rolf molich - “five users will find 85% of the usability problems” – and other myths about...
DESCRIPTION
Rolf Molich owns and manages DialogDesign, a small Danish usability consultancy that he founded in 1993. Rolf conceived and coordinated the Comparative Usability Evaluation studies in which more than 100 professional usability teams tested or reviewed the same applications. Rolf was a principal investigator in the Nielsen Norman Group’s large-scale usability test of 20 US e-commerce websites, involving more than 60 users. He has worked with usability since 1984 and wrote the best-selling Danish book User Friendly Computer Systems, of which roughly 30,000 copies have been sold. The book is now available in English, with the title Usable Web Design. Rolf is also the co-inventor of the heuristic evaluation method (with Jakob Nielsen). Rolf is an experienced speaker. His 24 tutorials at the Nielsen Norman Group World Tour attracted roughly 1,000 participants. The overall average participant evaluation of his tutorials was 4.46 on a five-point scale.TRANSCRIPT
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 1
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
Supporters Sponsors Organiser
1
”Five users will find 85% of the usability problems”- and other myths about usability testing
November 9, 2012Rolf Molich, DialogDesign (www.DialogDesign.dk)
This document and its content is Copyright ©2012 Rolf Molich and UCD UK Limited.
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 2
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
3
Dogma 1
► Usability professionals must be highly usableReports, presentations, responses to comments, etc.
When you point your finger at someone, remember that three fingers point at yourself
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 3
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
Sweep before your own door
before you sweep the doorsteps of your neighbors
Excerpt from Usability Test Report - CUE-6, Team G
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 4
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
Excerpt from Usability Test Report - CUE-6, Team G
Thank you for your attention! Any questions?
Contact: Rolf Molich, DialogDesign, [email protected]
Picture credit: Rob Gonsalves – ”The Sun Sets Sail”
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 5
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
9
Dogma 2
► Data trumps opinion at any time
A Good Old American Bake-off
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 6
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
A Usability Bake-off
CUE-9:
19 Atlanta +16 Chemnitz
Professionals
5 Videos
>100 Different Findings
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 7
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
Data to Fight Unsubstantiated
Myths and Voodoo-- CUE motto
Please use a few minutes to mark your position on each of the above 5 statements
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 8
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
1Truth or myth?
Five users are enough to catch 85% of the usability problems in practically any product
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
1Truth or myth?
Five users are enough to catch 85% of the usability problems in practically any product
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 9
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
”The parabola of optimism” (Jared Spool)
18
Real data: CUE studies
CUE = Comparative Usability Evaluation
► 10-17 professional teams test the same website.
► In all CUE-studies, more than 60% of problems were uniquely reported.
► In CUE-4, more than 300 issues were reported.
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 10
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
Five users are enough to drive a
useful iterative cycle
2Truth or myth?
The main goal of a usability test is to discover usability problems
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 11
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
2Truth or myth?
The main goal of a usability test is to discover usability problems
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
Real cowboy programmers don’t
need no stinkin’ usability test
-- Anonymous
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 12
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
23
Goals of usability test
1. Find problems so they can be corrected
2. Demonstrate convincingly to skeptical stakeholders (developers, management) that problems exist and that there are efficient ways to find and correct them
3Truth or myth?
Expert reviews provide results that are as reliable as those from usability tests
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 13
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
3Truth or myth?
Expert reviews provide results that are as reliable as those from usability tests
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
26
Expert review vs. Utest
Data from CUE-studies, most notably CUE-4, consistently shows
► Expert reviews find as many problems as usability testing
► Expert reviews overlook problems –but so do usability tests
► Expert reviews are cheaper than usability tests
These findings apply only when expert reviews are carried out by Experts
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 14
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
27
Beware!
Expert reviews can be political dynamite in organizations that are immature with respect to usability.
Before doing an expert review, consider what you will answer an upset stakeholder or developer who asks you:
► “Why are your opinions better than mine?”
4Truth or myth?
At least 25% of the comments in a usability test report should be positive
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 15
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
4Truth or myth?
At least 25% of the comments in a usability test report should be positive
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
30
Positive Findings
1. Make it easier for you to sell inconvenient truths
2. Ensure that the development team doesn’t remove a feature that users actually liked
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 16
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
31
Positive Findings
”A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down”Mary Poppins
Even developers
have feelings
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 17
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
33
Required by UPA CPC
Positive findings are required by the UPA Code of Professional Conduct
► The CPC requires you to "accurately report both the positive and negative feedback".
► If you can prove that there is nothing positive to say, then you have fulfilled the CPC. I am not sure how I would prove this.
When you have a hammer in your hand, everything looks like a nail-- The Law of the Instrument, Abraham Kaplan
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 18
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
35
Real World Data
Number of reported positive findings for each CUE-9 team
0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 8 10
50%
30%
10%
5Truth or myth?
Usability testing can be conducted by anyone
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 19
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
5Truth or myth?
Usability testing can be conducted by anyone
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
5Truth or myth?
Quality testing can be conducted by anyone
Agree
Both agree & disagree
Disagree
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 20
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
If you don’t care
about quality, everything else
is trivial-- Gerald M. Weinberg
40
10 Assessments
1 professional passed with flying colors
2 professionals had serious deviations but no critical deviations from generally accepted good practice in usability testing.
5 professionals had both critial deviations and serious deviations
2 professionals did so badly that the assessor recommended that the client should not pay for the service, or that the test should be repeated at no cost for the client.
A "serious deviation" from good practice may skew important results.
A "critical deviation" from good practice will skewimportant test results seriously.
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 21
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
41
Client Actions
Actions taken by clients to prevent future quality problems:
► Develop and publish usable guidelines for good usability testing. The guidelines are based on observed user behaviour.
► Quality Assurance as part of procurement“Do a test while we observe”Is their understanding of a good usability test the same as ours?
► Make assessments available to teams and insist that they respond.
Fortunately, most usability professionals take pride in doing things right
42
Certification
► The German UPA is currently working on a professional certification scheme for ►Foundation level (“Do You Speak Usability?”)
►Usability Engineer
►Usability Tester
► Certification procedure: ►40 multiple choice questions
►Relevant deliverable (advanced levels only)
UCD 2012, London Rolf Molich, DialogDesign Page 22
Myths about usability testing Copies of Slides
6Evaluation
Did this presentation change some of your views of usability testing?
Yes
Don’t know
No
44
Takeaways
► As usability professionals we must set a good example for the world
►Our products, presentations, doings must be usable and useful: Correct, relevant, brief, constructive
► Five users are enough to drive a useful iterative cycle. Never claim that you can find all usability problems
► Expert reviews are valuable – but politically challenging
► Include positive findings