rochester public schools data and continuous improvement report
DESCRIPTION
Rochester Public Schools Data and Continuous Improvement Report. Rochester Area Math and Science Partnership February 20, 2013. Strategic Planning: Draft Mission. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rochester Public Schools Data and Continuous Improvement Report
Rochester Area Math and Science Partnership
February 20, 2013
Strategic Planning: Draft Mission
• Our mission is to inspire, challenge, and empower all students with the knowledge and skills required to reach their full potential, to contribute to future generations, and to become involved members of a global community.
Draft Strategic ObjectivesBy 2017, all students will:
1. Demonstrate and promote cultural understanding of self and others to become involved members of a global community
2. Identify, develop and apply their personal talents to contribute positively to future generations
3. Create and pursue their individual evolving roadmaps that empower them to reach their full potential.
Mathematics Proficiency (MCA)
All Stu-dent
s RPS
All Stu-dents MN
Asian
RPS
Asian MN
His-panic RPS
His-panic MN
Black
RPS
Black MN
White
RPS
White MN
FRP RPS
FRP MN
Not FRP RPS
Not FRP MN
LEP RPS
LEP MN
Not LEP RPS
Not LEP MN
SPED
RPS
SPED
MN
Not SPE
D RPS
Not SPE
D MN
2008-09
0.7015
0.6229
0.7194
0.5794
0.4549
0.3872
0.3939
0.3358
0.7657
0.6869
0.4891
0.4391
0.7887
0.7123
0.3918
0.3191
0.7443
0.6476
0.3922
0.3317
0.7401
0.67
2009-10
0.707
0.6469
0.7445
0.6181
0.505
0.422
0.4065
0.368
0.7703
0.7104
0.4954
0.4781
0.8091
0.7425
0.4196
0.3859
0.7473
0.6704
0.3883
0.3537
0.7482
0.6949
2010-11
0.6206
0.5645
0.6655
0.5396
0.3791
0.3199
0.3357
0.2813
0.6852
0.6325
0.4006
0.3765
0.7325
0.6741
0.2815
0.2574
0.6641
0.5902
0.3058
0.2725
0.6631
0.6045
2011-12
0.6779
0.6127
0.7301
0.5796
0.4434
0.382
0.4075
0.326
0.7462
0.6835
0.4687
0.4355
0.7871
0.7216
0.3465
0.308
0.7238
0.6386
0.3745
0.3386
0.7203
0.6589
5.0%
25.0%
45.0%
65.0%
85.0%
Grades 3-8, 112008-09 to 2011-12
RPS Compared to MN
Perc
en
t o
f S
tud
en
ts P
rofi
cie
nt
** Results are as released by MDE.
• RPS mathematics proficiency rates compared to MN are higher in most categories
High Level Mathematics
• 352 students currently enrolled in AP math courses (AP Calc AB, AP Calc BC, AP Stats)
AP Math Test Trend
School 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Century 93 101 140 145 139
John Marshall
23 42 35 39 81
Mayo 68 66 77 74 85
Totals 184 209 252 258 305
All Stu-dent
s RPS
All Stu-dent
s MN
Asian
RPS
Asian
MN
His-pani
c RPS
His-pani
c MN
Black
RPS
Black
MN
White
RPS
White
MN
FRP RPS
FRP MN
Not FRP RPS
Not FRP MN
LEP RPS
LEP MN
Not LEP RPS
Not LEP MN
SPED
RPS
SPED
MN
Not SPE
D RPS
Not SPE
D MN
2008-09
0.5339
0.4607
0.497
0.3516
0.2789
0.2006
0.151
0.1677
0.6159
0.5282
0.2509
0.2586
0.6379
0.5519
0.11 0.0908
0.5888
0.4869
0.2859
0.2313
0.5628
0.4961
2009-10
0.5568
0.4883
0.5282
0.3629
