
.0+
62
44
08
(H)
1.0
36
0.2
72
.43
61.0
93.2
56
1.0
315.1
0.5
0.1
6L
ate
K-s
tar
47
22
57
06
.2+
62
38
28
(H)
1.4
86
0.3
41
1.2
96
2.0
77.9
56
1.5
515.6
See
Sec
tion
8
48
22
57
06
.5+
62
38
48
(1)
<0
.07
9.6
96
2.0
79.0
66
1.6
9S
eeS
ecti
on
8
49
22
57
08
.4+
62
33
28
(P)
<0
.05
5.4
86
1.5
33.5
76
1.0
7
50
22
57
15
.0+
62
26
10
(P)
<0
.29
4.1
16
1.6
63.7
96
1.3
6
51
22
57
26
.2+
62
49
39
(P)
0.4
76
0.2
21
.94
60.9
71.8
16
0.8
2
52
22
57
29
.6+
62
43
53
(H)
0.8
56
0.2
61
.64
61.0
62.7
06
1.0
2E
mpty
bo
x
53
22
57
37
.8+
62
42
32
(P)
<0
.05
5.3
96
1.5
12.0
16
0.8
6E
mpty
box
54
22
57
43
.2+
62
49
26
(H)
0.6
06
0.2
1<
0.8
42.1
06
0.8
7
55
22
57
52
.1+
62
52
18
(P)
0.1
76
0.1
31
.93
61.0
22.7
16
0.9
8
56
22
59
14
.8+
62
37
47
(H)
0.4
66
0.1
6<
0.9
1<
0.2
7
So
urc
esfo
rp
osi
tio
ns
are:
H=
HR
Io
bse
rvat
ion
s;1
=®
rst
PS
PC
ob
serv
atio
n;
2=
seco
nd
PS
PC
obse
rvat
ion;
P=
com
bin
edP
SP
Cim
age.
So
urc
esfo
rm
agn
itu
des
and
spec
tral
typ
esar
e:B
HJ=
Bla
auw
,H
iltn
er&
Johnso
n(1
959);
GS
C=
HS
TG
uid
eS
tar
Cat
alog;
INT
=IN
Tsp
ectr
osc
opy.
Optical spectra of 10 of the tentative identi®cations were obtained
for us at the 2.5-m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT), during the night
of 1995 October 7/8. The Intermediate Dispersion Spectrograph
was used with the 235-mm camera, R1200R grating and Tek CCD.
This covered the range 6140±7070 AÊ at a resolution of 1.7 AÊ and a
dispersion of 0.85 AÊ pixelÿ1. The spectra were debiased using an
overread region of the chip, and ¯at-®elded using an exposure of a
tungsten lamp. The spectra were extracted using the procedure
described in Horne (1986), and wavelength-calibrated using exposures
of arc lamps.
4 W H AT A R E T H E P O I N T S O U R C E S A N D
D I F F U S E E M I S S I O N ?
The obvious interpretation for the majority of the point sources is
that they are T Tauri stars in the association. The discovery of T
Tauri stars via their X-ray emission is now commonplace (see
NeuhaÈuser 1997 for a review), and, as we show below, the optical
and X-ray luminosities of these sources match this hypothesis. First,
however, we consider the likely levels of contamination from
foreground and background stars, and from background AGN.
Guillout et al. (1996) present a model for the stellar content of
ROSAT observations, which Motch et al. (1997) evaluate for
galactic latitude b � 08 and longitude l � 908, yielding about two
sources brighter than 5 counts per kilosecond. This can be com-
pared with the approximately 40 sources found in our combined
PSPC image above this count level. Furthermore, our pointing is at
about b � 38 and l � 1108, both of which changes in coordinate
tend to reduce the number of contaminating sources. A hard upper
limit to the number of AGN in our data can be derived using the
ROSAT Lockman Hole observations presented in Hasinger et al.
(1993, 1994). From their log(N)±log(S) function there would be
about three sources with ¯uxes above 4 count ksÿ1 in the 0.5±
2.4 keV band, again compared with our approximately 40 sources
found above this ¯ux in the combined PSPC image. In fact, Galactic
absorption should reduce this number considerably, but precise
calculation of this reduction is hard, due to the highly structured
nature of the plane in this region. However, the conclusion is clear:
there is a signi®cant excess of sources in this region above that
expected for foreground and background objects.
