risk taking in sme's
TRANSCRIPT
Page | 1
Brian Stevens
BA Business administration with
Accounting and finance
Dissertation report
Does operational and financial risk taking
lead to success in SME’s?
University of Greenwich Medway
Page | 2
Abstract
Are small medium enterprises that are risk taking in the operational and financial risk areas more
successful than those that are adverse?
Introduction – The aims were to find the concepts of risk and what SME’s perceive as success, to find
if profit was influenced by the SME attitude to risk taking and to interpret research and data into a
conclusion that risk taking SME’s have higher success than risk adverse companies in the operational
and financial risk area.
Literature review – Risk reading and examination including perception, operational, financial, risk
taking and SME view of risk. Risk taking is down to personality type and situational variables;
Operational risk involves software, system and human interaction procedures whilst financial risk
involves investing into new products, hedge funds or change of business costs. The perception of
SME’s main objective is to survive which is most small firm success priority and risk taking is
restricted due to lower budgets, short-term financing and knowledge of risk.
Research methodology - A 15 questioned survey that was implementing with use of the literature to
capture SME perception of risk taking as well as profit against risk attitude. Likert scale method was
used in the survey from strongly agree ( risk taking) to strongly disagree (risk adverse), The profit
against attitude being analysed to discover if revenue was effected by risk attitude, Operational and
financial risk perception would be captured to determine the majority opinion of risk attitude to
indicate SME measure of success.
Data Analysis – Profit against risk attitude provided that a profit range was not because of the SME
risk taking as results showed that in each profit range had an equal scale of different opinion to risk
taking. The majority of SME’s resulted in having a mode disagree (adverse) in operational and
financing risk taking which indicated that most SME’s had this view.
Page | 3
Conclusions – Due to the literature and data analysis that although risk taking can produce success
but SME’s main focus is survival which gives them to have a higher perception of risk that gives most
SME’s an adverse attitude and based on the profit against attitude results shows that success can be
made with different risk attitude to risk and wasn’t dependant on this and from this point as well as
majority SME perceive success mainly to survive rather than high reward concludes that SME’s that
operational and financial risk take over adverse companies do not have a greater chance of success.
Recommendations – for SME’s in view of risk taking to firstly evaluate what is success for them,
secondly to grasp as much risk knowledge from their resources available to have the better
understanding of risk taking and finally to those who have high profit that do not risk take to
experiment with partial profit in risk taking to see if they can gain success from the experiment.
Page | 4
Contents
Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 2
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5
2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 7
3. Research methodology ................................................................................................................ 18
4. Data collection............................................................................................................................. 20
5. Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 29
6. Discussion.................................................................................................................................... 37
7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 43
8. Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 45
9. Bibliography ................................................................................................................................ 46
10. Appendix ................................................................................................................................... 48
Page | 5
1. Introduction
In this study I will be looking to find an outcome through research and literature to find if small
medium enterprises that take more risk in the operational and financial risk areas are more likely to
succeed than those who are risk adverse.
1.1 Aims
Identify through the literature the conception of risk and what SME’s perceive to be success
If risk taking affects the chances of success due to the profits of the SME
To approve or disapprove that risk taking in these areas gives a better chance of success to SME’s
1.2 Objectives
A thorough reading of literature in risk within the context of the study
Using knowledge of literature produce a survey to measure risk taking in SME’s
Send out to sample of small medium enterprises
Collect and then analyse the data obtained
Interpret data with literature to produce findings and conclusions
1.3 Significance of study
I believe this is worth investigating because first of all I am very interested in small business as I
aspire to one day perhaps start my own business and am keen to learn how these companies handle
their risk taking in the day to day running in the business world. Risk is a perception and it is key to
find out how the small medium enterprises attitude to risk is taken whether they deem being risk
taking is leading them to success or in fact not taking risk is actually being a successful criteria for
Page | 6
them in having annual income. This topic is very capturing as it gives perspective on how smaller
firms take risk and how much their attitude can actually effect the progression or declining of a
business.
1.4 Plan of action
The research that is going to help validate if the thesis is true or false or in fact near one side with
other possible arguments is going to be crucial in this study. The research will be taken out in 6 key
steps first of all understand the objectives of the study, secondly research a wide range of literature
into risk, operational and financial risk and how risk affects small medium enterprises. Thirdly set out
a research methodology to get the view point from smaller firms. Step four is to then create a survey
and send to a sample of SME’s which is then followed by a data analysis and interpretation taking
into the account of knowledge obtained from the literature review. The final step is to find out
evidence of approving or disapproving the thesis and then to make recommendations on the
subject.
1.5 What should be expected from the results
What is hoped to be achieved is to find a significant attitude to risk from small medium enterprises
and whether this attitude can affect the chances of them being successful. A successful thorough
investigation into the literature review and a well-constructed survey and analysis must be
undertaken to help achieve this to give concluding evidence and recommendations.
Page | 7
2. Literature review
2.1. Introduction
In this chapter I will be focusing on the literature of my study which my dissertation is looking at are
small medium enterprises succeeding more by taking risk than those who are risk adverse in the
operating and financial areas?. I will be evaluating the literature I find about risk, the perception of
risk and the financial and operating risk area keeping it relevant to my topic. I will be measuring and
arguing what different authors have said whether they agree or disagree on the same thing and I will
give my own thoughts on this. From this I will be able to discover evidence on how SME’s deal with
risk and I will use this when analysing my survey when measuring the companies risk choices against
their profit to see if risk has helped them in their success.
2.2Risk and SME’s managing risk
Risk is what people take every day based on their decisions which can lead to certain events
happening to them but in the business context risk “the chance of something happening that will
have an impact upon objectives. It is measured in terms of consequences and likelihood” (Hodges,
2000). Businesses have to be very cautious when taking risk as it could lead to debt or even
bankruptcy and these decisions have to be assessed before being made.