0.285
0.2107
0.2138
0.1934
0.6359
0.5614
0.2794
0.2865
0.6777
0.5933
0.1108
0.0856
0.6083
0.5163
0.2839
0.247
0.592
0.5258
2010-11
0.5264
0.4836
0.5267
0.3859
0.2198
0.2332
0.2284
0.1968
0.5984
0.5558
0.2671
0.2869
0.6459
0.5927
0.1121
0.0969
0.5721
0.511
0.2751
0.2446
0.5569
0.5212
2011-12
0.4967
0.5081
0.4659
0.4013
0.2778
0.2525
0.1639
0.2126
0.5796
0.5824
0.2654
0.315
0.6097
0.616
0.1075
0.1143
0.5372
0.5354
0.2372
0.2779
0.5316
0.5439
5.0%
25.0%
45.0%
65.0%
85.0%
Grades 5, 8, HS2008-09 to 2011-12
RPS Compared to MN
Percen
t o
f S
tud
en
ts P
ro
ficie
nt
• RPS science proficiency rates compared to MN are higher in most categories
Science Proficiency (MCA)
High Level Science
• 403 students currently enrolled in AP science courses (AP Biology, AP Chemistry, AP Physics)
AP Science Test Trend
School 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Century 112 98 139 112 81
John Marshall
58 50 38 56 87
Mayo 61 46 83 64 67
Totals 231 194 260 232 235
Certified Nursing Asst.
2009 2010 2011 2012
98 114 69 83
Benchmarking
• In a comparison of 8 similar school districts (i.e. based on LEP, Special Education, FRPL, and Minority demographics), Rochester Public Schools ranked 1st in both Math and Science in two of the last four years (2009 and 2010).
Benchmark ResultsScience
** Results are as released by MDE.
Anoka-Hen-nepin
Roseville Shakopee Hopkins Rochester Burnsville St. Louis Park
North St. Paul
Spring Lake Park
2008 0.4316 0.4502 0.3576 0.4529 0.4479 0.4248 0.4157 0.3412 0.3437
2009 0.4988 0.5055 0.5086 0.4855 0.5336 0.4923 0.4585 0.4413 0.3866
2010 0.5391 0.5267 0.5192 0.5482 0.5573 0.4837 0.5222 0.4442 0.4371
2011 0.5482 0.5322 0.5295 0.5246 0.5243 0.4954 0.4576 0.3896 0.3551
2012 0.574 0.516 0.528 0.527 0.496 0.488 0.487 0.458 0.381
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
MCA-II Science Benchmarking Analysis2008-09 to 2011-12
Per
cen
tag
e o
f S
tud
ents
Pro
fici
ent
Benchmark ResultsMathematics
** Results are as released by MDE.
Rochester Shakopee Anoka-Hen-nepin
Hopkins North St. Paul
Spring Lake Park
St. Louis Park
Burnsville Roseville
2008-09 0.7015 0.6239 0.6632 0.7057 0.6093 0.6004 0.6429 0.6318 0.6543
2009-10 0.707 0.6735 0.6818 0.7018 0.6449 0.6266 0.6713 0.6331 0.6522
2010-11 0.6206 0.5837 0.583 0.5475 0.5402 0.5501 0.5808 0.5218 0.5548
2011-12 0.678 0.65 0.627 0.626 0.606 0.603 0.591 0.557 0.537
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
35.0%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
95.0%
2008-09 to 2011-12 MCA Proficiency RatesOrdered By 2011-12 Rank
Pro
fici
ency
Per
cen
tag
e
Use of Technology
• We currently have 9 elementary and 10 secondary classrooms using 1:1 iPads
• We currently have 114 active blended courses and 2 wholly online courses. – Average enrollment per course is around 75
students.– Total number of students enrolled in blended /
online courses is about 8700.– About 100 teachers have an active blended
course.