To examine the X-ray and optical luminosities of the sources, we
®rst constructed the diagram of optical versus X-ray ¯ux, shown in
Fig. 3. Studies of ®eld stars show that most single stellar X-ray
sources are either earlier than spectral type A5, with X-ray emission
associated with their stellar winds, or later than F5, with coronal
X-ray emission. Hence we expect the upper part of Fig. 3 to be
occupied by X-ray-bright O and B stars, and the lower part to be
®lled with coronally active stars. We have therefore coded the
points plotted in Fig. 3 according to spectral type. Previously
discovered O, B and early A stars, and one discovered via our
INT spectroscopy, are marked as circles. Since our INT spectra
would detect the strong Ha absorption characteristic of B and early
A stars, we mark the remaining stars for which we have spectro-
scopy as late-type, with open triangles; if they show Ha emission,
the triangles are ®lled. Stars for which no spectral-type information
is available are marked with crosses. Stars 47 and 48 have been
excluded (see Section 8). Fig. 3 shows that we do see a clear
boundary between the early-type stars (circles) and the coronal
emitters (triangles), at V � 12:5.
We can determine the X-ray luminosity only if we assume a
spectral shape, and so we ®tted the spectrum of Star 34 to a
Raymond±Smith model. The best-®tting temperature is .1 keV.
Using temperatures in the range 1 to 3 keV, typical of T Tauri stars,
gives a conversion of 10 count ksÿ1 which corresponds to 1031:1
erg sÿ1 (1±2.4 keV). Comparing this with the T Tauri stars in
Chamaeleon I (Feigelson et al. 1993) shows that these objects lie at
the top of the T Tauri X-ray luminosities. Although there is
controversy about T Tauri luminosity functions (e.g. NeuhaÈuser
ROSAT observations of Cepheus OB3 719
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Figure 3. The V-band magnitude and X-ray ¯ux of all the sources detected
in the ROSAT observations. The different symbols represent different
spectral types. Stars later than mid-A are shown as either open triangles,
or, if they have emission, ®lled triangles. O, B and early A stars are open
circles, and those with no spectral information are crosses.
Figure 4. The INT spectra of the late-type stars. Note the lithium absorption
at 6708 AÊ in some of the spectra, and the Fe I 6595-AÊ blend. Some of the
spectra have absorption or emission features at Ha (6553AÊ ), and all show
telluric absorption at about 6870AÊ .
et al. 1995, and references therein), especially the difference
between weak and classical T Tauri stars, this does not affect
what the highest luminosities are that one might expect to see.
The T Tauri interpretation is given further weight by the ratio of
X-ray to V-band luminosity for the optically faintest sources, which
is ,10ÿ1:5 as one might expect for very active stars (e.g. Stocke et al.
1983).
Several of our spectra show lithium 6708 AÊ at impressive
(<300 mAÊ ) equivalent widths (see Table 2 and Fig. 4). Whilst
this is normally thought of as an indicator of mid- or late-type pre-
main-sequence stars, weaker lithium also occurs in young main-
sequence stars. Since the lithium equivalent width is a function of
spectral type for a given abundance, spectral types are needed to
proceed further. We therefore adopt a simpli®ed version of the
approach of Magazzu et al. (1997). We examined the spectra of the
six stars which show unblended Li absorption, and compared them
with the spectral atlas of Jacoby et al. (1984). None of them shows
TiO features, and so they are earlier than late K. By examining other
features, especially the equivalent width of the Fe I 6595-AÊ blend,
we identi®ed two stars as G, and four as K. Soderblom et al. (1993)
show that the Pleiades have equivalent widths of about 0.2 AÊ for G
stars, 0.4 AÊ for early- to mid-K stars, after which the equivalent
width falls to almost zero. Stars 32 and 34 are K stars with Li
equivalent widths of 0.50 and 0.38 AÊ , and are therefore younger
than the Pleiades. The remaining stars are either close to the
Pleiades equivalent widths (G stars 23 and 33), or depend critically
on spectral type (K stars 13 and 46), which is hard to determine from
our low signal-to-noise spectra. However, it is clear that some of the
stars are pre-main-sequence, based on their Li absorption.
Two of the eight sources for which we have spectra clearly show
Ha emission, although only one of them is above the formal 10-AÊ
limit normally taken as the de®nition of a classic T Tauri star. This
would seem to indicate that there are more weak than classical T
Tauri stars in the luminosity range explored by our observations.