In a journal article by Adrian Slywotzky he said that strategic risks are needed to be managed to
generate high returns (Slywotzky, 2004) this is important to keep the company profitable, these
strategic risks include:
Page | 8
Technological risk – keeping up to date with the new technology out there to enhance the
company in their market.
Customer risk - prioritising customers come to them as a customer can switch quickly to new
products or services from competitors so it is important the company keeps up with the
demand.
New project risk – this is a massive risk as the project could fail to attract customers and
competitors could imitate it and there would be no market share gained.
Brand risk – any potential problem could cause damage to the brand and the possibility of
loss of customer loyalty so it is important the business keeps control of the threats that
could harm their image.
Competitor risk – A competitor could come up with something that is costly to imitate and
unique which could make them the market leader and take all the customer to them
instead.
Industry economics risk – when a company achieves extended growth it is hard for them to
increase their profit margins and by this point their customers can see competitive prices
and choose the lowest price available and the company has to try and keep competitive
price as well as high profit margins.
Market stagnation risk - It is important to get across to the company’s customers as they
have to show offer the products in the best method possible to keep revenue of their
business.
It’s about managing risk that keeps the company going as “business management has to be prepared
for the current risk environment. The corporation exposure to serious loss from risk is linked with
failure and this shows managing risk is a full time responsibility” (Boodman, 1987). Especially with
the current economic environment it is important that there is a risk manager to oversee the threats
that could harm the company.
Page | 9
The role of a risk manager involves a wide range of tasks but the widest roles are providing a risk
management framework, building risk awareness into long term corporate communication
programmes and issuing guidelines and giving advice on risk (Ward, 2001). Risk taking has to be
done wisely and it shows that the importance of analysing risk will give me an idea of how much
companies analyse risk before making decisions and I can draw from this to use in relevance for my
topic and include in my survey.
SME’s main focus of concern is actually survival (Waring, 2002) this shows that Small medium
enterprises main ambition is to still be in business year by year which may restrict them from taking
such risks as they could face liquidation. I will have to find out in my survey if the SME’s companies
take risks and gain considerable profit because of this or if they are restrained by the fear of survival
and take no risks in their business approaches.
2.3Perception of risk
The perception of risk can determine a company’s attitude to how much risk they are willing to take
to make profit as the core competencies and management of the company have an impact on their
risk taking which could halt them from making the right risks or in fact harm them in taking too much
and making a loss.
One article suggest that risk preference is a stable personality trait and the effect of situational
variables affect their choice on risk perception (Weber & Milliman, 1997) this means depending on
the situation determines their decision on this risk action.
Another article suggests that being negative about risk perception is actually thinking about the
chance of risk in the first place is being negative (Sjoberg, 2007) what the writer is claiming is
thinking about the possibility of the risk being taken means they are already being negative which
would most likely give a signal of a company being risk adverse if they thought a lot about the
decision.
Page | 10
It has also been said that the perception of risk is depending on manager/companies dimensions of
knowledge of risk is how well they manage this perception (Singh & Bhowal, 2011) what the two
authors are pointing out is that companies perception towards risk is dependent on their actual
knowledge of what it can lead to being positive or negative.
All the authors argue good points in relation to risk perception as they all claim to give evidence on
what effects decisions on risk taking. It is down to the company’s decision at the end and they have
to go on their knowledge and experience to whether they take the risks in order to expand and with
the more understanding of the risk environment the better for them.
Focusing on SME’s they are more likely to have a high perception of risk as they have less finances
and resources to be aware of the of potential risks compared to large companies who have the
sources to have the knowledge available (Durst & Edvardsson, 2012). As found in the literature
perception of risk is based on the personality trait of the manager of the SME company and it will be
interesting to find out in my proposed survey if there is a trend of adverse or taking in risk activities
which would give me evidence of a typical manager in a SME on their perception of risk and whether
this measures against their company turnover.
2.4 Financial risk
Financial risk is what is in the name it’s the financing of the company and whether there is not
enough capital to prevent debt for the company. Financial risk can be linked to business risk which is
“the risk of financial loss due to changes in the competitive environment or the extent the business
can adapt to these changes” (Doff, 2008) this means that they have not financed in the right areas to
keep up with the current market and to retain customer loyalty.
Page | 11
Financial risks especially for SME’s
Example of financial risk Risk effect on company
Cash flow management Especially for SME’s lack of control of cash flow
knowing the ins and outs of your company and
being able to forecast the future is hazardous as
keeping control of the budget keeps the firm in
control
Investments Can be a hedge fund or funding into new
products it is a risk in having the company’s
capital into investments that could fail
Financing For SME’s getting financing is important and is
tough and being able to establish these funds is
important for survival
Business costs Increasing costs such as labour and fuel costs
have a marginal impact on a SME the higher
these costs are the more worry for the smaller
firm.
In a journal article the author has said that financial risk management activities can reduce risk and
value adding if it reduces the cost of financial distress (Fairchild, 2002) and what Fairchild is saying is
that if there is tasks to reduce financial risk then it gives the organisation a lot more value other than
for example brand or customer service.
SME’s generally have low budgets and rely on short term finance because of constant cash flow
problems (Paul & Boden, 2011) this makes it more important to take financial risk cautiously as
investing company finances into new areas or a project to take the company forward could damage
Page | 12
the business. Linking back to my thesis it is important that I now use my survey to question the
SME’s on how they have used finances in development and how they would use financial risk in
certain situations.
2.5 Operational risk
Operational risk is defined as non- financial risks and the failure of internal processes, people and
systems (Kuritzkes, 2002). It is the risk that mainly human interaction affects the state of the
businesses day to day running of the firm.
