rob mark, school of education, queen’s university belfast, northern ireland

31
Quality and inclusion: developing quality management systems which empower learners and tutors: reflections from an evolving quality framework experiment .' Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland 32nd EUCEN Symposium and Project Forum Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 16-18 November 2006

Upload: hakeem-campbell

Post on 30-Dec-2015

35 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

‘ Quality and inclusion: developing quality management systems which empower learners and tutors: reflections from an evolving quality framework experiment .'. Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland 32nd EUCEN Symposium and Project Forum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

‘Quality and inclusion: developing quality management systems which empower learners and tutors: reflections from an evolving quality framework experiment .' Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

32nd EUCEN Symposium and Project Forum

Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 16-18 November 2006

Page 2: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Summary:

Background on quality – What do we mean by quality? EU Quality indicators etc;

Designing a Stakeholder Quality Framework - an example of a stakeholder quality model in lifelong learning

Page 3: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

The Need for Quality in Lifelong Learning EU Report on Quality & LL ( 35 countries)

recognised:

‘the need to set up mechanisms for quality assurance, evaluation and monitoring in order to ensure constant progression towards quality improvement with a view to striving for excellence on an ongoing basis.’

Quality Indicators of Lifelong Learning (E.C. 2002, p5)

Page 4: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

The language of quality:

What do we mean by quality? Is there agreement on what quality is?

How should we measure quality? Who should measure quality? Independent Assessors? Senior Mangers? Teachers? Learners?)

Page 5: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

What is Quality?

policy, institution, learning process Other terms- assessment? evaluation? review? Practice of experts? Process for improving accountability? Facilitating development & new knowledge through

steps in experts work? ‘No consensus exists among theorists and

practitioners of continuing higher education on how to define quality.’ ( Freedman )

Page 6: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

‘all learning activity undertaken through life with the aim of improving knowledge, skills and competencies within a personal, civic, social and /or employment-related perspective.’

EU Definition (2002) European Quality Indicators; Working Group on Quality Indicators

What is Lifelong Learning?

Page 7: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

qualitative & quantitative indicators can promote dialogue and support planning.

indicators can describe the context, Indicators can quantify objectives & provide

evidence on progress Indicators can provide insights into what has

contributed to achieving results.

Why do we need quality indicators in lifelong learning ?

Page 8: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Area A: Skills, Competencies and Attitudes New Skills for the Learning Society Learning to Learn Active Citizenship, Cultural and Social Skills Literacy & Numeracy

Area B: Access & Participation Access to Lifelong Learning Participation in Lifelong Learning

European Quality Indicators & Lifelong Learning

Page 9: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Area C: Resources for lifelong Learning Investment in Lifelong Learning Educators and Training ICT in learning

Area D: Strategies & System Development Strategies of Lifelong Learning Coherence of Supply Counselling and Guidance Accreditation and Certification Quality Assurance

European Report on Quality Indicators of Lifelong Learning: (based on the work of the Working Group on Quality Indicators in 35 countries).

European Quality Indicators & Lifelong Learning (2)

Page 10: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

‘Towards a Quality Framework for Adult Basic Education’ (1998 –2001) EU Socrates Project

From 2002 framework has been used in Ireland & Belgium(Rolling out phase)

Project Partners : Ireland: The National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland [email protected] Belgium Lire et Ecrire, Bruxelles, Belgium Belgium Collective Alpha, Bruxelles Northern Ireland ,UK Institute of Lifelong Learning, Queen‘s

University Belfast [email protected]

Designing a Stakeholder Quality Framework

Page 11: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Literacy, Participation & Quality

Literacy Partic ipation

Quality

Page 12: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

What was the Quality Framework designed to do?

raise awareness about the concept of quality within a total quality framework. which is capable of further development and which can be owned by stakeholders and at practitioner and management level.

Who was the Quality Framework designed for?

line managers and practitioners in adult basic education concerned with the implementation and monitoring of quality performance.

