response of ocean ecosystems to climate warming
DESCRIPTION
Response of Ocean Ecosystems to Climate Warming. Primary Production = f (biomass, light , physiology). 3 Models: B&F (1997) Carr (2002) Marra (2003). P b max. Temperature. constant P b opt. measured P b opt. Modeled IPP (mgC m -2 h -1 ). r 2 = 0.38. r 2 = 0.86. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Response of Ocean Ecosystems to Climate Warming
0
2
4
6
8
10
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature
Pb m
ax
3 Models: B&F (1997)Carr (2002)Marra (2003)
Primary Production = f (biomass, light, physiology)
0 2000 4000 6000 80000 2000 4000 6000 8000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Measured Integral Primary Production (mgC m-2 h-1)
Mod
eled
IP
P(m
gC m
-2 h
-1)
constant Pbopt measured Pb
opt
r2 = 0.38 r2 = 0.86
1 10 100 1000
1 10 100 1000
0.1 1 10 100
Rel
ativ
e F
requ
ency
Euphotic Zone Chlorophyll
(mg m2)
PrimaryProduction
(mg C m2)
Light-saturatedPhotosynthesis
(mgC/mgChl/h)
Product Yields
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30 40
This is the assumed temperature dependence of epsilon- star . The decrease at low temperatures is assumed to ref lect low grow th rates and high root biomass and thus high ratio of respiration to
photosynthesis. The decrease at high temperatures is supposedly due to increased respiration at high temperatures.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
These are the temperature dependent curves used in the CASA model for "T-epsilon2". Each curve represents the temperature dependence of epsilon for plant communities
'adapted' to their seasonal temperature range. Such curves should not exist for phytoplankton since species composition can change at the rate of seasonal f luctuations in
temperature.
Ter
rest
rial S
yste
ms:
The
CA
SA
mod
elTemperature??
Ocean?
Pbmax =
net carbon fixing capacity
light harvesting capacity
Temperature Enzyme Activity & Concentration
No direct effect on Pbmax
Growth Rate Equal changes incarbon fixation &light harvesting
No direct effect on Pbmax?
Rel
ativ
e C
hlor
ophy
ll N
orm
aliz
ed P
hoto
synt
hesi
s
Irradiance
Pbmax-1
Pbmax-2
Pbmax-1
Pbmax-2
Ek-1
Ek-2
" b
" b1 " b
2
'Ek-dependent' variation
'Ek-independent' variationEk
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3Myers (1946) Chlorella pyrenoidosa; Eppley and Sloan (1966)Dunaliella tertiolecta; Paasche (1967), Coccolithus huxleyi;Paasche (1968), Ditylum brightwellii, Nitzschia turgidula; Bealeand Appleman (1971) Chlorella vulgaris; Durbin (1974)Thalassiosira nordenskioldii; Beardall and Morris (1976)Phaeodactylum tricornutum; Chan (1978) Chaetoceros sp.,Skeletonema costatum, Cylindrotheca fusiformis, Thalassiosirafloridana, Gymnodinium simplex, Amphidinium carterae; Yoder(1979) Skeletonema costatum; Falkowski and Owens (1980)Skeletonema costatum, Dunaliella tertiolecta; Falkowski et al.(1981) Dunaliella tertiolecta; Verity (1981) Leptocylindrusdanicus; Cosper (1982a) Skeletonema costatum; Cosper (1982b)Skeletonema costatum; Faust et al. (1982) Prorocentrum mariae-lebouriae; Raps et al. (1983) Microcystis aeruginosa; Terry et al(1983) Phaeodactylum tricornutum; Geider et al. (1985)Phaeodactylum tricornutum; Post et al. (1985) Oscillatoriaagardhii; Dubinski et al. (1986) Thalassiosira weisflogii,Isochrysis galbana, Prorocentrum micans; Sukenik et al. (1987)Dunaliella tertiolecta; Fisher (unpublished) Tetraedron minimum,Nannochloropsis sp.