An organization has to manage all of the operation aspects in order to prevent the risk of it having
an impact on the firm’s process. Some of the operation risks that need to be controlled are dealing
with fraud issues, processing errors, business discontinuity, legal ability, reputation and strategic risk
management (Power, 2005).
Operational risks
Example of operational risk Risk effect on company
fraud This can be tax evasion or theft of hacking
information for which the company would be
heavily penalised
Reputation Not handling their business dealings in the right
way such as improper trade and manipulation
which then customers loyalty would be damaged
Employee dissatisfaction Employees are not being treated how they want
and this is a risk as they may not function to their
Page | 13
maximum
Business disruption Can be system or software failure which the
company has to control to avoid disrupting the
business operating
Processing errors Such as data entry and errors in accounting and
reporting which can cause hassle and a lot of the
firms time
From this literature I have to use the operational functions in the survey to measure how much the
SME uses operation risk in my survey and whether their risks in their operations helps them achieve
success and it is important the questions are worded correctly to make sure responses are valid uses
of data to my study.
2.6 Risk taking and Companies performance
Risk taking is normally down to the manager of the company and they lay their own reputation on
the line when making the decisions. Risk taking is valued and essential to innovation and success. A
good manager is seen as taking risks and not gambling (March & Shapira, 1987) this paper shows
that risk is taken in order to move on as a company to seek new innovation and success in their
market.
Risk taking can be divided into three main areas
Risk Taking – a risk taker is someone who seeks to desire sensation and is willing to do
what’s possible to reach the top (MacCrimmon & Wehrung, 1990) this is someone or
business decisions that are always very risky to what they currently own
Risk Neutral – This is where someone is neither risk taking nor risk adverse they are stuck in
the middle when taking risk.
Page | 14
Risk adverse – tends to be less likely to take risk and with risk expect low return. Risk-averse
will see threats and continue to use the methods that give them success (Reed & Storrud-
Barnes, 2010) this will be someone who will keep to what’s going well for them and think
there will be no need to take risk to change.
The level or risk you take measures you the amount of reward you receive as taking risk is an
investment and that will suit the company’s needs and this can impact on the readiness of the
decision to accept risk in pursuit of expected high reward (Rosenberg, 1979). It is what the business
wants to get out of the risk they go into as if they want to keep their finances tight the return will be
profitable but only low but high risk is dangerous but can achieve outstanding return.
The traditional way of measuring performance just includes an accounting figure on the return but
does not actually include the perspective of the variation in risk taking itself (Jemison, 1987) this
shows that some firms may not actually measure their performance by the amount of risk they have
undertaken during the accounting period and will not know how well it has worked out for them. A
firm having a review of their risk performance can learn from mistakes and take experience in
regarding how to take risk in the future.
One article argues two points about risk taking in company performance firstly declining firms that
reduce risk taking go on to further decline whilst in the paper it has also been said that firms that are
low performing take more risks and therefore reduce performance more (Wiseman & Bromiley,
1996) with these two theories they both have credibility but I would agree more with the second
point that companies who are declining take risks because they are trying to get themselves moving
forward and taking risk is innovation and one high risk can pull off a high return and the firm will be
on the rise again.
Page | 15
A paper suggests that SME’s have to finance in new products and services to meet customer needs
to have growth and success in performance and to sell most of their current products/services (Oke,
et al., 2007) and this is reliant on financing and these smaller firms have to take risk in getting the
finance to have the products ready for their target market.
Focusing on SME’s and there risk taking towards their performance I have to in my survey ask the
SME’s on activities that they take in risk to achieve their success and it is important that the question
measures and captures the correct data for my study.
Page | 16
2.7 Discussion
In review of the literature I have researched I must now use this to create a methodology for the
survey to find out and to change and improve the questions I have created in the sample
questionnaire in the proposal.
From the literature I was able to find key points to give me vital knowledge in order to carry out my
survey and study:
SME’s main aim is to survive and risk management is the key to stability and to taking risk to go
forward, I agree that the main aim of smaller firms is to survive but without taking risks they are
neglecting to expand in growth.
Risk perception is going to be what is measured in the survey and I found in the literature it is what
the company has knowledge of and that perhaps thinking of the implications of risk is being negative
which can been seen as being risk adverse and t will interesting to see the results as I am going to
ask questions about their risk activity and also scenario type situations which will give me the firms
perception of risk and whether it’s taking or adverse.
Operation and financial risk in SME’s is more crucial than larger companies as they have more to lose
and from the literature I have to make sure that the questions in my survey are measuring these two
types of risk so I will evenly split operational asking questions about human interaction and the
everyday functions of the company and financial risk with how much money they invest and how
they would deal in scenarios.
In the literature about risk taking and performance I am raising a few points I found that risk is taken
is valued as innovation to succeed and this gives me more evidence for risk takers as I can measure
the small firms by success if they are risk taking as they are already making a movement to go
forward to grow.
Page | 17
Another aspect of literature I have found is that risk is not often calculated in a company’s
performance which means most companies don’t know how risk has impacted on their business.
This makes it important that I focus on capturing information about the firms risk activity and the
survey should be 100% based on their attitude towards risk.
There is a set of authors which highlighted two points about risk taking and how it affects their
performance and they were companies taking no risk tend to decline but companies who also take
risk decline. As I highlighted earlier I believe that the second point of taking risk despite decline is a
SME in the right set up to be successful as they want to go up in their market and although it might
not mean they get success they are in my view considered more successful as they are taking risks to
expand. This gives me more meaning to my methodology as I can consider that the SME’s I get that
have shown they are risk takers but have not got considerable profit I can still value them as being
successful as they are looking to improve for the future.
