restrictive use policy

12
Improvement Methodology: Introduction of ALERT Second Line Antibiotic Policy Steve McCormick Lead Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Lanarkshire

Upload: joanne

Post on 15-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Improvement Methodology: Introduction of ALERT Second Line Antibiotic Policy Steve McCormick Lead Antimicrobial Pharmacist NHS Lanarkshire. Restrictive Use Policy. Pilot across three acute sites in July 2009 Benchmark Practice => challenging areas first - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Restrictive Use Policy

Improvement Methodology: Introduction of ALERT Second Line Antibiotic Policy

Steve McCormickLead Antimicrobial Pharmacist

NHS Lanarkshire

Page 2: Restrictive Use Policy

Restrictive Use Policy

Page 3: Restrictive Use Policy

• Pilot across three acute sites in July 2009– Benchmark Practice => challenging areas

first

• Followed the Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) Test of Change approach – 1 => 3 => 5 spread

• Following analysis of pilot data, the policy was rolled out across all NHSL wards in January 2010

A PS D

Data A PS D

A PS D

Page 4: Restrictive Use Policy

“What does ALERT mean ?”

•Second•Line•Antibiotic •Policy

- Isobel Patterson C [Sister ICU MK]

Page 5: Restrictive Use Policy

Key Driver = Quality NOT Savings

Alert Antibiotic Issues Value Financial Years 2008/2009 and 2009/2010

£0.00

£10,000.00

£20,000.00

£30,000.00

£40,000.00

£50,000.00

£60,000.00

£70,000.00

Months

Iss

ue

s V

alu

e

FY 2008/2009

FY 2009/2010

Page 6: Restrictive Use Policy

SBAR REPORTDOTS

Page 7: Restrictive Use Policy

Appropriate PrescribingPiperacillin/Tazobactam Use

3026

30

86

1623

18

57

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Monklands Hairmyres Wishaw Total

Hospital

No

of

form

s

No of patient episodes forPiperacillin/Tazobactom

No of patient episodes forpermitted indication (alsoexpressed as percentage)

88% 60%53%

66%

Page 8: Restrictive Use Policy

Non ALERT Use

Analysis of non-ALERT indication use of Piperacillin/Tazobactam

5 585

136

3

3

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Monklands Hairmyres Wishaw Total

Hospital

No

of

form

s

d/w Micro - ALERT antibioticagreed

d/w Micro unknown outcome

Not d/w Micro

Page 9: Restrictive Use Policy

Site X

Total number of alert antibiotic forms completed = 81

Ward A Ward B Ward C Ward D Ward E Total

Tazocin 2 1 25 10 14 52Meropenem 1 1 3 2 6 13Ceftazidime - - - - - -IV

levofloxacin

- - 2 - 4 6

IV ciprofloxacin

- - - - 3 3

Usage Hotspots

• Monthly report will enable drill down to ward, consultant, patient – retrospective analysis of use

Page 10: Restrictive Use Policy

Role Models or Outliers

Page 11: Restrictive Use Policy

Pareto Chart Analysis

Piperacillin/Tazobactam use in Monklands (Feb 2010)

01

234

56

18 14 5 4 26 (ITU) 17 15 ERU 2 7

Ward

No

of

epis

od

es o

f u

se

0

20

40

60

80

100Cumulative percentage

No of episodes of use Cumulative percent

50%

Page 12: Restrictive Use Policy

“..but we use these all the time”

“Our area will be exempt”

“We are not joining the pilot”

“Ok FY’s will do it”

“Seems to be working”

“Non compliance – how can we minimise?”