review article

19
www.hochbegabung-und- gehirn.de Review Article Münte, T.F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 473-478 Bonn, 21.01.2008 YRG @ Department of Epileptology University of Bonn Medical Centre, Germany [email protected] Group work reports Abstract Introduction Subtitles Conclusion Animations

Upload: delora

Post on 05-Jan-2016

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Review Article M ünte, T.F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 3, 473-478. Group work reports Abstract Introduction Subtitles Conclusion Animations. Bonn, 21.01 .2008. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Review ArticleMünte, T.F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 473-478

Review ArticleMünte, T.F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 473-478

Bonn, 21.01.2008YRG @ Department of Epileptology University of Bonn Medical Centre, Germany [email protected]

Group work reportsAbstractIntroductionSubtitlesConclusionAnimations

Group work reportsAbstractIntroductionSubtitlesConclusionAnimations

Page 2: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Composition examplesComposition examples

Group work

• Results

• Main findings for:

• Group 1: Background Variables (p. 257)

• Group 2: Background Variables (p. 258)

• Group 3: Academic achievement (general and reading)

• Group 4: Academic achievement (mathematics)

Page 3: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Composition examplesComposition examples

Group work

• Discussion (Morrison et al. article):

• Group 1: General and „Growth of Academic Skills“ 1st, 2nd, and 3rd paragraph

• Group 2: „Growth of Academic Skills“, 4th and 5th paragraph

• Group 3: „Question of Background Variables“

• Group 4: „Implications“ until „Educational Policy“

Page 4: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Abstract

• Eliciting stimulus →→→→neural changes

• Professional musicians: ideal model for plasticity

• Music:

• complexity of stimuli

• exposure (practice)

• reviewed point: brain differences in musicians via neuroimaging

Page 5: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Introduction

• Experience shapes cortical representation:

• temporal: refers to time• cortical: refers to cortex

• Animal studies: training induced plastic changes

• Hebbian learning:

• presynaptic cell → repeated and persistant stimulation → postsyn. cell

• increase in synaptic strength

• Wikipedia: Assembly Theory

Page 6: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Introduction

• Problem with animal studies:

• lack of ecological validity (?)

• stimuli limitations

• Understanding human brain plasticity:

• changes induced by defects

• Music performance:• highly complex human endeavor• musical stimulus: complex, multidimensional, multidomain (multisensory)• Possible nature vs. nurture explanation

Page 7: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Functional measures of plasticity

• String players:

• Larger cortical representation of left hand fingers

• Left hand (“fingering hand”)

• Greater effect for early beginners

• Adaptation to own instrument:

• ↑ responses to own instrument tones

• plastic changes due to practice

Page 8: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Functional measures of plasticity

• Structural regularities of music

• Pre-attentive detection of changes

• MMN ↑ in professional musicians:

• different facets of music

• Auditory cortex shaping

• Conductors’ advantage for spatial auditory processing

Page 9: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Anatomical differences

• Planum temporale, anterior corpus callosum, primary hand motor area, cerebellum

• Musicians vs. non-musicians: ↑ left planum temporale

• Primary hand motor area:

• negative correlation (?) (commencement of musical training and the size of the primary hand motor area)

Page 10: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Anatomical differences

• Corpus callosum:

• ↑ in musicians (especially if training started before 7 yrs of age)

• enhanced interaction between the hemispheres: ↓ interhemispheric inhibition (?)

• facilitation of bimanual coordination

• Cerebellum: movement timing

• VBM: ↑grey matter volume in musicians’ motor network

Page 11: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Sensorimotor learning

• Phases of motor learning:

• Consolidation (several hours)

• Slow learning (gradual performance increase)

• Tapping:

• ↑ M1 activity in musicians within minutes:

• effect of pre-practice experience

• ↓ SMA activity in musicians: ↑ efficiency

• Mental practice!

Page 12: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Sensorimotor learning

• Audio-motor integration (cooperation):

• Automatized in musicians

• Apparent in non-musicians with 20 min. of training

• The effect extended to a mere observation:

• listening or viewing (auditory or visual)

• monkey mirror neurons

• Example ?

Page 13: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Maladaptive plasticity

• „Musicians‘ cramp“ (focal dystonia)

• Overuse → maladaptive neuroplasticity

• Dedifferentiation of sensory feedback

Page 14: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Musicians as a model?

• Neurobehavioural changes:

• from several minutes to lifetime

• Neuroplasticity:

• new synapses

• disinhibitions or inhibitions of neuronal connections

• Commencement of early training:

• grey and white matter volume changes

• not pre-existing differences

• parallel findings: London taxi drivers

Page 15: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Main pointsMain points

Conclusion

• Musician‘s brain: valuable model of neuroplasticity

• Questions for future research:

• training parameters?

• the role of genes?

• effect of emotional networks?

Page 16: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

TaskTask

Meeting after next

Set up a study trying to answer the following questions:

Group 1: music training parameters effect on the brain plasticity

Group 2: the role of genes in the music facilitated brain plasticity

Group 3: effect of emotional networks on music facilitated brain plasticity

Page 17: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

Single study articleSingle study article

Next meeting

Norton, A. et al. (2005). Are there pre-existing neural, cognitive, or motoric markers for musical ability? Brain and Cognition, 59, 124-134.

Presentation (main points):

Group 1: Introduction

Group 2: Methods and results

Group 3: Discussion

Page 18: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

SitesSites

Animated presentations

http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/matthews/animate.html

Brain probe: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/tryit/brain/probe.html

Map: http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/body/interactives/organs/brainmap/index.shtml

http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/dottime.html: reaction time test

http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/boxes.html: boxes RT test

Page 19: Review Article

www.hochbegabung-und-gehirn.de

YRG @ Department of Epileptology University of Bonn Medical Centre, Germany [email protected]

Work group:

Christian HoppeJelena StojanovicChristian E. Elger

Funded by Karg-Stiftung für Hochbegabtenförderung (Frankfurt/M.)