2.8 Conclusion
With my sample survey already in place in the proposal the literature I have reviewed has given me
more credibility in the type of questions I have included as they will measure the companies
operation and financial risk with questions about the way they run in their firm and how they will
deal in possible situations regarding risk. I will ask for the SME’s operating turnover and I will
measure this figure against their risk type. I have set the survey to be a Likert scale and will have five
responses but ultimately after the data analysis I will find out if the company is a risk taker, risk
neutral or risk adverse. I will also consider those who are risk taking but not having successful
turnover to be successful as they are willing to succeed I think this is a point to refer to in my analysis
but ultimately to find out if SME’s that take risk are more successful than those who are adverse and
this statement would be true if the more companies in my survey have financial success against their
risk taking.
Page | 18
3. Research methodology
3.1 Introduction
The research methodology I used in my study was first of all the evidence I obtained from the
literature of my study and secondly how I developed the knowledge from the literature into a 15
question survey which was sent out to a sample of small/medium enterprises. The survey included
5 demographic questions which included their estimated profit turnover. The next 5 was their view
on taking operational risks and the concluding 5 was their view on financial risk taking. For these risk
taking questions I used a Likert scale which the respondent answers were strongly agree, agree,
neutral, disagree and strongly disagree. Strongly agree being 1 and strongly disagree being 5. On the
basis of their profit turnover against their response to risk taking, the overall perception to risk, as
well as referring to the literature review and my own opinion I will interpret if their risk taking has
given them success.
3.2 Sampling
In distributing my survey (see appendix) I used the website survey monkey to create my
questionnaire into three sets of questions demographics, operational and financial. Using the
website (Surveymonkey, 2013) I created a data collector which was a web link for the respondent to
easily gain access to the survey. It is important that the businesses were small medium enterprises
and that they were in the United Kingdom. I then located a UK small business directory (UKSBD,
2013) well as knowing a few business owners to then send out the survey .I used the method of
email by creating a letter explaining the thesis, what the survey was about and data protection being
used for academic purposes. Over 200 emails had been sent to multiple businesses in a range of
Page | 19
counties and different professions to get a fair response. The response was limited but enough
sample was collected to start analysing and interpreting the data.
3.3 How the data will be analysed
As indicated already in this chapter the data will be analysed using Likert scale with risk taking
relating to strongly agree and risk adverse to strongly disagree. This would be 5 scale with the
middle being risk neutral. The profit of the small medium enterprise will be linked to the company’s
original opinion of risk attitude to interpret if the attitude can have an impact on profit. In analysing
the operational and financial risk questions being 5 on each descriptive statistics will be used in
analysing each individual question and a total of each category. It is important that the mean and
standard deviation is not used using this function as this is a false interpretation as using this tool the
results will be focused on the median, mode and range as this gives the result in most powerful
response and can showcase a trend a more powerful side of the Likert scale with more respondents
for example answering the strongly agree side of the scale to the strongly disagree side.
Page | 20
4. Data collection
The respondents answered to a Likert scale with 1 being strongly agree and 5 being strongly
disagree. The lower the number the more risk they perceive to take. Below is a showcase of the data
in chart form
4.1Demographic data
Page | 21
The two graphs shows the demographic data from the survey which resulted in the number of
employees that the small medium enterprises had which showed 92% of the companies had over 20
employee whilst 8% had less than 5 members of staff suggesting some of these were sole traders.
The second graph shows the profit estimated profit that the SME currently has which had a diverse
percentage of profit with the SME’s sampled.
23.1%
30.8%
7.7%
7.7%
30.8%
SME annual turnover
<50k
51K-100K
101K-150K
151K-200K
201K>
Page | 22
4.2 SME perception of risk taking to succeed
This graph shows the company’s original risk attitude to risk taking to success which resulted in a
diverse and split opinion into risk taking can help generate success.
23.1%
23.1%
15.4%
30.8%
7.7%
Our company believes that taking risk is important for success
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Page | 23
4.3 Operation risk responses
Below will show the response of the data to the operation risk questions in graph form
The response for the best deal being more important than customer reputation showed that the
most response was strongly disagree with 46.2%.
0.0% 0.0%
23.1%
30.8%
46.2%
The best deal for the company is more important than building reputation for our
customers
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
7.7%
15.4%
0.0%
38.5%
38.5%
Preventing data entry and accounting errors is not one of our main concerns
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Page | 24
The opinion of the operational risk of preventing data entry and accounting errors showed that the
most powerful answer was joint strongly disagree and disagree with 38.5% each.
The response that was must selected was strongly disagreeing with 69.2% on the opinion the SME’s
view of decision making effect on employees.
0.0% 0.0% 7.7%
23.1%
69.2%
Taking important decisions we do not consider the impacts this will have on our employees
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0.0%
30.8%
0.0%
46.2%
23.1%
Fixing system and software problems is not our main priority
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Page | 25
The majority response for fixing systems and software problems was disagree with 46.2%
This operational risk question was a more direct risk taking perspective on relying on employee
performance with 69.2% strongly agreeing with this statement.
69.2%
23.1%
7.7% 0.0% 0.0%
We heavily rely on our employee performance
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Page | 26
4.4 Financial risk responses
The showcase on the questions based on financial risk in graph form is below
This financial risk question showed the response to the statement of company not using cashflow
management with the most answer being 46.2% disagrees.
0.0%
30.8%
7.7%
46.2%
15.4%
Our company does not use cashflow management to forecast the future
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0.0% 7.7%
15.4%
61.5%
15.4%
If there is a new product or service beneficial to the company we would spend beyond are
means to offer it to our customers
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Page | 27
61.5% was the most response to disagreeing with this statement on spending more than the
companies means to offer a beneficial new product/service to customers.