However, such a conclusion is at best preliminary, since we does not
have optical spectroscopy for a complete sample above a given ¯ux
limit.
Summarizing the above arguments, the point sources are
certainly not active ®eld stars or AGN. Their X-ray and optical
luminosities are consistent with T Tauri stars, as is the ratio of X-ray
to V-band luminosity. Many of the optical spectra show strong Li
6708-AÊ absorption, in some cases strong enough to be almost
certainly pre-main-sequence stars, and some show Ha emission.
Finally, the X-ray variability is similar to that observed in other
groups of T Tauri stars (e.g. Montmerle et al. 1983). For these
reasons, it seems likely that we have discovered low-mass stars in
Cep OB3.
To examine the nature of the diffuse X-ray emission within the
cluster, we compared its spectrum with that of the point sources. We
®rst excised the point sources from within the cluster, and then
created a spectrum from the remaining counts. We used a region to
the south-west, i.e., in the direction of the molecular cloud, as
background. We then compared this with the background-
subtracted sum of the point sources. The resulting spectra, shown
in Fig. 5 are indistinguishable. Given that the diffuse emission also
lies within the region of highest density of point sources, it is likely
that it is simply unresolved T Tauri stars.
5 T H E S PAT I A L D I S T R I B U T I O N O F T TAU R I
S TA R S
If we wish to study the spatial distribution of the T Tauri stars, we
must ®rst create a clean sample. For simplicity, we dealt only with
those X-ray sources that were detected in the combined PSPC
image. The very faintest sources also present a problem, because the
PSPC vignetting gives a lower ¯ux limit for sources in the centre of
the ®eld than at the periphery. (The background is low enough in
10 ks that the increase in point spread function does not affect the
detection threshold.) The vignetting is almost 20 per cent at 20
arcmin off axis, and so we chose to exclude those sources whose
¯ux was within 20 per cent of the faintest detected source, i.e., less
than 5.4 count ksÿ1. Finally, we wished to reject all the early-type
stars, and so applied the magnitude criterion discussed in Section 4,
by rejecting all those X-ray sources with optical counterparts
brighter than V � 12:5. Since the HST GSC is complete to approxi-
mately this magnitude, we can be relatively sure that we have
detected optical counterparts to this magnitude even outside the
®eld covered by our CCD images. If a high-mass star happened to
lie within the error box of a low-mass X-ray source, our technique
would reject it from the sample. However, with just eight high-mass
stars within the inner circle of the PSPC, and using a 7-arcsec X-ray
error circle, there is only a 1 per cent chance that a low-mass X-ray
source has been accidently rejected in this way. We also rejected
Source 47, for reasons outlined in Section 8.
In Fig. 1 we show the resulting source positions, along with the
edge of the molecular cloud, the edge of the PSPC central ®eld, and
the positions of the OB stars which are members of the Cep OB3b
association. The latter are those originally identi®ed by BHJ, with
the membership criteria re®ned by Sargent (1977). Assuming the
Ha emission de®nes the edge of the cloud, there are very few
sources within the cloud itself. Outside the cloud the sources do not
appear to be uniform in density, but cluster close to the cloud edge.
Assessing the signi®cance of the density enhancement is very
dif®cult, since it lies on a rapidly varying background of objects.
However, it is associated with the diffuse background discussed
above, and so it seems likely that the density of T Tauri stars is
highest close to (but outside) the cloud edge. This is in contrast to
the OB stars in the region, which seem to be strung out slightly
further from the cloud.
Before attaching much signi®cance to the impression that the
T Tauri stars are closer to the cloud than the high-mass stars, we
performed a two dimensional Kolmogorov±Smirnov test (Press
et al. 1992) to see if the distribution of T Tauri stars and OB stars
720 T. Naylor and A. C. Fabian
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
Figure 5. The PSPC spectra of the diffuse background (dots) and the point
sources (stars). Within the error bars the two spectra are identical, consistent
with the idea that the diffuse X-ray emission is just unresolved point sources.
was actually different. For this test we require a well-behaved
sample of massive stars, and so we used those observed by BHJ and
classi®ed as members by Sargent (1977). These simple criteria are
possible, since BHJ observed a sample complete to approximately
12th magnitude. The Kolmogorov±Smirnov test gave an 41 per
cent probability that both samples were drawn from the same parent
spatial distribution. So we conclude that although it may appear that
there is a cluster of T Tauri stars on the outside edge of the cloud, we
cannot prove that they have a signi®cantly different distribution
with respect to the OB stars.
