review article asafeprotocolforama ?· review article asafeprotocolforamalgamremoval danag.colson...
Post on 23-Jul-2018
Embed Size (px)
Hindawi Publishing CorporationJournal of Environmental and Public HealthVolume 2012, Article ID 517391, 4 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/517391
A Safe Protocol for Amalgam Removal
Dana G. Colson
Dr. Dana Coloson & Associates, 1950 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M4S 1Z4
Correspondence should be addressed to Dana G. Colson, firstname.lastname@example.org
Received 9 August 2011; Accepted 1 November 2011
Academic Editor: Margaret E. Sears
Copyright 2012 Dana G. Colson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Todays environment has different impacts on our body than previous generations. Heavy metals are a growing concern inmedicine. Doctors and individuals request the removal of their amalgam (silver mercury) restorations due to the high mercurycontent. A safe protocol to replace the silver mercury filling will ensure that there is minimal if any absorption of materialswhile being removed. Strong alternative white composite and lab-processed materials are available today to create a healthy andfunctioning mouth. Preparation of the patient prior to the procedure and after treatment is vital to establish the excretion of themercury from the body.
In dentistry, there is a lot of controversy about the topic ofsilver mercury fillings; are they safe or not safe? There aremany articles written on the pros and cons of these typesof fillings. It is difficult to quantify and to assess the effectsin each individual. It is not easy to identify silver mercuryfillings as the cause if illness presents or if the fillings con-tributed to illness, except in extreme toxicity cases. Refer tothe beginning sections of this review paper concerning thescience and mechanism of how mercury interconnects withbody tissues and functions.
Environmental doctors investigate heavy metal toxicity aspart of their overall wellness regiment to help their patientswith health concerns. These doctors look at sources of metalswhen the patients lab reports/diagnostic tests show highlevels of mercury and other metals. They investigate whatsources are contributing and how to reduce the burden onthe body. The doctor may prescribe the safe removal of silvermercury fillings so as not to create an additional burden onthe body and to help their patient heal. Thus, when removingamalgams, additional steps help ensure that the patient isprotected.
2. Introduction of Amalgam in Dentistry
Dental amalgam restorations, also called silver mercury fill-ings, were introduced to North America in the 1830s and
have been the standard restorative filling for our molars andpremolars. At that time there was a lot of controversy aboutits intraoral use. Silver mercury fillings began to take overthe cast gold and gold foil restorations. These were excellentand lasted for years; however they were labour intensiveand the cast gold required a lab process that centrifugedgold into a wax pattern to fit the tooth accurately. This wasa two-appointment process with added expense. Gold foilrestorations were often traumatic to the pulp of the tooth,creating necrosis and requiring root canal. The addition ofamalgams as a restorative filling was a welcomed opportunityto offer at a substantial cost reduction as the mercury wastriturated with a pellet containing silver, copper, tin, andzinc. This created a substance that could be placed into thecleaned out tooth structure where decay had been present. Itwas packed, condensed, and allowed to harden within a fewminutes and then carved intraoral chairside. Today the extra,unused amalgam is placed in a container for safe disposal.This restoration is easily burnished to tooth structure torecreate the tooth to its original shape and size. The onsetof amalgam allowed people to keep their teeth, rather thanhaving them extracted if money did not allow for gold res-torations. Keeping teeth enabled people to have betterdigestion and supported a more balanced quality of life.
Today, with the increase of chemicals such as pesticides,preservatives, processed ingredients in food, and diverse con-taminants in our environment; sensitivities, allergies, and
2 Journal of Environmental and Public Health
other illnesses are increasing rapidly. The Brain Wash pos-tulates that the toxins in our society are not additive butsynergistic. For example, the average apple contains residueof eleven different neurotoxins and is sprayed with pesticidesseventeen times prior to being picked from a tree . Ourfood intake of many pesticides and additives is most oftenunknown. The level of materials such as mercury that ourbodies could tolerate several decades ago may not be whatwe can sustain today.
