rhic polarimetery
DESCRIPTION
RHIC Polarimetery. A.Bazilevsky for RHIC Polarimetry group RHIC Spin Collaboration Metting April 10 (Friday), 2009. pC measurements. Online Polarization (%), not normalized (!) vs fill. Fills 10300 (Mar6) – 10522 (Apr 9) Pol-1 measure systematically lower than Pol-2 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
RHIC Polarimetery
A.Bazilevsky for RHIC Polarimetry group
RHIC Spin Collaboration MettingApril 10 (Friday), 2009
pC measurements
Fills 10300 (Mar6) – 10522 (Apr 9)
Pol-1 measure systematically lower than Pol-2
Blue1/Blue2 1 from Fill 10476
Yell1/Yell2 1 from Fill 10505
Online Polarization (%), not normalized (!) vs fill
Rate history
Runs in reasonable conditions (below 3 MHz)
Blue-1: since fill 10476
Blue-2 : Ok
Yellow-1: since fill 10505
Yellow2: since fill 10414
pC-Blue vs HJet
Hjet/pC is stable over fills within (large) stat. errors (of HJet)
HJet: <P>=32%(fills 10402-10508)
HJet/Blue1 0.960.04(before target change, fill10476)
HJet/Blue1 0.840.04(after target change , fill10476)
HJet/Blue2 0.820.02
pC-Yellow vs HJet
Hjet/pC is stable over fills within (large) stat. errors (of HJet)
HJet: <P>=36%(fills 10439-10508)
HJet/Yell1 1.020.03(before target change, fill10505)
HJet/Yell1 HJet/Yell2(after target change , fill10505)
HJet/Yell2 0.840.03
Another APEX exercise: Polarization, “rate” corrected
Fill 10508Energy correction assumed to be an offset (baseline shift) – should be confirmed
If so, it may explain the “rate” effect (target dependence and pol1/pol2 difference)
Plans: Put pulses in other bunches (now only in bunch0)Vary pulse amplitude
After correctionBefore correction
2/NDF=12/92/NDF=24/9
Very thick targets (very high rate, >5MHz)
Backups
pC Monitoring
Generator pulses
Carbon
Ekin
ToF
pC monitoringLow rate example: 10429.013 High rate example: 10346.007
Pulse ToF vs time
Event rate vs time
Pulse rate vs time
Pulse amplitude vs time
AN vs energy
Ebeam = 100 GeVEbeam = 100 GeV
Any shift in energy measurements lead to a shift in AN (asymmetry)
FastOffline vs Online From Xuan Li
FastOffline: Use “deadlayer” concept to correct energy: all energy shifts are attributed to change in Si DeadLayer
Offline: Yell1/Yell20.9
Online: Yell1/Yell20.8
Corrects about half of “rate effect”
Flattop
FastOffline vs Online From Xuan Li
FastOffline: Use “deadlayer” concept to correct energy: all energy shifts are attributed to change in Si DeadLayer
Corrects about half of “rate effect”
Offline: Yell1/Yell20.96
Online: Yell1/Yell20.89
Injection
FastOffline vs Online From Xuan Li
FastOffline: Use “deadlayer” concept to correct energy: all energy shifts are attributed to change in Si DeadLayer
Flattop
Offline: Blue1/Blue20.88
Online: Blue1/Blue20.86
FastOffline vs OnlineInjection
FastOffline: Use “deadlayer” concept to correct energy: all energy shifts are attributed to change in Si DeadLayer
Offline: Blue1/Blue20.93
Online: Blue1/Blue20.93