Our X-ray observations of Cep OB3 are similar to those of
IC 1396 (Schulz et al. 1997) and the Monocerous R2 and Rosette
nebulae (Gregorio-Hetem et al. 1998). All these observations show
many point sources, which are almost certainly at the tip of the T
Tauri luminosity function, and diffuse emission which can be
interpreted as unresolved T Tauri stars. There is one interesting
difference, however. From Fig. 1 it is clear that, with a few
exceptions the Cep OB3 sources avoid the area of CO emission.
In contrast, the sources in Mon R2 and the Rosette seem to be mixed
with the CO (see especially ®g. 13 of Gregorio-Hetem et al.). Again,
in Orion Sterzik et al. (1995) ®nd T Tauri stars embedded within the
cloud, in addition to being distributed outside it. It seems that, in
contrast, Cep OB3 is particularly simple in its star formation
history. The ionization front appears to be moving from west to
east, resulting in a group of newly formed stars to the west of the
cloud edge. Presumably a deeper exposure would reveal more
sources in the molecular cloud itself.
The simplicity of Cep OB3 does allow us to make one very
important inference, however. It is clear that low-mass stars have
emerged from the molecular cloud despite it being strongly irradi-
ated by nearby early-type stars. This allows us to rule out any
suggestion that high-mass stars beget only more high-mass stars
(e.g. Larson 1986), inhibiting low-mass star formation by raising
the temperature of the molecular cloud.
6 T H E I N I T I A L M A S S F U N C T I O N
We can constrain the IMF between about 1 and 17 M( using the
ratio of the number of detected X-ray sources to the number of OB
stars within the PSPC ®eld. Our total number of detected low-mass
X-ray sources is about 50, which represents an absolute minimum to
the number of stars in the T Tauri mass range of 0.2 to 2.3 M(
(Cohen & Kuhi 1979); however, this sample is incomplete because
of the (variable) ¯ux limit. The number of high-mass stars in the
region covered by the PSPC is 8, of which the lowest mass is
approximately 4 M(, based on the apparent magnitude limit of
V � 12. Thus the ratio 0:3 < M < 3 M( : M > 4 M( is certainly
more extreme than 6:1. Further, in the region of the cluster of
sources, there is roughtly equal ¯ux from resolved and unresolved
sources. To be unresolved these sources must, individually, be
fainter than the resolved sources. Thus a lower limit to the
number of sources represented by the unresolved ¯ux is that they
are equal in number to the resolved sources. So we can tighten our
limit on the ratio of low-mass to high-mass stars to be more than
12:1. Perhaps the most realistic ®eld IMF to compare this with is
that of Miller & Scalo (1979), which gives a ratio for the same mass
ranges of 25. Two other possible mass functions are those due to
Salpeter (1955), which would require a ratio of 30:1, and Van Buren
(1985), which gives 13:1. So we conclude that although normally
regarded as a massive-star formation region, Cep OB3 certainly
contains low-mass stars, and our lower limit on the number of them
is not inconsistent with ®eld IMFs.
The only other regions for which similar experiments have been
carried out are Orion, the Upper Sco Region (Sco OB2-2) and,
perhaps more importantly, the `low-mass' Taurus-Auriga region.
Unfortunately the Orion IMF has been examined only in the range
3 to 9 M( (Claudius & Grosbùl 1980), and so is not a useful
comparison. Walter et al. (1994) showed that the IMF of the Uppper
Sco Region is, like that of Cep OB3, consistent with a Miller &
Scalo IMF for masses greater than 0.3M(. The data for the Taurus-
Auriga IMF at high masses are more speculative (Walter & Boyd
1991), but are consistent with the Salpeter, Miller & Scalo and Van
Buren IMFs. Thus the data collected to date suggest that the IMFs
over quite a wide range of masses are similar in low-mass and high-
mass star-forming regions. Furthermore, it is clear that there is no
evidence for a de®cit of low-mass stars in OB regions when
compared with the ®eld.