Rel
ativ
e C
hlor
ophy
ll C
once
ntra
tion
Growth Irradiance (mol quanta / m2 / s)
Ek-dependent variability
0 200 400 600 800 10000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 200 400 600 800 10000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 25 50 75 1000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 >
<
Nutrient ‘Charged’ Nutrient ‘Depleted’
Growth Irradiance (umol quanta m-2 s-1)
Chl
orop
hyll
(
) C
alvi
n C
ycle
C
apac
ity
(
) &
Pbm
ax (
)
:
< MLD
> MLD
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 2 4 6 8
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0 2 4 6 8
Optical Mixing Depth
Rel
ativ
e C
hlor
ophy
llR
elat
ive
Sub
surf
ace
Lig
ht
Photoacclimation
300
Ein
30 Ein
equalconcentration
Photoacclimation – average or median?
Average MixedLayer Light
Median Mixed Layer Light
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
Nut
ricl
ine
& T
herm
ocli
ne
Dep
th (
m)
LatitudeLatitudeNorth South North South
AMT-2AMT-3
Chlorophyll-a Concentration (mg/m3)
.01 1 5 5010.02 .05 .1 .2 .5
Atlantic Meridional Transect
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-50 -30 -10 10 30 500
2
4
6
8
10
Latitude
Mea
sure
d &
Mod
eled
Mix
ed L
ayer
Pb m
ax
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 22000
3
6
9
12
15
18
Mea
sure
d &
Mod
eled
Pb m
ax
Progressive Days
BATS 6-year Time Series
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
M Ryther 1957F Cullen 1990
Megard 1972
Balch 1992 Eppley 1972 m/b Antoine 1996
Behrenfeld &Falkowski 1997
PhotoAcc 2000
Mod
el li
ght-
satu
rate
d ph
otos
ynth
esis
Measured light-saturated photosynthesis
-- requires MLD --
Pbmax-1
Pbmax-2
" b1 " b
2
'Ek-independent' variationEk
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.60
5
10
15
20
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.300
2
4
6
8
10
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.30
5
10
15
20
25
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80
30
60
90
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.120
5
10
15
20
0.00 0.01 0.020
1
2
3
4
5
0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.160
3
6
9
12
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.30
3
6
9
12
15
Light-limited Slope
Ligh
t-sa
tura
ted
Pho
tosy
nthe
tic R
ate
Ek-independent variability
LightC
hlor
ophy
ll-s
peci
fic
phot
osyn
thes
is
Field Data
Stroma
Lumen
PSI
Cytb6 f
AT
Pas
e
aa3-
type
C
yt. O
xid.PTOX
c553H20
O212
PQ
PQH2
Ndh
PSII
e
+
e
e
e e
ATPADP + Pi
Fdx
H202H20
Cell Metabolism NADPH
O2H20
12 O2
H2012
A
B
Chloroplast
AminoAcid
Biosynthesis
GAP
Storage
Rubisco
CO2
Calvin-BensenCycle
GAP RuBP
NO3-
GOGAT
GSgln
NO2-
NH4+
e
eOAA
MalateMalate
OAA
MalateOAA
OAAMalate
GAP
PEP
NADP+
NADH NAD+
Cytosol
ETC
H20 O2
12
e
ATP
ADP + Pi
OAA
citrateCitric Acid
Cycle
NADH
NAD+
Mitochondria
NADH glu
e
e
e
e
PGA
BPGA
GAP/DHAP
PGA
BPGA
GAP/DHAP NADH
NAD+
e e
2 H 2 H
2 H H
NADPH
Photosystem II
Photosystem I
Sum =Remote Sensing
Chlorophyll
Nitrogen Reduction& Amino AcidBiosynthesis
Medium Pathway3-C product to
Citric Acid Cycle& Mitochondria
Fast Pathwayto Mitochondriato generate ATP
CalvinCycle
Carbon Fixation
Carbon Storage
O2
Carbon Growth
Growth Irradiance0 1 2 3
Pho
tosy
nthe
sis
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Ligh
t-sa
tura
ted