3. Amalgam and Composite Fillings
Silver mercury amalgam restorations are comprised of 50%mercury, with the balance being silver, copper, tin, and zinc. Over time the exposed surface changes. The fillings cor-rode, and surface texture becomes rough. People who chewgum create a smooth, shiny surface on their fillings. Mercuryvapor is released by chewing grains, nuts, seeds, and gum, asdetected using mercury vapor analyzers . A study in 2010looked at the wearability of composite (white) restorationscompared to amalgams. It showed that over 12 years, thegroup of patients that were not prone to decay, with resin/composite-filled restorations, were better off than the groupof patients with silver amalgam restorations . Today withawareness of diet, home care, and education, the majority ofpeople who seek preventative dental care are less prone todecay. The author has worked with alternative restorationsfor over 27 years.
The advantage of white composite restorations is thatcomposite binds to composite and the base of the toothrarely needs to be disturbed once the amalgams are removed.Dental restorative materials have various components, andindividual Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) are availablefrom the manufacturer. If an individual has concerns or issensitive to materials, one can refer to these reference sheets.For example, there are many composites and bonds availabletoday without bisphenol A. Psychological benefits are also apositive factor for patients. People feel that they now have amouth without the scars of the past. They are no longerself-conscious when smiling, laughing, and singing.
With the introduction of composite restorations, manymodifications have been made with the materials and ap-plications due to the extensive ongoing technology andresearch. The concerns with good marginal seals and pre-vention of recurrent decay have been diminished. Wear andpolishability of the composite materials with nanohybridparticulates can withstand stronger chewing forces. Com-posites are technique sensitive, and various aids can be usedto ensure a proper seal of the restorative material to thetooth structure and to create tight contacts to the adjacenttooth to prevent food impaction between teeth. Today weaim for minimally invasive dentistry to maintain integrity ofthe tooth structure, and white composite materials are idealfor these restorations.
4. Considerations prior to Amalgam Removal
When examining a patient for amalgam removal uponrequest, many factors must be looked at including the rate of
wear/attrition on their teeth, pressures exerted, type of dietconsumed on a daily basis, their oral hygiene, and othermetals in their mouth. Often amalgam restorations existunder crowns and amalgam tattoos (discoloration along thegum) are noted. Amalgams have also been used to seal theapex of root canal treated teeth. If heavy pressures areexerted by an individual or there is evidence of grinding andclenching, then the longevity of a composite restoration maybe compromised. The size of the restoration will also influ-ence the choice of materials. Tooth cusps often fracture overtime, as well as with excessive pressure, requiring an indirectrestoration to be fabricated by a lab. Today the increasingtrend is to work with a computer-generated restoration tosecure/repair the tooth in the long term. Bite plates to preventgrinding and clenching help preserve these new restorationsfrom excessive wear and pressure.
When the patient is seen for an initial exam, a thoroughmedical and dental history is taken. Records including radio-graphs and intraoral pictures are taken, and a comprehensiveexam follows. Previous films are requested or brought in bythe patient. Lengthy conversations ensue to make sure thatthe patient is properly prepared and that we are workingwith their physician, in a timely manner, to complement thedetoxification process that their doctor has prescribed and isadministering. The physician evaluates the overall health ofthe body and the ability of the individual to eliminate toxins.For example, if a patient has a leaky gut, physicians restorethis prior to removal as it is difficult to flush out toxins .If a woman is pregnant or breast feeding, amalgam removaldoes not occur until she has completed breast feeding herchild . It has been reported that the mercury concentra-tion in the blood of the fetus can be thirty times greaterthan the mothers blood . Supplements are helpful and areprescribed on an individual basis by the physician. VitaminC intake is recommended, often with other supplements,prior to and following amalgam removal. Once the amalgamrestorations have been removed, the physician continues towork with the patient to help with the detoxification ofmercury that is stored in the body.
5. Chairside Procedures
The following steps are taken when removing silver mercuryfillings, to ensure minimal if any absorption sublingually, orthrough the mucosal tissues, and to minimize mercury vaporabs