High investment being important to improve was more split opinion in response with the highest
answer being 38.5% neutral.
7.7%
15.4%
38.5%
15.4%
23.1%
High investment is important for any company to improve
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
0.0% 15.4%
15.4%
38.5%
30.8%
With our finances we believe in taking high risk for high reward
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Page | 28
This financial risk statement of believing in taking high risk for high reward was very most
respondent to the disagree side of the scale with 38.5 % the highest disagree and then 30.8%
strongly disagree.
The final financial risk statement had the highest response from the sample of 61.5% to select
disagree in regards to a company spending more than their budget to progress.
0.0% 15.4%
7.7%
61.5%
15.4%
A company can survive spending more than their budget to progress
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Page | 29
5. Data Analysis
5.1 Profit against attitude to risk
With the respondent’s stating their profits they then answered a question stating their attitude to
risk and the link between the two didn’t interpret any real outcome as the profit differed with the
companies attitude to risk on an equal scale for example the respondent’s with a high profit of 201k
or over the strongly agree, agree, strongly disagree and disagree were practically 25% each. Also
with companies profit of 50k or less was split 33% over strongly agree, agree and disagree. This again
shows very equal results but more of an indication for companies earning less have to take risk to
succeed and this gives a thought that risk is actually a situational choice of perception. This gives
reasoning that the success from risk taking is a perception of the business or manager. This being
linked to points made in literature review and will be commented on in discussion.
Profit 201k> Operational risk answer
percentage
Financial risk answer percentage
Strongly disagree 45% 15%
Disagree 15% 35%
Neutral 10% 20%
Agree 15% 25%
Strongly agree 15% 0%
Profit 50k< Operational risk answer
percentage
Financial risk answer
percentage
Strongly disagree 40% 13.3%
Disagree 13.3% 53.3%
Page | 30
Neutral 6.6% 26.6%
Agree 6.6% 0%
Strongly agree 26.6% 6.6%
Above shows the highest and lowest profit groups in terms of answer percentage and from these
two profit groups you can see that there is also not much difference in opinion when it comes to
how the small medium enterprises perceive risk taking as both of the profit groups have mainly
answered in the two risk adverse categories in strongly disagree and disagree. This gives more
reasoning that attitude to risk taking does not affect the success of a small medium enterprise in
terms of profits.
Page | 31
5.2 Operational risk analysis
Question ! Question 2 Question 3
Mean 4.230769 Mean 4.076923 Mean 4.615385
Median 4 Median 4 Median 5
Mode 5 Mode 4 Mode 5
Standard
Deviation 0.83205
Standard
Deviation 1.037749
Standard
Deviation 0.650444
Question 4 Question 5 Operation Total
Mean 3.615385 Mean 1.384615 Mean 3.584615
Median 4 Median 1 Median 4
Mode 4 Mode 1 Mode 5
Standard
Deviation 1.192928
Standard
Deviation 0.650444
Standard
Deviation 1.413023
Page | 32
Using descriptive statistics I have analysed each question from the operational risk category and the
total to give me the impression on how the SME’s will take risk in the category.
Question 1 – The best deal for the company is more important than customer reputation
The results shown from this question that the maximum answer was 5 strongly disagree and the
minimum was 3 neutral with the mode being 5 strongly disagree. This is showing that in response to
taking operation risk based on this scenario that the overall judgement is that businesses do not
believe they have to take this risk with no respondents agreeing with the statement to some degree
at all.
2. Preventing data entry and accounting errors is not one of our main concerns
In analysis of this operational risk question the median and mode is both 4 being disagree and with
the range being 3 this yet shows SME’s tend to not want to take risk in this scenario with the most
common answer being disagree.
3. When taking important decisions we do not consider the effects on our employees
Page | 33
In analysis of this statement this was out of the five operation risk questions was the most risk
averse response from the SME’s with the median and mode both being 5 strongly disagree with the
minimum answer being 3 neutral.
4. Fixing system and software problems is not our main priority
This question responses has a median and mode of 4 disagree this shows that the assumption of
SME’s is mainly risk averse I response to this statement.
5. We heavily rely on employee performance
This question surprisingly has an opposite outcome in comparison to the other 4 questions as the
median and mode was 1 strongly agree and the maximum answer was 3 neutral and this says that
the majority of SME’s take risk in relying operationally on their employee performance. Whether the
significant difference in risk taking is based on the statement or possibly on the situation as linking
back to the literature review suggests certain variables can have the impact of attitude to risk
Operational risk as a whole the median was 4 disagree and the mode was 5 strongly disagree and
this shows that the view on the senior management from the SME’s that responded is that they are
risk averse on taking operational risks. As one question from the 5 was strongly risk taking this gives
some thought that the success of risk taking is merely situational or down to the actual perception of
risk by the company.
5.3 Financial risk analysis
Question 6 Question 7 Question 8
Mean 3.461538 Mean 3.846154 Mean 3.307692
Median 4 Median 4 Median 3
Page | 34
Mode 4 Mode 4 Mode 3 Standard Deviation 1.126601
Standard Deviation 0.800641
Standard Deviation 1.250641
Question 9 Question 10 Financial total
Mean 3.769231 Mean 3.846154 Mean 3.646154
Median 4 Median 4 Median 4
Mode 4 Mode 4 Mode 4 Standard Deviation 0.926809
Standard Deviation 1.068188
Standard Deviation 1.037286
Again using descriptive statistics each financial risk question has been analysed to view the SME’s
opinion on how much risk they would take on the following statements.
Question 6 – Our Company does not use cash flow management to forecast the future
This statement the response was the median and mode was 4 disagree and this shows that the
SME’s are risk averse as they use cash flow management to forecast the future so they do not take
risk on not relying on using the financial statement.