Pho
tosy
nthe
sis
(P* m
ax )
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Light-limited Photosynthesis (Nmax)0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07
Ek = 146
r2 = 0.63n = 17
o.d. = 0.2 - 0.5
Ek = 138
r2 = 0.73n = 14
o.d. = 0.7 - 1.0
Ek = 118
r2 = 0.95n = 16
o.d. = 1.4 - 1.9
Ek = 95
r2 = 0.91n = 16
o.d. = 2.1 - 2.6
Ek = 59
r2 = 0.79n = 20
o.d. = 2.7 - 3.3
Ek = 42
r2 = 0.80n = 19
o.d. = 3.6 - 4.3
Ek = 27
r2 = 0.75n = 17o.d. = 4.5 - 5.0
Ek = 21
r2 = 0.50n = 14o.d. = 5.3 - 5.8
Ek = 12
r2 = 0.77n = 25o.d. = 6.2 - 10.6
Optical Depth0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ek
0
40
80
120
160
Observed
Calculated
Pmax
"
Tropical Pacific Data – 16oS to 1oN
High Nutrients Low NutrientsLo
w L
ight
Hig
h Li
ght
<
>
?
<
ATPN
C
ATPN
C
PigmentsPigments
PigmentsPigments
Reductants
Reductants Reductants
ReductantsN
CC
ATP ATPN
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Light Growth Rate(+nutrients) (+light)
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Growth Irradiance Relative Growth Rate
Chl
orop
hyll
: C
arbo
nIn a single species, light & nutrients can cause C:Chl to vary from < 10 to > 800
0
2
4
6
8
10
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Temperature
Pb max
Lig
ht li
mit
atio
n do
min
ates
Lig
ht-N
utri
ent
inte
ract
ions
Lig
ht v
ersu
s N
utri
ent
as d
omin
ant c
ontr
ol
BOTTOM LINE: Temperature not a good model for current production & worse for future. Best approach is direct attack on light and growth rate
c p
POC
J. Bishop 1999 Deep Sea Research
April May June
NABE Time Series
Pb
op
t (m
g C
mg
Chl
-1 h
-1 )
0
2
4
6
8 cp
* (m2 m
g Chl -1
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0Leg 4 Leg 5
653 4130 2 272523201886 312927 292625
BATS
HOT
NABE
cp*
14C-based photosyntheticefficiency
0 10 20 30 40 50
Pb
op
t (m
g C
mg
Ch
l-1 h
-1 )
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
cp * (m
2 mg C
hl -1 )
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
Sequential Observation0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.81992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
1994199319921991 19961995
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.02
0.05
0.08
0.11
0.14
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
1.0
1.5
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
B
C
D
E
F
Year
Ch
loro
ph
yll c
on
cen
tra
tion
(
),
bbp
(
)
Satellite C
hl:C R
atio ( )
75o
0o
15o
30o
90o
60o
45o
60o
75o90o
15o
30o
45o
75o
0o
15o
30o
90o
60o
45o
60o
75o90o
15o
30o
45o
NP
SP SA
NANP
SP
CPCA
SA
NA
SI
NICA
B
C
D
E
F
Asym
ptote
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
Temperature
5 10 15 20 25 30
Slope
0.000
0.004
0.008
0.012
0.016
0.020
Satellite Chl:C Ratio
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015
Mod
el C
hl:C
Rat
io
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
C
BA
XXXXXX
XX
X X
X
X
D
bbp-based Chl:C = a + b exp -3 Ig
InteractionGrowth rate
Light
Current Limitation…
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.0005
0.001
0.01
0.05
0.01 0.1 1 10
Inve
rsio
n b bp
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
Sea
WiF
S c
hlor
ophy
ll
Inversion chlorophyll
The Physiology Lidar-
Multispectral Mission
Exploring complex ecosystems of our global oceans