The Quality Framework

Page 13: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

The Evolving Quality Framework (EQF) EQF is a plan to guide and improve the quality of

service in adult basic education in Ireland

EQF is developed through research, consulting and testing

EQF provides a self evaluation tool to improve the quality of service

EQF is in its 4th year of operation in Ireland in the Vocational Education Committees.

Page 14: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Parts to the evolving quality framework

1. Guiding Principles2. five quality areas with statements of

quality3. nine step evaluation process

multi-stakeholder evaluation teams with trained facilitators

Page 15: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
Page 16: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Guiding Principles:

Right to attend on a voluntary basis & to set their goals to be supported

Ethical code of confidentiality, respect & trust to inform all aspects of organisation

Cultural differences to be respected at all levels Particular attention to creating an atmosphere of

social interaction, informality & enjoyment Learners to be enabled to participate in all aspects

of the organsiation

Page 17: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Quality areas and statements of quality Resources Management Teaching & learning Progression Outreach and promotion

Page 18: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Sample Quality Statements:Programme Elements:

learning and development sensitive and creative promotional strategies links with other groups additional student support staff training and development resources for teaching and learning management and planning programme evaluation premises scheme funding

Page 19: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

ABE Quality Framework: A process for implementation

Practice

Programme Improvement

Quality Statements

Measures

Performance Indicators

Data

Analysis

Guiding Principles

Evaluation Criteria

Page 20: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Reflection in Experiential Learning

The Experiential Learning CycleKolb, 1984

Concrete Experiencing of an

Experience

Active Experimentation

Reflective Observation

Abstract Conceptualising

Page 21: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
Page 22: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Increased understanding of the importance of

quality provision for learners Better understanding of the process of

measurement Improved listening and team work skill Greater self-confidence an outlet for learners views to be listened to improved provision responsive to the needs

Advantages of learner involvement in quality management

Page 23: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

lack of understanding of the framework

intimidating for some learners

slowed the process down

Problems involving learners:

Page 24: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Benefits of the Quality Framework: Can be used to define standards on key

topics Is flexible and responsive to needs Involves tutors, managers & learners can be used to inform the development of

outside reporting requirements

Page 25: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

What has been the impact of the QF in Ireland? Was voluntarily implemented in 28 out of 33

VEC adult literacy services Evolution is monitored and supported Has led to innovation e.g. assessment

framework, quality management training etc Has led to service improvements

Page 26: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Lessons Learned from the Quality Framework Provides an evidence based process for

programme improvement on a continual basis

Avoids a deficit approach to quality management

a multi-stakeholder approach has many benefits

ownership of QF can be developed by involving others including learners

Page 27: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Framework is not complete

time-consuming

Need for training and support

Need for input of resources

Conclusions: Limitations

Page 28: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

a focus on quality issues can encourage critical reflection and act as a catalyst for change

stakeholders can become actively involved in measuring quality & improvement in a short space of time

a change of attitude towards quality is discernable as a result of a more inclusive approach which values everyone’s concern

imaginative and innovative ways of measuring quality can result from team-work

the evolving nature of quality is recognised

Conclusions : Advantages

Page 29: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

‘the framework recognises achievements and celebrates good practice… The quality improvement process generates wider awareness of quality issues and commitment to improvement. The dialogue, evidence-gathering, review and action steps can promote a culture change.’ (Doyle, 2003)

‘a model with a commitment to achieving quality through negotiation with learners and with other stakeholder groups may be the best way to ensure the ongoing success of our lifelong learning practices.’ (Mark , 2005)

Comments on framework:

Page 30: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

EQUIPE: European Quality in Individualised Pathways in Education (2002-5)

Mark, R. (2005) The Quality debate in Lifelong Learning: what are we measuring and for whom? http://equipe.up.pt/

EQUIPE Project Website.Project Supported by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture Grundtvig 4

National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland. http://www.nala.ie/nalaprojects/project/20020131164824.html

Page 31: Rob Mark, School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

What is quality and how can we measure it?

To what extent should learners be involved in the quality management process?

What are the pro’s and con’s of top down versus bottom up approaches to nurturing quality?

Possible Questions for Discussion?