Analysis of Current Situation• Needed to move to clear data teams model for PLCs• Need more frequent common assessments• Needed stronger instructional support• Needed to move from Core and Intervention to Tiered
Instruction• Needed stronger focus on standards• Needed easier way for teachers to create blended
classrooms (not BlackBoard)• Move from “Fidelity to the Curriculum” to “Fidelity to the
Student and Fidelity to the Standards:• Have a strong partnership with RCTC• Have a strong Medical Careers program at HSCC
Actions Taken• Replaced Stanford/Olsat with NWEA MAP (K-8
Math; 3-8 Science)• Math curriculum committee working to align
curriculum and assessments to standards• Science curriculum alignment to literacy
standards• Added instructional coaches to 6 elementary
schools• Provided instructional coaching training to
principals and district instructional staff• Providing Data Teams training for all sites
More Actions Taken• Added AP Calc BC, PLTW GTT Design & Modeling,
PLTW Civil Engineering & Architecture, PLTW Biomedical, Math for College (concurrent enrollment)
• Hired a STEM Coordinator• 1:1 iPad pilots at Longfellow, Willow Creek, Gage• Implementing Tiered Instruction (incl. lunch buddies at
HS)• Increased # of schools to 5 participating in Action 100
Reading
Mathematics NWEAFall 2012 Average Score Winter Average Score Growth Percent Meeting Growth Projection
Grade Kindergarten 141 149 8 54%
1 161 175 14 74%2 178 188.5 10.5 70%3 191 200 9 67%4 205.3 215.5 7.2 65%5 216 223 7 64%6 225.9 230.6 4.7 64%7 231.8 233.9 2.1 49%8 236 238.3 2.2 49%
Science-General Science NWEAFall 2012 Average Score Winter Average Score Growth Percent Meeting Growth Projection
Grade 3 189.6 194.8 5.1 60%4 196.9 201.7 4.8 66%5 202 204.7 2.7 52%6 207 209.5 2.5 55%7 211.7 213.3 1.6 52%8 215.3 216.7 1.4 51%
Science -Concepts and Processes NWEA
Fall 2012 Average Score Winter Average Score Growth Percent Meeting Growth ProjectionGrade
3 186.9 192.2 5.3 59%4 195.1 199 4 63%5 200.7 203.7 3 58%6 205.8 209.3 3.5 60%7 209.1 211.6 2.5 53%8 212.8 214.1 1.3 49%
Asian Hispanic Black White10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Mathematics Percent of Students Meeting
Growth Projections By Ethnicity Grades K-8
Asian 61%Hispanic 57%Black 55%White 63%
Asian Hispanic Black White10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Science-General Science Percent of Students Meeting Growth Pro-jection By Ethnicity
Grades 3-8
Asian 58%Hispanic 56%Black 55%White 56%
Asian Hispanic Black White10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Science-Concepts and Processes Percent of Students Meeting Growth Projec-tion By Ethnicity Grades
3-8
Asian 58%Hispanic 59%Black 53%White 58%
Future Actions
• Designing programming for CTECH (to open Fall 2015); expanding our program articulations
• Adding PLTW Human Body Systems: PLTW GTT Automation & Robotics; Multivariable Calc (concurrent enrollment); AP Environmental Science; AP Computer Science A
• Adding more coaches• Expanding the use of our planetarium with new digital
software• Offering CLEP tests as an option for Credit by Assessment• Working on transitioning to standards-based grading
Lead Indicators to be Used to Monitor Results
• NWEA MAP• MCA• Measurement team indicators for Strategic
Goals• AP participation and test data
Lessons Learned
• The data teams process is helping teachers improve instruction through collaborative inquiry.
• Standards-based instruction is beginning and will take much more support.
• We need to continue to improve the communication process to ensure students are able to register for rigorous courses.
• Our equity conversations must continue to ensure our gap continues to close.
Next Steps
• Curriculum and assessments aligned to the standards (pre)K-11
• Continue to grow PLTW, CTE, and other rigorous course offerings
• Continue to support differentiated and tiered instruction
• Continue to grow the use of the data teams process to improve instruction so that all students succeed