Page | 35
Question 7 – If there is a new product or service that is beneficial to the company we would spend
beyond are means
The analysis from this question is very similar to question 6 with the median and mode both being 4
disagree and this yet again shows the SME’s view would be averse as they wouldn’t be encouraged
to take the risk on new ventures if it could give them high reward.
Question 8 – high investment is important for any company to improve
The response to this question seemed to be a very neutral response as the median and mode being
3 neutral. This question is the most debatable out of the five financial risk statements with different
opinions on investment. Yet again this can give an impression that the success of risk is a perception
by the company.
Question 9 – A company can survive spending more than their budget to progress
This question yet again shows a median and mode of 4 which is telling that companies will not take
financial risk to improve as they do not want to face the complications. The risk adverse approach is
showing that they do not think taking these risks creates success.
Question 10 = with our finances we believe in taking high risk for high reward
This is a more direct statement for financial risk taking and the response shows that the median and
most disagree with this statement and that they do not perceive getting high award for a high
investment risk.
Overall the financial risk responses are showing to be risk averse with the median and mode being 4
disagree. From these results it seems that financial risks for small medium enterprises are not risk
taking with the main result disagreeing that they take risk financially. On a thought back to the
literature review there was a point that SME’s take less risk as they have more to lose and this will
bring up an interesting debate in the discussion and conclusion.
Page | 36
5.4 Operational vs. Financial risk
Comparing the data results from the operational risk questions and financial risk questions Using the
descriptive statistics there is not a significant difference between the two risk categories which
shows both types of risk are deemed in the same perspective, The financial risk results are only
slightly more risk adverse which is most likely logical because of the actual investment of the small
medium enterprises money.
Page | 37
6. Discussion
6.1 What the data analysis told us
The data analysis showed that the profit of the small medium enterprises wasn’t dependant on the
companies attitude to risk taking as the SME’s with high profits had different opinion of attitude
towards risk as well as companies with low profits also having different attitudes to risk. This part of
the analysis shows an equal attitude to risk to profit. This indicates that the success of risk taking is
down to the perception by the small medium enterprises senior management.
Looking at the results from the operational and financial risk questions they were set out to measure
the small medium enterprises attitude to a risk scenario that might be an opportunity for them to
get success from although it could cause a risk to the companies’ existence. First of all comparing
both risk scales they were fairly similar in the results of how they would take attitude to risk in both
risk categories. This suggests that all risk is considered by the SME’s whether it being an operational
function or putting capital from finances into an investment. Both categories were mean averaged
between neutral and disagree with mainly disagree being the most chosen response which seems to
show that the small medium enterprises are risk averse into taking risk but does this credit that
actually taking risk is actually not being successful.
These results may not actually give the true reflection that small medium enterprises taking risk
gives them success but what the results do show is that these companies do have a perception of
mainly being risk averse to take chances to expand and grow profit for their businesses. For some
questions the results were different in some capacity for example one operational risk question was
strongly agree as the mode which could suggest that it was down to the question or the fact that risk
taking is acted upon on the situation with the variables being looked up at the time to determine
whether risk should be taken. Interestingly enough that question was the most direct statement to
Page | 38
taking operational risk with the statement being “we heavily rely on employee performance “. Also
the most directive financial risk question being “we believe in taking high risk for high reward with
our finances £ differed from the other financial risk statements with a more debatable result with
the other statements being all risk averse majority responses. It will be key to link these results back
to the literature review on whether the thesis will be approved to be right or disapproved. Overall
from the data suggest that the larger scale of SME’s attitude to risk is averse but does this mean they
are not taking risk to give them a better chance of success.
6.2 Linking back to the literature review
After the results from the survey undertaken showed that most small medium enterprises have a
more risk adverse attitude to risk taking. Now looking back at what was found in the literature
review I will be able to relate if this risk averse attitude is actually stopping them gaining success or
really is the approach giving them success by not taking chances and keeping their businesses going
and with the profit they have.
Linking with the data showing powerful attitude to being more risk adverse than risk taking it relates
to the literature where SME’s actually have a higher perception of risk than larger companies as they
have more to lose than larger companies as the owners actual living is actually dependent from
money made from their businesses. This gives most SME’s opinion that actually being more cautious
with their risk taking gives them success as they are being cautious and want to generate profit
without high risk of being liquidised. This is not saying that taking risk does not get success as any
risk can be pulled off by a business that can give them significant reward and revenue which
showcases it is more of a roll of a dice by the manager of the company, it gives credit that risk is
purely a perception and just down to the individual of the company but the trend in most SME’s is to
have a perception of being safe and not taking much risk in order to generate profit.
Page | 39
On to the actual perception of risk itself it’s all down to the company as in the literature it is
mentioned that perception of risk is down to the personality traits of the manager and the actual
knowledge of the managers risk implications as if they know more about what the risk can cause and
the best approach to take the risks they are going to be more confident about the risks that put their
companies in. This is why all companies not just small medium enterprises have different attitudes
to risk as its down to the values and culture of the management and business this is why in the data
some SME’s have answered with different attitudes to risk and have put different responses to the
scenarios that was presented before them.
Also the surveys strength to get results is showed as the statements on occasions had a different
outcome of result to attitude to other statements because in the literature risk can be taken due to
the variables in the current situation which merits that risk is a perception of the scenario that arises
and that down to the managers personality it’s how important they value the opportunity to take
the risk at that time and what effect it will have on their business.
Looking at financial risk specifically the data feedback from the small medium enterprises ties in with
the literature that SME’s operate on small budgets and focus on short term financing and this is why
they are more cautious with risk taking which the results from the survey credit the literature with
the main attitude being risk adverse.