7 T H E S TA R F O R M AT I O N E F F I C I E N C Y
We can estimate the star formation ef®ciency, i.e., what fraction of
the mass of the molecular cloud becomes stars, on the assumption
that the molecular cloud will continue to form stars at roughly the
same density as it has in the recent past. To do this, we compare the
mass of stars per unit area outside the cloud with the surface density
(on the sky) of the cloud itself. Minchin, Ward-Thomson & White
(1992) estimate that there are ,6 M( per square arcminute in the
`Cepheus B' region, which is the bright section of the molecular
cloud roughly enclosed by the nebulosity marked in Fig. 1.
The total mass of stars within the PSPC ®eld-of-view can be
found by integrating the mass for the Miller & Scalo IMF. This
yields an average mass (i.e.,�
MdN=�
dN) of 0.64 M(. The total
number of stars can be obtained by extrapolating the same IMF
from the eight high-mass (>4 M() stars, which yields about 200
stars in total. The area examined is certainly no larger than the 40-
arcmin diameter of the central region of the PSPC (1260 arcmin2),
but we will reduce this by 50 per cent, as the area in the eastern
half of the ®eld-of-view is either part of the molecular cloud, or
has not been involved in the recent star formation. This yields a
mass estimate of 0.2 M( per square arcminute. Assuming that this
region will form a similar density of stars to that close to the
molecular cloud, this implies a star formation ef®ciency of 3 per
cent.
This is a factor of 10 higher than that found in the l Ori region by
Duerr, Imhoff & Lada (1982), although star formation in that OB
region may have been truncated by irradiation from an OB wind. It
is closer to the 1±2 per cent ef®ciency found for the low-mass star-
forming clouds in Taurus by Mizuno et al. (1995). However, all
these estimates are probably suf®ciently uncertain that the only
conclusion that can be drawn is that Cep OB3b is not unusual when
compared with other star-forming regions.
8 T H E ` T R A P E Z I U M '
Sources 47 and 48 coincide with a trapezium of stars located on the
edge of the molecular cloud, in the midst of the Ha nebulosity. The
HRI position (47) coincides with the easternmost of the stars,
although it is possible that some of the emission could originate
from elsewhere. However, we can de®nitely rule out the suggestion
by Testi et al. (1995), made on the basis of the current PSPC data
alone, that the X-ray source is coincident with their compact radio
source `B'.
The presence of a clearing nebulosity suggests that the stars
suffer a large extinction and/or are pre-main-sequence even at early
ROSAT observations of Cepheus OB3 721
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722
spectral types. Such a conclusion is supported by the colour±
magnitude diagram for this region of Moreno-Corral et al. (1993).
Even though we have long-slit spectra, the diffuse Ha in this region
is changing so rapidly it is dif®cult to subtract a reliable back-
ground. However, the spectrum of the northernmost star does
appear to have strong Ha absorption, supporting the idea that
these are heavily reddened early-type stars emerging from the
molecular cloud; they are perhaps the beginnings of the next
generation of stars in Cep OB3. Given its possible early-type
nature, we excluded Sources 47 and 48 from our sample of late-
type stars.
9 C O N C L U S I O N S
There seems little doubt that the ROSAT pointings have revealed the
coronally active low-mass stars in Cepheus OB3b. Studying these
has allowed us to draw three main conclusions.
(1) The presence of low-mass stars between high-mass objects
and the molecular cloud is dif®cult to reconcile with the idea that
ionization from early-type stars inhibits low-mass star formation
(Larson 1986).
(2) The ratio of high to low-mass stars is consistent with the
initial mass function of ®eld stars. This means that Cep OB3b ®ts in
with the idea that there is no difference in the IMF between high-
mass and low-mass star-forming regions, furthering the case that
there is no observational distinction between the two classes of star-
forming region.
(3) The star formation ef®ciency in Cep OB3b is of order a few
per cent.
AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S
TN acknowledges the support of a PPARC Advanced Fellowship,
and ACF thanks the Royal Society for support. Some of the data
reduction was carried out on the Keele Starlink node using the ARK
software. We are grateful to those who support Keele Observatory,
especially the local amateur astronomers who help maintain the
telescopes, and ICL who have provided computing facilities. We
thank Mark Somers, Coel Hellier and Gregory Beekman who
obtained the spectra for us, and Rob Jeffries who commented on
the manuscript. The Isaac Newton Telescope is operated on the
island of La Palma by the Royal Greenwich Observatory in the
Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Institutio
de Astrophysica de Canarias.