With operational risk the results in small medium enterprises being mostly risk adverse in the
functions of the everyday business including software, system and employee control is that they
have to ensure that all processes that keep the business running and the employees work ethic is
important for them to operate. This means that the running of the company is important and any
issues regarding operational problems are attending immediately as they won’t take the risk of these
factors harming the company’s everyday business.
Page | 40
One article in the literature had 2 points about risk taking which suggested reducing risk is actually
declining as well as taking risk and declining but it is interpreted that actually taking risk is being
successful rather than reducing as taking risk shows ambition in becoming a more successful
company. This gives a good argument about the results that the majority of the small medium
enterprises are not aiming to be successful by taking risk to gain a higher reward.
Also from the literature there was a journal article by Alan Warring that SME’s main focus is actually
survival which in theory means risk taking is not a success to smaller firms because simply making
sure they have enough funds to operate in the next 12 months and forward is actually success to
them and being cautious in risk is how they aim to survive in their respective industries.
From the link between the survey results and the literature it interprets that small medium
enterprises view is that being risk adverse is success to them as their main aim is actually survival.
There is a strong argument from the literature that taking risk is showing the intent to be successful.
The main point is that SME’s perception is that not taking risk is successful. This could be just the
actual perception and not that fact as there are some cases of risk taking that leads to success.
6.3 Final thoughts
My interpretation is that firstly I with the results and literature I think that small medium enterprises
view risk taking as not being successful because their main focus is staying afloat and minimising the
risk they take is the best way they can achieve this as it is staying safe and ensuring there will be a
tomorrow for them. This is not meaning to say that taking risk is not successful as it just depends on
the company and to see if the potential risk actually pays off to give them high reward.
The data shows strong and similar risk adverse results in both financial and operational areas but I
believe that taking financial risk is more of a concern to these smaller firms than operational risk as
finances are more important to these firms and they will take more cautious approach with these
risks as they will cause more damage with a financial investment going wrong other a system failure
Page | 41
for example. Risk is all the same and it is important that it is well managed and strategic approaches
are in place when taking risk as the more prepared the better positioned the business is in taking
risk.
I believe that risk taking is just a perception by the smaller firms and each company is different
depending on the character of the manager at the business. The perception of most of these firms is
that risk is too harmful to them and is why being adverse is staying successful. Yet again one
personality from an SME may think being risk taking is the key to success whilst another may think
that staying adverse is the key to success it’s just down to the personality and perception of the
company.
Yet the point of the article about reducing risk and taking risk but decreasing performance but both
eventually ending in the result of declining is a really strong argument as in my view taking the risk is
being successful as your always looking to improve whilst aiming to reduce risk is maybe keeping
safe but there is no ambition to strive and expand the business into higher revenues. It’s a very
strong case for SME’s to perceive but yet that is the point it is what that firm perceives that risk will
bring them in their attempt to succeed.
Overall I agree with the results that have been researched that the majority of small medium
enterprises are risk adverse attitude to risk in financial and operating areas because their main aim is
to survive and taking less risk is a fundamental in ensuring this. Although some points in the
literature review can say this is being a success to them other points say that being risk adverse is
not being successful. This causes a good debate but in my view the main interest of the SME is to
survive so taking less risk to do so is considered from their perspective a success to them. This does
not mean I don’t believe that taking risk in SME’s can create success but the majority being risk
adverse would say success is to survive and minimising this is vital.
Page | 42
6.4 key points
Majority of SME’s from the data analysis attitude to risk in operational and financial risk attitude to
risk is adverse
All SME’s are different based on their attitude and perception of risk
Company’s dimension of knowledge of risk could be affecting their attitude to risk taking
The argument of being risk taking but a reduction in performance is more successful than reducing
risk and still declining
Survival is the main priority to the small medium enterprises
Risk taking is a general perception
Page | 43
7. Conclusion
7.1 Findings
The key things that have been discovered from the study is that the perception of these operational
and financial risks are very much down to the manager and firm perception as each small medium
enterprises aim with dealing with risk taking can be different from each other.
The data collected from research into actual small medium enterprises gave a strong result that
most of the companies are in fact risk adverse when it comes to risk management.
Regarding the literature and the survey results it suggests that most small medium enterprises see
being successful by surviving which does not include gambling trying to make high fortune taking
risks as they would prefer to stick to their strategy and stay safe but earn profit.
Results also concluded that risk attitude didn’t really affect if a SME made higher profits than others
from risk taking as from the sample gathered there was an almost equal response to profit and
original risk attitude.
Literature examination found that SME’s rely on small budgets and short term financing as well as
not having the resources to fully have knowledge of how to approach risk and the true implications
that can bring to a smaller firm. These factors are the most logical reasons why the majority of small
medium enterprises have a risk adverse attitude in the two risk categories. The literature also
brought up an interesting point about firms reducing risk can decline as much as firms risk taking but
the interpretation is that being risk taking over risk reduction is showing business innovation to
succeed but yet again is the perception on how the firm will view this argument.
Page | 44
7.2 Does Financial and operational risk taking lead to success in SME’s?
The findings that have been discovered in this study gives an overall assessment that although risk
taking can lead to success the general perspective from a high percentage of small medium
enterprises are risk adverse in the operational and financial areas, which given the literature
examined gives the assumption based on the study that risk taking in these areas for SME’s does not
give them success as they do not perceive success as high reward and extraordinary financial
revenues because most SME’s aim and objectives is to survive. Another key factor in this conclusion
is based on the company’s original opinion to risk taking there was no major difference in this
affected profit as many SME’s had similar profit range but different attitudes to risk taking opinion.
Therefore the conclusion of the equal scale of attitude to profit shows risk taking doesn’t seem to
make a difference to give more success over a risk adverse SME. The earlier point of the small
medium enterprise main focus is survivals deems that they value this as more important than
tasking high volume of risk that gives them high reward but could cost them the business itself due
to lower budgets and short term financing which give them disadvantage to large firms. Yet again
reiterating the point that risk taking can gain success but not to the perception of most managers in
small medium enterprises.
Page | 45
8. Recommendations
After the conclusions of the study there are some recommendations that small medium enterprises
can take from this research topic and results to actually help them in risk taking to help some of
these firms with adverse attitude:
Firstly to evaluate their business aim and how they see their firm hitting the success criteria. Is it to
reach high revenue, to aim to survive each year with profit or to give great value to their customers.
This study has brought up a lot on perception and not just in risk and it is important for these small
medium enterprises to keep evaluating their strategy and what they want to achieve from their
business.
Another recommendation is for the SME’s to really focus on how much they know about risk, as the
literature stated these firms can lack resources in this area which will in confident them about their
security in risk taking. The point is for the mangers to get as much resource and knowledge with
what they can get to make them confident that they can go forward and take risks as business is
about trial and error there will be bad decisions but you will learn and one risk could pull off a
massive reward. A stronger knowledge dimension in risk will give confidence and better
understanding in decision making as the manager will know more about risk strategy, the
implications of risk and how to control the level of risk they take whether it being financial or
operational.
A final recommendation is if the small medium enterprise has made a high volume of profit is if they
are normally quite risk adverse is to take some risk with a small proportion of their profit to simply
test taking some risk in some capacity whether it being an investment into a new product or a hedge
fund just to see if they can get some reward from the risk. This can give them a change in attitude if
the risk pulls off and more confident in taking risk to try and expand innovation for higher success.
Page | 46
9. Bibliography
Boodman, D. M., 1987. Managing business risk. interfaces, 17(2), pp. 91-96.
Doff, R., 2008. Defining and measuring business risk in an economic-capital framework. Journal of
risk finance, 9(4), pp. 317-333.
Durst, S. & Edvardsson, I. R., 2012. Knowledge management in SMEs: a literature review. Journal of
knowledge management, 16(6), pp. 879-903.
Fairchild, R., 2002. Financial risk management: is it a value-adding activity?. Balance sheet, 10(4), pp.
22-25.
Hodges, A., 2000. Emergency Risk Management. Risk management, 2(4), pp. 7-18.
Jemison, D. B., 1987. Risk and the Relationship among Strategy, Organizational Processes, and
Performance. Management Science, 33(9), pp. 1087-1101.
Kuritzkes, A., 2002. Operational Risk Capital: A Problem of Definition. The journal of risk finance,
4(1), pp. 47-56.
MacCrimmon, K. R. & Wehrung, D. A., 1990. Characteristics of Risk Taking Executives. Management
science, 36(4), pp. 422-435.
March, J. G. & Shapira, Z., 1987. Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking. Management
Science, 33(11), pp. 1404-1418.
Oke, A., Burke, G. & Myers, A., 2007. Innovation types and performaces in growing UK SMEs.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), pp. 735-753.
Paul, S. Y. & Boden, R., 2011. Size matters: the late payment problem. Journal of Small Business and
Enterprise Development, 18(4), pp. 732-747.
Page | 47
Power, M., 2005. The Invention of Operational Risk. Review of International Political Economy ,,
12(4), pp. 577-599.
Reed, R. & Storrud-Barnes, S. F., 2010. Uncertainty, risk, and real options: who wins, who loses?.
Management Decision, 48(7), pp. 1080-1089.
Rosenberg, B., 1979. How Active Should a Portfolio Be? The Risk-Reward Tradeoff. Financial Analysts
Journal, 35(1), pp. 49-62.
Singh, R. & Bhowal, A., 2011. Development of marketing-driven measure of risk perception. Journal
of risk finance, 12(2), pp. 140-152.
Sjoberg, L., 2007. Emotions and Risk Perception. Risk Management, 9(4), pp. 223-237.
Slywotzky, A., 2004. Exploring the strategic risk frontier. Strategy & leadership, 32(6), pp. 11-19.
Surveymonkey, 2013. [Online]
Available at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/
UKSBD, 2013. [Online]
Available at: http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory.co.uk/
Ward, S., 2001. Exploring the Role of the Corporate Risk Manager. Risk Management, 3(1), pp. 7-25.
Waring, A., 2002. Strategies of Risk Management Organisations: A Case Review. Risk management,
4(3), pp. 23-41.
Weber, E. U. & Milliman, R. A., 1997. Perceived Risk Attitudes: Relating Risk Perception to Risky
Choice. Management Science, 43(2), pp. 123-144.
Wiseman, R. M. & Bromiley, P., 1996. Toward a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: An
Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline. Organization science, 7(5), pp. 524-543.
Page | 48
10. Appendix
Appendix 1 Online survey sent to small medium enterprises
1. Name (please state)
2. Organisation (please state)
3. How many employees does your company have? (Please circle)
≤5 6-10 11-15 16>
4. What is your annual turnover? (Please circle)
<50K 51-100K 101-150K 151-200k 201k>
5. Our company believes that taking risk is important for success (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
6. The best deal for the company is more important than customer reputation (Please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
7. Preventing data entry and accounting errors is not one of our main concerns (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
Page | 49
8. When taking important decisions we do not consider the effects on our employees (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
9. Fixing system and software problems is not our main priority (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
10. We rely on employee performance (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
11. Our company does not use cash flow management to forecast the future (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
12. If there is a new product or service beneficial to the company we would spend beyond our
means (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
13. High investment is important for any company to improve (please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
14. A company can survive spending more than there budget to progress (please circle)
Page | 50
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree
15. With our finances we believe in taking high risk for high reward (Please circle)
Strongly agree agree Neutral disagree strongly disagree