REFERENCES
Allan D. J., 1992, ASTERIX User Note No. 004, Starlink, Rutherford Appleton
Laboratory, UK
Blaauw A., 1964, ARA&A, 2, 213
Blaauw A., Hiltner W. A., Johnson H. L., 1959, ApJ, 130, 69 (BHJ)
Claudius M., Grosbùl P. J., 1980, A&A, 87, 339
Cohen M., Kuhi L. V., 1979, ApJS, 41, 743
Duerr R., Imhoff C. L., Lada C. J., 1982, ApJ, 261, 135
Ebeling H., White D. A., Rangarajan F. V. N., 1999, MNRAS, in press
Fabian A. C., Stewart G. C., 1983, MNRAS, 202, 697
Feigelson E. D., Casanova S., Montmerle T., Guibert J., 1993, ApJ, 416, 623
Garmany C. D., 1973, AJ, 78, 185
Gregorio-Hetem J., Montmerle T., Casanova S., Feigelson E. D., 1998,
A&A, 331, 193
Guillout G., Haywood M., Motch C., Robin A. C., 1996, A&A, 316, 89
Hasinger G., Burg R., Giacconi R., Hartner G., Schmidt M., TruÈmper J.,
Zamorani G., 1993, A&A, 275, 1
Hasinger G., Burg R., Giacconi R., Hartner G., Schmidt M., TruÈmper J.,
Zamorani G., 1994, A&A, 291, 348
Horne K., 1986, PASP, 98, 609
Jacoby G. H., Hunter D. A., Christian C. A., 1984, ApJS, 56, 257
Jeffries R. D., Thurston M. R., Pye J. P., 1997, MNRAS, 287, 350
Jordi C., Trullols E., & GaladõÂ-EnrõÂquez D., 1996, A&A, 312, 499
Larson R. B., 1986, MNRAS, 218, 409
Magazzu A., Martin E. L., Sterzik M. F., NeuhaÈuser R., Covino E., Alcala J.
M., 1997, A&AS, 124, 449
Miller G. E., Scalo J. M., 1979, ApJS, 41, 513
Minchin N. R., Ward-Thompson D., White G. J., 1992, A&A, 265, 733
Mizuno A., Onishi T., Yonekura Y., Nagahama T., Ogawa H., Fukui Y., 1995,
ApJ, 445, 161
Montmerle T., Koch-Miramond L., Falgarone E., Grindlay J. E., 1983, ApJ,
269, 182
Moreno-Corral M. A., Chavarria-k. C., De la ra E., Wagner S., 1993, A&A,
273, 619
Motch C., Guillout P., Haberl F., Pakull M., Pietsch W., Reinsch K., 1997,
A&A, 318, 111
Naylor T., 1998, MNRAS, 296, 339
NeuhaÈuser R., 1997, Sci, 276, 1363
NeuhaÈuser R., Sterzik M. F., Schmitt J. H. M. M., Wichmann R., Krautter J.,
1995, A&A, 297, 391
Panagia N., Thum C., 1981, A&A, 98, 295
Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T., Flannery B. P., 1992,
Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, 2nd edition, Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge
Salpeter E. E., 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
Sargent A. I., 1977, ApJ, 218, 736
Sargent A. I., 1979, ApJ, 233, 163
Schulz N. S., BerghoÈfer T. W., Zinnecker H., 1997, A&A, 325, 1001
Sharpless S., 1959, ApJS, 4, 257
Soderblom D. R., Jones B. F., Balachandran S., Stauffer J. R., Duncan D. K.,
Fedele S. B., Hudon J. D., 1993, AJ, 106, 1059
Sterzik M. F., Alcala J. M., NeuhauÈser R., Schmitt J. H. M. M., 1995, A&A,
297, 418
Stocke J. T., Liebert J., Gioia I. M., Grif®ths R. E., Maccacaro T., Danziger I.
J., Kunth D., Lub J., 1983, ApJ, 273, 458
Testi L., Olmi L., Hunt L., Tofani G., Felli M., Goldsmith P., 1995, A&A,
303, 881
Walter F. M., Boyd W. T., 1991, ApJ, 370, 318
Walter F. M., Vrba F. J., Mathieu R. D., Brown A., Myers P. C., 1994, AJ,
107, 692
Van Buren D., 1985, ApJ, 294, 567
This paper has been typeset from a TEX=LATEX ®le prepared by the author.
722 T. Naylor and A. C. Fabian
q 1999 RAS, MNRAS 302, 714±722